Risk Factors for Skin Flap and Nipple-Areolar Necrosis in Patients Undergoing Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is a surgical option for select patients with or at risk of breast cancer. However, post-operative skin flap and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis remain common complications. This study aimed to identify factors associated with necrosis in patients undergoing NSM with DIEP reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed from 2015 to 2023. 74 variables were analyzed in patients undergoing NSM with DIEP. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on post-operative skin/NAC necrosis: none, partial thickness, and full thickness. Comparative and descriptive statistics were performed via t-tests, ANOVA, and chi-squared tests. RESULTS: 34 women with 31 breast cancers met inclusion. 44% experienced necrosis: 15% partial thickness and 29% full thickness. The majority were white (85.3%) with mean age of 50 years (SD = 9.11). In patients with immediate DIEP reconstruction, hypoperfused areas identified by SPY angiography increased risk of necrosis (P = .012). Approximately 50% of both partial thickness and full thickness necrosis patients had concerns on SPY angiography. Former smokers in the full thickness necrosis group had more pack years than those without necrosis (9 vs .65 pack years, P = .035). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving NSM with DIEP flap reconstruction, those with hypoperfusion on SPY angiography and longer smoking history had higher necrosis rates. This supports the continued used of SPY angiography and the role of pre-operative counseling in former smokers with increased pack years on their risk of necrosis and the role of preventative measures in the perioperative setting.

Microsurgical breast reconstruction and primary hypercoagulable disorders.

BACKGROUND: Primary hypercoagulable disorders pose a significant challenge to microsurgeons and have traditionally been regarded as a relative contraindication to free tissue transfer. Since free flaps offer numerous advantages in breast reconstruction, there is an effort to expand the population to whom these operations can be safely offered. The purpose of this study is to describe our chemoprophylaxis regimen in cases of primary hypercoagulability, as well as to compare flap outcomes and complications between women with and without hypercoagulability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single institution retrospective review identified 15 patients (25 flaps) with known primary hypercoagulability who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from 2010 through 2020. There were 785 patients (1268 flaps) without primary hypercoagulability who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction, including 40 patients (73 flaps) with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), evaluated for comparison. Patient characteristics, thromboprophylaxis regimen, and surgical outcomes were collected. In carrying out this cohort study, we have adhered to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with primary hypercoagulability were identified, including heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation (n = 12), protein S deficiency (n = 1), prothrombin mutation (n = 1), and primary antiphospholipid syndrome (n = 1). Thirteen of these (87%) were discharged with an extended LMWH course. There was no postoperative VTE or mortality in this cohort, and no significant difference in hematoma or transfusion compared with the control group (p = .31, p = .87, respectively). The flap loss rate was 4% in the hypercoagulable group compared with 0.92% in the control group (p = .15). The salvage for arterial or venous compromise in the hypercoagulable group was poor (0% vs. 52%, p = .3). CONCLUSION: Microsurgical breast reconstruction in women with primary hypercoagulability disorders is feasible with acceptable risk of flap loss but poor salvage potential. Postoperative thromboprophylaxis with extended prophylactic LMWH in this population appears to be a safe regimen.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in lower extremity free tissue transfers.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) an immunologically mediated reaction to heparin products, can lead to severe thrombocytopenia and potentially life-threatening thrombotic events. In microsurgery, a missed or delayed diagnosis of HIT can cause complications requiring revision operations, flap loss, or limb loss. Surgeons must remain vigilant for this uncommon yet potentially devastating condition and keep abreast of management strategies. METHODS: CPT and ICD-10 codes in electronic medical records were used to collect demographic information, clinical courses, and outcomes for patients with a HIT diagnosis who underwent lower extremity free tissue transfer in one institution. RESULTS: The authors' institution performed 415 lower extremity free flaps in 411 patients during the 10-year study period. Flap salvage rate was 71% for compromised lower extremity flaps without HIT, and 25% in those with HIT. Four patients (four flaps) met study inclusion criteria during the study period. Three of the four flaps failed and were later debrided; one was rescued after a takeback for anastomosis revision. Two patients successfully underwent a delayed second free flap procedure after recovery, and one was salvaged with a pedicled muscle flap. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should monitor for HIT by establishing coagulation panel and platelet count baselines and trending these values in the early post-operative period for patients treated with heparin products. The 4T score can be used to screen for HIT with high clinical suspicion. Arterial thrombosis or poor flap perfusion despite sound microvascular technique could suggest HIT. Surgical and medical management including strict heparin avoidance can prevent adverse events for these patients.

