The Triple-negative Breast Cancer Cell Line MDA-MB 231 Is Specifically Inhibited by the Ionophore Salinomycin.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Tumour cells of the profile CD44+/CD24low/- have a high tumorigenic potential. Salinomycin can specifically inhibit the growth of these cells. Herein, we investigated the effects of salinomycin on the viability and migration of triple negative breast cancer cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed two cell lines: i) triple-negative MDA-MB 231 breast cancer cells and ii) a cytokeratin 18-transfected, re-differentiated subclone of the MDA-MB 231 cell line. The viability was determined using an MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) test, and the migration was determined using 24-h videography. The expression of oestrogen receptor was determined using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Salinomycin reduces all migration parameters in MDA-MB 231 cells. A significant correlation was found between increasing salinomycin concentrations and loss of cell viability, which was significantly less noticeable in the transfected control cells. CONCLUSION: With salinomycin there is a specific inhibition of MDA-MB 231 cells. Since MDA-MB 231 has over 90% cells with the profile CD44+/CD24low/-, these might represent a possible point of attack for salinomycin.

Influence of vascular endothelial growth factor and radiation on gap junctional intercellular communication in glioblastoma multiforme cell lines.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly aggressive glial brain tumor with an unfavorable prognosis despite all current therapies including surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. One characteristic of this tumor is a strong synthesis of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an angiogenesis factor, followed by pronounced vascularization. VEGF became a target in the treatment of GBM, for example with bevacizumab or the tyrosine kinase inhibitor axitinib, which blocks VEGF receptors. To improve patients' prognosis, new targets in the treatment of GBM are under investigations. The role of gap junctions in GBM remains unknown, but some experimental therapies affect these intercellular channels to treat the tumor. Gap junctions are composed of connexins to allow the transport of small molecules between adjacent cells through gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC). Based on data derived from astrocytes in former studies, which show that VEGF is able to enhance GJIC, the current study analyzed the effects of VEGF, radiation therapy and VEGF receptor blockade by axitinib on GJIC in human GBM cell lines U-87 and U-251. While VEGF is able to induce GJIC in U-251 cells but not in U-87 cells, radiation enhances GJIC in both cell lines. VEGF receptor blockade by axitinib diminishes radiation induced effects in U-251 partially, while increases GJIC in U-87 cells. Our data indicate that VEGF and radiation are both modifying components of GJIC in pathologic brain tumor tissue.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Irradiation, and Axitinib Have Diverse Effects on Motility and Proliferation of Glioblastoma Multiforme Cells.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor. It is highly aggressive with an unfavorable prognosis for the patients despite therapies including surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy. One important characteristic of highly vascularized GBM is the strong expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF has become a new target in the treatment of GBM, and targeted therapies such as the VEGF-receptor blocker axitinib are in clinical trials. Most studies focus on VEGF-induced angiogenesis, but only very few investigations analyze autocrine or paracrine effects of VEGF on the tumor cells. In this study, we examined the impact of VEGF, irradiation, and axitinib on cell proliferation and cell motility in human GBM cell lines U-251 and U-373. VEGF receptor 2 was shown to be expressed within both cell lines by using PCR and immunochemistry. Moreover, we performed 24-h videography to analyze motility, and a viability assay for cell proliferation. We observed increasing effects of VEGF and irradiation on cell motility in both cell lines, as well as strong inhibiting effects on cellular motility by VEGF-receptor blockade using axitinib. Moreover, axitinib diminished irradiation induced accelerating effects. While VEGF stimulation or irradiation did not affect cell proliferation, axitinib significantly decreased cell proliferation in both cell lines. Therefore, the impairment of VEGF signaling might have a crucial role in the treatment of GBM.

Effect of Whole-abdominal Irradiation on Penetration Depth of Doxorubicin in Normal Tissue After Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a Post-mortem Swine Model.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the impact of whole-abdominal irradiation on local penetration of doxorubicin into the peritoneum and the abdominal organs in a post-mortem swine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Doxorubicin was aerosolized into the abdominal cavity of swine at a pressure of 12 mmHg CO2 at room temperature (25°). One swine was subjected to pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) using Micropump© without irradiation; the second one received 2 Gy and the third one 7 Gy whole-abdominal irradiation, 15 min prior to PIPAC application. Samples of the peritoneal surface were extracted at different positions from within the abdominal cavity. In-tissue doxorubicin penetration was measured using fluorescence microscopy on frozen thin sections. RESULTS: The depth of penetration of doxorubicin was found to be wide-ranging, between 17 µm on the surface of the stomach and 348 µm in the small intestine. The penetration depth into the small intestine was 348 µm, 312 µm and 265 µm for PIPAC alone, PIPAC with 2 Gy irradiation and PIPAC with 7 Gy irradiation, respectively (p<0.05). The penetration into the liver was 64 µm, 55 µm and 40 µm, respectively (p=0.05). CONCLUSION: Irradiation was not found to increase the depth of doxorubicin penetration into normal tissue in the post-mortem swine model. A reduction of doxorubicin penetration was observed after application of higher irradiation doses. Further studies are warranted to determine if irradiation can be used safely as chemopotentiating agent for patients with peritoneal metastases treated with PIPAC.

