Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 378: 123-129, 2023 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36791963

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is usually accompanied by cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities, which may significantly impact its prognosis. In this study we aimed to characterize the comorbidity profile and its impact in mortality in patients with HF diagnosis from the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA). METHODS: RECOLFACA enrolled adult patients with HF diagnosis from 60 centers in Colombia during the period 2017-2019. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the impact of the comorbidities in mortality. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: From the total 2528 patients included in the registry, 2514 patients (58% males, mean age 68 years) had information regarding comorbidity diagnoses. 2321 patients (92.3%) reported at least one comorbidity. Arterial hypertension was the most frequent individual diagnosis (72%; n = 1811), followed by anemia (30.1%, n = 726). The most frequently observed coexisting comorbidities were coronary disease (CHD) with dyslipidemia, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Different patterns of comorbidity coexistence were observed when comparing HF patients by sex and left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) classification. The only comorbidities that were significantly associated with mortality after multivariate adjustment were T2DM (HR 1.45. 95% CI 1.01-2.12), anemia (HR 1.48. 95% CI 1.02-2.16), and CHD (HR 1.59. 95% CI 1.09-2.33). CONCLUSION: Multiple comorbidities were frequently observed in the patients from the RECOLFACA. T2DM, anemia and CHD were significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality, highlighting the importance of promoting an optimal follow-up and control of these conditions.


Assuntos
Anemia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Idoso , Feminino , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda , América Latina , Comorbidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Sistema de Registros
2.
Nat Metab ; 4(12): 1847-1857, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36344766

RESUMO

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cytotoxicity may involve inhibition of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha. Fenofibrate activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro. Whether fenofibrate can be used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in humans remains unknown. Here, we randomly assigned inpatients and outpatients with COVID-19 within 14 d of symptom onset to 145 mg of oral fenofibrate nanocrystal formulation versus placebo for 10 d, in a double-blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was a severity score whereby participants were ranked across hierarchical tiers incorporating time to death, mechanical ventilation duration, oxygenation, hospitalization and symptom severity and duration. In total, 701 participants were randomized to fenofibrate (n = 351) or placebo (n = 350). The mean age of participants was 49 ± 16 years, 330 (47%) were female, mean body mass index was 28 ± 6 kg/m2 and 102 (15%) had diabetes. Death occurred in 41 participants. Compared with placebo, fenofibrate had no effect on the primary endpoint. The median (interquartile range) rank in the placebo arm was 347 (172, 453) versus 345 (175, 453) in the fenofibrate arm (P = 0.819). There was no difference in secondary and exploratory endpoints, including all-cause death, across arms. There were 61 (17%) adverse events in the placebo arm compared with 46 (13%) in the fenofibrate arm, with slightly higher incidence of gastrointestinal side effects in the fenofibrate group. Overall, among patients with COVID-19, fenofibrate has no significant effect on various clinically relevant outcomes ( NCT04517396 ).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Fenofibrato , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Fenofibrato/uso terapêutico , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos , PPAR alfa
3.
Res Sq ; 2022 Aug 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35982675

RESUMO

Background Abnormal cellular lipid metabolism appears to underlie SARS-CoV-2 cytotoxicity and may involve inhibition of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARα). Fenofibrate, a PPAR-α activator, modulates cellular lipid metabolism. Fenofibric acid has also been shown to affect the dimerization of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, the cellular receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Fenofibrate and fenofibric acid have been shown to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in cell culture systems in vitro . Methods We randomly assigned 701 participants with COVID-19 within 14 days of symptom onset to 145 mg of fenofibrate (nanocrystal formulation with dose adjustment for renal function or dose-equivalent preparations of micronized fenofibrate or fenofibric acid) vs. placebo for 10 days, in a double-blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was a ranked severity score in which participants were ranked across hierarchical tiers incorporating time to death, duration of mechanical ventilation, oxygenation parameters, subsequent hospitalizations and symptom severity and duration. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04517396. Findings: Mean age of participants was 49 ± 16 years, 330 (47%) were female, mean BMI was 28 ± 6 kg/m 2 , and 102 (15%) had diabetes mellitus. A total of 41 deaths occurred. Compared with placebo, fenofibrate administration had no effect on the primary endpoint. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) rank in the placebo arm was 347 (172, 453) vs. 345 (175, 453) in the fenofibrate arm (P = 0.819). There was no difference in various secondary and exploratory endpoints, including all-cause death, across randomization arms. These results were highly consistent across pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Conclusion Among patients with COVID-19, fenofibrate has no significant effect on various clinically relevant outcomes.

