Assessing adherence and clinical utility of modified goal management training for adolescents with ADHD: A pilot study.

Many adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have executive functioning (EF) difficulties that contribute to academic and social-emotional challenges. This pilot explored adherence to and effectiveness of modified Goal Management Training (GMT), an EF intervention, with ADHD youth. Six adolescents with ADHD (14-17 years, 2 female) participated in a 6-session online group. Adherence was tracked via attendance and homework. Reliable change scores gaged pre-post differences on measures before and after training (primary: everyday EF and goal attainment; secondary: EF task performance, functional impairment, emotional adjustment, and self-concept). All youth attended at least 4 sessions, though homework completion was mixed. Four youth achieved their goal, some demonstrated reliable change on outcome measures, and all evidenced a reduction in impairment. Results support the feasibility of modified GMT in adolescents with ADHD and suggest that youth may benefit from this more personalized and holistic approach to EF intervention.

The Development and Evaluation of a Patient Educational Resource for Cancer-Related Cognitive Dysfunction.

Cancer patients and survivors frequently experience cognitive deficits, including problems with attention and memory. These symptoms, referred to as cancer-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD), are associated with distress. Learning about CRCD and self-management strategies may improve functioning and quality of life in cancer survivors. This study describes the development and evaluation of a CRCD resource for cancer patients. An educational booklet was developed in accordance with multiple evidence-based guidelines for cancer patient education. Cancer patients on chemotherapy (N = 113; 34% men; median age 55, range 19-85) reviewed the booklet and self-reported CRCD knowledge before and after reading the booklet. They also gave ratings on general impressions of the booklet. Seventy-five percent of participants reported that the resource increased their self-reported CRCD knowledge. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test demonstrated that exposure to the booklet elicited a statistically significant change in self-reported knowledge (Z = - 7.13, p < 0.001). A repeated-measures ANCOVA determined that the means of self-reported CRCD knowledge were significantly different between pre- and post-exposure (F(1, 92) = 7.96, p = 0.006, η2 = 0.08). Exploratory analyses revealed that self-reported CRCD knowledge increased across all educational attainment levels from pre- to post-exposure. Ninety-one percent of participants reported that all patients undergoing cancer treatment would find this booklet helpful. Cancer patients at risk for cognitive challenges gained self-reported CRCD knowledge from the booklet, and they think this knowledge would be helpful to others. A resource that makes CRCD understandable and manageable can bridge the gap in self-rated knowledge across education levels.

Trauma exposure and mental health in a community sample of children and youth.

