Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in a patient treated with ribociclib for metastatic breast cancer. Case reports and literature review.

Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. Cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (ribociclib, palbociclib, and abemaciclib) modulate endocrine resistance and are widely used treatment for patients with advanced-stage hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. Reports of both venous and arterial thromboembolic events, as a complication of cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, are increasingly recognized, but none involved cerebral venous sinus. We herein report on a 44-year-old female patient who initially presented with an early-stage breast cancer treated with surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and finished 5 years of tamoxifen uneventfully. Eight years after her initial diagnosis, she relapsed with a solitary brain lesion which was resected and treated with radiation therapy, and was then started on aromatase inhibitors. Few months later, she progressed with biopsy-proven cervical and mediastinal lymph node metastasis. She was then switched to fulvestrant and ribociclib; both were well-tolerated. However, few weeks later she presented with increasing headache and mild dizziness. Imaging studies showed right lateral sinus acute non-occlusive thrombosis with no parenchymal changes. Patient was anticoagulated with low molecular weight heparin and follow-up visits showed stable disease with no bleeding.

Survival Outcomes after Placement of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Cancer Patients: Insights from a Comprehensive Cancer Center's Experience.

BACKGROUND: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters serve as a vital intervention when systemic anticoagulation proves ineffective or contraindicated, particularly in the context of cancer patients. This study aimed to provide real-world insights into the outcomes of cancer patients following IVC filter placement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer patients with IVC filters were retrospectively reviewed. The indications and survival outcomes following IVC filter insertion have been reported. RESULTS: A total of 176 cancer patients with IVC filters were included in the study. The median patient age was 56 years (range: 18-88 years). Solid tumors were the most common primary cancers (n = 125, 71.0%), and the majority (n = 99, 79.2%) had the advanced-stage disease at the time of IVC insertion. The filters were inserted because of contraindications to anticoagulation (n = 99, 56.3%) or the failure of anticoagulation (n = 56, 31.8%). The median survival (range) following filter placement was only 2 (1.45-2.55) months for patients with advanced-stage solid tumors, 5 (0.62-9.38) months for patients with brain tumors, and 44 (8.59-79.41) months for those with early-stage solid tumors, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that IVC filter placement offers limited benefits to patients with advanced-stage disease. The underlying tumor, stage, and life expectancy are crucial factors in the decision-making process before IVC filter insertion.

Aggressiveness of Cancer Care at End of Life in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer in Jordan.

Background: Contrary to Western societies, more than 15% of patients with breast cancer in Jordan are diagnosed with stage IV disease. In this study, we evaluate the value of early palliative care integration in the end-of-life care of such patients. Methods: All consecutive adult patients who died between 2014 to 2018, while under the care of our institution, with a confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer at the time of death, irrespective of place of death, were retrospectively reviewed. Results: During the study period, a total of 433 patients, median age 51.6 years, were included in the analysis. Among the whole group, 102 (23.6%) were referred to palliative care service early (≥30 days prior to death), 182 (42.0%) had late referral (<30 days from death), while 149 (34.4%) were never referred and were followed up by their medical oncologists. During the last 30 days prior to death, patients who were never referred to palliative care were more likely to visit the Emergency Room (ER) more than once (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.20-2.99, p = 0.006), more likely to be admitted to the hospital more than once (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.38-3.73, p = 0.001), and more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.48-6.38, p = 0.0027). Fewer patients in the "no referral" group died with advance directives compared to those who had early or late referral; 60.8%, 75.0% and 82.5%, respectively, p = 0.0003. Survival of patients followed by medical oncologist was not better than those referred to palliative care, either late or early; median survival was 19.0, 19.1 and 23.8 months, respectively (p = 0.2338). Conclusion: Findings suggest that earlier palliative care referral is associated with less aggressive end-of-life care, leading to less frequent ER visits, hospital and ICU admissions during the last month of life, and does not compromise survival.

COMPASS-CAT versus Khorana risk assessment model for predicting venous thromboembolic events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer on active treatment with chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy, the CK-RAM study.

Cancer patients are at higher risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Several risk assessment models (RAM), including the Khorana and COMPASS-CAT, were developed to help predict the occurrence of VTE in cancer patients on active anti-cancer therapy. We aim to study the prevalence and predictors of VTE among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and compare both RAMs in predicting VTE in patients with NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed. Variables known to increase the risk of VTE were collected and risk of VTE was assessed using both Khorana and COMPASS-CAT RAM. A total of 508 patients (mean age ± SD, 58.4 ± 12.2 years) were enrolled. Most (n = 357, 70.3%) patients had adenocarcinoma, and 333 (65.6%) patients had metastatic disease. VTE were confirmed in 76 (15.0%) patients. Rates were higher among patients with metastatic disease (19.8%, p < 0.001), adenocarcinoma (17.4%, p = 0.01) and those treated with immunotherapy (23.5%, p = 0.014). VTE rates were 21.2%, 14.1% and 13.9% among those with high (n = 66), intermediate (n = 341) and low (n = 101) Khorana risk scores, respectively (p = 0.126). On the other hand, 190 (37.4%) were classified as high risk by the COMPASS-CAT RAM; 52 (27.4%) of them had VTE compared to 24 (7.5%) of the remaining 318 (62.6%) classified as Low/Intermediate risk level, p < 0.001. In conclusion, patients with NSCLC are at high risk for VTE, especially those with adenocarcinoma, metastatic disease and when treated with immunotherapy. Compared to Khorana RAM, COMPASS-CAT RAM was better in identifying more patients in high-risk group, with higher VTE rate.