Trends in Management of Ménière Disease: A TriNetX Network Database Analysis.

This study investigated management practices for Meniere's disease (MD) and their temporal trends from 2008 to 2022 within the TriNetX network database. Study cohort included adult patients (≥18 years) with the diagnosis of MD from TriNetX's multi-institutional medical records (n = 77,493). MD diagnosis and management were queried based on the international classification of diseases, tenth revision, current procedural terminology, and RXNorm codes. Temporal trends were analyzed using joinpoint regression. There was significant increase in rates of relevant medications prescribed within 12 months of MD diagnosis from 2008 to 2022 (annual percent change [APC]: 1.2 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.4-1.9]). There were no significant changes in rate of intratympanic injection within 12 months of MD diagnosis (1.7 [95% CI: -1.1 to 4.5]). Rate of endolymphatic sac surgery and labyrinthectomy any time after MD diagnosis gradually decreased from 2008 to 2022 at APC of -8.1 (95% CI: -11.8 to -4.2) and -11.0 (95% CI: -14.0 to -7.7), respectively. Use of relevant medications has significantly increased during the early management of MD and the overall use of surgical treatments has decreased.

Cerumen impaction: Prevalence and associated factors in the United States population.

Objective: To examine the prevalence of cerumen impaction in a nationally representative sample of the US population and the association of cerumen impaction with sociodemographic factors, hearing loss, and tinnitus. Methods: The cohort included 14,230 individuals aged ≥12 years who completed otoscopy and audiometry in NHANES (2005-2016). Cerumen impaction (partial/complete) was determined by otoscopy. Hearing level was defined by speech-frequency pure-tone average (PTA). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with cerumen impaction. Results: The prevalence of any cerumen impaction was 18.6% [95% CI: 17.3%-19.9%] among individuals ≥12 years and 32.4% [29.9%-35.1%] among those ≥70 years. The prevalence of bilateral partial and complete cerumen impaction was 6.3% [5.6%-7.1%] and 1.2% [1.0%-1.9%], respectively. Any cerumen impaction was associated with male sex (OR 1.77 [1.5-2.1]), identifying as Black race (vs. Caucasian, OR: 1.78 [1.5-2.9]), lower level of education (OR: 0.84 [0.71-0.98]), and older age (OR: 1.02 [1.01-1.03]). After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, complete impaction was associated with increased PTA (right ear: ß = 4.1 dB [2.4-5.8 dB], left ear: ß = 1.9 dB [0.46-3.4 dB]), but not with tinnitus. Conclusions: Cerumen impaction is highly prevalent in the US population, especially among older adults, and has disproportionate sociodemographic impacts. Complete impaction is associated with a small, statistically significant elevation in PTA, but there is no association with tinnitus. These findings emphasize the need to implement and disseminate best practices for ear hygiene and cerumen management broadly and equitably. Level of Evidence: 2B.

Age, Race, Ethnicity, and Sex of Participants in Clinical Trials Focused on Chronic Pain.

There is limited data on equitable inclusion in chronic pain trials. We aimed to 1) identify the frequency of reporting age, race, ethnicity, and sex in clinical trials targeting chronic pain, and 2) compare sociodemographic representation to the United States (US) population. We examined US-based intervention trials for chronic pain initiated between 2007 and 2021 and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. We 1) assessed the frequency of reporting each demographic variable, 2) compared representation with US population estimates, and 3) explored change in reporting over time. Of 501 clinical trials, the frequency of reporting was as follows: 36.9% reported older adults, 54.3% reported race, 37.4% reported ethnicity, and 100% reported sex. Rates of race and ethnicity reporting increased, but older adult age reporting decreased over time (ps < .00001). Compared to 2020 US population estimates, there was an equitable representation of older adults, under-representation of individuals identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native (.8% vs .6%), Asian (5.6% vs 2.9%), Black or African American (12.6% vs 12.2%), with more than one race (2.9% vs 1.2%), and Hispanic/Latino (16.9% vs 14.1%). There was an over-representation of individuals identifying as Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (.2% vs .5%) or White (70.4% vs 72.9%), and of females (50.8% vs 68.4%). Some representation rates varied by chronic pain condition. Reporting of older adult age, race, and ethnicity was low in chronic pain trials in ClinicalTrials.gov, reinforcing the need for adhering to reporting guidelines. Representation varied across trials compared with US population data, particularly among those identifying as Hispanic/Latino and certain minority racial groups. PERSPECTIVE: Despite initiatives to increase the reporting of demographic information, doing so in clinical pain trials is far from ubiquitous. Moreover, efforts to improve diversity in these trials continue to be insufficient. Indeed, Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) remain under-represented in clinical pain trials.

