A systematic review of the pharmacological approaches against snoring: can we count on the chickens that have hatched?

BACKGROUND: Snoring is the sound produced by the vibration of the soft tissues caused by the air passing through a narrow upper airway during sleep. It is usually associated with the conditions that increase upper airway resistance, but can occur in their absence too (primary snoring). Considering its sheer prevalence, the associated comorbidities, like carotid atherosclerosis and the social disorder that it can represent, treatment for snoring must be considered even in the absence of any other medical condition. Treatment options include conservative approaches like weight reduction, smoking and alcohol cessation, sleep positioning, mechanical nasal dilators, and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to more radical approaches like surgery. Till date, we have no drugs for treating the primary pathology of snoring. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in PUBMED and EMBASE, and we found only nine randomized control trial's and one interventional study focusing on the pharmacotherapy of snoring per se, even as the literature is replete with studies evaluating drug therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. RESULT: Drugs evaluated include protriptyline, pseudoephedrine and domperidone, mometasone, nasal surfactant, Botulinum toxin type A, and some homeopathic and oil-based nasal sprays. The selected studies showed no strength in data and had a great methodological heterogeneity, so it is impossible to compare the analyzed studies. DISCUSSION: Even though there are no consistent data to support pharmacologic treatment for primary snoring, through the critical analysis of these studies, we have discussed about the future directions for clinical trials in this area to arrive at a clinically meaningful decision.

Influence of pre-operative use of serotonergic antidepressants (SADs) on the risk of bleeding in patients undergoing different surgical interventions: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Serotonergic antidepressants (SADs) are one of the most widely prescribed group of drugs. Of late, the use of SADs is being associated with an increased risk of perioperative bleeding. However, the results are inconsistent. The present analysis was planned to evaluate the association between preoperative SADs use and the risk of bleeding/mortality in patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: Studies that had reported the effects of preoperative SADs use on the perioperative bleeding outcomes and/or mortality in adult patients undergoing surgical interventions were identified and evaluated for inclusion in the analysis. Outcomes evaluated were reoperation for bleeding event, requirement of blood/RBC transfusion and mortality. A meta-analysis was conducted, and a pooled estimate of odds ratio (OR) was calculated using the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Eight cohort studies, comprising a total of 79 976 SADs users and 485 336 non-antidepressant users were included in the final analysis. SADs use was not associated with increased risk of requirement of reoperation for bleeding event [OR = 1.48 (0.84-2.62)]. However, there was an increased requirement of transfusion [OR = 1.19(1.09-1.30)], which was not observed in the subgroup of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) [OR = 1.06(0.90-1.24)]. SADs use was associated with a substantial increase in mortality [OR = 1.53 (1.15-2.04)] in patients undergoing CABG but not in the overall population [OR = 1.1 (0.99-1.22)]. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative SADs use is associated with increased bleeding risk with respect to requirement of transfusion; nevertheless, the results should not be generalized to all surgical groups. The divergence between bleeding risk and mortality in CABG surgery patients needs further evaluation.

Preoperative statin therapy is associated with lower requirement of renal replacement therapy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

OBJECTIVES: Acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery is a common complication associated with serious morbidity and mortality. Activation of inflammatory cascade and vascular endothelial dysfunction plays a vital role during the perioperative period leading to AKI. Statins are known to suppress inflammation and improve endothelial dysfunction over and above the cholesterol lowering efficacy. METHODS: Observational studies with a defined population in terms of preoperative statin therapy and no preoperative statin therapy undergoing cardiac surgery (CABG, isolated valve surgery or both) and with reported data on the incidence of acute renal failure/injury and/or mortality were identified and analysed for inclusion in the analysis. Outcomes evaluated were occurrence of postoperative acute kidney injury/failure, requirement of any postoperative renal replacement therapy and short-term all-cause mortality rate. A meta-analysis was conducted and a pooled estimate of odds ratio (OR) was calculated using the inverse variance method. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies with a total population of 24 998 statin users and 22 082 non-statin users were included in the final analysis. PST resulted in a significantly lower incidence of renal replacement therapy in patients undergoing CABG (OR: 0.56 [0.41-0.76]) but not in isolated valve surgery (OR: 1.80 [0.73-4.44]). Also preoperative statin therapy resulted in a significantly lower postoperative mortality (0.72 [0.61-0.84]) irrespective of the type of surgery. There was no effect of preoperative statin therapy on the incidence of AKI in any of the sub-group of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing CABG might derive benefit from preoperative statin therapy in terms of reducing the need for postoperative renal replacement therapy and mortality. However, the uncertainty concerning the reno-protective efficacy of preoperative statin therapy in patients undergoing isolated valve surgery needs further investigation.