Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aesthet Surg J ; 33(4): 487-96, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23563904

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Suction drains are commonly placed after rhytidectomy to avoid seroma formation that may result from dead spaces between skin layers. Fibrin sealants promote tissue adherence by crosslinking with extracellular matrix proteins, which may reduce the dead space under skin flaps. OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluate the safety and efficacy of the fibrin sealant (FS) VH S/D 4 s-apr (Artiss; Baxter Healthcare Corp, Deerfield, Illinois), added to standard-of-care (SoC) treatment, in improving flap adherence and reducing dead space in patients undergoing rhytidectomy. METHODS: Patients with planned facial rhytidectomy were enrolled in this phase 3, prospective, controlled, randomized, patient-blinded, multicenter trial. They received SoC treatment on 1 side of the face and adjunctive FS VH S/D 4 s-apr on the other. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients completed the trial. The mean (SD) drainage volume was 7.7 (7.4) mL from the sides treated with sealant and 20.0 (11.3) mL from the SoC-only sides (P < .0001). Rates of hematoma and seroma were similar for the 2 treatments, as were changes in postoperative skin sensitivity. Adverse events generally were mild; 2 serious adverse events were reported (wound abscess, dehydration). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunct use of FS VH S/D 4 s-apr in rhytidectomy was proven safe in this study. It significantly reduced drainage volumes without increasing the incidence of hematoma or seroma, which suggests that it eliminates dead space through improved flap adherence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.


Assuntos
Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/uso terapêutico , Ritidoplastia/métodos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/irrigação sanguínea , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Idoso , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/métodos , Feminino , Hematoma/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Ritidoplastia/efeitos adversos , Seroma/prevenção & controle , Método Simples-Cego , Envelhecimento da Pele/fisiologia , Resistência à Tração , Adesivos Teciduais/uso terapêutico , Cicatrização/fisiologia
2.
Aesthet Surg J ; 33(3): 323-33, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23515377

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Suction drains are commonly placed after rhytidectomy surgery to avoid seroma formation that may result from dead spaces between skin layers. Fibrin sealants promote tissue adherence by cross-linking with extracellular matrix proteins, which may reduce the dead space under skin flaps. OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of the fibrin sealant (FS) VH S/D 4 s-apr (ARTISS; Baxter Healthcare Corp, Deerfield, Illinois), added to standard-of-care (SoC) treatment, on tissue plane adherence and local hemostasis in rhytidectomy patients. METHODS: In this phase 2, prospective, controlled, randomized, evaluator- and patient-blinded, multicenter study, 45 patients (of 56 possible enrollees) received SoC treatment on 1 side of the face and adjunctive FS VH S/D 4 s-apr treatment on the other side. Outcomes measures included visual assessments of ecchymosis (by blinded reviewers), grading of ecchymosis and edema, drainage volumes, occurrence of hematoma/seroma, safety evaluations, and patient-reported assessments of pain, numbness, and treatment preferences postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 55.1 years. Rates and grades of ecchymosis and edema were similar for the 2 treatments. The mean (SD) drainage volume 24 hours after surgery was 11.5 (13.7) mL from the FS VH S/D 4 s-apr-treated sides of the face and 26.8 (24.0) mL from the SoC-only sides (P < .0001). Patient assessments of pain, numbness, and preference favored treatment with FS VH S/D 4 s-apr. Adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant use of FS VH S/D 4 s-apr appears to be safe and results in lower drainage volumes than SoC treatment alone.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Reagentes de Ligações Cruzadas/uso terapêutico , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/uso terapêutico , Hemostáticos/uso terapêutico , Rejuvenescimento , Ritidoplastia/métodos , Envelhecimento da Pele , Adulto , Idoso , Reagentes de Ligações Cruzadas/efeitos adversos , Drenagem , Equimose/etiologia , Edema/etiologia , Dor Facial/etiologia , Feminino , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/efeitos adversos , Hematoma/etiologia , Hemostáticos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hipestesia/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Ritidoplastia/efeitos adversos , Ritidoplastia/normas , Seroma/etiologia , Padrão de Cuidado , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...