Assessment of a pro-healing stent in an animal model of early neoatherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Neoatherosclerosis represents an accelerated manifestation of atherosclerosis in nascent neointima after stenting, associated with adverse events. We investigated whether improved reendothelialization using RGD-coated stents results in diminished vascular permeability and reduced foam cell formation compared to standard DES in atherosclerotic rabbits. METHODS AND RESULTS: Neointimal foam cell formation was induced in rabbits (n = 7). Enhanced endothelial integrity in RGD-coated stents resulted in decreased vascular permeability relative to DES, which was further confirmed by SEM and TEM. Cell culture experiments examined the effect of everolimus on endothelial integrity. Increasing concentrations of everolimus resulted in a dose-dependent decrease of endothelial cell junctions and foam cell transformation of monocytes, confirming the relevance of endothelial integrity in preventing permeability of LDL. CONCLUSION: Incomplete endothelial integrity was confirmed as a key factor of neointimal foam cell formation following stent implantation. Pro-healing stent coatings may facilitate reendothelialization and reduce the risk of neoatherosclerosis.

Acute thrombogenicity of fluoropolymer-coated versus biodegradable and polymer-free stents.

AIMS: Durable fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (FP-EES) have shown lower rates of stent thrombosis (ST) versus bare metal stents (BMS) and first-generation bioabsorbable polymer (BP) DES. The aim of the study was to evaluate the specific role of the FP in thromboresistance. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 57 stents were assessed in three separate ex vivo swine arteriovenous shunt model experiments (first shunt experiment, custom-made fluoropolymer-coated BMS [FP-only] vs. BMS [n=8 each]; second shunt experiment, FP-EES vs. abluminally coated biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents [BP-SES] vs. BMS [n=8 each]; and third shunt experiment, FP-EES vs. polymer-free Biolimus A9-coated stents [PF-BCS] vs. BMS [n=6 each]). After one hour of circulation, stents were bisected, and each half was dual-immunostained using a platelet cocktail and a marker for inflammation. Antibody staining was visualised by confocal microscopy. In addition, stents were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. FP-only stents showed significantly lower platelet adherence compared with BMS (% fluorescence-positive area: FP-only=1.8%, BMS=5.6%, p=0.047) with similar inflammatory cell density. FP-EES also demonstrated the lowest platelet adherence compared with BP-SES (p=0.056), PF-BCS (p=0.013) and BMS (p=0.003) with the significantly lowest inflammatory cell density. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoropolymer coating imparts greater thromboresistance relative to BMS and to polymer-free DES designs, which reflects an unique phenomenon known as fluoropassivation, representing one proposed mechanism for clinically observed low ST rates in FP-EES.

Comparison of acute thrombogenicity for magnesium versus stainless steel stents in a porcine arteriovenous shunt model.

AIMS: The present study aimed to investigate whether the Magmaris resorbable magnesium scaffold (RMS) has platelet-repelling properties by comparing its acute thrombogenicity with an equivalent stainless steel stent in an arteriovenous shunt model. METHODS AND RESULTS: An ex vivo porcine carotid jugular arteriovenous shunt was established and connected to Sylgard tubing containing the Magmaris RMS with sirolimus-eluting PLLA coating and an equivalent 316L stainless steel stent with sirolimus-eluting PLLA coating. Six shunts (two shunt runs per pig) were run comparing the two scaffolds (n=9) in alternating order. Nested generalised linear mixed models were employed to compare variables between scaffold groups. Confocal fluorescent microscopy containing CD61/CD42b demonstrated that the 316L equivalent stent had significantly greater platelet coverage of the total scaffold compared with Magmaris (5.8% vs. 2.8%, adjusted rate ratio 2.21 [1.41, 3.47], p=0.012). Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated significantly greater thrombus deposition on the 316L equivalent stent as a percentage of the total scaffold compared with Magmaris (8.0% vs. 5.3%, p=0.009). Magmaris also had significantly less CD14 positive monocyte deposition and a trend towards less PM-1 positive neutrophil compared with the 316L equivalent stent. CONCLUSIONS: Magmaris has less thrombogenicity and inflammatory cell deposition compared with the equivalent 316L stainless steel (in geometry and design) stent in a porcine arteriovenous shunt model. These data suggest that resorbable magnesium scaffolds may have inherent properties that reduce adhesion of platelets and inflammatory cells.