Connecting Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder Clinical Trials Through Data Harmonization: Wake Forest IMPOWR Dissemination, Education, and Coordination Center (IDEA-CC).

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has developed the NIH HEAL Integrative Management of chronic Pain and OUD for Whole Recovery (IMPOWR) network to address the interconnected nature of chronic pain (CP) and opioid use disorder (OUD), which are influenced by mental health. The network aims to develop integrated treatment pathways across multiple sites in the United States. The IMPOWR Dissemination, Education, and Coordination Center (IDEA-CC) is proposed to support the NIH HEAL IMPOWR network by developing a CP- and OUD-focused infrastructure that includes measures of stigma, trauma, and quality of life. This includes deploying a data framework to link clinical sites, developing an educational infrastructure to address stigma and health disparities, and disseminating research findings. The IDEA-CC will standardize data collection processes, develop web-based data commons, and facilitate data sharing opportunities. The IDEA-CC will support the development and validation of composite CP and OUD measures and will develop educational materials to address stigma and health disparities. Overall, the IDEA-CC will create a research community and data commons that connect NIH HEAL IMPOWR centers to translate findings and develop a key CP-OUD research data, and education infrastructure.

Association of Symptomatic Dizziness With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality.

Importance: Dizziness is a highly prevalent complaint with wide-ranging causes and resultant morbidity. Whether symptomatic dizziness and its various manifestations are associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality is unknown. Objective: To examine the associations of symptomatic dizziness and its manifestations with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study is a mortality follow-up study based on the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The study cohort included adults 40 years and older who completed questions about symptomatic dizziness, including problems with dizziness, balance, falling, and positional dizziness, within the past 12 months. Respondents were linked to mortality data through December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from February to August 2023. Exposure: Self-reported symptomatic dizziness. Main Outcomes and Measures: All-cause and cause-specific (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, and unintentional injuries) mortality. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to examine associations between symptomatic dizziness and all-cause and cause-specific mortality while adjusting for demographics and medical history. Results: In this nationally representative cohort of 9000 middle-aged and older US adults (mean [SD] age, 61.8 [13.8] years; 4570 [50.8%] female), prevalence of symptomatic dizziness was 23.8%. Specifically, 18.3% reported problems with dizziness, 14.5% reported problems with balance, 5.7% reported problems with falling, and 3.8% reported dizziness when turning in bed (positional dizziness). At a median (range) of 16.2 (0.1-20.6) years of follow-up, all-cause mortality for adults with symptomatic dizziness was higher than for those without (45.6% vs 27.1%). Symptomatic dizziness was associated with elevated risk for cause-specific mortality from diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.23-2.25), cardiovascular disease (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.55), and cancer (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.99-1.47) but not unintentional injuries (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.51-1.88). Reporting problems with balance or falling was associated with increased all-cause mortality (balance: HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.17-1.39; and falling: HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.33-1.73), cardiovascular disease-specific mortality (balance: HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.20-1.66; and falling: HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.94), and diabetes-specific mortality risks (balance: HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.26-2.39; and falling: HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.26-3.18). There was no association between positional dizziness and mortality (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82-1.19). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, symptomatic dizziness was associated with increased risk for all-cause and diabetes-, cardiovascular disease-, and cancer-specific mortality. The imprecision of the effect size estimate for cancer-specific mortality prevents making a definitive conclusion. Future studies are needed to determine whether symptomatic dizziness indicates underlying health conditions contributing to mortality or if early intervention for imbalance and falls can reduce mortality risk.

