Regional anesthesia is associated with improved mortality and morbidity in patients with congestive heart failure undergoing lower extremity amputation.

OBJECTIVE: While existing literature reports variable results of general anesthesia (GA) and regional anesthesia (RA) in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation (LEA), the effect of RA on patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) has not been explored. This study aims to assess whether the choice of anesthesia plays a role in influencing outcomes within this vulnerable population. METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) files between 2005-2022, all patients receiving LEA were identified, and the subset of patients with CHF was included. Patient characteristics and 30-day outcomes were compared using χ2 or Fischer's exact test as appropriate for categorical variables and the independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate for continuous variables. The association between anesthesia modality and post-operative outcomes was studied using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5,831 patients (4,779 undergoing GA, 1,052 undergoing RA) with a diagnosis of CHF undergoing LEA were identified. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, RA was associated with lower mortality (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97), pneumonia (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.99), septic shock (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.88), post-operative blood transfusion (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.97), and 30-day readmission (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that RA for LEA in patients with CHF is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality compared to GA. While further research is needed to confirm this association, RA should be at least considered in CHF patients undergoing LEA when feasible.

In Patients with Heart Failure Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy, Locoregional Anesthesia is Not Associated with Decreased Mortality, Stroke, or Myocardial Infarction Compared to General Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: While existing literature reports no benefit of locoregional anesthesia (LRA) over general anesthesia (GA) in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA), the effect of LRA on patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) has not been explored. This study aims to assess whether the choice of anesthesia plays a role in influencing outcomes within this population. METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) files between 2005 and 2022 and the procedural targeted ACS-NSQIP database for CEA between 2011-2022, all patients receiving CEA were identified, and the subset of patients with CHF was included. Patient characteristics and 30-day outcomes were compared using χ2 or Fischer's exact test as appropriate for categorical variables and the independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate for continuous variables. Mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were compared between patients receiving GA and LRA using univariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 3,040 patients (2,733 undergoing GA, 307 undergoing LRA) with a diagnosis of CHF undergoing CEA were identified. No difference in mortality (GA 3.1% vs. LRA 4.6%, P = 0.162), MI (GA 3.0% vs. LRA 2.3%, P = 0.478), stroke (2.4% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.805) or MACE (GA 7.4% vs. LRA 8.1%, P = 0.654) was observed. LRA patients had a significantly lower hospital stay compared to GA patients (1 day [interquartile range (IQR) 1-3] vs. 2 days [IQR 1-4], P < 0.001). Shunt was more commonly used in patients receiving GA (32.9% vs. 12.5%, P < 0.001) compared to LRA. CONCLUSIONS: While utilizing LRA compared to GA during CEA in patients with CHF is associated with a shorter hospital stay and less intraoperative shunting, the choice of anesthesia did not impact the outcomes of mortality, MI or stroke. Further research is needed to determine the effect of LRA on the outcomes of CEA among patients with different stages of heart failure.

Supraclavicular Versus Transaxillary First Rib Resection for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Background: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) results from compression of neurovascular structures supplying the upper extremity as they exit the thoracic outlet. Depending on the clinical presentation, surgical decompression may be required. Objectives: Transaxillary (TA) and supraclavicular (SC) approaches are both widely utilized and deemed effective. Our objective was to review the outcomes for both approaches at our institution. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent thoracic outlet decompression between 2010 and 2015. Data on demographics, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, and type of TOS (neurogenic, venous, or arterial) were collected. Operative times, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, and outcomes were also studied. Results: A total of 82 thoracic outlet decompression procedures were performed during the study period: 42% neurogenic TOS, 46% venous TOS, and 12% arterial TOS. In total, 49% underwent TA approach and 51% underwent SC approach. Adjunct procedures were performed in 13% of patients. There were no significant differences in average operative time (151.3 ± 54.1 minutes versus 126.1 ± 36.1 minutes, P = .11) or hospital stay (2.3 ± 1.9 days versus 2.4 ± 1.4 days, P = .23) between both groups, respectively. Minor complications were seen in 6% of patients with no significant difference in both groups, whereas 6% had major complications. No perioperative or 30-day mortalities were observed. In total, 49% of patients had complete resolution of symptoms, 46% had partial improvement, and 5% had no improvement. There was no difference in symptom resolution between either group. Conclusions: TA and SC approaches are equally safe and effective for the treatment of TOS. SC decompression allows for adjunct procedures and vascular reconstructions.

Distal landing zone optimization before endovascular repair of aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: The general goals of endovascular management in chronic distal thoracic aortic dissection are optimizing the true lumen, maintaining branch patency, and promoting false lumen (FL) thrombosis. Distal seal can be challenging in chronic distal thoracic aortic dissection due to the well-established secondary fenestrations and fibrotic septum. We describe our approach of distal landing zone optimization (DLZO) to enable full-diameter contact of the distal endoprosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our experience includes 19 procedures in 16 patients (12 male, age 68 ± 8 years) between May 2014 and November 2017. A history of previous ascending repair for type A dissection was present in 8 patients. Treatment indication was enlarging aneurysm in all subjects, and 4 patients had associated chronic visceral or distal ischemia. Point septal fenestrations were expanded by serial balloon dilation and/or wire-pull approaches. Balloon molding was used to ensure complete endograft apposition and FL collapse. RESULTS: One death occurred due to aortic perforation during wire-pull fenestration in a patient with heavily calcified and angulated aorta. The remaining procedures were accomplished safely and successfully. Balloon fenestration was used in 16 procedures, alone or in combination with a limited wire pull component. Adjunct procedures for distal seal included surgeon-modified fenestrated stent graft (3), iliac branch device (3), parallel superior mesenteric artery stent-graft (1), renal artery or superior mesenteric artery stent-graft (4), iliac stent (3), and plug obliteration of FL (5). Reintervention was required in 3 patients due to delayed loss of seal after the initial procedure (3, 8, and 12 months). Two were managed by repeat DLZO and distal extension. The third had distal extension via a surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-graft component. Follow-up imaging was available in 14 patients (16.0 ± 12.5 months, range: 1-33), with stable or regressed sac diameter with complete or near-complete thrombosis of the FL in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: DLZO enabled creation of a distal seal zone in all patients. Residual retrograde filling of the FL is a marker of procedure failure, especially when seal segment length or feasible endoprosthesis oversizing are marginal. Insufficient landing segment can be circumvented with the use of a fenestrated or branched device to accomplish seal in the visceral aorta or iliac bifurcation. Adjunct FL ablation is also a valuable technique to promote FL thrombosis.

