Extensor Tendon Integrity After Percutaneous Placement of Intramedullary Metacarpal Screws: A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary implants are an increasingly common method for fixation of metacarpal fractures. Numerous techniques for instrumentation have been described with varied consideration for the risk of extensor tendon injury. The current cadaveric study evaluates the prevalence and degree of extensor tendon injury and compares percutaneous approaches with different drilling techniques. METHODS: Ninety-six metacarpals (thumbs excluded) from 24 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities were used to compare 2 percutaneous approaches and 2 drilling techniques. This resulted in 4 subgroups available for comparison: oscillate to bone (OB), forward to bone (FB), oscillating through the skin (OS), and forward through the skin (FS). After instrumentation, the extensor tendons were dissected and disruption was characterized. The main outcome measures were tendon "hit rate" and relative extensor tendon defect width. RESULTS: Tendon hit rate was significantly higher in the long finger (LF), that is, 79.2%, compared with other metacarpals: index finger, 20.8%; ring finger, 12.5%; and small finger 25%. The mean relative tendon disruption was significantly less in the OB group (16.05%) compared with the other groups: FB (31.84%), FS (31.50%), and OS (29.85%). CONCLUSION: Retrograde intramedullary screw fixation of metacarpal fractures can be performed using percutaneous approaches without a significant disruption of the extensor mechanism. Instrumentation through a longitudinal stab incision down to the metacarpal head and the use of drill oscillation minimize injury to the extensor tendons. The LF extensor tendon is most at risk with retrograde intramedullary implant placement.

Alternate Graft Options for Staged Flexor Tendon Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study of Hamstring Autografts Compared to Conventional Autografts.

PURPOSE: To compare the semitendinosus and gracilis tendon lengths and diameters to the palmaris longus, plantaris, flexor digitorum profundus, and flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendons in a cadaveric model to evaluate the feasibility of hamstring autograft use for staged flexor tendon reconstruction. METHODS: Fifteen fresh cadavers were evaluated for surgical incisions about the knee, forearm, and hand. All flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), FPL, palmaris longus, plantaris, semitendinosus, and gracilis tendons were harvested from each specimen. Diameter and length were recorded and means with SDs were calculated. The mean diameters of the gracilis and semitendinosus were compared to the mean diameters of the FDP and FPL tendons. The hamstring tendon lengths were then compared in terms of percentage of the palmaris longus and plantaris tendon lengths. RESULTS: The gracilis (18.0 cm) and semitendinosus (19.9 cm) means were notably longer than the palmaris longus (16.0 cm) and shorter than the plantaris (30.0 cm). The average gracilis tendon diameter (3.8 mm) was smaller than the flexor tendon diameters except for the little finger FDP (3.8 mm). The semitendinosus tendon diameter (4.8 mm) was larger than all flexor tendons with the exception of the middle finger FDP (4.6 mm). Average gracilis and semitendinosus tendon diameters were 3.7 mm and 4.5 mm in males, and 3.8 mm and 4.8 mm in females. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the gracilis tendon to have adequate length and diameter for potential autograft use in staged flexor tendon reconstruction in all digits but the little finger. The semitendinosus is larger in diameter than the native flexor tendons, making it a poor autograft option in cases with an intact pulley system. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Common tendon autograft options for flexor tendon reconstruction are variably present, and the use of gracilis and semitendinosus autograft present potential graft options.

Medial Elbow Exposure: Modified Taylor-Scham Versus Flexor Carpi Ulnaris-Split.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the exposure of the coronoid process, anteromedial facet, and anterior band of the medial collateral ligament using the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU)-splitting approach with the Taylor-Scham approach modified with an ulnar nerve transposition. METHODS: Thirty approaches were performed on 15 fresh cadavers using a randomized cross-over design and standardized incision. Access to key anatomic landmarks was assessed, and a calibrated digital image was taken from the surgeon's best perspective of each approach. Images were analyzed using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health) software to calculate the area of osseous exposure. RESULTS: All key anatomic landmarks were visualized using both approaches. The average area of exposure for the Taylor-Scham was 19.5 cm 2 compared with 13.6 cm 2 for the FCU-splitting ( P < 0.0001). The distal extent of the FCU-splitting approach is limited by the ulnar nerve and its branches to the humeral head of the FCU. CONCLUSION: The Taylor-Scham approach provides a more extensile exposure of the anteromedial coronoid and proximal ulna than the FCU-splitting approach while avoiding cross-tensioning of the ulnar nerve.