Evaluating Both Partner and Patient Satisfaction With Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Few studies have looked in-depth at the relationship between patient and partner satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction. The studies that do exist suggest that perceived partner satisfaction is an important predictor of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. METHODS: We created a novel survey designed to look at reconstruction outcomes from a partner's perspective. Patients with a history of mastectomy-alone or mastectomy with reconstruction at our institution from January 2011 through December 2020 were contacted electronically to complete a demographic form and the BREAST-Q, while partners completed our novel partner survey. Sixteen mastectomy-only and 76 mastectomy with reconstruction couples completed surveys. RESULTS: The mean Breast-Q and partner survey scores were 87 and 87 (maximum possible = 100), respectively, for mastectomy with reconstruction. There was a correlation of 0.57 between patient and partner overall satisfaction. There was no difference in overall satisfaction between patients who underwent reconstruction and those who did not (P = 0.19). There was a relationship between satisfaction with preoperative counseling and overall satisfaction in both patients and partners. The partner survey was found to have high internal consistency for measuring various areas of partner satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: There is a relationship between patient and partner satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Our data may support the positive impact of social support on recovery after breast cancer treatment, as satisfaction was high in both groups. We therefore encourage partners to attend and participate in preoperative consultations. Finally, our novel partner survey is a reliable tool to assess partner satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Rates of major complications and flap loss for abdominally based breast reconstruction in obese patients are independent of WHO class of obesity.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a risk factor for complications following autologous breast reconstruction. Little is known regarding outcomes based on the degree of obesity. This study compares breast reconstruction outcomes and complication rates for the three classes defined by the body mass index (BMI)-based WHO classification. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective chart review identifying obese patients who underwent abdominally based breast reconstruction between January 2011 and January 2021. Patients were stratified by BMI class [class 1 (C1) = 30-34.99 kg/m2, class 2 (C2) = 35-39.99 kg/m2, and class 3 (C3) = 40 kg/m2 + ]. Outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients (395 flaps) were included with 138 patients were classified as C1, 68 patients as C2, and 26 patients as C3. Rates of any complication (80%) and at least one major complication (31%) did not vary significantly (P = 0.057, 0.185). Individual rates of 30-day readmission (18%) or reoperation (26%) did not vary significantly (P = 0.588 and 0.059). Rates of seroma (C1 = 15%, C2 = 16%, and C3 = 35%), hernia (C1 = 0%, C2 = 4%, and C3 = 8%), and incisional dehiscence (C1 = 30%, C2 = 44%, and C3 = 62%) were associated with significantly increased risk with higher classes of obesity (P < 0.05). The rate of flap failure did not vary significantly (P = 0.573). CONCLUSION: The risk of major complications and total flap loss associated with abdominally based breast reconstruction does not differ between the classes of obesity. Although complication rates are high overall in the obese population, detrimental complications do not vary between the classes. Patients should be counseled regarding their individual risk without the need for arbitrary BMI cutoffs.

Abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction in the severely obese population: Is it safe?

INTRODUCTION: Class 3 (severe) obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m2 . Obesity is common and an independent risk factor for breast cancer. The plastic surgeon will be tasked with providing reconstruction for obese patients after mastectomy. This presents a surgical dilemma because patients with elevated BMI are known to have greater rates of morbidity when undergoing free flap reconstruction, however free flap reconstruction is associated with greater functional and aesthetic outcomes. This study quantifies complication rates in a cohort of patients with class 3 obesity that underwent abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. This study may be able answer whether this surgery is feasible or safe. METHODS: Patients with a class 3 obesity who underwent abdominally-based free flap breast reconstruction between January 1, 2011 and February 28, 2020 at the authors' institution were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed to record patient demographics and peri-operative data. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Eighty percent of patients had at least one minor complication including infection (42%), fat necrosis (31%), seroma (15%), abdominal bulge (8%), and hernia (8%). Thirty-eight percent of patients had at least one major complication (requiring readmission (23%) and/or a return to the operating room (38%)). No flaps failed. CONCLUSION: Abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction in patients with class 3 obesity is associated with great morbidity, however, no patients experienced flap loss or failure which may imply that this population can safely undergo surgery so long as the surgeon is prepared for complications and takes steps to mitigate risk.