Thromboresistance and functional healing in the COBRA PzF stent versus competitor DES: implications for dual antiplatelet therapy.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the COBRA PzF stent (C-PzF) with respect to thrombogenicity and healing versus conventional drug-eluting stents (DES) in dedicated preclinical models to evaluate their suitability for short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). METHODS AND RESULTS: To examine acute thrombogenicity, the C-PzF durable polymer drug-eluting stent (DP-DES), and a bioabsorable polymer DES (BP-DES) were compared in a porcine arteriovenous shunt model and in a rabbit model to evaluate endothelial coverage at 14 days. Barrier function at 28 days in the rabbit was assessed in the former stents as well as in a polymer-free DES (PF-BES). The number of clots by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was significantly less in the C-PzF and DP-EES versus the BP-EES. Endothelial coverage at 14 days was significantly greater in the C-PzF versus the DP-EES and BP-EES by CD31/PECAM-1 positive area in confocal microscopy (CM) (24.7% vs 11.9% vs 3.7%, respectively) and SEM (99.0% vs 29.6% vs 17.7%, respectively). Barrier protein expression by CM for p120/vascular-endothelial cadherin complex was significantly greater in the C-PzF versus the DP-EES, BP-EES, and PF-BES (82.6% vs 12.8% vs 14.4% vs 18.1%, respectively). The percentage of Evan's Blue positive area was least in the C-PzF versus all groups (22.0% vs 70.7% vs 66.4% vs 55.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The C-PzF demonstrated a unique combination of thrombogenicity and healing advantages compared to contemporary DES and may be uniquely suitable for very short-term DAPT.

Endothelial Barrier Protein Expression in Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate endothelial coverage and barrier protein expression following stent implantation. BACKGROUND: Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) have been purported to have biological advantages in vessel healing versus durable polymer DES (DP-DES), although clinical trial data suggest equipoise. METHODS: Biodegradable polymer-sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES), durable polymer-everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES), and bare-metal stents (BMS) were compared. In the rabbit model (28, 45, and 120 days), stented arteries underwent light microscopic analysis and immunostaining for the presence of vascular endothelium (VE)-cadherin, an endothelial barrier protein, and were subjected to confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. A cell culture study in stented silicone tubes was performed to assess cell proliferation. RESULTS: Light microscopic assessments were similar between BP-SES and DP-EES. BMS showed nearly complete expression of VE-cadherin at 28 days, whereas both DES showed significantly less with results favoring BP-SES versus DP-EES (39% coverage in BP-SES, 22% in DP-EES, 95% in BMS). Endothelial cell morphologic patterns differed according to stent type with BMS showing a spindle-like shape, DP-EES a cobblestone pattern, and BP-SES a shape in between. VE-cadherin-negative areas showed greater surface monocytes regardless of type of stent. Cell proliferation was suppressed in both DES with numerically less suppression in BP-SES versus DP-EES. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine VE-cadherin expression after DES. All DES demonstrated deficient barrier expression relative to BMS with results favoring BP-SES versus DP-EES. These findings may have important implications for the development of neoatherosclerosis in different stent types.

Comparison of Acute Thrombogenicity for Metallic and Polymeric Bioabsorbable Scaffolds: Magmaris Versus Absorb in a Porcine Arteriovenous Shunt Model.