4.
Acevedo-Peña, Juan; Yomayusa-González, Nancy; Cantor-Cruz, Francy; Pinzon-Florez, Carlos; Barrero-Garzón, Liliana; De-La-Hoz-Siegler, Ilich; Low-Padilla, Eduardo; Ramírez-Ceron, Carlos; Combariza-Vallejo, Felipe; Arias-Barrera, Carlos; Moreno-Cortés, Javier; Rozo-Vanstrahlen, José; Correa-Pérez, Liliana; Rojas-Gambasica, José; González-González, Camilo; La-Rotta-Caballero, Eduardo; Ruíz-Talero, Paula; Contreras-Páez, Rubén; Lineros-Montañez, Alberto; Ordoñez-Cardales, Jorge; Escobar-Olaya, Mario; Izaguirre-Ávila, Raúl; Campos-Guerra, Joao; Accini-Mendoza, José; Pizarro-Gómez, Camilo; Patiño-Pérez, Adulkarín; Flores-Rodríguez, Janine; Valencia-Moreno, Albert; Londoño-Villegas, Alejandro; Saavedra-Rodríguez, Alfredo; Madera-Rojas, Ana; Caballero-Arteaga, Andrés; Díaz-Campos, Andrés; Correa-Rivera, Felipe; Mantilla-Reinaud, Andrés; Becerra-Torres, Ángela; Peña-Castellanos, Ángela; Reina-Soler, Aura; Escobar-Suarez, Bibiana; Patiño-Escobar, Bonell; Rodríguez-Cortés, Camilo; Rebolledo-Maldonado, Carlos; Ocampo-Botero, Carlos; Rivera-Ordoñez, Carlos; Saavedra-Trujillo, Carlos; Figueroa-Restrepo, Catalina; Agudelo-López, Claudia; Jaramillo-Villegas, Claudia; Villaquirán-Torres, Claudio; Rodríguez-Ariza, Daniel; Rincón-Valenzuela, David; Lemus-Rojas, Melissa; Pinto-Pinzón, Diego; Garzón-Díaz, Diego; Cubillos-Apolinar, Diego; Beltrán-Linares, Edgar; Kondo-Rodríguez, Emilio; Yama-Mosquera, Erica; Polania-Fierro, Ernesto; Real-Urbina, Evalo; Rosas-Romero, Andrés; Mendoza-Beltrán, Fernán; Guevara-Pulido, Fredy; Celia-Márquez, Gina; Ramos-Ramos, Gloria; Prada-Martínez, Gonzalo; León-Basantes, Guillermo; Liévano-Sánchez, Guillermo; Ortíz-Ruíz, Guillermo; Barreto-García, Gustavo; Ibagón-Nieto, Harold; Idrobo-Quintero, Henry; Martínez-Ramírez, Ingrid; Solarte-Rodríguez, Ivan; Quintero-Barrios, Jorge; Arenas-Gamboa, Jaime; Pérez-Cely, Jairo; Castellanos-Parada, Jeffrey; Garzón-Martínez, Fredy; Luna-Ríos, Joaquín; Lara-Terán, Joffre; Vargas-Fodríguez, Johanna; Dueñas-Villamil, Rubén; Bohórquez-Feyes, Vicente; Martínez-Acosta, Carlos; Gómez-Mesa, Esteban; Gaitán-Rozo, Julián; Cortes-Colorado, Julián; Coral-Casas, Juliana; Horlandy-Gómez, Laura; Bautista-Toloza, Leonardo; Palacios Palacios, Leonardo; Fajardo-Latorre, Lina; Pino-Villarreal, Luis; Rojas-Puentes, Leonardo; Rodríguez-Sánchez, Patricia; Herrera-Méndez, Mauricio; Orozco-Levi, Mauricio; Sosa-Briceño, Mónica; Moreno-Ruíz, Nelson; Sáenz-Morales, Oscar; Amaya-González, Pablo; Ramírez-García, Sergio; Nieto-Estrada, Víctor; Carballo-Zárate, Virgil; Abello-Polo, Virginia.
Acta méd. colomb ; 46(1): 51-72, ene.-mar. 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1278159

