The effect of early administration of rectal progesterone in IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies on the preterm birth rate: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The rate of multiple pregnancies in IVF/ICSI ranges from 20 to 30%. The incidence of preterm birth in multiple pregnancies is as high as 60% and is even higher in pregnancies conceived after IVF & ICSI. The effect of progesterone on prevention of preterm birth in twins is controversial. Our group has proven a positive effect in reduction of preterm birth, by starting progesterone from the mid-trimester, in exclusively IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies but not twins. The purpose of our current study was to explore the effect of earlier administration of natural progesterone, in IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies starting at 11-14 weeks for prevention of preterm birth. METHODS: This is a double-blind, placebo controlled, single center, randomized clinical trial. Women with dichorionic twin gestations, having an IVF/ICSI trial were randomized to receive natural rectal progesterone (800 mg daily) vs placebo, starting early from 11 to 14 weeks. They also received oral and vaginal antimicrobial agents as part of our routine treatment for vaginitis and urinary tract infection. They were randomized regardless of cervical length and had no previous history of preterm birth or known Mullerian anomalies. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth rate before 37 weeks. The secondary outcome was; spontaneous preterm birth before 34, 32, 28 weeks and neonatal outcome. RESULTS: A total of 203 women were randomized to both groups, final analysis included 199 women as 4 were lost to follow up. The base line characteristics as well as gestational age at delivery were not significantly different between the study and the placebo group (34.7 ± 3.6 vs 34.5 ± 4.5, P = 0.626). Progesterone administration was not associated with a significant decrease in the spontaneous preterm birth rates before 37 weeks (73.5% vs 68%, P = 0.551), before 34 (20.6% vs 21.6%, P = 0.649), before 32 (8.8% vs 12.4%, P = 0.46) & before 28 (4.9% vs 3.1%, P = 0.555) weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal natural progesterone starting from the first trimester in IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies did not reduce spontaneous preterm birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on 31 January 2014 at www.ISRCTN.com, number 69810120.

Characterization of embryonic cells obtained from multifetal reduction.

The multifetal reduction (MFR) procedure is usually reserved for high-order multiple pregnancies, and aspirated tissues are typically discarded. In this study, cells obtained from MFR tissue (termed multifetal reduction embryonic cells (MFR-ECs)), were characterized in vitro by genotypic and phenotypic analyses and tested in vivo by injection under the kidney capsule of nude mice. MFR-ECs were highly proliferative in culture and showed a normal karyotype by microarray CGH. Immunohistochemical analysis at day zero showed positive focal staining for desmin, S-100 protein, synaptophysin and chromogranin. Histology examination showed a mixture of cells from the three germ layers at different stages of differentiation. Markers of these stages included important developmental transcription factors, such as beta three-tubulin (ectoderm), paired box 6 (ectoderm) and alpha-smooth muscle actin (mesoderm). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) showed down-regulation of the mRNAs of cancer-related genes such as TP53. In vivo transplantation in nude mice showed a typical hyaline cartilage plate and no teratoma formation. Thus, MFR-ECs represent a rich, unique source for studying stem cell development, embryogenesis and cell differentiation.

Increased insulin resistance in men with unexplained infertility.

This prospective case-control study aimed to test the presence of insulin resistance (IR) in men with unexplained infertility. We included two groups: the study group including 160 infertile men with unexplained oligozoospermia (sperm count <10 × 106/ml) and normal hormonal profile, and the control group of 79 men with proven fertility within the preceding year. A fasting blood test measured IR, FSH, LH, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein and triglycerides. Insulin level was significantly higher in the study group (13.67 ± 10.44) compared with the control group (5.46 ± 3.15), P < 0.0001, and IR was significantly higher in the study group, P < 0.0001. FSH was significantly (P < 0.0001) higher in the study group (4.71 ± 2.57) than the control group (3.15 ± 1.92). LH was significantly higher in the study group (4.98 ± 2.41) compared with the control group (3.15 ± 1.12), P < 0.0001. Total cholesterol was significantly higher in the study group (198.29 ± 37.52) than the control group (182.45 ± 35.92), P < 0.05. In conclusion, IR in men with unexplained infertility may be a cause of reproductive and metabolic abnormalities. The benefit of insulin-sensitizing agents for these patients should be tested.