BACKGROUND: A comparison in acute thrombogenicity between the Magmaris sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable magnesium scaffold and the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold has not been performed. This study assessed acute thrombogenicity of Magmaris compared with Absorb and the Orsiro hybrid drug-eluting stent in a porcine arteriovenous shunt model. METHODS AND RESULTS: An ex vivo porcine carotid jugular arteriovenous shunt was established and connected to SYLGARD tubing containing the Magmaris, Absorb, and Orsiro scaffolds/stents and allowed to run in the shunt for a maximum of 1 hour. Twelve shunts (2 shunt runs per pig) were run comparing the 3 scaffolds in alternating order. Nested generalized linear mixed models were used to compare variables between scaffold groups while adjusting for variability between shunt runs. Confocal fluorescent microscopy costaining CD61/CD42b demonstrated that both Magmaris (3.0%) and Orsiro (4.6%) had less platelet coverage of the total scaffold compared with Absorb (21.8%). Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated significantly less thrombus deposition to Magmaris as a percentage of the total scaffold compared with Absorb (5.0% versus 16.1%, P=0.02). Magmaris had significantly less PM-1-positive neutrophil and CD14-positive monocyte adherence compared with both Orsiro and Absorb. Orsiro had significantly less monocyte deposition compared with Absorb. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a similar scaffold strut thickness, the Magmaris sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable magnesium scaffold was significantly less thrombogenic compared with the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold in an ex vivo porcine arteriovenous shunt model. Further studies are needed to determine whether the reduced thrombogenicity of Magmaris will result in reductions in major cardiovascular events.

Preclinical evaluation of a novel polyphosphazene surface modified stent.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with coronary artery disease at high risk for bleeding complications are limited. The aim of the current preclinical study was to evaluate neointimal coverage, endothelial recovery, inflammation and thrombogenicity in a novel thin-strut (71µm thickness) Cobalt Chromium (CoCr) stent modified with a nano-thin Polyzene®-F (PzF) surface coating. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-eight single PzF nano-coated stents and 20 bare metal control stents (BMS) were implanted in the coronary arteries of 24 pigs, with scheduled 5- (n=5), 28- (n=13), and 90-day (n=6) follow-up in addition to overlapping configuration (n=6 each), examined at 28-days. Histomorphometric analysis showed significantly lower neointimal thickness in PzF nano-coated stents than BMS controls at both 28- and 90-days (p=0.023 and 0.005) and reduced inflammation (p=0.06 and 0.13). Endothelial coverage over luminal surfaces at all time points was similar between nano-coated stents and BMS controls. We conducted supplementary in-vitro experiments using human monocytes and an ex-vivo swine carotid-jugular arterio-venous shunt model to better understand the healing properties afforded by the PzF nano-coating. Overall, the PzF-nano-coating showed reduced monocyte adhesion and thrombus formation compared to the un-coated controls. CONCLUSIONS: Stents modified with a nano-thin PzF-coating implanted in healthy swine indicate favorable vascular healing properties shown by reduced neointimal hyperplasia and inflammation, along with resistance to thrombus formation in an ex-vivo shunt model over unmodified stents.

Acute Thrombogenicity of a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent Relative to Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Coatings Assessed Ex Vivo in a Swine Shunt Model.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate whether the permanent fluoropolymer-coated Xience Xpedition everolimus-eluting stent (Xience-EES) exhibits lower acute thrombogenicity compared with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) with biodegradable polymer coatings in an acute swine shunt model. BACKGROUND: Previous pre-clinical and clinical experience suggests that several factors may influence the predisposition for acute thrombus formation of polymer-coated DES, including stent design and the polymer coating technology. It remains unclear whether relevant differences exist with respect to acute thrombogenicity, particularly between current commercial stent designs using permanent polymers and those using biodegradable polymers. METHODS: An ex vivo carotid to jugular arteriovenous porcine shunt model involving a test circuit of 3 in-line stents, was used to test acute thrombogenicity, where Xience-EES (n = 24) was compared with 4 CE-marked DES with biodegradable polymer coatings (BioMatrix Flex, Synergy, Nobori, and Orsiro [n = 6 each]). After 1 h of circulation, platelet aggregation in whole mount stents was evaluated by confocal microscopy with immunofluorescent staining against dual platelet markers (CD61/CD42b) along with scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Xience-EES showed the least percentage of thrombus-occupied area as compared with the biodegradable polymer-coated DES, with a significant difference compared with BioMatrix Flex and Synergy (mean differences: [BioMatrix Flex: 15.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.34 to 19.75, p < 0.001; Synergy: 8.64, 95% CI: 4.43 to 12.84, p < 0.001; Nobori: 4.22, 95% CI: -0.06 to 8.49, p = 0.055; Orsiro: 2.95, 95% CI: -1.26 to 7.15, p = 0.286). The number of cell nuclei on strut surfaces was also the least in Xience-EES, with a significant difference relative to BioMatrix Flex, Nobori, and Orsiro (mean ratios: BioMatrix Flex: 4.73, 95% CI: 2.46 to 9.08, p < 0.001; Synergy: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.75 to 2.76, p = 0.51; Nobori: 5.97, 95% CI: 3.11 to 11.44, p < 0.001; Orsiro: 5.16, 95% CI: 2.69 to 9.91, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Xience-EES's overall design confers acute thromboresistance relative to contemporary DES with biodegradable coatings, with less platelet aggregation versus BioMatrix Flex and Synergy, and less inflammatory cell attachment versus BioMatrix Flex, Nobori, and Orsiro, in an ex vivo swine shunt model, which lends support to reported clinical findings of lower early stent thrombosis.