Management of Postsurgical Pyoderma Gangrenosum Following Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Role for a Dermal Regeneration Template.

INTRODUCTION: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a relatively uncommon necrotizing and ulcerative cutaneous disorder. It is often associated with a systemic inflammatory disease but may also present following trauma to the skin due to pathergy. Given its rare occurrence and nonspecific histology, PG is primarily a diagnosis of exclusion, which often results in delayed treatment. Very few cases of PG following autologous breast reconstruction have been reported in the literature, particularly in the absence of systemic disease. CASE REPORT: Presented is the case of a 62-year-old female with a history of ductal carcinoma in situ who underwent a left breast mastectomy with immediate deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction complicated by fever and leukocytosis as well as erythema, edema, and bullae involving the mastectomy flaps. Initially, necrotizing soft-tissue infection was suspected, and 2 debridements were performed. A diagnosis of PG was made on postoperative day 7, and the patient responded favorably to high-dose prednisone. Reconstruction was performed with a bilayer wound matrix and delayed skin grafting. Despite significant loss of mastectomy skin flap, the free flap was preserved. CONCLUSIONS: Although PG is a rare complication, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis for patients with atypical presentation of infection following breast reconstruction, even in the absence of systemic inflammatory disease. Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary management may prevent unnecessary surgical intervention and enable flap preservation. Furthermore, bilayer wound matrix placement may be useful as an intermediate reconstruction to determine if it is safe to proceed with skin grafting to avoid further pathergy. The findings in this case suggest that final reconstruction may be safely performed sooner than noted in the literature.

Comparative Analysis of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.

Recent advances in mastectomy and reconstruction have allowed for an evolution in implant-based breast reconstruction to a muscle-sparing, prepectoral approach. Advantages of this technique may include reductions in postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, less narcotic usage, and improved aesthetic outcomes. Postoperative complication rates are described as comparable to subpectoral techniques; however, little comparative data exist to adequately assess prepectoral versus subpectoral implant placement. METHODS: To address this knowledge gap, we performed a single institution retrospective review of 186 (83 prepectoral, 103 subpectoral) consecutive immediate breast reconstructions. All cases were tracked for a minimum of 2 years between 2016 and 2021. RESULTS: Prepectoral patients demonstrated an overall higher seroma rate (P = 0.001), with all other postoperative complications being comparable. Prepectoral patients tolerated higher intraoperative tissue expander fill volumes (P < 0.001), shorter hospital stays (P = 0.007), fewer clinic visits for tissue expansion (P < 0.001), and experienced less animation deformity (P = 0.005). Both groups demonstrated similar pain scores (P = 0.65) and needs for narcotics (P = 0.8) as well as comparable scores of capsular contracture (P = 0.791). CONCLUSIONS: Our comparative analysis of consecutive immediate implant-based breast reconstructions finds prepectoral reconstruction to be safe and effective. Compared with subpectoral reconstruction, the prepectoral approach may offer quicker tissue expansion, less postoperative office visits, less need for muscle relaxants, and a shorter hospital stay with a comparable complication profile.

Clinical course of venous thromboembolism following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially devastating complication following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction, with a reported incidence of 0.08-4%. The authors aim to describe disease presentation and clinical course following VTE diagnosis in patients within their practice. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from January 2007 through December 2018. Patients with VTE diagnosed within 90 days of surgery were included. Demographics, co-morbidities, signs and symptoms, and characteristics of oncologic, surgical, and post-operative care were analyzed. RESULTS: Seven hundred one patients underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction. Eleven patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) and four with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were identified, resulting in VTE incidence of 2.1% (0.57% DVT, 1.6% PE). Patients were on average 51 years old and had an average body mass index (BMI) of 31.7 kg/m2. Two had a history of VTE, and none had a known hypercoagulable disorder. Using the 2005 Caprini model, all were high risk and seven were highest risk. Among those with PE, the most common symptom was shortness of breath, and the most common signs were desaturation or supplemental oxygen requirements. VTE was diagnosed on average 14.2 days post-operatively (range 2-52 days). CONCLUSION: VTE is an infrequent complication following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction. We recommend a high index of suspicion in women reporting shortness of breath or having desaturation, especially in those with high BMI, high Caprini scores, post-operative complications, or early return to the operating room.

