Low-Power Red Laser Treatment for Anisometropic Myopia Control in Children: A Contralateral Comparison Study.

BACKGROUND: There are some uncertainties about the effect of low-power red laser treatment on myopia control for anisometropic myopia in children. To evaluate the effect and safety of low-power red laser treatment on refractive development for anisometropic myopia in children, a contralateral comparison study was conducted. METHODS: The more myopic eye of child with anisometropic myopia was treated with low-power red laser treatment (LRL group), the other eye received no treatment other than the wearing of single-focus spectacles (SFS) (SFS Group). The LRL treatment was given at home under parental guidance for 3 minutes each time, twice daily with a minimal interval of 4 hours, 7 days per week, using an equipment that produces red laser of 650 nm wavelength at an illuminance range of roughly 1200-1800 lux and an energy of 0.60 mw for a 4-mm pupil (class I classification). RESULTS: Among 51 included children, 44 (86.27%) completed the 3-months study, consisting of 15 girls (34.1%) and 29 boys (65.9%). After 3-months axial length (AL) and spherical equivalent refraction (SER) progression were -0.08 mm [95% CI (confidence interval), 0.11 to 0.06 mm] and +0.23 diopter (D) (95% CI, 0.13-0.33 D) for LRL group and +0.08 mm (95% CI, 0.05-0.11 mm) and -0.07 D (95% CI, -0.16-0.03 D) for SFS group. AL and SER progression between the groups varied by 0.17 mm (95% CI, 0.13-0.20 mm) and -0.30 D (95% CI, -0.42 to -0.18 D). There was no visible structural damage on optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. CONCLUSIONS: AL growth, myopia progression, and anisometropia of the binoculars can all be slowed down by LRL treatment. Compared to SER progression, axial elongation is more accurate and simpler to monitor. LRL treatment unrecorded functional and structural damage of binoculus.

Associations between anthropometric indicators and refraction in school-age children during the post-COVID-19 era.

Purpose: To explore the associations between anthropometric indicators and refraction in school-aged children in the post-COVID-19 era. Methods: Data were collected from 25,644 children aged 7 to 12 years in 48 elementary schools in Tianjin. The comprehensive examination included height, weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), refraction, and calculation of BMI, with a follow-up visit after 6 months. Myopia was defined as spherical equivalent refraction (SER) ≤-0.50 diopter (D). Bivariate correlation coefficients and multiple linear regression models were used to explore the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between anthropometric indicators (height, weight, BMI, SBP, and DBP) and refraction. Results: The mean changes in height, weight, BMI, SBP, DBP, and SER of the participants were 4.03 ± 2.18 cm, 3.10 ± 2.39 kg, 0.45 ± 1.16 kg/m2, 2.26 ± 14.74 mmHg, 2.18 ± 11.79 mmHg and -0.17 ± 0.51 D, respectively. Overall, height, weight, BMI, SBP, and DBP were all correlated with SER (r = -0.324, r = -0.234, r = -0.121, r = -0.112, r = -0.066, both p < 0.001), and changes in height and weight were correlated with changes in SER (r = -0.034, -0.031, both p < 0.001). Furthermore, multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the association of BMI, SBP, and DBP with SER was significant in myopic children but not in non-myopic children. The association between changes in weight and changes in SER was only present in non-myopic children but not in myopic children. Conclusion: Height and weight were negatively correlated with SER in both cross-sectional analysis and longitudinal changes, indicating that children's height, weight and growth rate may be used as a reference indicator for myopia risk prediction and myopia progression monitoring.