Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Microbiol ; 55(6): 473-9, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17924164

RESUMO

In the present study, several conventional methods to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were compared with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of mecA gene-positive isolates. Cefoxitin E-test was also evaluated as a possible phenotypic method of MRSA detection. Oxacillin agar screen and PBP2' latex agglutination methods were found to be more sensitive than oxacillin and cefoxitin disk-diffusion methods. Cefoxitin disk diffusion was found to be the most specific. A combination of oxacillin agar screening with cefoxitin disk diffusion, or oxacillin disk diffusion with PBP2', improved sensitivity and specificity. Cefoxitin E-test with the current break points had low sensitivity and specificity (33.3% and 75%, respectively) for the detection of MRSA. However, changing the break points to or= 6 microg/ml for sensitive and resistant, respectively, greatly improved both. Changing the 30-microg cefoxitin disk-diffusion break points to

Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Resistência a Meticilina , Meticilina/farmacologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Cefoxitina , DNA Bacteriano/análise , DNA Bacteriano/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Testes de Fixação do Látex , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Proteínas de Ligação às Penicilinas , Fenótipo , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...