OBJECTIVE: Childhood trauma is common and has implications for mental health. Research conducted retrospectively with clinical samples of adults and prospectively with high-risk samples of children has identified factors that moderate negative mental health sequelae (e.g., age, gender, nature and amount of trauma). Presently, however, there is a paucity of research examining mental health outcomes, and potential moderators of these outcomes, that may be associated with the experience of trauma among children in the general community. METHOD: To address this knowledge gap, the present study analyzed data from youth aged 8-17 years in the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample, a publicly available repository of information collected from a nationally representative sample of participants across the life span. We report the frequency and nature of trauma in our sample; bivariate correlations between trauma, demographic variables, and mental health outcomes; and hierarchical regressions in which these outcomes were modeled as a function of multivariate predictors. RESULTS: Anxiety was elevated in older youth and in females who experienced more cumulative trauma, particularly when trauma was accidental in nature. Conversely, increased depressed mood was associated with more cumulative trauma for females regardless of age and for younger boys-findings that were driven by the experience of interpersonal trauma for both genders. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation demonstrates that although the prevalence of trauma is lower among children in the general community, the negative impact of trauma experiences on children's anxiety and mood remains significant. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Pharmacological interventions for apathy in Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of apathy in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and its harmful effects, there are currently no therapies proven to treat this symptom. Recently, a number of pharmacological therapies have been investigated as potential treatments for apathy in AD. OBJECTIVES: Objective 1: To assess the safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapies for the treatment of apathy in Alzheimer's disease (AD).Objective 2: To assess the effect on apathy of pharmacotherapies investigated for other primary outcomes in the treatment of AD. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (ALOIS), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) portal, ICTRP on 17 May 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible studies were double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) investigating apathy as a primary or secondary outcome in people with AD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors extracted data. We assessed the risks of bias of included studies using Cochrane methods, and the overall quality of evidence for each outcome using GRADE methods. We calculated mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals on an intention-to-treat basis for all relevant outcome measures. MAIN RESULTS: We included 21 studies involving a total of 6384 participants in the quantitative analyses. Risk of bias is very low to moderate. All studies reported appropriate methods of randomization and blinding. Most studies reported appropriate methods of allocation concealment. Four studies, three with methylphenidate and one with modafinil, had a primary aim of improving apathy. In these studies, all participants had clinically significant apathy at baseline. Methylphenidate may improve apathy compared to placebo. This finding was present when apathy was assessed using the apathy evaluation scale (AES), which was used by all three studies investigating methylphenidate: MD -4.99, 95% CI -9.55 to -0.43, n = 145, 3 studies, low quality of evidence, but not when assessed with the neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI)-apathy subscale, which was used by two of the three studies investigating methylphenidate: MD -0.08, 95% CI -3.85 to 3.69, n = 85, 2 studies, low quality of evidence. As well as having potential benefits for apathy, methylphenidate probably also slightly improves cognition (MD 1.98, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.91, n = 145, 3 studies, moderate quality of evidence), and probably improves instrumental activities of daily living (MD 2.30, 95% CI 0.74 to 3.86, P = 0.004, n = 60, 1 study, moderate quality of evidence), compared to placebo. There may be no difference between methylphenidate and placebo in the risk of developing an adverse event: RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.42, n = 145, 3 studies, low quality of evidence. There was insufficient evidence from one very small study of modafinil to determine the effect of modafinil on apathy assessed with the FrSBe-apathy subscale: MD 0.27, 95% CI -3.51 to 4.05, n = 22, 1 study, low quality of evidence. In all other included studies, apathy was a secondary outcome and participants were not selected on the basis of clinically significant apathy at baseline. We considered the evidence on apathy from these studies to be indirect and associated with publication bias. There was low or very low quality of evidence on cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) (six studies), ChEI discontinuation (one study), antipsychotics (two studies), antipsychotic discontinuation (one study), antidepressants (two studies), mibampator (one study), valproate (three studies) and semagacestat (one study). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Methylphenidate may demonstrate a benefit for apathy and may have slight benefits for cognition and functional performance in people with AD, but this finding is associated with low-quality evidence. Our meta-analysis is limited by the small number of studies within each drug class, risk of bias, publication bias, imprecision and inconsistency between studies. Additional studies should be encouraged targeting people with AD with clinically significant apathy which investigate apathy as a primary outcome measure, and which have a longer duration and a larger sample size. This could increase the quality of evidence for methylphenidate, and may confirm whether or not it is an effective pharmacotherapy for apathy in AD.

Apathy associated with neurocognitive disorders: Recent progress and future directions.

INTRODUCTION: Apathy is common in neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) such as Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Although the definition of apathy is inconsistent in the literature, apathy is primarily defined as a loss of motivation and decreased interest in daily activities. METHODS: The Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment (ISTAART) Neuropsychiatric Syndromes Professional Interest Area (NPS-PIA) Apathy workgroup reviewed the latest research regarding apathy in NCDs. RESULTS: Progress has recently been made in three areas relevant to apathy: (1) phenomenology, including the use of diagnostic criteria and novel instruments for measurement, (2) neurobiology, including neuroimaging, neuropathological and biomarker correlates, and (3) interventions, including pharmacologic, nonpharmacologic, and noninvasive neuromodulatory approaches. DISCUSSION: Recent progress confirms that apathy has a significant impact on those with major NCD and those with mild NCDs. As such, it is an important target for research and intervention.

Beyond immunotherapy: new approaches for disease modifying treatments for early Alzheimer's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Current pharmacological recommendations for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) include the cholinesterase inhibitors and the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, memantine. However, these medications only manage symptoms of AD, and do not target Aß plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. As such, there is a need to develop effective and safe disease modifying treatments that directly target AD pathology and alter the course of AD progression. Areas covered: This review evaluates ongoing phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, as well as those completed or published over the past five years. Studies for this review were obtained from clinicaltrials.gov, alzforum.org/therapeutics, and PubMed. Keywords and search criteria included: phase 2, or 3 trials related to Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, amyloid-beta and tau. Immunotherapies for AD have not been included as this is beyond the scope of this review. Expert opinion: A substantial number of trials investigating disease modifying drugs in AD target amyloid-beta and tau pathology. However, many of these trials have relatively short treatment duration and do not include combined assessment of biomarkers and clinical outcomes. Future investigations are recommended to include biomarker assessments and clinical outcomes over a minimum treatment duration of 18 months in order to establish disease-modifying effects.