Minimally Invasive Management of Severe Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a complex and highly prevalent pathology. It has been estimated that ∼8.5 million people in the United States are affected by PAD, of which 12%-20% are older than age 60. The TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) guidelines classified aortoiliac atherosclerotic disease based on morphology and level of lesions. TASC II guidelines recommend bilateral surgical bypass to the femoral arteries for TASC II C and D lesions. The aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) has been considered the gold standard in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). The long-term patency rate of 85%-90% at 5 years and 75%-80% at 10 years has been for a long time unmatched by other methods of revascularization. METHODS: This is a review of the current literature regarding minimally invasive strategies in the care of TASC II C and D aortoiliac disease. RESULTS: Endovascular therapies have led to a paradigm change even in the treatment of highly advanced lesions. Reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation for distal aortic and/or ostial unilateral/bilateral common iliac artery disease can be achieved via the deployment of stents with "kissing" technique and aortic endografts. Laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery for TASC II C and D lesions was first proposed in 1993. Total laparoscopic, laparoscopic-assisted, and laparobotic techniques have been described. Minimal incision aortic surgery (MIAS) describes abdominal incisions varying from 6 to 12 cm and positional adjustment of retractors to access the retroperitoneum for infrarenal aortic aneurysms and/or AIOD. CONCLUSIONS: Although initial enthusiasm laparoscopic aortic surgery and MIAS have failed to gain acceptance in the vascular surgery community due to intrinsic procedural challenges, they are currently practiced in few highly specialized centers. At this moment, high-quality evidence is lacking regarding the further feasibility of these techniques and their applicability in general practice compared to endovascular therapies. While the ABF remains still the optimal choice in select, fit for surgery patients, endovascular therapies offer a less invasive approach that may provide a mortality and morbidity benefit in higher risk patients with acceptable short- and long-term outcomes.

Switching temporary hemodialysis catheters to long-term catheters: exchange versus de-novo placement, any difference in line infection?
.

BACKGROUND: Shifting from a short-term catheter to a long-term one is done either by removing the old catheter and placing a new long-term one via fresh new puncture site, or by replacing the old catheter with a long-term one over a guidewire. AIM: We aimed to describe our technique in changing a temporary line to a long-term catheter (LTC) over a guidewire and to determine the incidence of line-related infections following this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective pilot study was conducted between 2005 and 2010 at the American University of Beirut Hospital. We compared the first group (A), which consisted of 20 patients who underwent exchange of a short-term dialysis catheter with a tunneled one over a guidewire using our technique, to a second group (B) of 60 patients who underwent de-novo LTC placement. The two groups were matched by age, with a follow-up of at least 1 month. RESULTS: The technical success rate of the catheter-conversion procedure was 100%. Our results revealed no significant difference of catheter duration between the two groups, with median duration of 6.5 vs. 4.0 days for group A and group B, respectively (p = 0.21). Moreover, there was also no significant mean time difference between any infection and long term catheter (LTC) insertion among the two groups (p = 0.31). Furthermore, there was no difference of catheter infection between the two groups (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: We concluded that there was no difference in terms of side effects or risk of infection in the guidewire group when compared to standard technique.
.

Sigmoid to scrotal fistula secondary to mesh erosion: a rare complication of inguinal hernia repair in a patient on anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND: Few reports from the medical literature have presented severe mesh-related complications following laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. One of these complications is being mesh erosion into bowel, resulting in fistulous tract with subsequent abscess formation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old patient, status post laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair, and on anticoagulation for dual prosthetic heart valves, presented with a unique case of sigmoid to scrotal fistula, post mesh erosion, resulting in sepsis. The patient presented in septic shock, necessitating an individualized surgical approach. Given the septic picture of our patient, the surgical approach was truncated. Initially the sepsis from the scrotum was drained and debrided. A watermelon seed was noted in the scrotum. After stabilization, the second stage approach was performed, were a laparotomy was performed, followed by division of the sigmoid to internal ring fistula, and reperitonealization of the mesh. Mesh removal was delayed as the risk of bleeding into the peritoneum was high, once anticoagulation needed to be resumed. Because of a persistent wound sinus tract, several months later, the mesh was removed, in a third stage, from an inguinal incision. Albeit meticulous dissection and homeostasis, a postoperative extraperitoneal inguinal hematoma developed, as expected, on day 2, once anticoagulation was resumed. CONCLUSION: Sigmoid to inguinoscrotal fistula is a rare, yet serious, complication of mesh infection and erosion. This can be obviated by preventing serosal tear, and proper peritonealization of the mesh. Fistulectomy alone with primary repair turned out to be a valid approach in our patient. Retaining the mesh could be an alternative for avoiding bleeding in patients on anticoagulation; despite that a persistent indolent infection and sinus tract will necessitate mesh removal afterwards.