Does intrauterine injection of low-molecular-weight heparin improve the clinical pregnancy rate in intracytoplasmic sperm injection?

OBJECTIVE: Heparin can modulate proteins, and influence processes involved in implantation and trophoblastic development. This study aimed to assess the improvement of clinical pregnancy and implantation rates after local intrauterine injection of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). METHODS: A randomised case/control design was followed in women scheduled for ICSI. The study arm was injected with intrauterine LMWH during mock embryo transfer immediately following the ovum pickup procedure, while the control arm was given an intrauterine injection with a similar volume of tissue culture media. Side effects, the clinical pregnancy rate, and the implantation rate were recorded. RESULTS: The pregnancy rate was acceptable (33.9%) in the LMWH arm with no significant reported side effects, confirming the safety of the intervention. No statistically significant differences were found in the clinical pregnancy and implantation rates between both groups (p=0.182 and p=0.096, respectively). The odds ratio of being pregnant after intrauterine injection with LMWH compared to the control group was 0.572 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-1.22), while the risk ratio was 0.717 (95% CI, 0.46-1.13; p=0.146). No statistical significance was found between the two groups in other factors affecting implantation, such as day of transfer (p=0.726), number of embryos transferred (p=0.362), or embryo quality. CONCLUSION: Intrauterine injection of LMWH is a safe intervention, but the dose used in this study failed to improve the outcome of ICSI. Based on its safety, further research involving modification of the dosage and/or the timing of administration could result in improved ICSI success rates.

GnRH agonist plus vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in ICSI cycles: a randomized study.

In this prospective randomized study, the effect of daily gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in the luteal phase on IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes was assessed. Women (n = 446) were counselled for IVF-ICSI, and randomized on the day of embryo transfer to group 1 (daily 0.1 mg subcutaneous GnRHa until day of beta-HCG) (n = 224) and group 2 (stopped GnRHa on day of HCG injection) (n = 222). Both groups received daily vaginal progesterone suppositories. Primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate beyond 20 weeks. Mean age, oestradiol on day of HCG, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos transferred, and clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were 28.9 ± 4.5 years, 2401 ± 746 pg/mL; 13.5 ± 6.0 oocytes; 2.6 ± 0.6 embryos, and 36.2% and 30.4% consecutively in group 1 compared with 29.7 ± 4.7 years, 2483 ± 867 pg/mL, 13.7 ± 5.5 oocytes, 2.7 ± 0.6 embryos, 30.6% pregnancy rate, and 25.7% ongoing pregnancy rate in group 2. No significant difference was found between the groups. Subcutaneous GnRHa during the luteal phase of long GnRHa protocol cycles does not increase clinical or ongoing pregnancy rates after IVF-ICSI.

Phase IV, open-label, randomized study of low-dose recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone protocols for ovulation induction.

