Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Can J Cardiol ; 16(10): 1249-54, 2000 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11064299

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can be helpful in distilling the medical research literature for clinicians; however, the guidelines should acknowledge the variable methodological quality used in clinical research by tempering their recommendations with a 'levels of evidence' scale. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proportion of English-language cardiovascular CPGs that provide the user with recommendations graded according to a defined levels of evidence scale. In addition, to evaluate other key aspects important in the critical appraisal of CPGs. METHODS: CPGs for atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction were identified by searching MEDLINE, a reference text of CPGs and the Internet. Each CPG was evaluated using a priori-defined criteria based on the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group's paper on critical appraisal of CPGs, including use of a reproducible search strategy, method of obtaining consensus, peer review and testing in practice. RESULTS: A total of 95 CPGs were evaluated. Only 13% graded their recommendations using a defined levels of evidence scale. In addition, few CPGs documented a reproducible search strategy or peer review process, and none had been formally tested in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting the levels of evidence for recommendations is an important component of CPGs, yet this system is not widely used.


Assuntos
Cardiologia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia
2.
Pharmacotherapy ; 20(9): 1060-5, 2000 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10999498

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adequacy of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) coming to a hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with a history of AF who had been prescribed warfarin and who had the international normalized ratio (INR) measured when they arrived at the hospital. Those who developed AF as a complication during hospitalization were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 1085 patients, 375 (mean age 73 yrs, 56.3% men) were eligible for further evaluation. Most had nonvalvular AF; in 44.5% the INR was subtherapeutic, in 36.5% it was therapeutic, and in 18.9% it was supratherapeutic. Patients admitted for any thromboembolic event and for ischemic stroke were significantly more likely to have subtherapeutic INRs. CONCLUSION: It is well documented in the literature that warfarin is underprescribed, but our results suggest that even in treated patients, about half are inadequately protected from thromboembolism.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Coeficiente Internacional Normatizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Varfarina/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Ann Pharmacother ; 33(9): 910-9, 1999 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10492489

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of a program of intervention by pharmacists on lipid risk management in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. METHODS: Randomized, multicenter (44 sites in Alberta and Saskatchewan) study of community pharmacist intervention versus usual care in 1000 patients. Patients are those at high risk of vascular events (existing atherosclerotic vascular disease, or diabetes with > or = 1 other risk factor). After obtaining consent, the pharmacist calls the Project Office to randomize. Patients allocated to intervention receive a brochure and education about cardiovascular risk factors. Pharmacists also complete a physician contact form, which lists the patient's risk factors, medications, and any recommendations. A point-of-care cholesterol test is performed, the result is discussed with the patient, and it is entered on the contact form. If appropriate, the patient is asked to see his or her primary care physician for further assessment and/or treatment, and the form is faxed to the physician. Patients are followed up at two, four, eight, 12, and 16 weeks. During follow-up visits, pharmacists provide educational reinforcement and check for primary end point occurrence. Patients allocated to usual care receive the brochure only, with minimal follow-up. The primary end point is a composite of measurement of a complete lipid panel by the physician, or addition or modification of lipid-lowering drug therapy. Substudies will evaluate economics (third-party payer and pharmacy manager perspective), patient satisfaction, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: SCRIP (Study of Cardiovascular Risk Intervention by Pharmacists) is a unique ongoing trial that is evaluating a community pharmacist intervention designed to optimize cholesterol risk management in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/organização & administração , Farmacêuticos , Idoso , Colesterol/sangue , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Capacitação em Serviço , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 47(7): 811-8, 1999 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10404924

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence for clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of proven medications in the treatment and prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) in older patients; to summarize Canadian data on treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for younger and older patients with coronary heart disease; to explore the reasons for gaps between best care, based on the evidence of efficacy from trials, and usual care, based on the population effectiveness audits; and to explore potential approaches to closing the care gaps. DESIGN: Review of the recent clinical trial literature on the management of MI, highlighting results in older patients. Review of medication utilization and outcomes data from a series of large, consecutively enrolled patient cohorts with acute MI (N = 7070) in a variety of cardiac care settings (10 centers in five Canadian provinces, including university-based teaching hospitals, community hospitals, cardiologist and family physician out-patient clinics) from 1987 to 1996. RESULTS: There is no qualitative interaction of cardiac therapies: thrombolytics, beta-blockers, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and statins are efficacious in all clinically relevant patient subgroups, including older people. However, there are consistent gaps between usual care and best care, particularly among older patients (in whom there is also a concomitantly higher mortality risk). Repeated multivariate analyses confirm older age to be an independent contributor to increased risk. Use of efficacious medications is, in contrast, consistently associated with increased survival. Analysis of temporal trends suggests beneficial changes in practice patterns and outcomes are possible to achieve. However, "best care" has not been rapidly or completely achieved. Review of strategies to close these care gaps suggests that audit and feedback, critical pathways, and multifactorial interventions involving patients and other members of the healthcare team as well as physicians may be the most efficacious strategies for change. CONCLUSIONS: Despite equal or enhanced efficacy, there is consistently less prescription of proven drugs among older cardiac patients. These care patterns may contribute to their enhanced risk. The causes underlying these practice patterns are complex, and their population impact may be undervalued by clinicians and managers. Improvement of these patterns is difficult, but ultimately it would be beneficial for this presently disadvantaged, readily identified, high risk patient population.


