Faculty Sim: Implementation of an Innovative, Simulation-based Continuing Professional Development Curriculum for Academic Emergency Physicians.

BACKGROUND: Maintaining and enhancing competence in the breadth of emergency medicine (EM) is an ongoing challenge. In particular, resuscitative care in EM involves high-risk clinical encounters that demand strong procedural skills, effective team leadership, and up-to-date clinical knowledge. Simulation-based medical education is an effective modality for enhancing technical and nontechnical skills in crisis situations and has been effectively embedded in undergraduate and postgraduate medical curricula worldwide. To our knowledge, there are few existing systematic department-wide simulation programs to address continuing professional development (CPD) for practicing academic EM faculty. DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: We developed our novel, simulation-based CPD program following Kern's six-step model. Based on the results of a multimodal needs assessment, a longitudinal curriculum was mapped and tailored to the available resources. Institutional support was provided in the form of a departmental grant to fund a physician program lead, monthly session instructors, and operating costs. OUTCOMES: CPD simulation sessions commenced in January 2017. Our needs assessment identified two key types of educational needs: 1) crisis resource management skills and 2) frequent practice of high-stakes critical care procedures (e.g., surgical airways). Simulation sessions involve two high-fidelity simulated resuscitations and one skills lab per day. To date, 21 sessions have been delivered, reaching 161 practicing EPs. Feedback from our faculty has been positive. REFLECTIVE DISCUSSION: We have successfully introduced a curriculum of monthly simulation-based CPD based on the educational needs of our EPs. Future work will include more detailed program evaluation linked to clinical outcomes and program expansion to support nearby institutions.

Use of the emergency department by refugees under the Interim Federal Health Program: A health records review.

INTRODUCTION: In June 2012, the federal government made cuts to the Interim Federal Health (IFH) Program that reduced or eliminated health insurance for refugee claimants in Canada. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the cuts on emergency department (ED) use among patients claiming IFH benefits. METHODS: We conducted a health records review at two tertiary care EDs in Ottawa. We reviewed all ED visits where an IFH claim was made at triage, for 18 months before and 18 months after the changes to the program on June 30, 2012 (2011-2013). Claims made before and after the cuts were compared in terms of basic demographics, chief presenting complaints, acuity, diagnosis, presence of primary care, and financial status of the claim. Bivariate or multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to yield odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: There were a total of 612 IFH claims made in the ED from 2011-2013. The demographic characteristics, acuity of presentation and discharge diagnoses were similar during both the before and after periods. Overall, 28.6% fewer claims were made under the IFH program after the cuts. Of the claims made, significantly more were rejected after the cuts than before (13.7% after vs. 3.9% before, adjusted OR 4.28, 95% CI: 2.18-8.40; p<0.05). The majority (75.0%) of rejected claims have not been paid by patients. Fewer patients after the cuts indicated that they had a family physician (20.4% after vs. 30% before, unadjusted OR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.14-2.44; p<0.05) yet a higher proportion of patients without a family physician were still advised to follow up with their family doctor during the after period (67.2% after vs. 41.8% before, unadjusted OR 2.85, 95% CI: 1.45-5.62; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: A higher proportion of both rejected and subsequently unpaid claims after the IFH cuts in June 2012, as demonstrated in the logistic regression analysis in this health records review, represents a potential barrier to emergency medical care, as well as a new financial burden to be shouldered by patients and hospitals. A reduction in IFH claims in the ED and a reduction in the number of patients with access to a family physician also suggests inadequate primary care for this population, yet this was not reflected in the follow-up advice offered by ED physicians to patients.