BACKGROUND: This Phase IV, open-label, multicentre, randomized study (MEnTOR) compared two low-dose recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) protocols for ovulation induction. METHODS: This study was conducted in six Middle Eastern countries between March 2009 and March 2011. Eligible women (18-37 years), with World Health Organization Group II anovulatory infertility, were randomized to receive r-hFSH (starting daily dose: 75 IU) as a chronic low-dose (CLD) (37.5 IU dose increase on Day 14) or low-dose (LD) (37.5 IU dose increase on Day 7) protocol if no follicles were ≥ 10 mm. The maximum r-hFSH daily dose permitted was 225 IU/day. The total length of ovarian stimulation could not exceed 35 days, unless ultrasound assessment suggested imminent follicular growth and maturation. Patients underwent only one treatment cycle. Primary endpoint: incidence of mono-follicular development. Secondary endpoints included: stimulation duration and rates of bi-follicular development; human chorionic gonadotrophin administration rate; clinical pregnancy; and cycle cancellation (owing to inadequate response). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. The primary efficacy analysis was performed using data from all patients who received at least one dose of correct study medication, had at least one efficacy assessment, and no protocol violations at treatment start (CLD group, n=122; LD group, n=125). RESULTS: Mono-follicular development rates (primary endpoint) were similar in both groups (CLD: 56.6% [69/122] versus LD: 55.2% [69/125], p=0.93; primary efficacy analysis population). Similarly, there were no significant differences between groups in bi-follicular development, clinical pregnancy or cycle cancellation (inadequate response) rates. In patients who received human chorionic gonadotrophin injections, the mean duration of stimulation was 13.7 days in the CLD group and 12.9 days in the LD group. Clinical pregnancy rates for those patients who received an hCG injection were similar in both groups (CLD: 20.2% [19/94] versus LD: 19.8% [18/91], p=0.94; primary efficacy analysis population). Most AEs were mild in severity. Only one case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was reported (mild; CLD group). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and safety outcomes were similar for the two protocols.

Impact of antimüllerian hormone assays on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a prospective controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of routine antimüllerian hormone (AMH) assays in patients considered high risk for cancellation. DESIGN: Prospective controlled study. SETTING: A private IVF center, Cairo, Egypt. PATIENT(S): In total 4,917 patients received counseling before starting IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). They were comprised of group A1 (n = 1,335), who were considered to be at risk for cancellation after ovarian stimulation, and group A2 (n = 3,582), who were considered low risk for cancellation. A control group, B (n = 4,639), included group B1 (n = 1,248) and group B2 (n = 3,391) based on the same criteria as groups A1 and A2. INTERVENTION(S): An AMH assessment was performed for group A1. All of the patients were stimulated using the long GnRH agonist protocol. Patients with low AMH levels received the flare-up protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The cancellation of IVF/ICSI cycles before or after stimulation, as well as the pregnancy rates (PR) in relation to AMH levels. RESULT(S): The group A1 patients (6.4%) did not start IVF due to low AMH, and some (6.6%) had their cycles canceled due to poor responses, compared with 2.6% in group A2 and 13.2% in group B1. The clinical PR was 42% in patients with normal AMH and 20% in patients with low AMH. The differences among these three groups were highly significant. CONCLUSION(S): The AMH assays reduced the cancellations, cost, and stress experienced by couples.

The use of vaginal natural progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in IVF/ICSI pregnancies.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of vaginal natural progesterone on the prevention of preterm birth in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) pregnancies. A single-centre prospective placebo-controlled randomized study was performed. A total of 313 IVF/ICSI pregnant patients were randomized into two groups for either treatment with daily 400 mg vaginal natural progesterone or placebo, starting from mid-trimester up to 37 weeks or delivery. Amongst the patients, there were 215 singleton and 91 twin pregnancies. There was no significant difference in risk of preterm birth among all patients (OR 0.672, 95% CI 0.42-1.0. There was a significantly lower preterm birth rate in singleton pregnancies in the natural progesterone arm (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-0.97) and no significant difference between both arms in twin pregnancies (OR 0.735, 95% CI 0.36-2). In conclusion, the administration of 400 mg vaginal natural progesterone from mid trimester reduced the incidence of preterm birth in singleton, but not in twin, IVF/ICSI pregnancies.

Agonist and antagonist coast.

