The International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) Vulvar Awareness Day Campaign: Knowledge of Vulvovaginal Diseases Among Italian Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to investigate vulvovaginal disease (VVD) awareness in Italian obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 25-question survey on VVD basic knowledge (17 questions) and willingness to improve it (8 questions) was distributed through Ob/Gyn resident online group chats, from different Italian Universities in January 2023. A total number of 250 residents were invited to participate; 124 responses were obtained (response rate: 50%). Data were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics through REDCap. RESULTS: Overall, 87 of the 124 respondents (70%) fully completed the questionnaire and represented the study group. Residents were distributed among years of residency: 15% first year, 31% second year, 23% third year, 11% fourth year, and 20% fifth year. Most (60%) never attended a VVD clinic during residency, with an increasing percentage of attendance in later residency years (15% at first year vs 65% at fifth).Participants reported low knowledge of vulvar precancerous lesions and vulvoscopy but better knowledge of vaginitis, vulvar self-examination, and lichen sclerosus. Of the respondents, 50% were not satisfied with the education provided during residency, and more than 60% lacked confidence in managing VVD.All participants expressed a strong desire to improve their knowledge and skills, with 100% agreeing that every gynecologist should know the "basics" and 98% wanting to improve their knowledge through webinars (45%), lessons (34%), newsletters, and videos (19%). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a significant need to improve VVD knowledge among Italian Ob/Gyn residents. Further efforts are necessary to provide information about VVD and comprehensive training programs in Italian Universities.

Ultra-radical surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary referral cancer center in the UK.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer in the UK. The standard of care is a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. The aim of the treatment is the resection of all macroscopic disease. In selected cases of advanced ovarian cancer this is achieved with ultra-radical surgery. However, NICE encourages further research due to low quality evidence on the safety and efficacy of this extensive surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the morbidity and survival rates of ultra-radical surgery for advanced ovarian cancer performed in our unit and compare our findings with the current literature. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 39 patients diagnosed with stage IIIA-IV ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer who underwent surgery in our unit between 2012 and 2020. The main outcome measures were the perioperative complications, the disease-free survival, the overall survival rate and the recurrence rate. RESULTS: The study enrolled 39 patients with stages IIIA-IV who were treated in our unit between 2012 and 2020. 21 patients were at stage III (53.8%) whereas 18 (46.1%) at stage IV. 14 patients underwent primary and 25 secondary debulking surgery. Major and minor complications occurred 17.9% and 56.4% of the patients, respectively. Complete cytoreduction following surgery was achieved in 24 cases (61.5%). The mean and the median survival time were 4.8 years and 5 years, respectively. The mean disease-free survival time was 2.9 years while median disease-free survival time was 2 years. Age (P=0.028) and complete cytoreduction (p=0.048) were found to be significantly associated with survival. Primary debulking surgery was significantly associated with lower probability of recurrence (P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of patients is relatively small, our study indicates that ultra-radical surgery in centers with high expertise may result in excellent survival rates with an acceptable rate of major complications. All patients in our cohort were operated by an accredited gynecological oncologist and a hepatobiliary general surgeon with a special interest in ovarian cancer. A few cases required input from a colorectal and a thoracic surgeon. We believe that the careful selection of the patients that can benefit from ultra-radical surgery and our model of joint surgery can explain our excellent results. Further research is essential to establish that ultra- radical surgery has an acceptable rate of morbidity for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Role of partner support in psychosexual aspects of vulvar dermatoses.

Women with vulvar dermatoses report a psychosexual effect due to the chronicity of symptoms and long-term treatment as the disabling nature of the condition impacts their sexual relationship. Partner role and support in the management of psychosexual impact are poorly understood and are not part of the routine care for increasing number of women with vulvar dermatoses. This paper provides an aide-mémoire for identifying patient concerns and supporting the partner. Holistic care of the affected women comprises assessment and management of the psychosexual impact of the disease on them and their partners through a dyadic or paired perspective. Limitations regarding the impact of increased virtual consultations, secondary to the recent global pandemic, and issues related to gender identity with sexual orientation are recognized.

Management of Vulvar Cancer Precursors: A Survey of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine how experts treat vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (VHSIL) and differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN). METHOD: A 26-question survey was designed through a literature review, reviewed by the Survey Committee of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), and distributed to all ISSVD members via e-mail in January 2019. RESULTS: Overall, 90 of 441 physician members consented to participate and 78 of 90 were eligible to complete the survey. Most respondents were gynecologists (77%), followed by dermatologists (12%). Forty-five percent responded that their pathology was being reported using the 2015 ISSVD terminology of vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesions. The most common first-line treatments were as follows: unifocal VHSIL-excision (65%), multifocal VHSIL-imiquimod 5% (45%), VHSIL in a hair-bearing area-excision (69%), and clitoral disease-imiquimod 5% (47%). In the recurrent VHSIL, excision was favored (28%), followed by imiquimod 5% (26%) and laser (19%). Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia was most often first treated with excision (82%), and more patients were referred to gynecologic oncology. Most patients were seen in follow-up at 3 months (range: 1 week-6 months). Sixty-seven respondents provided 26 different ways to follow treated patients, which were most commonly every 6 months for 2 years and then yearly (25%), followed by every 6 months indefinitely (18%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of VHSIL and dVIN varies among vulvar experts with excision being the most common treatment, except in multifocal VHSIL where imiquimod is commonly used. There is wide variation in how patients are followed after treatment.