Vascular healing and integration of a fully bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold in a rabbit iliac arterial model.

AIMS: We aimed to investigate a fully bioresorbable poly-l-lactide (PLLA) scaffold to assess vascular remodelling in comparison to a permanent polymeric metal DES. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five New Zealand white rabbits received an Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS, 1.0 and 1.1) or a CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in the iliac arteries. Twelve arteries were harvested at one month for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis (BVS 1.1). The other implanted (BVS 1.0) arteries (n=32) were explanted at three, six and 36 months for light microscopic analysis. Re-endothelialisation assessed at one month was incomplete in both BVS and SES by SEM, with a trend towards greater coverage in SES (endothelialisation above strut: 32.2% vs. 60.6%, p=0.10). However, light microscopic analysis at later time points revealed greater endothelial coverage in BVS than in SES at 36 months (100.0% vs. 93.3%, p=0.05). Inflammation scores were comparable between arteries implanted with BVS and SES at three months (1.1 vs. 1.1, p=0.99), which decreased over time in the BVS implanted arteries (36 months: 0.0 vs. 0.2, p=0.05). At 36 months, BVS were completely resorbed, and resorption sites were replaced by connective tissue. CONCLUSIONS: BVS in the rabbit iliac artery model demonstrated ongoing vascular healing at three and six months, and complete vessel restoration, re-endothelialisation and no to minimal vascular inflammation at 36 months.

Histopathologic evaluation of nitinol self-expanding stents in an animal model of advanced atherosclerotic lesions.

AIMS: The histologic response to self-expanding stent implantation into advanced atherosclerotic lesions has not been systematically investigated. We tested the hypothesis of whether gradual expansion of advanced atherosclerotic plaques by self-expanding stents would be an appropriate method to seal atherosclerotic lesions without causing plaque disruption as is usually observed with balloon-expandable stents. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve New Zealand white rabbits were fed an atherogenic diet (1% cholesterol) followed by arterial denudation and injection of washed autologous erythrocytes. Nitinol self-expanding stents of two different stent designs and strengths (n=12 for SX and n=12 for Micro-SX) were implanted into the previously formed lesions within the abdominal aorta six weeks following injection of erythrocytes. Four weeks following stent implantation, animals were sacrificed, specimens harvested and processed for histology. Histomorphometry was performed on stented and adjacent non-stented regions. Atherosclerotic lesions were composed of foam cells, cholesterol clefts and necrotic plaque. While SX stents showed an unfavourable outcome with respect to vessel remodelling and the percentage of uncovered stent struts, Micro-SX stents had fewer uncovered stent struts, less positive remodelling and less plaque injury. CONCLUSIONS: Nitinol Micro-SX self-expanding stents might be a valuable approach to seal high risk atherosclerotic lesions.

Differential healing after sirolimus, paclitaxel, and bare metal stent placement in combination with peroxisome proliferator-activator receptor gamma agonists: requirement for mTOR/Akt2 in PPARgamma activation.

RATIONALE: Sirolimus-eluting coronary stents (SESs) and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents (PESs) are used to reduce restenosis but have different sites of action. The molecular targets of sirolimus overlap with those of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma agonist rosiglitazone (RSG) but the consequence of this interaction on endothelialization is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Using the New Zealand white rabbit iliac model of stenting, we examined the effects of RSG on SESs, PESs, and bare metal stents endothelialization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Animals receiving SESs, PESs, or bare metal stents and either RSG (3 mg/kg per day) or placebo were euthanized at 28 days, and arteries were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Fourteen-day organ culture and Western blotting of iliac arteries and tissue culture experiments were conducted. Endothelialization was significantly reduced by RSG in SESs but not in PESs or bare metal stents. Organ culture revealed reduced vascular endothelial growth factor in SESs receiving RSG compared to RSG animals receiving bare metal stent or PESs. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) revealed that sirolimus (but not paclitaxel) inhibited RSG-induced vascular endothelial growth factor transcription. Western blotting demonstrated that inhibition of molecular signaling in SES+RSG-treated arteries was similar to findings in HAECs treated with RSG and small interfering RNA to PPARgamma, suggesting that sirolimus inhibits PPARgamma. Transfection of HAECs with mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) short hairpin RNA and with Akt2 small interfering RNA significantly inhibited RSG-mediated transcriptional upregulation of heme oxygenase-1, a PPARgamma target gene. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay demonstrated sirolimus interferes with binding of PPARgamma to its response elements in heme oxygenase-1 promoter. CONCLUSIONS: mTOR/Akt2 is required for optimal PPARgamma activation. Patients who receive SESs during concomitant RSG treatment may be at risk for delayed stent healing.

Site-specific targeting of nanoparticle prednisolone reduces in-stent restenosis in a rabbit model of established atheroma.

OBJECTIVE: TRM-484 is a novel drug consisting of nanoparticles of prednisolone with high affinity to chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs). This may allow for neointimal suppression via directed targeting to areas of injury at systemic concentrations low enough to avoid adverse side effects known to occur with oral delivery of steroids. METHODS AND RESULTS: Atherosclerotic New Zealand white Rabbits were implanted with bare metal stents and randomized to receive intravenous TRM-484 at doses of 1 mg/kg or 0.32 mg/kg starting at the day of stenting and continuing 3 times a week for the duration of the study. Control animals received empty liposomes (placebo) or saline infusion. Stented arterial segments were harvested at 42 days and processed for histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry. Tissue and plasma levels were determined along with confocal microscopic analysis to determine distribution of rhodamine-labeled TRM-484 at various time points. TRM-484 was exclusively observed at sites of stent-induced injury, with absence of drug in contralateral nonstented arteries. Tissue concentration of stented arteries exceeded that of contralateral nonstented arteries by 100-fold 24 hours after administration of 1 mg/kg TRM-484 and resulted in significant reduction of percent stenosis compared to saline and placebo treated rabbits (22.5+/-4.4 versus 31.0+/-8.4 and 29.5+/-8.1%, P<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: TRM-484 at doses of 1 mg/kg resulted in significant suppression of in-stent neointimal growth in atherosclerotic rabbits. Site-specific targeting by this nanoparticle steroid in injured atherosclerotic areas might be a valuable and cost-effective approach for the prevention of in-stent restenosis.

Endothelial cell recovery between comparator polymer-based drug-eluting stents.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess trends in endothelial coverage and recovery among leading polymer-based drug-eluting stents (DES). BACKGROUND: Autopsy studies of human U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved DES implanted coronary arteries suggest that complications of late stent thrombosis are associated with incomplete endothelial coverage of struts. METHODS: Rabbits received sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) for 14 or 28 days along with MULTI-LINK (ML) Vision control stents. Endothelial coverage above and between struts was measured by morphometric analysis of images acquired through en face scanning electron microscopy. Dual fluorescent immunolabeling was performed for platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM)-1 and thrombomodulin (TM), factors involved in cell-to-cell contact and thrombogenicity, respectively. In a separate analysis, the endothelial mitogen, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), was also assessed. RESULTS: Varying rates of endothelialization among comparator DES were most notable at 14 days, where coverage above struts remained poor in SES, PES, and ZES (or=70%), whereas no significant differences were observed at 28 days. Select DES with poor endothelialization showed a further reduced expression of PECAM-1. All DES showed an absence or weak expression of the antithrombotic cofactor TM. Incomplete endothelialization in select DES was further associated with increased VEGF secretion and messenger ribonucleic acid levels at 14 days, providing evidence of a transitional healing surface. CONCLUSIONS: The present study marks the first comparator analysis of endothelial coverage in leading polymeric DES, supporting disparities in arterial healing based on endothelial regrowth and recovery, favoring newer designs over the current generation of FDA-approved stents.