Extracranial oral cavity metastasis from glioblastoma multiforme: A case report.

Glioblastoma multiforme is the most common primary malignant brain tumor. The clinical outcome following diagnosis remains extremely poor. The treatment of choice is wide surgical resection of the visible tumor, frequently followed by adjuvant combined radiochemotherapy (RCTx) with temozolomide as the chemotherapeutic agent. Extracranial metastases are extremely rare, with <200 cases of extracranial metastases from glioblastoma multiforme reported in the literature to date. We herein present a case of a patient suffering from a fast-growing metastasis to the oral cavity, completely filling the buccal cavity within 2 weeks, as the only manifestation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme following initial surgical resection and adjuvant RCTx.

Evaluating the Effect of Micropump© Position, Internal Pressure and Doxorubicin Dosage on Efficacy of Pressurized Intra-peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in an Ex Vivo Model.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel clinical approach to the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. A well-established, not anatomic ex vivo PIPAC model was used to investigate the influence of changes in internal pressure, distance of the Micropump(©) (MIP) to the distributing surface and the drug concentration on the penetration depth of doxorubicin in the target tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Doxorubicin was aerosolized in an ex vivo PIPAC model using a hermetic container system mimicking the abdominal cavity. Fresh post-mortem swine peritoneum was cut into proportional samples. Tissue specimens were spatially placed at 4 different spots within the box: P1, on the distributing surface of the box, directly opposite to MIP; P2, on the side wall of the box; P3, on the ceiling of the box; P4, on the distributing surface with a partial cover. Impact of changes in the following parameters were analyzed and compared with clinically established values (CEVs) at our center: pressure (CEV=12 mmHg), distance of the MIP from the distributing surface (CEV=8 cm) and doxorubicin concentration (CEV=3 mg/50 ml). In-tissue doxorubicin penetration depth was measured using fluorescence microscopy on frozen thin sections. RESULTS: Tissue positioning in the box had a significant impact on drug penetration after PIPAC with CEV. Under CEV conditions, the highest drug penetration depth was observed in the tissue placed on the distributing surface directly opposite to the MIP (P1: 351 µm, P2: 77 µm, P3: 66 µm, P4: 34 µm). A closer positioning of the MIP lead to a significantly higher mean depth penetration of doxorubicin in the P1 in contrast to other samples in which a reduced drug penetration was observed (1 cm vs. 8 cm distance from MIP to the distributing surface, P1 at 1 cm: 469 µm vs. P1 at 8 cm: 351 µm, p<0.0001; P2 at 1 cm: 25 µm vs. P2 at 8 cm: 77 µm, p<0.0001; P3 at 1 cm: 21 µm vs. P3 at 8 cm: 66 µm, p<0.001; P4 at 1 cm: 13 µm vs. P4 at 8 cm: 39 µm, p=0.021). Higher doxorubicin concentrations led to a highly significant increase of drug penetration in P1 (1 cm vs. 8 cm, p<0.0001), but only a little significant increase in other samples. An increase of internal pressure did not show a significant increase in penetration depth of doxorubicin. CONCLUSION: Our ex vivo data suggest that a higher pressure does not increase the penetration deepness of doxorubicin. Higher drug dosage and a closer positioning of the MIP toward the target lead to a higher penetration of doxorubicin within the samples. A more homogeneous penetration within all targets cannot be achieved by changing drug concentration, position of the nozzle or pressure increase.

Irradiation Does Not Increase the Penetration Depth of Doxorubicin in Normal Tissue After Pressurized Intra-peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in an Ex Vivo Model.

