Making a Difference with Vision 2020: The Right to Sight? Lessons from two States of North Western Nigeria

Settings and Aim: The World Health Organization launched in 1999 an initiative to eliminate the global avoidable blindness and prevent the projected doubling of avoidable visual impairment between 1990 and 2020 (Vision 2020: The Right to Sight). The World Health Assembly (WHA) adopted resolutions WHA 59.25; WHA 56.26 urging member states to adopt the Vision 2020 principles. More than 90 nongovernmental development organizations; agencies; and institutions; together with a number of major corporations; are now working together in this global partnership. Two neighboring states in North Western Nigeria provide eye care services using different approaches; one state uses the principles of Vision 2020; the other uses a different strategy. The aim of the study was to assess awareness and utilization of eye care services in two Nigerian states. Design: A population-based cross-sectional interview of households was conducted in two neighboring states using a structured questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 21 and a P 0.05 was considered as significant. Findings: Participation rate was 97 in the two states. The population in the Vision 2020-compliant state were significantly more aware about general eye care services (80 vs. 44; P 0.0005); had less proportion of households unaware of any eye care service (55 vs. 69; P 0.0005); and have a significantly higher felt the need to utilize eye care services (47 vs. 5.9; P 0.0005). The service utilization rate was however low in the two states. Conclusion: The principles of Vision 2020: The Right to Sight is adaptable to different cultures/societies and has demonstrated a potential to increase awareness and a felt need for eye care in poor resource settings

Making a difference with Vision 2020: The Right to Sight? Lessons from two states of North Western Nigeria.

UNLABELLED: Settings and Aim: The World Health Organization launched in 1999 an initiative to eliminate the global avoidable blindness and prevent the projected doubling of avoidable visual impairment between 1990 and 2020 (Vision 2020: The Right to Sight). The World Health Assembly (WHA) adopted resolutions WHA 59.25, WHA 56.26 urging member states to adopt the Vision 2020 principles. More than 90 nongovernmental development organizations, agencies, and institutions, together with a number of major corporations, are now working together in this global partnership. Two neighboring states in North Western Nigeria provide eye care services using different approaches; one state uses the principles of Vision 2020, the other uses a different strategy. The aim of the study was to assess awareness and utilization of eye care services in two Nigerian states. DESIGN: A population-based cross-sectional interview of households was conducted in two neighboring states using a structured questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 21 and a P < 0.05 was considered as significant. FINDINGS: Participation rate was 97% in the two states. The population in the Vision 2020-compliant state were significantly more aware about general eye care services (80% vs. 44%, P < 0.0005); had less proportion of households unaware of any eye care service (55% vs. 69%, P < 0.0005); and have a significantly higher felt the need to utilize eye care services (47% vs. 5.9%, P < 0.0005). The service utilization rate was however low in the two states. CONCLUSION: The principles of Vision 2020: The Right to Sight is adaptable to different cultures/societies and has demonstrated a potential to increase awareness and a felt need for eye care in poor resource settings.

Mapping trachoma in 25 local government areas of Sokoto and Kebbi states, northwestern Nigeria.

INTRODUCTION: The WHO global initiative on elimination of trachoma by 2020 (GET 2020) recommends mapping of trachoma at district (Local Government Area (LGA)) levels to enable planning and control activities in affected communities worldwide. The aim of the present study was to provide baseline data on trachoma for the LGAs of Sokoto and Kebbi states, Nigeria. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in 25 LGAs between November 2011 and May 2012. The WHO guidelines for trachoma control and risk factor assessment were used in the planning and conduct of the survey. RESULTS: The prevalence of trachomatous inflammation-follicular in children aged 1-9 years ranged from 0.3% in Sokoto South to 15.6% in Kalgo LGA. The prevalence of trachomatous trichiasis (TT) in adults (>14 years) ranged from 0.03% in three LGAs to 0.6% in Gudu LGA. Logistic regression analysis for the trachoma risk factors after χ(2) analysis showed only distance from water source as a significant risk factor (OR>1, p<0.5). Clean face, access to latrines and knowledge of trachoma prevention were significantly protective (OR<1, p<0.5) against active disease. The average number of persons in need of TT lid surgery ranged from 0 in 3 LGAs to 397 in Danko-Wasagu LGA. Mass antibiotic distribution is needed in 4 LGAs. The estimated number of households in need of latrines and improved water sources are high, with 1 LGA requiring 34 500 latrines and 20 000 improved water sources. CONCLUSIONS: There is a burden of active trachoma of different endemicity levels in all the surveyed LGAs. The burden of trachoma risk factors remains a challenge despite the global effort to decrease the risk factors through the Millennium Development Goals.