Population pharmacokinetics modeling and analysis of foretinib in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.

Foretinib is a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, including MET and VEGFR, with the potential for treatment of solid tumors. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) pathogenesis is associated with overexpression of MET, and physiologic changes in the livers of HCC patients may decrease CYP3A isozyme-mediated metabolism of foretinib. A population pharmacokinetic model of foretinib was developed to explore the effect of tumor type, formulation, and other covariates. Data from 1 HCC study in Asia and 3 non-HCC studies in the United States with varying foretinib regimens and formulations were used for analysis. A 2-compartment model with a linear first-order absorption and elimination and lag time in absorption adequately described foretinib pharmacokinetics in 132 advanced non-HCC and HCC patients and identified an effect of formulations on bioavailability. The bisphosphate salt capsules and freebase tablets had a relative bioavailability 37% and 20% higher, respectively, than the solution formulation. HCC patients had ≈19.6% lower mean clearance (70.14 L/h), ≈16% lower mean volume of distribution (1725.6 L), and higher dose-normalized exposure compared with non-HCC patients. This could be a result of differences in metabolism in HCC patients, body weight, or activity of CYP3A isozymes between Asian and Western cancer patients.

A pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety study of intravenous cyclophosphamide with an oral casopitant antiemetic regimen in cancer patients.

Casopitant is a potent and selective neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist formerly under development for a number of indications, including the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This study was an open-label, randomized, multi-center, two-period crossover casopitant-cyclophosphamide interaction study. Subjects were cancer patients receiving cyclophosphamide based chemotherapy. The objectives of the study were to assess the effect of 3-day, repeat-dose, 150 mg oral casopitant on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics (white blood cell count) of single-dose IV cyclophosphamide. PK data from 14 evaluable subjects showed the geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% CI) for cyclophosphamide and the metabolite 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide AUC (with:without casopitant) were 1.03 (0.975, 1.09) and 0.948 (0.835, 1.08), respectively. Administration of casopitant was well tolerated and did not impact the safety profile of the treatment regimen. Casopitant did not affect the expected bone marrow toxicity of cyclophosphamide. Co-administration of 150 mg oral casopitant with single-dose IV cyclophosphamide did not appear to result in a clinically relevant change in cyclophosphamide or 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide exposure or safety.

An open-label study of the safety and tolerability of pazopanib in combination with FOLFOX6 or CapeOx in patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although combining targeted agents with conventional, first-line cytotoxic therapy has improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, further improvements in outcomes and tolerability are needed. METHODS: This phase I study evaluated the feasibility of combining oral pazopanib, an agent that targets multiple proangiogenic factors, with FOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) or CapeOx (oxaliplatin and capecitabine). This phase I study evaluated the optimally tolerated regimen of daily pazopanib (dose-escalated) plus standard FOLFOX6 or CapeOx in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. At the optimally tolerated regimen, each cohort was expanded to further evaluate safety and clinical response. RESULTS: The optimally tolerated regimens were pazopanib 800 mg plus FOLFOX6 and pazopanib 800 mg plus reduced CapeOx (capecitabine 850 mg/m(2)). The most commonly reported adverse events in the FOLFOX6 cohorts included decreased appetite, neutropenia, diarrhea, peripheral neuropathy, and vomiting. Similarly, the most commonly reported adverse events in the CapeOx cohorts included fatigue, vomiting, and decreased appetite. The overall response rate was 40 % (8/20 patients) in the pazopanib plus FOLFOX6 cohorts and 38 % (8/21 patients) in the pazopanib plus CapeOx cohorts. CONCLUSION: Pazopanib combined with FOLFOX6 or reduced CapeOx was adequately tolerated in this patient population.

A Phase 1 dose-escalation study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily oral foretinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors.

Foretinib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor targeting MET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2, RON, KIT, and AXL kinases. In this Phase 1, open-label, non-randomized study, foretinib was administered once daily at doses of 60 mg, 80 mg, 100 mg, or 120 mg for 28 days. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess the safety and tolerability of the daily oral administration schedule. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and assessment of tumor response. Patients had histologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable solid tumors for which no standard treatments existed and all received oral foretinib once daily. Dose escalation was planned as a conventional "3+3" design with an expansion at the MTD for collection of additional safety and pharmacokinetic information. Thirty-seven patients were treated across four dose levels. The MTD was established as 80 mg foretinib. Dose-limiting toxicities were hypertension, dehydration, and diarrhea. The most common adverse events included fatigue, hypertension, nausea, and diarrhea. Twenty-three of 31 patients (74 %) had a best response of stable disease. No patient had a confirmed partial or complete response. At the MTD, steady state was achieved by approximately 2 weeks, with average post-dose time to maximum concentration, peak concentration, and trough concentration of 4 h, 46 ng/mL, and 24 ng/mL, respectively. In patients treated at the MTD, soluble MET and VEGF-A plasma levels significantly increased (P<0.003) and soluble VEGFR2 plasma levels significantly decreased from baseline (P<0.03). The MTD of foretinib bisphosphate salt was determined to be 80 mg once daily.

