RESUMO
The present outbreak of Human Monkeypox (HMPX) that has begun in May 2022 and has spread across all continents in less than two months has qualitative and quantitative characteristics that make it different from the pattern of human disease previously caused by this virus. It has spread with enormous ease, affects almost exclusively adults, behaves as a sexually transmitted disease and focuses on very specific groups and transmission conditions. The high incidence in the city of Madrid in males that have sex with males (MSM) has allowed us to observe and report the experience with the first 30 cases diagnosed in our institution. Patients presented with febrile symptoms, genital and paragenital skin lesions reminiscent of smallpox, but less extensive and severe. The disease may also cause proctitis, pharyngitis and perioral lesions. The PCR test for diagnostic confirmation has been shown to be very sensitive and effective, not only in skin lesions but also in blood and other fluids such as pharyngeal, rectal exudates and blood. A very high proportion of patients with HMPX also have other sexually transmitted diseases that must be actively detected in this context. The spontaneous evolution of our patients has been good and hospitalization has been practically unnecessary. Transmission to non-sexual cohabitants and health personnel has been nonexistent and the lesions have disappeared in less than 30 days without leaving sequelae and no need for specific antiviral treatment. (AU)
El actual brote de la enfermedad por el virus de la viruela del mono humana (HMPX), que ha comenzado en mayo de 2022 y se ha extendido por todos los continentes en menos de dos meses, tiene unas características cualitativas y cuantitativas que lo diferencian del patrón de enfermedad humana causado anteriormente por este virus. Se ha extendido con enorme facilidad, afecta casi exclusivamente a adultos, se comporta como una enfermedad de transmisión sexual y se centra en grupos y condiciones de transmisión muy específicas. La alta incidencia en la ciudad de Madrid en varones que tienen sexo con varones (HSH) nos ha permitido observar y comunicar la experiencia con los primeros 30 casos diagnosticados en nuestra institución. Los pacientes se presentaron con síntomas febriles, lesiones cutáneas genitales y paragenitales que recuerdan a la viruela, pero menos extensas y graves. La enfermedad también puede causar proctitis, faringitis y lesiones periorales. La prueba PCR para la confirmación del diagnóstico ha demostrado ser muy sensible y eficaz, no sólo en las lesiones cutáneas sino también en la sangre y otros fluidos como los exudados faríngeos y rectales y la sangre. Una proporción muy elevada de pacientes con HMPX presentan también otras enfermedades de transmisión sexual que deben ser detectadas activamente en este contexto. La evolución espontánea de nuestros pacientes ha sido buena y la hospitalización ha sido prácticamente innecesaria. La transmisión a convivientes no sexuales y al personal sanitario ha sido inexistente y las lesiones han desaparecido en menos de 30 días sin dejar secuelas y sin necesidad de tratamiento antiviral específico. (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Mpox/diagnóstico , Mpox/epidemiologia , Mpox/virologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Surtos de DoençasRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Dalbavancin is an antibiotic with activity against gram-positive bacteria that allows early discharge of patients requiring intravenous therapy. Outpatient treatment helps offset hospitalisation costs associated with standard intravenous treatment. Our objective was to assess the cost of disease management, including treatment with dalbavancin, in a Spanish hospital for 1 year, and the hypothetical costs associated with treatment with other therapeutic alternatives to dalbavancin. METHODS: A single-centre, observational, retrospective post-hoc analysis was conducted based on electronic medical records analysing all patients who received dalbavancin treatment throughout 1 year; cost analysis was performed for the whole process. In addition, three scenarios designed on the basis of real clinical practice by clinical experts were hypothesised: (i) individual therapeutic alternative to dalbavancin, (ii) all patients treated with daptomycin, and (iii) all days of dalbavancin as outpatient treatment transformed into hospital stay. Costs were obtained from the hospital. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were treated with dalbavancin; their mean age was 57.9 years, and 70.6% were men. The main reasons for dalbavancin use were outpatient management (61.7%, n = 21) and ensuring treatment adherence (26.5%, n = 9). The main indications were: osteoarticular infection (32.4%) and infective endocarditis (29.4%). One-half (50%) of the infections were due to Staphylococcus aureus (23.5% were methicillin resistant). All patients achieved clinical resolution, and no costs associated with dalbavancin-associated adverse events or re-admissions were reported. The mean total cost of treatment was 22,738 per patient, with the greatest expenditures in interventions (8,413) and hospital stay (6,885). The mean cost of dalbavancin treatment was 3,936; without dalbavancin, this cost could have been increased to 3,324-11,038 depending on the scenario, mainly due to hospital stays. MAIN LIMITATION: Limited sample size obtained from a single centre. CONCLUSION: The economic impact of the management of these infections is high. The cost of dalbavancin is offset by the decreased length of stay.