Effects of oral prednisone after stenting in a rabbit model of established atherosclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of systemic prednisone in combination with a bare-metal stent (BMS) or a paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus, Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) on neointimal inhibition and vessel healing in an atherosclerotic rabbit model. BACKGROUND: Inflammation plays a critical role in neointimal formation after coronary artery stenting. The efficacy of immunosuppressive doses of oral prednisone to inhibit in-stent neointimal proliferation was compared with BMS and with a commercially available paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus) in a rabbit model of established atherosclerosis. METHODS: Bilateral iliac artery injury in atherosclerotic New Zealand White rabbits fed an atherogenic diet was followed by stent implantation. Animals randomly received Taxus stents, BMS (Express, Boston Scientific Corp.) and placebo, or BMS and oral prednisone (2.1 mg/kg/day for the first 7 days, followed by 1.4 mg/kg/day for 14 days and 0.7 mg/kg/day for 21 days). Stented arterial segments were harvested at 42 days and processed for light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and organoid culture. RESULTS: Compared with control subjects, prednisone-treated animals showed a 30% reduction in percent stenosis (p = 0.009), a 35% decrease in neointimal area (p < 0.003), and a 66% decrement in neointimal thickness (p < 0.001). Taxus stents also reduced all 3 parameters significantly (-34%, -39%, and -83%, respectively), but showed significantly more inflammatory cells and fibrin deposition and less endothelialization compared with the other 2 groups. Plaque burden was equal among groups, as shown by the identical stent and vessel area, and no remodeling was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic prednisone treatment and Taxus stents reduce neointimal formation compared with BMS. The extent of neointimal reduction is similar between prednisone- and Taxus stent-treated animals; however, Taxus stents resulted in a significantly greater delay in healing. Targeting of inflammatory pathways after percutaneous coronary intervention may be an efficacious way to prevent restenosis without the long-term risk of late thrombosis.

Pioglitazone inhibits in-stent restenosis in atherosclerotic rabbits by targeting transforming growth factor-beta and MCP-1.

OBJECTIVE: Although emerging data from preclinical and clinical studies suggests a reduction of in-stent restenosis with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma agonists, the reduction of neointimal growth via anti-inflammatory mechanisms has not been explored. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hypercholesterolemic New Zealand White rabbits (n=45) received bilateral balloon-expandable stents implanted into atherosclerotic iliac arteries. Animals were randomized to oral pioglitazone 3 (low dose) or 10 mg/kg per day (high dose) started on the day of stent implantation; control rabbits received placebo. Tissue harvest was performed 28 days after stenting, and stented segments underwent histology, morphometry, immunostaining for macrophages, and scanning electron microscopy. In selected animals, stented arterial segments were placed in organoid culture for 48 hours, and the conditioned media was assayed for 23 different cytokines. There was a 21% reduction in neointimal area for high-dose pioglitazone treated versus placebo rabbits (P<0.005), which was associated with a significant reduction of neointimal macrophages. Analysis of conditioned media revealed an 82% and 74% reduction in the release of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) (P<0.007) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 (P<0.01), respectively, in stented segments from animals treated with 10 mg/kg per day pioglitazone versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Oral pioglitazone suppresses in-stent neointimal growth by limiting local inflammatory pathways and may be useful as an adjunctive therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous interventions.