Association of Sleep Characteristics with Tinnitus and Hearing Loss.

Objective: The impact of poor sleep on tinnitus has been mainly attributed to central processes. There is an association between sleep disorders and hearing loss, but whether hearing levels mediate the association between sleep disorders and tinnitus is unknown. This study investigates the association between sleep characteristics, tinnitus, and hearing loss. Study Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods: Study cohort includes 9693 adults (≥20 years) from the NHANES 2005 to 2018 who completed audiometric testing and questionnaires on tinnitus and sleep characteristics. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to quantify associations between sleep characteristics, tinnitus, and hearing loss. Results: In this cohort, 29% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28%-31%) reported trouble sleeping and 9% (95% CI: 8%-10%) reported being diagnosed with sleep disorders. Negative sleep characteristics (less hours of sleep, diagnosis of a sleep disorder, trouble sleeping, or OSA symptoms) were not associated with audiometry-measured hearing loss in multivariable models adjusted for demographics and comorbidities but were significantly associated with bothersome tinnitus. This association remained significant without substantial attenuation in multivariable models additionally adjusting for hearing levels: sleeping <8 h/day (vs ≥8) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.28 [95% CI: 1.08-1.52]), trouble sleeping (OR: 1.78 [95% CI: 1.45-2.19]), diagnosis of sleep disorders (OR: 1.57 [95% CI: 1.14-2.15]), and report of OSA symptoms (OR: 1.42 [95% CI: 1.08-1.88]). Conclusion: Negative sleep characteristics were associated with tinnitus while there was no clinically meaningful association between sleep and hearing loss. Our findings suggest that the relationship between poor sleep and tinnitus is likely contributed by central processes without a major role of mediation via the peripheral auditory system.

Development of a feline model for preclinical research of a new translabyrinthine auditory nerve implant.

Cochlear implants are among the most successful neural prosthetic devices to date but exhibit poor frequency selectivity and the inability to consistently activate apical (low frequency) spiral ganglion neurons. These issues can limit hearing performance in many cochlear implant patients, especially for understanding speech in noisy environments and in perceiving or appreciating more complex inputs such as music and multiple talkers. For cochlear implants, electrical current must pass through the bony wall of the cochlea, leading to widespread activation of auditory nerve fibers. Cochlear implants also cannot be implanted in some individuals with an obstruction or severe malformations of the cochlea. Alternatively, intraneural stimulation delivered via an auditory nerve implant could provide direct contact with neural fibers and thus reduce unwanted current spread. More confined current during stimulation can increase selectivity of frequency fiber activation. Furthermore, devices such as the Utah Slanted Electrode Array can provide access to the full cross section of the auditory nerve, including low frequency fibers that are difficult to reach using a cochlear implant. However, further scientific and preclinical research of these Utah Slanted Electrode Array devices is limited by the lack of a chronic large animal model for the auditory nerve implant, especially one that leverages an appropriate surgical approach relevant for human translation. This paper presents a newly developed transbullar translabyrinthine surgical approach for implanting the auditory nerve implant into the cat auditory nerve. In our first of a series of studies, we demonstrate a surgical approach in non-recovery experiments that enables implantation of the auditory nerve implant into the auditory nerve, without damaging the device and enabling effective activation of the auditory nerve fibers, as measured by electrode impedances and electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses. These positive results motivate performing future chronic cat studies to assess the long-term stability and function of these auditory nerve implant devices, as well as development of novel stimulation strategies that can be translated to human patients.

