RESUMO
The challenges in controlling the pandemic have been exacerbated by the disease's morbidity and the emergence of additional COVID-19 variants. The use of emergency vaccines to circumvent these challenges has sparked mixed opinions on their effectiveness. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines on clinical outcomes such as incidence, hospitalization, and ventilation rates in both vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials were searched on April 21, 2022, to extract published articles comparing vaccinated COVID-19 patients versus unvaccinated COVID-19 patients and their clinical outcomes. The clinical outcomes studied were incidence rate, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and hospitalization rates. The analysis was performed with Review Manager (RevMan) software. Random-effect models were used to calculate pooled odds ratio and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). In our meta-analysis, we have identified a total of 250 published findings, encompassing 15 studies that involved a cumulative count of 24,164,227 individuals diagnosed with COVID-19. Being unvaccinated had a significant association with severe clinical outcomes in patients infected with COVID-19. Unvaccinated individuals were 2.36 times more likely to be infected, with a 95% CI ranging from 1.13 to 4.94 (p = 0.02). Unvaccinated subjects with COVID-19 infection were 6.93 times more likely to be admitted to the ICU than their vaccinated counterparts, with a 95% CI ranging from 3.57 to 13.46 (p < 0.0001). The hospitalization rate was 3.37 higher among the unvaccinated compared to those vaccinated, with a 95% CI ranging from 1.92 to 5.93 (p < 0.0001). In addition, patients with COVID-19 infection who are unvaccinated were 6.44 times more likely to be mechanically ventilated than those vaccinated, with a 95% CI ranging from 3.13 to 13.23 (p < 0.0001). Overall, our study revealed that vaccination against COVID-19 disease is beneficial and effective in mitigating the spread of the infection and associated clinical outcomes. However, more awareness and proper education must be made to increase vaccine acceptance. We, therefore, recommend and urge all stakeholders involved in COVID-19 prevention, management, and control to strengthen awareness and educate the people on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination.
RESUMO
Aortic dissection is characterized by a tear or rupture in the intimal layer of the aorta causing blood to flow between the layers of the arterial wall, thus separating them. While cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a life-saving intervention, it can unintentionally contribute to the development or worsening of aortic dissection. The forceful chest compressions involved in CPR can put significant pressure on the fragile aortic wall, potentially leading to a tear or rupture. This highlights the delicate balance between life-saving measures and the potential risks they carry. Though studies have been done on the effects of CPR on the thoracic wall, few reports have studied the effects on the structures that lie in the thoracic cavity. The authors present a 63-year-old with a history of thoracic aneurysm repair who experienced a cardiac arrest while choking on food at home. The patient received CPR and a CT scan done thereafter revealed thoracic dissection and rupture. The patient received medical management in the Intensive Care Unit but eventually expired due to irreversible neurological damage. This highlights the importance of recognizing that CPR can pose a risk for aortic dissection and rupture, particularly in individuals with prior aortic repairs. It emphasizes the need for developing protocols to monitor patients who have undergone aneurysmal repair and adjusting CPR techniques to suit their specific needs. Additionally, further studies are needed to understand how often aortic complications occur after CPR and to provide guidance for follow-up care in patients who have had aortic repairs. By implementing these measures, we can improve outcomes and safety during resuscitation.