Assuntos
Doença das Coronárias/terapia , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Benchmarking , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Doença das Coronárias/complicações , Doença das Coronárias/mortalidade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Análise Multivariada , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Ann Pharmacother ; 33(6): 674-9, 1999 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10410177

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To define the utilization pattern of nonprescription therapies in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and to compare this pattern with that of an age- and gender-matched control group without any self-reported heart conditions. DESIGN: Survey questionnaire completed by participants at home. SETTING: Ambulatory CHF clinic in a tertiary care hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients attending the clinic between July 1995 and May 1996 who agreed to participate. Control subjects were age- and gender-matched participants identified and approached by participating patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Nonprescription therapies used at least once weekly. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were received from 180 (75%) of the 239 patients who agreed to participate and from 133 controls. Mean age of responding patients was 69 years (63% men). Controls were younger, with a mean age of 64 years (63% men). The most commonly used nonprescription medication categories for both patients and controls, with no significant intergroup differences, were vitamins and minerals (59% patients, 50% controls), pain relievers (48% and 43%, respectively), herbal or health food products (38% and 38%), antacids (26% and 28%), and laxatives (24% and 21%). Significantly fewer patients than controls used cough and cold products (9% vs. 17%; p < 0.05), specifically oral decongestants (0.6% vs. 5%; p < 0.01), and more patients than controls used nutritional supplements (17% vs. 4%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, use of nonprescription therapies by our CHF clinic patients is similar to that of an age- and gender-matched population without a self-reported heart condition. The differences in medication use observed between patients and controls included cough and cold products that might be harmful. This likely reflects appropriate caution with which CHF patients approach nonprescription therapies.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Medicamentos sem Prescrição , Idoso , Alberta/epidemiologia , Terapias Complementares/estatística & dados numéricos , Coleta de Dados , Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
Ann Pharmacother ; 33(3): 289-93, 1999 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10200851

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To define the contemporary practice patterns of digoxin utilization for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: A retrospective medical records audit of 2490 patients with documented AF, from 12 Canadian hospitals and six outpatient clinics, during fiscal year 1993-1994, was conducted. RESULTS: There were 1158 women and 1332 men, with a mean age of 72 years; 956 patients were < 70 years of age and 1534 were > or = 70 years old. The majority of patients had nonvalvular AF (75% of those with a documented etiology). Paroxysmal AF (PAF) was documented in 800 patients, 936 had chronic AF, and 754 had new-onset AF. While the prescribing patterns were heterogeneous, the predominant strategy pursued in all subgroups appeared to be that of achieving rate control. Digoxin was the most commonly prescribed medication (79%) and was prescribed for the majority of patients in all subgroups, including patients with PAF (74%) and patients with a history of chronic AF who were currently in sinus rhythm (83%). Only 10% of the patients with PAF who were prescribed digoxin had congestive heart failure. Similarly, less than 25% of the patients with chronic AF who were prescribed digoxin after conversion to sinus rhythm had evidence of heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of clinical trial evidence supporting either a strategy of antiarrhythmic therapy or rate control with anticoagulation, the appropriateness of the observed prescribing practices cannot be judged. However, digoxin is not the best rate-controlling agent for all patients and may be overused in certain subgroups of patients, such as those with PAF and those successfully converted to sinus rhythm.


Assuntos
Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Digoxina/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Can J Cardiol ; 12(9): 809-13, 1996 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8842134

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Noncardiac mortality in congestive heart failure (CHF) is substantial. OBJECTIVE: To define the specific causes of noncardiac mortality among hospitalized CHF patients. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record audit. SETTING: Three hospitals in British Columbia and Alberta, 1992-93. PATIENTS: A total of 2216 consecutive patients admitted with CHF. MAIN RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 404 of 2216 (18%). Cause of death was cardiac in 290 of 404 (72%) patients, with an average age of 76 years. However, 114 of 404 (28%) deaths, in patients with an average age of 69 years, had noncardiac causes. Four causes accounted for almost 70%, of the noncardiac deaths: cancer (24%); pneumonia (16%); other pulmonary diseases, including embolism (15%); and cerebrovascular disease (11%). Renal disease (9%), gastrointestinal disorders (9%), non-pulmonic sepsis (7%), multiple system failure (5%) and trauma or surgical complications (4%) accounted for most of the remaining noncardiac deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Noncardiac causes produce a substantial proportion of deaths among elderly and sick CHF patients. As the survival of patients with CHF improves, the relative risk of noncardiac mortality in this population will likely increase. However, since hospitalized CHF patients so closely reflect their general population counterparts in terms of cause-specific mortality risk, the search for an ideal therapy might be viewed as a quixotic search for the cure of death.


Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/mortalidade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA