The changing landscape in epilepsy imaging: Unmasking subtle and unique entities.

Dramatic changes have occurred recently in the field of epilepsy, including a fundamental shift in the etiology of epileptogenic substrates found at surgery. Hippocampal sclerosis is no longer the most common etiology found at epilepsy surgery and this decrease has been associated with an increase in the incidence of focal cortical dysplasia and encephaloceles. Significant advances have been made in molecular biology and genetics underlying the basis of malformations of cortical development, and our ability to detect epileptogenic abnormalities with MR imaging has markedly improved. This article begins with a discussion of these trends and reviews imaging techniques essential for detecting of subtle epilepsy findings. Representative examples of subtle imaging findings are presented, which are often overlooked but should not be missed. These include temporal lobe encephaloceles, malformations of cortical development (and especially focal cortical dysplasia), hippocampal sclerosis, hippocampal malformation (also known as HIMAL), ulegyria, autoimmune encephalitis, and Rasmussen's encephalitis. Recent findings on the pathophysiology and genetic underpinnings of several causes of localization-related epilepsy are incorporated. For instance, it has been recently found that focal cortical dysplasia IIb, tuberous sclerosis, hemimegalencephaly, and gangliogliomas are all the result of mutations of the mTOR pathway for cell growth.

Arterial distensibility in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: is it a predisposing factor for rupture risk?

BACKGROUND: A risk factor assessment that reliably predicts whether patients are predisposed to intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture has yet to be formulated. As such, the clinical management of unruptured IA remains unclear. Our aim was to determine whether impaired arterial distensibility and hypertrophic remodeling might be indicators of risk for IA rupture. MATERIAL/METHODS: The study population (n=49) was selected from consecutive admissions for either unruptured IA (n=23) or ruptured IA (n=26) from January to December 2010. Hemodynamic measures were taken from every patient, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure using a sphygmomanometer. Unruptured IA and ruptured IA characteristics, including aneurysmal shape, size, angle, aspect ratio, and bottleneck factor, were measured and calculated from transverse brain CT angiography images. With ultrasound, the right common carotid artery intima-media thickness was measured, as well as the lumen diameter during systole and diastole. Arterial wall strain, distensibility, stiffness index, and elastic modulus were calculated and compared between patients with unruptured IAs and ruptured IAs. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: General demographic data did not differ between patients with unruptured IAs and ruptured IAs. Greater mean intima-media thickness (p=0.013), mean stiffness index (p=0.044), and mean elastic modulus (p=0.026) were observed for patients with ruptured IAs. Moreover, mean strain (p=0.013) and mean distensibility (p=0.024) were decreased in patients with ruptured IAs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ruptured IAs demonstrated decreased arterial distensibility and increased intima-media thickness at the level of the carotid arteries. By measuring these parameters via ultrasound, it may be possible to predict whether patients with existing IAs might rupture and hemorrhage into the subarachnoid space.

Cervical ribs: identification on MRI and clinical relevance.

To determine the prevalence of cervical ribs on cervical spine MRI and clinical relevance, we reviewed 2500 studies for cervical ribs and compression of neurovascular structures and compared to CT, when available. Brachial plexus or subclavian artery contact by cervical rib was identified on MRI and/or CT in 12 cases with diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome in one. Cervical ribs were identified on 1.2% (25/2083) of examinations, lower than on CT (2%), but MRI may offer equivalent anatomic explanation for patient symptoms.