Prevalence of Self-Medication Among Patients With Common Dermatological Diseases in Saudi Arabia.

Introduction  Self-medication is defined as the use of a medication or product to treat, alleviate, or prevent a condition or symptom of an illness or to promote health. Self-management is increasingly used for dermatological diseases, especially chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Hence, it is crucial to be aware of its prevalence and the leading factors of its usage. Therefore, this study aims to estimate the prevalence of self-treatment for dermatological diseases and to determine possible factors associated with its practice.  Methodology  This is a cross-sectional online-based questionnaire study that was conducted in King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. In this study, we included all first-visit and follow-up patients diagnosed with vitiligo, eczema, alopecia areata, and psoriasis. Data analysis was conducted using JMP Statistical Discovery Software, version 15 (JMP Statistical Discovery LLC, Cary, NC).  Results  Of the 203 patients who participated in this study, 91 (44.8%) had vitiligo. Moreover, topical corticosteroids were the most commonly used medications in self-treatment and included mometasone and hydrocortisone, which were used by 143 (41.3%) and 50 (14.5%) patients, respectively. Thirty patients (16.2%) improved with self-treatment, whereas 52 (28.1%) had no improvement. In addition, the most common reason for self-treatment was having mild symptoms of the disease in 97 patients (30.1%).  Conclusion  This study revealed that the prevalence of self-treatment among various dermatological diseases was 53.2%. Topical corticosteroids were the most commonly used conventional medicines, whereas the most common alternative medications used were honey and henna. We found that the most common reason for self-treatment was mildness of the dermatological disease. Family and friends were the most common sources of information.

Palbociclib-Induced Vitiligo-Like Lesions: A Report of a Challenging Case.

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors, such as palbociclib, have emerged as essential in managing hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer. While effective, these inhibitors can cause rare dermatologic side effects, including vitiligo-like depigmentation. We report a rare case of a 52-year-old female with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer who developed vitiligo-like depigmentation following palbociclib treatment. The patient presented with asymptomatic depigmented lesions on the lower limbs and abdomen, appearing seven months after starting palbociclib. Examination and investigations confirmed the diagnosis after excluding other potential causes. Despite treatment with topical steroids and calcineurin inhibitors, there was no significant improvement, highlighting the need for more research into effective management strategies for drug-induced vitiligo. This case emphasizes the importance of recognizing rare dermatologic side effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors like palbociclib. Ongoing vigilance, reporting, and research are necessary to improve understanding and management of these side effects, ultimately enhancing patient care in oncology.

Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants versus nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint (MISIJ) fusion is a surgical option to relieve SIJ pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare MISIJ fusion with triangular titanium implants (TTI) to nonoperative management of SIJ dysfunction. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included prospective clinical trials that compared MISIJ fusion to nonoperative management in individuals with chronic low back pain attributed to SIJ dysfunction. We evaluated pain on visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 8 articles representing 3 trials that enrolled 423 participants were deemed eligible. There was a significant reduction in pain score with MISIJ fusion compared with nonoperative management (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.03 to -1.39). Similarly, ODI scores (SMD -1.03, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.81), SF-36 PCS scores (SMD 1.01, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.19), SF-36 MCS scores (SMD 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.9), and patient satisfaction (odds ratio 6.87, 95% CI 3.73 to 12.64) were significantly improved with MISIJ fusion. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups with respect to adverse events (SMD -0.03, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.23). CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that MISIJ fusion with TTI shows a clinically important and statistically significant improvement in pain, disability score, HRQoL, and patient satisfaction with a similar adverse event profile to nonoperative management in patients with chronic low back pain attributed to SIJ dysfunction.

Noninvasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous or Intermittent Positive Airway Pressure for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) is a newly developed noninvasive ventilation technique with promising clinical and ventilatory outcomes for preterm infants. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether NIV-NAVA has better clinical and ventilatory outcomes than nasal continuous airway pressure (NCPAP) or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPP) on premature infants. MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared NIV-NAVA with NCPAP or NIPP for preterm infants (gestational age: <37 weeks) were included. We evaluated the following outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit: the desaturation rate, failure of noninvasive modality requiring intubation when received as the primary mode or the need for re-intubation after extubation from mechanical ventilation in the secondary mode (weaning), length of stay, and fraction of inspired oxygen. The mean difference and risk ratio were used to represent continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. We included nine RCTs involving 339 preterm infants overall. NIV-NAVA showed similar clinical and ventilatory outcomes to NCPAP or NIPP, except for the maximum diaphragmatic electrical activity. The rate of failure of the noninvasive modality was not statistically different between NIV-NAVA and NCPAP. The pooled estimates for the maximum electrical activity were significantly reduced in NIV-NAVA compared with those in NIPP. The findings suggest that NIV-NAVA may be as safe and effective as NCPAP and NIPP for preterm neonates, particularly those who may not tolerate these alternative noninvasive methods. However, further trials are recommended for greater evidence.