The use of GnRH-a in ovarian stimulation permitted stronger stimulation resulting in an increased incidence of OHSS. The first Cochrane review comparing GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols for ovarian stimulation showed no significant difference in OHSS rate between the two protocols, however, a recent Cochrane review showed a highly significant decrease in the incidence in OHSS rate in the antagonist protocol. Coasting is a commonly used procedure for preventions of OHSS. The optimum time to start coasting is when the lead follicle reaches 16 mm in diameter and hCG should be given when E2 level drops below 3000 pg/ml. Coasting may act by diminishing the functioning granulosa cell cohort. Administration of daily GnRH antagonist in high risk patients for OHSS who were down-regulated by GnRH-a resulted in rapid drop of E2 and decrease in incidence of OHSS. A series of patients who developed early OHSS were treated by daily GnRH antagonist injections, all embryos were cryopreserved. No progression to severe OHSS was observed.

Intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before embryo transfer significantly improves the implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) before embryo transfer (ET). DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: The Egyptian IVF-ET Center. PATIENT(S): Infertility patients younger than 40 years undergoing their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI). INTERVENTION(S): The study group (n = 167) received either 100 IU of hCG (n = 83), or 200 IU of hCG (n = 84) via intrauterine administration before ET. The control group (n = 93) underwent ET without hCG. After the interim analysis, the modified study group (n = 107) received intrauterine injection of 500 IU of hCG, and the control group (n = 105) underwent ET without hCG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate (PR) and implantation rate (IR). RESULT(S): The IR and PR were statistically significantly higher in the 500 hCG group (41.6% and 75%, respectively) as compared with the control group (29.5% and 60%, respectively). The IR and PR were 26.6% and 54% in the 100 hCG group, 28.3% and 57% in the 200 IU hCG group, and 29.4% and 60% in the control group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION(S): Intrauterine injection of 500 IU of hCG before ET statistically significantly improved the implantation and pregnancy rates in IVF/ICSI. CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT 01030393.

Barriers to conducting clinical research in reproductive medicine: Egypt.

There are many barriers to scientific research in Egypt, including lack of funding, lack of a scientific atmosphere, and "brain drain" of scientists who produce high quality research.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology.

BACKGROUND: Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists can be used to prevent a luteinizing hormone (LH) surge during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) without the hypo-estrogenic side-effects, flare-up, or long down-regulation period associated with agonists. The antagonists directly and rapidly inhibit gonadotropin release within several hours through competitive binding to pituitary GnRH receptors. This property allows their use at any time during the follicular phase. Several different regimes have been described including multiple-dose fixed (0.25 mg daily from day six to seven of stimulation), multiple-dose flexible (0.25 mg daily when leading follicle is 14 to 15 mm), and single-dose (single administration of 3 mg on day 7 to 8 of stimulation) protocols, with or without the addition of an oral contraceptive pill. Further, women receiving antagonists have been shown to have a lower incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Assuming comparable clinical outcomes for the antagonist and agonist protocols, these benefits would justify a change from the standard long agonist protocol to antagonist regimens. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001, and previously updated in 2006. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists with the standard long protocol of GnRH agonists for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted conception cycle SEARCH STRATEGY: We performed electronic searches of major databases, for example Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE (from 1987 to April 2010); and handsearched bibliographies of relevant publications and reviews, and abstracts of major scientific meetings, for example the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). A date limited search of Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL from April 2010 to April 2011 was run. Eighteen studies have been entered into the Classification pending references section of this update. These studies will be appraised for inclusion or exclusion in the next update of this review, due April 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Two review authors independently screened the relevant citations for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different agonist versus antagonist protocols in women undergoing IVF or ICSI. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial risk of bias and extracted data. If relevant data were missing or unclear, the authors were contacted for clarification. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-five RCTs (n = 7511) comparing the antagonist to the long agonist protocols fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was no evidence of a statistically significant difference in rates of live-births (9 RCTs; odds ratio (OR) 0.86, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.08) or ongoing pregnancy (28 RCTs; OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.00). There was a statistically significant lower incidence of OHSS in the GnRH antagonist group (29 RCTs; OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.57). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The use of antagonist compared with long GnRH agonist protocols was associated with a large reduction in OHSS and there was no evidence of a difference in live-birth rates.