AIM: To compare the impact of single fractional with bi-fractional irradiation on the depth of doxorubicin penetration into the normal tissue after pressurized intra-peritoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in our ex vivo model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fresh post mortem swine peritoneum was cut into 12 proportional sections. Two control samples were treated with PIPAC only (no irradiation), one sample on day 1, the other on day 2. Five samples were irradiated with 1, 2, 4, 7 or 14 Gy followed by PIPAC. Four samples were treated on day one with 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5 or 7 Gy and with the same radiation dose 24 h later followed by PIPAC. Doxorubicin was aerosolized in an ex vivo PIPAC model at 12 mmHg/36°C. In-tissue doxorubicin penetration was measured using fluorescence microscopy on frozen thin sections. RESULTS: Doxorubicin penetration (DP) after PIPAC for the control samples was 407 µm and 373 µm, respectively. DP for samples with single fraction irradiation was 396 µm after 1 Gy, 384 µm after 2 Gy, 327 µm after 4 Gy, 280 µm after 7 Gy and 243 µm after 14 Gy. DP for samples with 2 fractions of irradiation was 376 µm after 0.5+0.5 Gy, 363 µm after 1+1 Gy, 372 µm after 2+2 Gy, 341 µm after 3.5+3.5 and 301 µm after 7+7 Gy irradiation. Fractionating of the irradiation did not significantly change DP into normal tissue. CONCLUSION: Irradiation does not increase the penetration depth of doxorubicin into the normal tissue but might have a limiting impact on penetration and distribution of doxorubicin. Further studies are warranted to investigate the impact of addition of irradiation to PIPAC of tumor cells and to find out if irradiation can be used safely as chemopotenting agent for patients with peritoneal metastases treated with PIPAC.

Effect of Irradiation on Tissue Penetration Depth of Doxorubicin after Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a Novel Ex-Vivo Model.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to assess the impact of irradiation on the tissue penetration depth of doxorubicin delivered during Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC). METHODS: Fresh post mortem swine peritoneum was cut into 10 proportional sections. Except for 2 control samples, all received irradiation with 1, 2, 7 and 14 Gy, respectively. Four samples received PIPAC 15 minutes after irradiation and 4 other after 24 hours. Doxorubicin was aerosolized in an ex-vivo PIPAC model at 12 mmHg/36°C. In-tissue doxorubicin penetration was measured using fluorescence microscopy on frozen thin sections. RESULTS: Doxorubicin penetration after PIPAC (15 minutes after irradiation) was 476 ± 74 µm for the control sample, 450 ± 45µm after 1 Gy (p > 0.05), 438 ± 29 µm after 2 Gy (p > 0.05), 396 ± 32 µm after 7 Gy (p = 0.005) and 284 ± 57 after 14 Gy irradiation (p < 0.001). The doxorubicin penetration after PIPAC (24 hours after irradiation) was 428 ± 77 µm for the control sample, 393 ± 41 µm after 1 Gy (p > 0.05), 379 ± 56 µm after 2 Gy (p > 0.05), 352 ± 53 µm after 7 Gy (p = 0.008) and 345 ± 53 after 14 Gy irradiation (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher (fractional) radiation dose might reduce the tissue penetration depth of doxorubicin in our ex-vivo model. However, irradiation with lower (fractional) radiation dose does not affect the tissue penetration negatively. Further studies are warranted to investigate if irradiation can be used safely as chemopotenting agent for patients with peritoneal metastases treated with PIPAC.

Treatment Results of MammoSite Catheter in Combination with Whole-breast Irradiation.

AIM: To report the initial outcomes of patients treated with the MammoSite brachytherapy device (MSBT) as a boost followed by external whole-breast irradiation (WBI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2011 to March 2014, 107 patients (typically with pT1-2, pN0-1, M0 disease) were treated with breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant radiotherapy with MSBT (15 Gy in 2.5-Gy fractions) followed by WBI (median=50.4 Gy). Toxicity was classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. The median follow-up was 21 months. RESULTS: To date, no ipsilateral breast-tumor recurrences have been observed; 102 patients (95%) were alive at last follow-up. Two patients (2%) developed distant metastases. Five patients (5%) died during follow-up, only one as a result of breast cancer. The 2-year disease-free survival was 95±3%. The incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic seroma in 90 days after MSBT was 28% and 10%, respectively. Infectious mastitis was observed in three patients (3%), who were treated successfully with antibiotics. Only three patients (3%) developed RT-induced dermatitis greater than grade 2 after WBI. CONCLUSION: The boost technique used in this study seems to provide excellent local control with acceptable toxicity, similar to the results observed with other forms of interstitial accelerated partial-breast irradiation as a boost. Long-term follow-up is necessary to refine the patient selection criteria and to assess efficacy and late toxicities.