Association between hearing aid use and mortality in adults with hearing loss in the USA: a mortality follow-up study of a cross-sectional cohort.

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss has been identified as an independent risk factor for negative health outcomes and mortality. However, whether rehabilitation with hearing aid use is associated with lower mortality is currently unknown. This study aimed to examine the associations of hearing loss, hearing aid use, and mortality in the USA. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, follow-up study, we assessed 9885 adults (age 20 years and older) who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 1999 and 2012 and completed audiometry and hearing aid use questionnaires (1863 adults with hearing loss). Main measures included hearing loss (speech-frequency pure-tone average) and hearing aid use (never users, non-regular users, and regular users). Mortality status of the cohort was linked to the National Death Index up to Dec 31, 2019. Cox proportional regression models were used to examine the association between hearing loss, hearing aid use, and mortality while adjusting for demographics and medical history. FINDINGS: The cohort consisted of 9885 participants, of which 5037 (51·0%) were female and 4848 (49·0%) were male with a mean age of 48·6 years (SD 18·1) at baseline. The weighted prevalence of audiometry-measured hearing loss was 14·7% (95% CI 13·3-16·3%) and the all-cause mortality rate was 13·2% (12·1-14·4) at a median 10·4 years of follow-up (range 0·1-20·8). The rate of regular hearing aid use among adults with hearing loss was 12·7% (95% CI 10·6-15·1). Hearing loss was an independent risk factor associated with higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·40 [95% CI 1·21-1·62]). Among individuals with hearing loss, the adjusted mortality risk was lower among regular hearing aid users in comparison with never users (adjusted HR 0·76 [0·60-0·95]) accounting for demographics, hearing levels, and medical history. There was no difference in adjusted mortality between non-regular hearing aid users and never users (adjusted HR 0·93 [0·70-1·24]). INTERPRETATION: Regular hearing aid use was associated with lower risks of mortality than in never users in US adults with hearing loss when accounting for age, hearing loss, and other potential confounders. Future research is needed to investigate the potential protective role of hearing aid use against mortality for adults with hearing loss. FUNDING: None.

Type-O Blood Is Not Associated With Elevated Mortality After Trauma: A North American Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have presented contradictory findings on the relationship between blood type and mortality in trauma patients. Using the largest population in a study of this type to date, we hypothesized that ABO genotype and Rhesus status would influence trauma-related mortality and morbidity given the relationship between blood type and hemostasis. METHODS: Data from all trauma patients admitted to level I and level II trauma centers in one city over a five-year period was retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified by ABO type. Patient demographics and outcomes were then assessed. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze categorical variables. Continuous variables were analyzed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests as appropriate. Logistic regression was used to determine independent associations for 28-day mortality and complications. RESULTS: Of 5249 patients, severe injury (ISS >15) was present in 1469. Approximately one-quarter of patients with severe injury received blood products within the first 24 hours. There were no significant variations in demographics or complications between patients of different blood types. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis showed no association between blood type and mortality. However, penetrating injury, lower GCS, higher ISS, blood transfusion within 24 hours, and Asian descent were associated with higher overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, we found no evidence of an association between blood type and mortality. However, our findings suggest that patients of Asian descent may be at higher risk for mortality following trauma. Further research is warranted to explore this observation.

Magnetic Resonancy Imaging Safety in Active Osseointegrated (Osia®) and Cochlear Implants: New Technology Creating Confusion.

OBJECTIVE: There is increased confusion regarding MRI-compatible CIs and BAHAs. This report describes two cases when patients underwent MRIs with non-MRI compatible devices. RESULTS: One patient with bilateral Cochlear Osias experienced dislocation of both internal magnets after 1.5 Tesla MRI. Both magnets were outside the silastic sheath, with the left magnet flipped. A second patient with a legacy CI experienced similar internal magnet dislocation and inversion after 3 Tesla MRI. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes internal magnet dislocation/inversion with the Cochlear Osia and a legacy CI after MRI. Our findings suggest the need for improved patient education and simplified radiology guidelines. Laryngoscope, 134:393-396, 2024.

