Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Health Econ Policy Law ; 6(1): 65-84, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20199714

RESUMO

This article analyses the European Union policymaking process regarding tobacco advertising. While others already highlighted the importance of intergovernmental bargaining between member states to explain the outcome of the tobacco advertising case, the main aim of this article is to identify the use of escape routes by the Commission, the European Parliament, the Council and interest groups that played an important role in overcoming the deadlock. When looking at the different institutions that structure policymaking, we argue that indeed focusing on escape routes provides a clear insight in the process and in what strategies were necessary to 'make Europe work'. In the end, it appears to be a combination of escape routes that resulted in the final decision.


Assuntos
Publicidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Formulação de Políticas , Indústria do Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , União Europeia , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto
2.
J Health Polit Policy Law ; 34(6): 979-1010, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20018988

RESUMO

After lengthening the duration of patents to twenty years in 1984, the pharmaceutical industry has turned to data exclusivity as a major vehicle for extending market protection, even after patents expire. Such protections give companies the power to tax consumers for innovation by charging above-market prices. This article draws upon unique information to describe how key actors lengthened data exclusivity for patented drugs to postpone generic competition in the European Union (EU) just before ten new members joined it. We explore the political route and the interests of different actors to understand the process by which industrial interests are translated into legal realities in the world's largest harmonized market. Several factors influenced the outcome, including the role of the pharmaceutical unit of the Directorate General for Enterprise of the European Commission in promoting the interests of the innovative branch of the industry, the time pressure to find a viable compromise before EU enlargement, and the heterogeneous preferences of the other actors. The case illustrates the inherent tension between the desire of both health care administrators and patients for high-quality, low-cost medicines and the objective of the innovator pharmaceutical industry to find and approve new drugs that are price protected and sell them in a way that maximizes revenues.


Assuntos
Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , União Europeia/organização & administração , Patentes como Assunto , Formulação de Políticas , Custos de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústria Farmacêutica/organização & administração , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Competição Econômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Legislação de Medicamentos/economia , Política
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...