RESUMO

resumen está disponible en el texto completo


Abstract Recent studies have reported the occurrence of thrombotic phenomena or coagulopathy in patients with COVID-19. There are divergent positions regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of these phenomena, and current clinical practice is based solely on deductions by extension from retrospective studies, case series, observational studies, and international guidelines developed prior to the pandemic. In this context, the aim was to generate a group of recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and management of thrombotic complications associated with COVID-19. Methods: A rapid guidance was carried out applying the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks and an iterative participation system, with statistical and qualitative analysis. Results: 31 clinical recommendations were generated focused on: a) Coagulation tests in symptomatic adults with suspected infection or confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection; b) Thromboprophylaxis in adults diagnosed with COVID-19 (Risk scales, thromboprophylaxis for outpatient, in-hospital management, and duration of thromboprophylaxis after discharge from hospitalization), c) Diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic complications, and d) Management of people with previous indication of anticoagulant agents. Conclusions: Recommendations of this consensus guide clinical decision-making regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of thrombotic phenomena in patients with COVID-19, and represent an agreement that will help decrease the dispersion in clinical practices according to the challenge imposed by the pandemic.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Embolia e Trombose , Consenso , Anticoagulantes
5.
Rev. colomb. cardiol ; 27(5): 446-460, sep.-oct. 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1289255

RESUMO

Introducción estudios recientes han reportado fenómenos trombóticos o coagulopatía en pacientes con COVID-19. Hay posiciones divergentes en cuanto a la prevención, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de estos fenómenos, y la práctica clínica actual está basada únicamente en deducciones por extensión a partir de estudios retrospectivos, series de casos, estudios observacionales y guías internacionales desarrolladas previas a la pandemia. Objetivo establecer una serie de recomendaciones sobre prevención, diagnóstico y manejo de las complicaciones trombóticas asociadas a COVID-19. Métodos se desarrolló una guía rápida en la que se aplicó el marco de la evidencia a la decisión (EtD) de GRADE y un sistema de participación iterativo, con análisis estadísticos y cualitativos de sus resultados. Resultados se generaron 31 recomendaciones clínicas enfocadas a: a) Pruebas de coagulación en adultos sintomáticos con sospecha de infección o infección confirmada por SARS-CoV-2; b) Tromboprofilaxis en personas adultas con diagnóstico de COVID-19 (escalas de riesgo, tromboprofilaxis de manejo ambulatorio, intrahospitalario y duración de tromboprofilaxis después del egreso de hospitalización), c) Diagnóstico y tratamiento de las complicaciones trombóticas y d) Manejo de personas con indicación previa a usar agentes anticoagulantes. Conclusiones las recomendaciones clínicas de este consenso orientan la toma de decisiones clínicas respecto a prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento de fenómenos trombóticos en pacientes con COVID-19, y representan un acuerdo que ayudará a disminuir la dispersión en las prácticas clínicas acorde con el desafío que impone la pandemia.


Abstract Introduction: recent studies have reported the occurrence of thrombotic phenomena or coagulopathy in patients with COVID-19. There are divergent positions regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of these phenomena, and current clinical practice is based solely on deductions by extension from retrospective studies, case series, observational studies, and international guidelines developed prior to the pandemic. Objective: to generate a group of recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and management of thrombotic complications associated with COVID-19. Methods: a rapid guidance was carried out applying the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks and an iterative participation system, with statistical and qualitative analysis. Results: 31 clinical recommendations were generated focused on: a) Coagulation tests in symptomatic adults with suspected infection or confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection; b) Thromboprophylaxis in adults diagnosed with COVID-19 (Risk scales, thromboprophylaxis for outpatient, in-hospital management, and duration of thromboprophylaxis after discharge from hospitalization), c) Diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic complications, and d) Management of people with previous indication of anticoagulant agents. Conclusions: recommendations of this consensus guide clinical decision-making regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of thrombotic phenomena in patients with COVID-19, and represent an agreement that will help decrease the dispersion in clinical practices according to the challenge imposed by the pandemic.


Assuntos
Humanos , Adulto , Consenso , Diagnóstico , COVID-19 , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea , Embolia e Trombose , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Anticoagulantes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...