Phase II and biomarker study of the dual MET/VEGFR2 inhibitor foretinib in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Foretinib is an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting MET, VEGF, RON, AXL, and TIE-2 receptors. Activating mutations or amplifications in MET have been described in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of foretinib in patients with PRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled onto the study in two cohorts with different dosing schedules of foretinib: cohort A, 240 mg once per day on days 1 through 5 every 14 days (intermittent arm); cohort B, 80 mg daily (daily dosing arm). Patients were stratified on the basis of MET pathway activation (germline or somatic MET mutation, MET [7q31] amplification, or gain of chromosome 7). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Overall, 74 patients were enrolled, with 37 in each dosing cohort. ORR by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 was 13.5%, median progression-free survival was 9.3 months, and median overall survival was not reached. The presence of a germline MET mutation was highly predictive of a response (five of 10 v five of 57 patients with and without germline MET mutations, respectively). The most frequent adverse events of any grade associated with foretinib were fatigue, hypertension, gastrointestinal toxicities, and nonfatal pulmonary emboli. CONCLUSION: Foretinib demonstrated activity in patients with advanced PRCC with a manageable toxicity profile and a high response rate in patients with germline MET mutations.

A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of the anticancer MET inhibitor foretinib free base tablet formulation to bisphosphate salt capsule formulation in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This phase I, open-label, randomized, 2-part crossover study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of single doses of the anticancer MET inhibitor foretinib (formerly known as GSK1363089, EXEL-2880 and XL-880) free base tablet formulation compared to a bisphosphate salt capsule formulation (Part 1), and assessed the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of the bisphosphate salt capsule administered 3 times a week in cancer patients (Part 2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In Part 1, patients were randomized in a crossover manner to receive a single oral dose of foretinib formulated as a bisphosphate salt capsule (240 mg; 183 mg free base equivalent) followed one week later by a single dose of a free base tablet (180 mg), or vice versa where the treatment sequence was reversed. In Part 2, patients self-administered oral doses of bisphosphate salt capsules (200 mg) 3 times a week until disease progression. RESULTS: Twelve patients with solid tumors were enrolled and completed Part 1, and 10 patients continued into Part 2. Most AEs were mild or moderate in severity. The most common drug-related AEs were fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea. The least-squares (LS) mean total area under the curve was 3144 and 3514 ng*h/mL for the free base tablet and bisphosphate salt capsule, respectively, with a ratio of 0.89 (90% confidence interval, CI: 0.69, 1.16). The LS mean maximal concentration (Cmax) was 81.6 and 98.5 ng/mL for the free base and bisphosphate salt, respectively, with a ratio of 0.83 (90% confidence interval, CI: 0.67, 1.02). The time to reach Cmax was ∼4 h for both formulations. The pharmacokinetics of foretinib were not clinically different between the 2 formulations. Of the 10 patients assessed for efficacy, 3 patients achieved stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Foretinib was well tolerated as single doses of both the free base and bisphosphate salt formulations. The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of the 2 formulations were not clinically different. The bisphosphate salt formulation was well tolerated on a 3-times a week dosing schedule, and reached steady-state plasma concentration after 2 weeks.

Effect of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of casopitant, a NK-1 receptor antagonist.

Two studies were conducted in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic or renal impairment and subjects with normal organ function to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of casopitant and to assess its safety in these populations. A total of 26 subjects were enrolled in the hepatic impairment study and 18 subjects in the renal impairment study. All subjects received oral casopitant 100 mg once-daily for 5 days. Casopitant area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased 11% and 24% in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment, respectively, on Day 1, compared with subjects with normal hepatic function; a similar increase was observed on Day 5. The AUC of the active major metabolite, GSK525060, was reduced 29% and 19% on Days 1 and 5, respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, but not altered by mild hepatic impairment. Casopitant AUC increased 34% and 22% on Day 1 in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment, respectively, and 28% and 11% on Day 5, respectively, compared with subjects with normal renal function. GSK525060 AUC was increased 17% and 24% on Days 1 and 5, respectively, in subjects with mild renal impairment; but did not significantly change in subjects with moderate renal impairment. Further age-adjusted analysis showed no meaningful effect of renal impairment on casopitant or GSK525060 AUC. Plasma protein binding of casopitant and GSK525060 was similar in all subjects. The pharmacokinetics of casopitant is not altered to a clinically significant extent in subjects with mild or moderate, hepatic or renal impairment. The impact of severe hepatic or renal impairment was not evaluated.