Use of Physical Therapy and Subsequent Falls Among Patients With Dizziness in the US.

Importance: Among adults who present for clinical evaluation of dizziness, there is a critical need to identify interventions, such as physical therapy (PT), to mitigate the risk of falls over time. Objective: The primary objective was to examine the association between receipt of PT and falls requiring medical care within 12 months of presentation for dizziness. Secondary objectives included identification of factors associated with falls requiring medical care and factors associated with receipt of PT after presentation for dizziness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study examined US commercial insurance and Medicare Advantage claims from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2015. In all, 805 454 patients 18 years or older with a new diagnosis of symptomatic dizziness or vestibular disorders were identified. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2021, to February 1, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of PT services and the incidence of falls requiring medical care were measured. The association between receipt of PT and falls that occurred 12 months after presentation for dizziness was estimated after accounting for presentation setting (outpatient clinic or emergency department), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; with higher scores indicating greater morbidity), diagnosis code, and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: A total of 805 454 patients presented for dizziness from 2006 through 2015 (median [range] age, 52 [18-87] years; 502 055 females [62%]). Of these patients, 45 771 (6%) received PT within 3 months of presentation for dizziness and 60 060 (7%) experienced a fall resulting in a medical encounter within 12 months after presentation for dizziness. In adjusted models, patients least likely to receive PT were female (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.81), those aged 50 to 59 years (AOR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.65-0.70] compared with patients aged 18-39 years), and those with more comorbidities (AOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.70-0.73] for CCI ≥ 2 vs 0). Receipt of PT services within 3 months of presentation for dizziness was associated with a reduced risk of falls over the subsequent 12 months, with the greatest risk reduction found within 3 months after PT (AOR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.14-0.15] at 3-12 months vs 0.18 [95% CI, 0.18-0.19] at 6-12 months and 0.23 [95% CI, 0.23-0.24] at 9-12 months). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that receipt of PT after presentation for dizziness was associated with a reduction in fall risk during the subsequent 12 months; thus, timely PT referral for dizziness may be beneficial for these patients. Future research, ideally with a clinical trial design, is needed to explore the independent impact of PT on subsequent falls for adults with dizziness.

Academic anaesthesiology: a global perspective on training, support, and future development of early career researchers.

As anaesthesiologists face increasing clinical demands and a limited and competitive funding environment for academic work, the sustainability of academic anaesthesiologists has never been more tenuous. Yet, the speciality needs academic anaesthesiologists in many roles, extending beyond routine clinical duties. Anaesthesiologist educators, researchers, and administrators are required not only to train future generations but also to lead innovation and expansion of anaesthesiology and related specialities, all to improve patient care. This group of early career researchers with geographically distinct training and practice backgrounds aim to highlight the diversity in clinical and academic training and career development pathways for anaesthesiologists globally. Although multiple routes to success exist, one common thread is the need for consistent support of strong mentors and sponsors. Moreover, to address inequitable opportunities, we emphasise the need for diversity and inclusivity through global collaboration and exchange that aims to improve access to research training and participation. We are optimistic that by focusing on these fundamental principles, we can help build a more resilient and sustainable future for academic anaesthesiologists around the world.

Examining primary care provider experiences with using a clinical decision support tool for pain management.

