Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Res Rep Urol ; 12: 415-422, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33062620

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study determines the prevalence and clinical presentation of detrusor underactivity (DU) and its urodynamic characteristics in adult patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study has reviewed the symptoms and urodynamic study (UDS) findings of 283 patients with LUTS. Chi-square analysis was used to present the prevalence of UDS characteristics in both sexes. RESULTS: Out of records of 206 patients included in this study, fifty-one (24.76%) patients were diagnosed with DU based on bladder contractility index. Storage lower urinary tract symptoms were the most prevalent characteristic presentation in both sexes as compared to the difficulty in voiding, recurrent urine retention, and urinary incontinence. Bladder outlet, sphincter EMG findings, and degree of DU were significantly correlated with gender. CONCLUSION: DU is a prevalent and sophisticated bladder pathology rather than a simple one. It requires more attention from the urologists, and evaluations, including UDS, to differentiate it from other pathologies.

2.
BJU Int ; 111(6): 946-53, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23464844

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies (TRUSBx) are associated with a spectrum of complications, including most significantly infection, which affects up to 5% of patients. In the most severe cases, infection leads to sepsis, a life-threatening complication. Escherichia coli is the primary responsible pathogen. Although antibiotic prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones is routinely used, there is evidence that the infection rate after TRUSBx is increasing, and this appears to be due to an increasing prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant rectal flora. This is the largest prospective clinical trial to date analysing the rectal flora of men undergoing prostate biopsies. We determined the microbial and antibiotic sensitivity profiles from 849 patients. Ciprofloxacin-resistant Gram-negative organisms were identified in the rectal flora of 19.0% of men. Furthermore, fluoroquinolone use within 6 months preceding a TRUSBx and the presence of a prosthetic heart valve were significant predictors of ciprofloxacin resistance on rectal swab. Determining the prevalence of rectal fluoroquinolone resistance has important implications in evaluation of the suitability of prophylactic regimens. Antimicrobial profiles derived from rectal swabs pre-biopsy may prove useful in guiding targeted antibiotic prophylaxis. OBJECTIVES: To establish the prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteria in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies (TRUSBx) and to determine whether this predicts subsequent infectious complications. To identify risk factors for harbouring ciprofloxacin-resistant flora. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Any patient undergoing a TRUSBx from 2009 to 2011 was eligible for enrolment in this prospective study. Pre-biopsy rectal and urine cultures and post-biopsy urine cultures were obtained and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent patient risk factors associated with ciprofloxacin-resistant rectal flora. RESULTS: A total of 865 patients underwent TRUSBx, of whom 19.0% were found to have ciprofloxacin-resistant Gram-negative coliforms. Escherichia coli was the most prevalent Gram-negative rectal isolate (80.9%) and accounted for 90.6% of ciprofloxacin resistance. Patient characteristics that conferred an increased risk of harbouring ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms included a history of a heart valve replacement (P < 0.05) and ciprofloxacin use in the past 3 months (P < 0.05). Infectious complications were observed in 3.6% (n = 31) of the patient population and 48% of these patients grew ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms on the pre-biopsy rectal swab (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial resistance to ciprofloxacin in the rectal flora was common, particularly in patients with recent ciprofloxacin use and a heart valve replacement. Despite a significant correlation between those patients who developed infections and the detection of ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms, only 9.0% (n = 15) of the total group with ciprofloxacin resistance developed an infectious complication. Future studies will need to evaluate the cost effectiveness and clinical utility of a pre-biopsy rectal culture in targeting antibiotic prophylaxis.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Urinários/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Escherichia coli/prevenção & controle , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Fezes/microbiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Reto/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Anti-Infecciosos Urinários/administração & dosagem , Canadá/epidemiologia , Ciprofloxacina/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Reto/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Urol ; 189(4): 1326-31, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23041343

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy can lead to urinary tract infections in 3% to 11% and sepsis in 0.1% to 5% of patients. We investigated the efficacy of rectal cleansing with povidone-iodine before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy to reduce infectious complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2009 and 2011, 865 men were prospectively randomized to rectal cleansing (421) or no cleansing (444) before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Patients received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis and rectal swab cultures were obtained before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Patients completed a telephone interview 7 days after undergoing the biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications, a composite end point of 1 or more of 1) fever greater than 38.0C, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Chi-square significance testing was performed for differences between groups and a multivariate analysis was performed to assess risk factors for infectious complications. RESULTS: Infectious complications were observed in 31 (3.5%) patients, including 11 (2.6%) treated and 20 (4.5%) control patients (p = 0.15). Sepsis was observed in 4 (1.0%) treated and 7 (1.6%) control patients (p = 0.55). On multivariate analysis resistance to ciprofloxacin in the rectal swab culture (p = 0.002) and a history of taking ciprofloxacin in the 3 months preceding transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (p = 0.009) predicted infectious complications. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cleansing with povidone-iodine before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy was safe, but the 42% relative risk reduction of infectious complications was not statistically significant. Patients who have received ciprofloxacin within 3 months of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy should be considered for alternate prophylaxis or possibly a delay of biopsy beyond 3 months.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Povidona-Iodo/uso terapêutico , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Próstata/patologia , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Reto , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...