Effects of postural threat on the scaling of anticipatory postural adjustments in young and older adults.

Introduction: The ability to scale anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) according to the predicted size of the upcoming movement is reduced with aging. While age-related changes in central set may be one reason for this effect, an individual's emotional state might also contribute to changes in anticipatory postural control. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether an altered emotional state, as elicited through postural threat, alters the scaling of APAs during a handle pull movement in young and older adults. It was hypothesized that the presence of postural threat would lead to more homogenous APAs (i.e., less scaling of APAs) across a range of pulling forces. Methods: Young (n = 23) and older adults (n = 16) stood on top of a force plate that was mounted to a motorized platform. From this position, participants performed a series of handle pull trials without (no threat) or with (threat) the possibility of receiving a postural perturbation in the form of an unpredictable surface translation. Handle pulls were performed at force levels between 50 and 90% of maximum force. For each trial, the magnitude and timing of the APA were quantified from center of pressure (COP) recordings as well as electromyographic (EMG) activity of the soleus and medial gastrocnemius. The scaling of APAs with respect to force exertion was then determined through regression analyses and by comparing APAs during pulls of lower versus higher force. Results and discussion: As evidenced by their smaller slope of the regression line between various dependent measures (i.e., COP velocity, soleus EMG onset latency, and soleus EMG amplitude) and the pulled forces, older adults demonstrated less scaling of APAs than the young. However, increases in arousal, anxiety and fear of falling due to postural threat, only minimally altered the scaling of APAs. Regardless of age, the slope of the regressions for none of the measures were affected by threat while only the soleus and medial gastrocnemius EMG onsets demonstrated significant force × threat interaction effects. These results suggest that the decreased ability to scale APAs with aging is unlikely to be due to changes in emotional state.

Postural threat increases sample entropy of postural control.

Introduction: Postural threat elicits modifications to standing balance. However, the underlying neural mechanism(s) responsible remain unclear. Shifts in attention focus including directing more attention to balance when threatened may contribute to the balance changes. Sample entropy, a measure of postural sway regularity with lower values reflecting less automatic and more conscious control of balance, may support attention to balance as a mechanism to explain threat-induced balance changes. The main objectives were to investigate the effects of postural threat on sample entropy, and the relationships between threat-induced changes in physiological arousal, perceived anxiety, attention focus, sample entropy, and traditional balance measures. A secondary objective was to explore if biological sex influenced these relationships. Methods: Healthy young adults (63 females, 42 males) stood quietly on a force plate without (No Threat) and with (Threat) the expectation of receiving a postural perturbation (i.e., forward/backward support surface translation). Mean electrodermal activity and anterior-posterior centre of pressure (COP) sample entropy, mean position, root mean square, mean power frequency, and power within low (0-0.05 Hz), medium (0.5-1.8 Hz), and high-frequency (1.8-5 Hz) components were calculated for each trial. Perceived anxiety and attention focus to balance, task objectives, threat-related stimuli, self-regulatory strategies, and task-irrelevant information were rated after each trial. Results and Discussion: Significant threat effects were observed for all measures, except low-frequency sway. Participants were more physiologically aroused, more anxious, and directed more attention to balance, task objectives, threat-related stimuli, and self-regulatory strategies, and less to task-irrelevant information in the Threat compared to No Threat condition. Participants also increased sample entropy, leaned further forward, and increased the amplitude and frequency of COP displacements, including medium and high-frequency sway, when threatened. Males and females responded in the same way when threatened, except males had significantly larger threat-induced increases in attention to balance and high-frequency sway. A combination of sex and threat-induced changes in physiological arousal, perceived anxiety, and attention focus accounted for threat-induced changes in specific traditional balance measures, but not sample entropy. Increased sample entropy when threatened may reflect a shift to more automatic control. Directing more conscious control to balance when threatened may act to constrain these threat-induced automatic changes to balance.

Cortical potentials time-locked to discrete postural events during quiet standing are facilitated during postural threat exposure.

