Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 44(7): 1439-45, 2004 Oct 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15464325

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test how surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) affects early and late survival in a registry of 1,198 post-anterior infarction congestive heart failure (CHF) patients treated by the international Reconstructive Endoventricular Surgery returning Torsion Original Radius Elliptical shape to the left ventricle (RESTORE)team. BACKGROUND: Congestive heart failure may be caused by late left ventricular (LV) dilation after anterior infarction. The infarcted segment is often akinetic rather than dyskinetic because early reperfusion prevents transmural necrosis. Previously, only dyskinetic areas were treated by operation. Surgical ventricular restoration reduces LV volume and creates a more elliptical chamber by excluding scar in either akinetic or dyskinetic segments. METHODS: The RESTORE group applied SVR to 1,198 post-infarction patients between 1998 and 2003. Early and late outcomes were examined, and risk factors were identified. RESULTS: Concomitant procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 95%, mitral valve repair in 22%, and mitral valve replacement in 1%. Overall 30-day mortality after SVR was 5.3% (8.7% with mitral repair vs. 4.0% without repair; p < 0.001). Perioperative mechanical support was uncommon (<9%). Global systolic function improved postoperatively. Ejection fraction (EF) increased from 29.6 +/- 11.0% preoperatively to 39.5 +/- 12.3% postoperatively (p < 0.001). The left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) decreased from 80.4 +/- 51.4 ml/m(2) preoperatively to 56.6 +/- 34.3 ml/m(2) postoperatively (p < 0.001). Overall five-year survival was 68.6 +/- 2.8%. Logistic regression analysis identified EF or=80 ml/m(2), advanced New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and age >or=75 years as risk factors for death. Five-year freedom from hospital readmission for CHF was 78%. Preoperatively, 67% of patients were NYHA functional class III or IV and postoperatively, 85% were class I or II. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical ventricular restoration improves ventricular function and is highly effective therapy in the treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy with excellent five-year outcome.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Ventrículos do Coração/patologia , Ventrículos do Coração/cirurgia , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Idoso , Pressão Sanguínea , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Dilatação Patológica/complicações , Dilatação Patológica/etiologia , Dilatação Patológica/cirurgia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/patologia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Infarto do Miocárdio/patologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Volume Sistólico , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Heart Fail Rev ; 9(4): 287-97, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15886974

RESUMO

Congestive heart failure may be caused by late left ventricular (LV) dilation following anterior infarction. Early reperfusion prevents transmural necrosis, and makes the infarcted segment akinetic rather than dyskinetic. Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) reduces LV volume and creates a more elliptical chamber by excluding scar in either akinetic or dyskinetic segments. The international RESTORE group applied SVR in a registry of 1198 post-infarction patients between 1998 and 2003. Early and late outcomes were examined and risk factors identified.Concomitant procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 95%, mitral valve repair in 22%, and mitral valve replacement in 1%. Overall 30-day mortality after SVR was 5.3% (8.7% with mitral repair vs. 4.0% without repair, p < .001) Perioperative mechanical support was uncommon (< 9%). Global systolic function improved postoperatively, as ejection fraction increased from 29.6 +/- 11.0% to 39.5 +/- 12.3% (p < .001) and left ventricular end systolic volume index decreased from 80.4 +/- 51.4 ml/m(2) to 56.6 +/- 34.3 ml/m(2) (p < .001). Overall 5-year survival was 68.6 +/- 2.8%, Logistic regression analysis identified EF < or = 30%, LVESVI > o = 80 ml/m(2), advanced NYHA functional class, and age > or =75 years as risk factors for death. Five-year freedom from hospital readmission for CHF was 78%. Preoperatively, 67% of patients were class III or IV, and postoperatively 85% were class I or II.SVR improves ventricular function and is highly effective therapy in the treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy with excellent 5-year outcome.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/cirurgia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/cirurgia , Remodelação Ventricular/fisiologia , Idoso , Endocárdio/fisiopatologia , Endocárdio/cirurgia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Ventrículos do Coração/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...