Complications of Wise-Pattern Compared With Vertical Scar Mastopexy/Breast Reduction in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) is most commonly performed using established or modified mastopexy/breast reduction techniques. Although the comparative complication profiles of Wise-pattern mastopexy/breast reduction techniques compared with vertical scar techniques are well understood, outcomes in the setting of OBCS are unknown. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of all patients that underwent OBCS using mastopexy/breast reduction techniques at a single center over a 6-year period. Patients who underwent Wise-pattern techniques were compared with those who underwent vertical scar techniques. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used, and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between these multiple variables and complications. RESULTS: Of 413 eligible patients, 278 patients (67.3%) received a Wise-pattern technique and 135 (32.7%) underwent a vertical scar technique. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in the Wise-pattern than in the vertical scar group (30.6% vs 18.5%, respectively; P = 0.012), as was the major complication rate (11.9% vs 4.4%; P = 0.011) including need for additional surgery for complications (6.8% vs 1.5%; P = 0.029). Complications resulted in a delay to any adjuvant therapy in 20 patients (4.8%); however, the difference between the groups was not significant (6.1% for Wise pattern vs 2.2% for vertical scar; P = 0.098). In a multivariable logistic model, use of a Wise-pattern technique (odds ratio, 0.37 [95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.99]; P = 0.049) was a significant predictor of major complications. CONCLUSIONS: The Wise-pattern mastopexy/breast reduction OBCS technique was associated with a significantly higher complication and major complication rate than vertical scar techniques. The findings should be considered during choice of surgical technique in oncoplastic breast conservation.

Immediate Contralateral Mastopexy/Breast Reduction for Symmetry Can Be Performed Safely in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery expands the indications for breast conservation. When performed using modified mastopexy/breast reduction techniques, the optimal timing of the contralateral symmetrizing mastopexy/breast reduction remains unclear. This study examined the effect of the timing of symmetrizing mastopexy/breast reduction on oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of all patients who underwent oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery using mastopexy/breast reduction techniques at a single center from 2010 to 2016. Patients who received synchronous (immediate) contralateral breast symmetrizing mastopexy were compared with those who underwent a delayed symmetrizing mastopexy procedure. Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the various relationships. RESULTS: There were 429 patients (713 breasts) included in the study; of these, 284 patients (568 breasts) underwent oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery involving mastopexy/breast reduction techniques and immediate symmetrizing mastopexy, and 145 patients underwent delayed contralateral symmetrizing mastopexy. The overall complication rate was similar between the immediate and delayed groups (25.4 percent versus 26.9 percent, respectively; p = 0.82), as was the major complication rate (10.6 percent versus 6.2 percent; p = 0.16). Complications resulted in a delay in adjuvant therapy in 18 patients (4.2 percent); in two patients (0.7 percent), this delay resulted from a complication in the contralateral symmetrizing mastopexy breast. Immediate contralateral symmetrizing mastopexy was not associated with increased risk of complications per breast (p = 0.82) or delay to adjuvant therapy (p = 0.6). CONCLUSION: Contralateral mastopexy/breast reduction for symmetry can be performed at the time of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in carefully selected patients without significantly increasing the risk of complications or delay to adjuvant radiation therapy. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy does not Increase Complications in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) broadens the indications for breast conservation. Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NAC) is used increasingly in the treatment of patients with early-stage and locally advanced breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes for patients who received NAC followed by OBCS. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent OBCS involving the mastopexy/breast-reduction technique, including synchronous mastopexy/breast reduction for symmetry, at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2010 and January 2016. Patients who had received NAC were compared with those who had undergone surgery first. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. RESULTS: The study included 429 patients, corresponding to 713 breasts. Of these patients, 122, corresponding to 199 breasts, received NAC. The patients who received NAC were younger (p < 0.001) and had a more advanced cancer stage (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate per patient was 25.9%, with major complications occurring in 9.1% of the patients. After adjustment for risk factors, NAC was not shown to be associated with an increased risk of complications or delayed adjuvant radiation therapy (p = 0.37), irrespective of the chemotherapy regimen used or whether the interval between NAC and surgery was 4 weeks or longer. CONCLUSIONS: In a high-volume center, OBCS can be performed safely for carefully selected patients after NAC without an increased risk of complications or delayed adjuvant radiation therapy. An interval of at least 4 weeks between completion of NAC and surgery can be regarded as safe irrespective of the chemotherapy regimen used.