Differential response of delayed healing and persistent inflammation at sites of overlapping sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: Although effective coverage of challenging coronary lesions has warranted the use of overlapping drug-eluting stents, the histopathological response to stent overlap is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: The arterial reaction to overlapping Cypher or Taxus drug-eluting stents was examined in rabbits with bare metal stents, BxVelocity or Express, serving as controls. Single iliac artery balloon injury was followed by placement of 2 overlapping 3.0-mm-diameter drug-eluting stents or bare metal stents in 60 animals (mean length of overlap, 9.8+/-3.6 mm). Stented arteries were harvested at 28 and 90 days for histology. Overlapped segments exhibited delayed healing compared with proximal and distal nonoverlapping sites at 28 days. Overlapped segments in Taxus stents induced significantly more luminal heterophils/eosinophils and fibrin deposition than Cypher; peristrut giant cell infiltration, however, was more frequent in the latter. Overlapping bare metal stents also showed mild delayed healing compared with nonoverlapped segments, but not to the same extent as drug-eluting stents. Although neointimal thickness within the overlap was similar in 28- and 90-day Cypher stents, there was a significant increase with Taxus (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with bare metal stents, drug-eluting stents further delay arterial healing and promote inflammation at sites of overlap. Taxus stents induced greater fibrin deposition, medial cell loss, heterophils/eosinophils, and late neointimal hyperplasia. Patients receiving overlapping drug-eluting stents need more frequent follow-up than patients with nonoverlapping stents.

Oral everolimus inhibits in-stent neointimal growth.

BACKGROUND: Rapamycin (sirolimus)-eluting stents are associated with reduced restenosis rates in animal studies and initial human trials. The present study evaluated whether orally administered everolimus (a macrolide of the same family as sirolimus) inhibits in-stent neointimal growth in rabbit iliac arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: New Zealand white rabbits were randomized to everolimus 1.5 mg/kg per day starting 3 days before stenting and reduced to 1 mg/kg per day from days 14 to 28 (group 1), everolimus 1.5 mg/kg given 1 day before stenting followed by 0.75 mg/kg per day for 28 days (group 2), or matching placebo for each group. Drugs were administered by oral gavage. Stents were deployed in both iliac arteries, and arteries were harvested 28 days after stenting. Group 1 everolimus-treated rabbits experienced weight loss and anorexia, which resolved after the everolimus dose was lowered on day 14. Group 2 animals were healthy for the duration of everolimus dosing. Both everolimus treatment groups significantly reduced in-stent neointimal growth (46% reduction and 42% reduction in intimal thickness in groups 1 and 2, respectively). In group 2 everolimus-treated animals, the neointima was healed or healing, characterized by stent struts covered by a thin neointima, overlying endothelial cells, and only small foci of fibrin. Scanning electron microscopy showed >80% stent surface endothelialization in group 2 everolimus-treated rabbits. CONCLUSIONS: Oral everolimus suppresses in-stent neointimal growth in the rabbit iliac artery. At a dose of 1.5 mg/kg given 1 day before stenting followed by 0.75 mg/kg per day for 28 days, everolimus was well tolerated and was associated with significant neointimal healing.

Sustained reduction of in-stent neointimal growth with the use of a novel systemic nanoparticle paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel (PXL)-eluting stents in animals cause incomplete healing and, in some instances, a lack of sustained suppression of neointimal growth. The present study tested the efficacy of a novel systemic delivery nanoparticle PXL for reducing in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A saline-reconstituted formulation of PXL stabilized by albumin nanoparticles (nPXL) was tested in 38 New Zealand White rabbits receiving bilateral iliac artery stents. Doses of nPXL (1.0 to 5.0 mg/kg) were administered as a 10-minute intra-arterial infusion; control animals received vehicle (0.9% normal saline). In a follow-up chronic experiment, nPXL 5.0 mg/kg was given at stenting with or without an intravenous 3.5-mg/kg repeat nPXL dose at 28 days; these studies were terminated at 3 months. At 28 days, mean neointimal thickness was reduced (P< or =0.02) by doses of nPXL > or =2.5 mg/kg with evidence of delayed healing. The efficacy of a single dose of nPXL 5.0 mg/kg, however, was lost by 90 days. In contrast, a second repeat dose of nPXL 3.5 mg/kg given 28 days after stenting resulted in sustained suppression of neointimal thickness at 90 days (P< or =0.009 versus single dose nPXL 5.0 mg/kg and controls) with nearly complete neointimal healing. CONCLUSIONS: Although systemic nPXL reduces neointimal growth at 28 days, a single repeat dose was required for sustained neointimal suppression. Thus, this novel systemic formulation of PXL may allow adjustment of dose at the stent treatment site and prove to be a useful adjunct for the clinical prevention of in-stent restenosis.