Lack of effect of casopitant on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: The neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, casopitant, is a weak-to-moderate inhibitor of cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4 (CYP3A) and has the potential to inhibit the metabolism of CYP3A substrates such as docetaxel. METHODS: Fourteen cancer patients were enrolled in this phase 1, open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study. Intravenous (i.v.) docetaxel was coadministered with oral ondansetron and dexamethasone with (Regimen B) or without (Regimen A) 150 mg single-dose oral casopitant. RESULTS: The geometric least-squares mean Regimen B: Regimen A ratios (90% confidence interval) for docetaxel maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 0.97 (0.83, 1.12) and 1.06 (0.94, 1.19), respectively. Coadministration of casopitant and docetaxel was well tolerated, with adverse event profiles and absolute neutrophil count nadirs similar for both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: C(max) and AUC of docetaxel were similar when given as monotherapy or when given in combination with casopitant. Likewise, absolute neutrophil count nadirs were similar for docetaxel alone or docetaxel with casopitant.

Effect of single and repeat doses of casopitant on the pharmacokinetics of CYP450 3A4 substrates midazolam and nifedipine.

AIM: To evaluate the impact of single and repeated doses casopitant on the pharmacokinetics of single dose midazolam and nifedipine (CYP3A substrates) in healthy subjects. The effect on debrisoquine metabolism (CYP2D6 substrate) was also assessed. METHODS: Three open-label studies were conducted in healthy subjects. In the first study subjects received single dose 50 or 100 mg oral casopitant, single dose 5 mg oral midazolam and single dose 10 mg oral debrisoquine. In the other two studies subjects received repeated doses of 10 mg (study 2), 30, or 120 mg oral casopitant and single doses of 5 mg oral midazolam (study 2) and single doses of 10 mg oral nifedipine (study 3). Plasma concentration-time data were analyzed using standard non-compartmental methods. The effect of casopitant on all probes was assessed using geometric means ratios and corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The AUC(0,∞) of midazolam was increased 1.44-fold (90% CI 1.35, 1.54) and 1.52-fold (90% CI 1.41, 1.65) after co-administration with a single dose of 50 or 100 mg casopitant, respectively. Debrisoquine metabolism was unchanged. After 3 days of casopitant administration, midazolam AUC(0,∞) was increased 1.45- (90% CI 1.32, 1.59), 2.02- (90% CI 1.75, 2.32), and 2.67-fold (90% CI 2.18, 3.27) after co-administration with 10, 30 or 120 mg casopitant, respectively. After 14 days of casopitant administration, midazolam AUC(0,∞) was increased 1.51- (90% CI 1.40, 1.63) to 3.49-fold (90% CI 2.98, 4.08). After 3 days of casopitant administration, nifedipine AUC(0,∞) was increased 1.56- (90% CI 1.37, 1.78) and 1.77-fold (90% CI 1.54, 2.04) after co-administration with 30 or 120 mg casopitant, respectively. Similar increases in nifedipine exposure were observed after 14 days of casopitant administration. CONCLUSIONS: Casopitant is a dose- and duration-dependent weak to moderate inhibitor of CYP3A.

Effect of casopitant, a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of steady-state warfarin.

Casopitant, a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist under investigation for the prevention of postoperative and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, is a weak to moderate inhibitor of CYP3A and a moderate inducer of CYP2C9 in vitro. Furthermore, both CYP enzymes are involved in the metabolism of R- and S-warfarin, respectively. This clinical study was conducted to explore the potential drug-drug interaction between casopitant and warfarin. In total, 97 healthy participants were enrolled and 54 completed the study. Participants received individualized daily dosing of warfarin to an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.3 to 2.3 over a 14-day period (period 1). Immediately following period 1, participants entered period 2 and were randomized to receive either regimen A (oral casopitant [150 mg day 1, 50 mg days 2 and 3] and warfarin [days 1-10]) or regimen B (oral casopitant 60 mg and warfarin [days 1-14]). INR assessments were performed daily. The steady-state C(max) and AUC of R- and S-warfarin were not altered by regimen A, but R-warfarin AUC was increased 1.31-fold (90% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22, 1.41), and S-warfarin AUC was increased 1.27-fold (90% CI: 1.18, 1.38) on day 14 in regimen B. Steady-state INR values were not affected by either casopitant regimen.