Microsurgical repair of neonatal iliac artery injuries with saphenous vein grafts.

Two neonates with congenital heart disease, one and thirty-one days old respectively, suffered inadvertent arterial injury from cardiac catheterization. Both insults resulted in unrecognized avulsion of the external iliac artery from its origin. The patients quickly decompensated, with their right lower extremities becoming critically ischemic. In both cases, segments of reversed greater saphenous vein were used as interposition grafts from the common iliac artery to the common femoral artery. Reperfusion of the right foot was immediate for the one-day-old. She is now three years old and able to run, but is followed for a mild limb length discrepancy. The 31-day-old had restoration of flow to the right limb; however, the foot remained ischemic and eventually required transmetatarsal amputation. She is now 16 months old and able to crawl; she also is followed for limb length discrepancy. Without vein grafting, both infants would likely have lost their affected limbs, and possibly lost their lives. These cases advocate for microsurgical repair of arterial injuries in even the youngest patients, and promote the use of vein grafts when direct anastomosis is not feasible.

Surgical Treatment of Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis.

Studies on the treatment of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis demonstrate decreasing morbidity and mortality; however, complication rates still range from 5% to 14%. Here, the authors present their last 10 years' experience treatment of nonsyndromic single suture craniosynostosis. A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent open surgical treatment of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis over 10 years. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Radiological analysis of intracranial volumes was performed using Amira software. The authors' technique for treatment of sagittal synostosis was the Foreshortening and Lateral Expansion of the Cranium Activated by Gravity (FLAG) procedure. The authors identified 106 patients with a median age of 0.8 years. Sagittal synostosis was most common (n = 65, 61%). Seventeen percent underwent distraction of the cranial vault; the remainder underwent traditional remodeling procedures. The average operative time was 131 minutes, blood loss was 296 mL (30 mL/kg), and intraoperative transfusion was 332 mL (34 mL/kg). There were 2 postoperative complications. Six patients required an additional major operation years later, most commonly for increased intracranial pressure. The authors separately analyzed 50 patients with sagittal synostosis treated with the FLAG procedure. There were no postoperative complications, and only 4 patients required reoperation. The average operative time for the FLAG procedure was 97.3 minutes. Intracranial volume increased by 191.45 mL (28.3-427.5 mL) with 28% average relative cranial vault expansion (4.5%-93.2%). Surgical correction of craniosynostosis using the FLAG technique is safe and effective with minimal morbidity and long standing results. Treatment should involve a structured approach, which minimizes operative times and decreases complication rates.

Microvascular surgery in the congenital cardiac patient: A case series exploring feasibility and practical applications.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric congenital heart disease patients are at risk for vascular injuries during surgical procedures or when the arterial system is accessed for monitoring or diagnostic studies. Our treatment of emergent situations in this patient population using microvascular techniques shows the feasibility of such techniques. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients aged 0-18 years with congenital heart disease identified six patients who underwent microvascular surgery by the senior surgeon from June 2007 to May 2015. We studied this series, highlighting technical aspects of surgery and perioperative care to determine their effect on outcome. RESULTS: Six patients with congenital cardiac defects requiring cardiothoracic surgery were studied, body weight ranging from 3.2 to 19.1 kg at the time of surgery. Five suffered iatrogenic arterial injury to the heart or vessels used for access or diagnostic studies, including coronary artery laceration, brachial artery thrombosis, and external iliac artery avulsion. Interventions included direct end-to-end repair and vein grafting. Vessel diameter averaged 1 mm. Patients received vasopressors intraoperatively and were on vasopressors and antihypertensives postoperatively. One patient died because of disseminated intravascular coagulation on postoperative day 17, but bypass graft was patent prior to death. The rest survived with clinical evidence of patency of the repaired vessel for a long-term. CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical intervention may be life-saving as a revascularization procedure to the heart by direct coronary repair or bypass grafting. Iatrogenic injuries to the limb may cause critical ischemia; limbs can be salvaged by microsurgical repair. Despite technical and physiological challenges, microsurgery is feasible and sometimes crucial in this patient population.