Objective: To evaluate primary care provider (PCP) experiences using a clinical decision support (CDS) tool over 16 months following a user-centered design process and implementation. Materials and Methods: We conducted a qualitative evaluation of the Chronic Pain OneSheet (OneSheet), a chronic pain CDS tool. OneSheet provides pain- and opioid-related risks, benefits, and treatment information for patients with chronic pain to PCPs. Using the 5 Rights of CDS framework, we conducted and analyzed semi-structured interviews with 19 PCPs across 2 academic health systems. Results: PCPs stated that OneSheet mostly contained the right information required to treat patients with chronic pain and was correctly located in the electronic health record. PCPs used OneSheet for distinct subgroups of patients with chronic pain, including patients prescribed opioids, with poorly controlled pain, or new to a provider or clinic. PCPs reported variable workflow integration and selective use of certain OneSheet features driven by their preferences and patient population. PCPs recommended broadening OneSheet access to clinical staff and patients for data entry to address clinician time constraints. Discussion: Differences in patient subpopulations and workflow preferences had an outsized effect on CDS tool use even when the CDS contained the right information identified in a user-centered design process. Conclusions: To increase adoption and use, CDS design and implementation processes may benefit from increased tailoring that accommodates variation and dynamics among patients, visits, and providers.

Daring discourse: artificial intelligence in pain medicine, opportunities and challenges.

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are currently expanding their influence within healthcare. For pain clinics, unfettered introduction of AI may cause concern in both patients and healthcare teams. Much of the concern stems from the lack of community standards and understanding of how the tools and algorithms function. Data literacy and understanding can be challenging even for experienced healthcare providers as these topics are not incorporated into standard clinical education pathways. Another reasonable concern involves the potential for encoding bias in healthcare screening and treatment using faulty algorithms. And yet, the massive volume of data generated by healthcare encounters is increasingly challenging for healthcare teams to navigate and will require an intervention to make the medical record manageable in the future. AI approaches that lighten the workload and support clinical decision-making may provide a solution to the ever-increasing menial tasks involved in clinical care. The potential for pain providers to have higher-quality connections with their patients and manage multiple complex data sources might balance the understandable concerns around data quality and decision-making that accompany introduction of AI. As a specialty, pain medicine will need to establish thoughtful and intentionally integrated AI tools to help clinicians navigate the changing landscape of patient care.

Guiding Patients Through Decision-Making in Management of Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma.

Decision-making in management of sporadic vestibular schwannoma aims to identify the most appropriate options based on tumor characteristics, symptoms, health, and goals for each patient. Advances in knowledge of tumor natural history, improvements in radiation techniques, and achievements in neurologic preservation with microsurgery have shifted emphasis toward maximizing quality of life using a personalized approach. To empower patients to make informed decisions, we present a framework to help match patient values and priorities with reasonable expectations from modern management options. Introduced herein are practical examples of communication strategies and decision aids to support shared decision-making in modern practice.

Neurotology Workforce in the United States: Gender Diversity and Geographic Distribution.

OBJECTIVE: The workforce of neurotology has changed with increasing numbers of accredited programs and diverse representation among trainees over the past several decades. This study aims to describe the characteristics, density, and geographic variation of the current neurotology workforce in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: American Board of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery portal and online search. METHODS: The study cohort included physicians certified in Neurotology by the American Board of Otolaryngology as of 2021 (n = 372). Physician characteristics including years of practice, gender, practice setting, and location were collected. Geographic variation analysis was performed by the state, county, and hospital referral region. Associations between the number of neurotologists per population and socioeconomic characteristics were assessed using multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 372 neurotologists, 65% practiced in academic settings and 13% were female. The percentage of female neurotologists increased from 0% among neurotologists with ≥30 years of practice to 23% among <10 years of practice. There were no differences in a practice setting by gender. The geographical analysis demonstrated that the average number of neurotologists was 1.1 per 1 million Americans. In a multivariable model, the density of neurotologists was significantly higher within counties with the highest quartiles of college education (ß = .6 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.3-0.8]) and income (ß = .3 [95% CI: 0.1-0.6]). CONCLUSION: The number of board-certified neurotologists has gradually increased and there have been trends toward greater gender diversity. The geographical distribution of neurotology practice was concentrated in counties with higher socioeconomic status as expected given the referral-based nature of the subspecialty. There should be efforts to reach out to low socioeconomic communities to ensure equivalent access to neurotological care.