Redefining the costal margin: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Classical teaching of rib anatomy contends that the false ribs (7th to 10th) fuse anteriorly to form the costal margin of the chest. Slipped rib syndrome consists of false rib subluxation into the thorax with symptomatic impingement of the intercostal nerve. We sought to determine the incidence of this anatomic finding through anatomic study of the costal margin. METHODS: Cadavers were evaluated for mobility and attachment of the ninth and tenth ribs. Experienced anatomists and chest wall surgeons conducted a standardized dissection and assessed rib tip mobility using predefined criteria. Videos of dissections were submitted to a single investigator who reviewed the findings. RESULTS: Costal margins of 40 cadavers (45% male) were evaluated bilaterally. The average age was 83 years ± 11 years. The ninth rib was found to be attached to the eighth rib 100% of the time by an interchondral cartilaginous attachment along the body of the eighth and ninth ribs. Internal subluxation was noted in 19% (15 of 80), and the tip of the rib was mobile in 86% (69 of 80) evaluations. The tenth rib was attached to the ninth rib in 18%(14/80). A "floating" 10th rib was noted in 59% (47 of 80) of specimens. Subluxation was noted in 33% (26 of 60). Half of the ribs that subluxed moved medially to the ninth rib and half moved externally. An upwardly hooked tip was noted in 10% (8 of 80). Ribs with a hooked tip subluxed in 63% (5 of 8), and all of these ribs (5 of 5) moved to the interior of the chest ( p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: The ninth rib is commonly attached to the eighth rib, but the tenth rib is often not attached to the ninth rib. Most commonly, the tenth rib is a "floating" rib. Internal subluxation of the tenth rib as well as the presence of a hooked tip may predispose individuals to the development of "slipped rib syndrome." LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level III.

Prospective Randomized Trial of Standard Left Anterolateral Thoracotomy Versus Modified Bilateral Clamshell Thoracotomy Performed by Emergency Physicians.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Resuscitative thoracotomy is a time-sensitive, lifesaving procedure that may be performed by emergency physicians. The left anterolateral thoracotomy (LAT) is the standard technique commonly used in the United States to gain rapid access to critical intrathoracic structures. However, the smaller incision and subsequent limited exposure may not be optimal for the nonsurgical specialist to complete time-sensitive interventions. The modified bilateral anterior clamshell thoracotomy (MCT) developed by Barts Health NHS Trust clinicians at London's Air Ambulance overcomes these inherent difficulties, maximizes thoracic cavity visualization, and may be the ideal technique for the nonsurgical specialist. The aim of this study is to identify the optimal technique for the nonsurgical-specialist-performed resuscitative thoracotomy. Secondary aims of the study are to identify technical difficulties, procedural concerns, and physician preferences. METHODS: Emergency medicine staff and senior resident physicians were recruited from an academic Level I trauma center. Subjects underwent novel standardized didactic and skills-specific training on both the MCT and LAT techniques. Later, subjects were randomized to the order of intervention and performed both techniques on separate fresh, nonfrozen human cadaver specimens. Success was determined by a board-certified surgeon and defined as complete delivery of the heart from the pericardial sac and subsequent 100% occlusion of the descending thoracic aorta with a vascular clamp. The primary outcome was time to successful completion of the resuscitative thoracotomy technique. Secondary outcomes included successful exposure of the heart, successful descending thoracic aortic cross clamping, successful procedural completion, time to exposure of the heart, time to descending thoracic aortic cross-clamp placement, number and type of iatrogenic injuries, correct anatomic structure identification, and poststudy participant questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixteen emergency physicians were recruited; 15 met inclusion criteria. All participants were either emergency medicine resident (47%) or emergency medicine staff (53%). The median number of previously performed training LATs was 12 (interquartile range 6 to 15) and the median number of previously performed MCTs was 1 (interquartile range 1 to 1). The success rates of our study population for the MCT and LAT techniques were not statistically different (67% versus 40%; difference 27%; 95% confidence interval -61% to 8%). However, staff emergency physicians were significantly more successful with the MCT compared with the LAT (88% versus 25%; difference 63%; 95% CI 9% to 92%). Overall, the MCT also had a significantly higher proportion of injury-free trials compared with the LAT technique (33% versus 0%; difference 33%; 95% CI 57% to 9%). Physician procedure preference favored the MCT over the LAT (87% versus 13%; difference 74%; 95% CI 23% to 97%). CONCLUSION: Resuscitative thoracotomy success rates were lower than expected in this capable subject population. Success rates and procedural time for the MCT and LAT were similar. However, the MCT had a higher success rate when performed by staff emergency physicians, resulted in less periprocedural iatrogenic injuries, and was the preferred technique by most subjects. The MCT is a potentially feasible alternative resuscitative thoracotomy technique that requires further investigation.