Ketoconazole and rifampin significantly affect the pharmacokinetics, but not the safety or QTc interval, of casopitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist.

Casopitant, an antiemetic, is a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist metabolized primarily by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Three phase 1 studies with 131 healthy subjects examined the impact of a strong CYP3A inhibitor (ketoconazole) and inducer (rifampin) on the pharmacokinetics and safety of casopitant. Oral casopitant was administered alone (study 1, 100-mg single dose; study 2, 150 mg on day 1, 50 mg on days 2 and 3; study 3, 150-mg single dose) with either 400 mg daily of oral ketoconazole or 600 mg daily of oral rifampin. Ketoconazole increased the maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration time curve to the last sampling time, t (AUC(0-t)) of single-dose casopitant 2.7-fold and 12-fold and increased the C(max) of 3-day casopitant 2.5-fold on day 1 and 2.9-fold on day 3, whereas AUC((0-tau)) increased 4.3-fold on day 1 and 5.8-fold on day 3. Neither safety signals nor prolongation of Fredericia-corrected QT was observed at these increased exposures in study 2. Repeat-dose rifampin reduced the C(max) and AUC((0-t)) of casopitant 96% and 90%, respectively. These clinical studies confirmed the role of CYP3A in the metabolism and disposition of casopitant. Coadministration of casopitant with strong inhibitors of CYP3A is likely to increase plasma exposure of casopitant, whereas coadministration with strong inducers of CYP3A is likely to decrease casopitant exposure and compromise efficacy.

Effect of casopitant, a novel NK-1 antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and granisetron.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the impact of casopitant, a novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist under investigation for the prevention of postoperative and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, on the pharmacokinetics of the commonly prescribed 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 3 receptor antagonists, dolasetron or granisetron. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a phase I, open-label, two-part, two-period, single-sequence study, two cohorts of healthy subjects received either oral dolasetron (100 mg once daily for 3 days) or oral granisetron (2 mg once daily for 3 days) alone (period 1) and combined with oral casopitant, 150 mg day 1, 50 mg days 2 and 3 (period 2). Pharmacokinetics of hydrodolasetron and granisetron were assessed on days 1 and 3 of each period. Log-transformed area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax were statistically analyzed by performing an analysis of variance. Eighteen subjects were enrolled in the dolasetron cohort; nine subjects were CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and nine subjects were CYP2D6 poor metabolizers. Nineteen subjects were enrolled in the granisetron cohort. RESULTS: The largest changes in hydrodolasetron exposure after coadministration with casopitant were seen in CYP2D6 EMs, with a 24% increase in hydrodolasetron AUC on day 1 and 30% increase in Cmax on days 1 and 3. All other changes in hydrodolasetron exposure were <20%, and granisetron exposure was not altered to any relevant extent (<11%). CONCLUSION: None of the changes observed are considered clinically meaningful, and coadministration of casopitant with dolasetron or granisetron was well tolerated.

A phase I study of a new nucleoside analogue, OSI-7836, using two administration schedules in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of the novel nucleoside analogue OSI-7836 in patients with advanced solid malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: OSI-7836 was initially given as a 60-minute i.v. infusion on day 1 every 21 days. In view of its dose-limiting toxicities, the administration time was amended to a 5-minute bolus, and subsequently, the schedule was amended to weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest. Blood and urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetic studies. Analyses of cytokines and lymphocyte subsets were added later in the study to elucidate a mechanism for the severe fatigue and lymphocyte depletion observed in earlier patients. RESULTS: Thirty patients received a total of 61 treatment cycles. Fatigue was the main dose-limiting toxicity. Maximum-tolerated dose was defined as 300 mg/m2 in the 60-minute infusion, (three times per week) schedule; 400 mg/m2 in the 5-minute bolus infusion, (three times per week) schedule; and 100 mg/m2 in the weekly schedule. Other common toxicities were nausea, vomiting, rash, fever, and a flu-like syndrome. There were no clinically significant hematologic toxicities. Following the initial dose, OSI-7836 was eliminated from plasma with a median (range) elimination half-life of 48.3 minutes (22.6-64.8 minutes). Lymphocyte subset analysis showed a significant drop in B cell counts, which persisted to day 14 and beyond. Cytokine analysis showed significant elevations of interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 in all patients who received > or = 200 mg/m2 OSI-7836. Best response was disease stabilization in seven patients. CONCLUSION: OSI-7836 was associated with excessive fatigue, and despite changes in its schedule and duration of administration, we did not observe an improvement in its tolerability. Its potentially selective effect on B lymphocytes could be exploited in further studies in specific hematologic malignancies.