RESUMO
Care homes in the UK were disproportionately affected by the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, accounting for almost half of COVID-19 deaths over the course of the period from 6th March - 15th June 2020. Understanding how infectious diseases establish themselves throughout vulnerable communities is crucial for minimising deaths and lowering the total stress on the National Health Service (NHS Scotland). We model the spread of COVID-19 in the health-board of NHS Lothian, Scotland over the course of the first wave of the pandemic with a compartmental Susceptible - Exposed - Infected reported - Infected unreported - Recovered - Dead (SEIARD), metapopulation model. Care home residents, care home workers and the rest of the population are modelled as subpopulations, interacting on a network describing their mixing habits. We explicitly model the outbreaks reproduction rate and care home visitation level over time for each subpopulation, and execute a data fit and sensitivity analysis, focusing on parameters responsible for intra-subpopulation mixing: staff sharing, staff shift patterns and visitation. The results suggest that hospital discharges were not predominantly responsible for the early outbreak in care homes, and that only a few such cases led to infection seeding in care homes by the 6th of March Sensitivity analysis show the main mode of entry into care homes are infections by staff interacting with the general population. Visitation (before cancellation) and staff sharing were less significant in affecting outbreak size. Our model suggests that focusing on the protection and monitoring of staff, followed by reductions in staff sharing and quick cancellations of visitation can significantly reduce future infection attack rates of COVID-19 in care homes.
RESUMO
Restrictions on mobility are a key component of infectious disease controls, preventing the spread of infections to as yet unexposed areas, or to regions which have previously eliminated outbreaks. However, even under the most severe restrictions, some travel must inevitably continue, at the very minimum to retain essential services. For COVID-19, most countries imposed severe restrictions on travel at least as soon as it was clear that containment of local outbreaks would not be possible. Such restrictions are known to have had a substantial impact on the economy and other aspects of human health, and so quantifying the impact of such restrictions is an essential part of evaluating the necessity for future implementation of similar measures. In this analysis, we built a simulation model using National statistical data to record patterns of movements to work, and implement levels of mobility recorded in real time via mobile phone apps. This model was fitted to the pattern of deaths due to COVID-19 using approximate Bayesian inference. Our model is able to recapitulate mortality considering the number of deaths and datazones (DZs, which are areas containing approximately 500-1000 residents) with deaths, as measured across 32 individual council areas (CAs) in Scotland. Our model recreates a trajectory consistent with the observed data until 1st of July. According to the model, most transmission was occurring "locally" (i.e. in the model, 80% of transmission events occurred within spatially defined "communities" of approximately 100 individuals). We show that the net effect of the various restrictions put into place in March can be captured by a reduction in transmission down to 12% of its pre-lockdown rate effective 28th March. By comparing different approaches to reducing transmission, we show that, while the timing of COVID-19 restrictions influences the role of the transmission rate on the number of COVID-related deaths, early reduction in long distance movements does not reduce death rates significantly. As this movement of individuals from more infected areas to less infected areas has a minimal impact on transmission, this suggests that the fraction of population already immune in infected communities was not a significant factor in these early stages of the national epidemic even when local clustering of infection is taken into account. The best fit model also shows a considerable influence of the health index of deprivation (part of the "index of multiple deprivations") on mortality. The most likely value has the CA with the highest level of health-related deprivation to have on average, a 2.45 times greater mortality rate due to COVID-19 compared to the CA with the lowest, showing the impact of health-related deprivation even in the early stages of the COVID-19 national epidemic.