During unperturbed bipedal standing, postural control is governed primarily by subcortical and spinal networks. However, it is unclear if cortical networks begin to play a greater role when stability is threatened. This study investigated how initial and repeated exposure to a height-related postural threat modulates cortical potentials time-locked to discrete centre of pressure (COP) events during standing. Twenty-seven young adults completed a series of 90-s standing trials at LOW (0.8 m above the ground, away from edge) and HIGH (3.2 m above the ground, at edge) threat conditions. Three LOW trials were completed before and after 15 consecutive HIGH trials. Participants stood on a force plate while electroencephalographic (EEG) activity was recorded. To examine changes in cortical activity in response to discrete postural events, prominent forward and backward peaks in the anterior-posterior COP time series were identified. EEG data were waveform-averaged to these events and the amplitude of event-related cortical activity was calculated. At the LOW condition, event-related potentials (ERPs) were scarcely detectable. However, once individuals stood at the HIGH condition, clear ERPs were observed, with more prominent potentials being observed for forward (edge-directed), compared to backward, COP events. Since forward COP peaks accelerate the centre of mass away from the platform edge, these results suggest there is intermittent recruitment of cortical networks that may be involved in the detection and minimization of postural sway toward a perceived threat. This altered cortical engagement appears resistant to habituation and may contribute to threat-related balance changes that persist following repeated threat exposure. KEY POINTS: While standing balance control is regulated primarily by subcortical and spinal processes, it is unclear if cortical networks play a greater role when stability is threatened. This study examined how cortical potentials time-locked to prominent peaks in the anterior-posterior centre of pressure (COP) time series were modulated by exposure to a height-related postural threat. While cortical potentials recorded over the primary sensorimotor cortices were scarcely detectable under non-threatening conditions, clear cortical potentials were observed when individuals stood under conditions of height-related threat. Cortical potentials were larger in response to COP peaks directed toward, compared to away from, the platform edge, and showed limited habituation with repeated threat exposure. Since forward COP peaks accelerate the centre of mass away from the platform edge, these findings suggest that when balance is threatened, there is intermittent recruitment of cortical networks, which may minimize the likelihood of falling in the direction of a perceived threat.

Facilitation and Habituation of Cortical and Subcortical Control of Standing Balance Following Repeated Exposure to a Height-related Postural Threat.

Threats to stability elicit context-specific changes in balance control; however, the underlying neural mechanisms are not fully understood. Previous work has speculated that a shift toward greater supraspinal control may contribute to threat-related balance changes. This study investigated how neural correlates of cortical and subcortical control of balance were affected by initial and repeated exposure to a height-related postural threat. Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) between EEG recorded over the sensorimotor cortex and EMG recorded from the soleus (SOL) provided an estimate of cortical control, while intermuscular coherence (IMC) between bilateral SOL provided estimates of both cortical and subcortical control. These outcomes, along with measures of psychological and arousal state and standing balance control, were examined in 28 healthy young adults during a series of 90-s quiet standing trials completed at LOW (0.8 m above ground; away from edge) and HIGH (3.2 m above ground, at edge) threat conditions. Initial exposure to threat significantly increased gamma-band CMC (31-40 Hz) and IMC at frequencies thought to be mediated by cortical (21-40 Hz) and subcortical (5-20 Hz) substrates. Following repeated threat exposure, only estimates of cortical control (gamma CMC and 21-40 Hz IMC) demonstrated significant habituation. Estimates of cortical control changed in parallel with high-frequency centre of pressure power (>0.5 Hz) and plantar-dorsiflexor coactivation, but not other threat-related balance changes which did not habituate. These results support the hypothesis that postural threat induces a shift toward more supraspinal control of balance, and suggests this altered neural control may contribute to specific threat-related balance changes.

Initial experience of balance assessment introduces 'first trial' effects on emotional state and postural control.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and arousal have been shown to influence balance control and, therefore, have the potential to confound balance assessment. It has been suggested that the 'first-trial' effect, where performance on the first trial of a balance task differs from subsequent trials, may be a result of participants being more anxious during their first experience of having their balance assessed. However, this remains speculative since limited work has simultaneously examined emotional state and balance control during repeated assessment of the same balance task. RESEARCH QUESTION: Determine how emotional state and standing balance control change over the course of repeated assessment. METHODS: Seventy-five healthy young adults completed five 120-s quiet standing trials. Psychological state was probed at each trial using self-report measures that assessed confidence, anxiety, and attention focus. Arousal was estimated from electrodermal activity and balance control was assessed from centre of pressure (COP) measures derived from forceplate data. Repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to determine how each of these estimates changed with repeated testing. RESULTS: There were significant changes in emotional state with repeated testing; self-report and autonomic measures indicated that participants were most anxious and physiologically aroused during the first trial. This emotional response diminished with repeated testing, although the greatest changes occurred from the first to second trial. Despite these changes in emotional state, only some COP outcomes significantly changed. Individuals leaned further forward during only the first trial and demonstrated higher frequency and velocity mediolateral COP oscillations during the first two trials. SIGNIFICANCE: When balance is assessed for the first time in an unfamiliar laboratory setting, there is a transient emotional response which appears sufficient to influence some aspects of balance control. It is critical to control for these confounds when designing experiments or interventions involving balance assessment.

Selective preservation of changes to standing balance control despite psychological and autonomic habituation to a postural threat.

Humans exhibit changes in postural control when confronted with threats to stability. This study used a prolonged threat exposure protocol to manipulate emotional state within a threatening context to determine if any threat-induced standing behaviours are employed independent of emotional state. Retention of balance adaptations was also explored. Thirty-seven adults completed a series of 90-s standing trials at two surface heights (LOW: 0.8 m above ground, away from edge; HIGH: 3.2 m above ground, at edge) on two visits 2-4 weeks apart. Psychological and autonomic state was assessed using self-report and electrodermal measures. Balance control was assessed using centre of pressure (COP) and lower limb electromyographic recordings. Upon initial threat exposure, individuals leaned backward, reduced low-frequency centre of pressure (COP) power, and increased high-frequency COP power and plantar/dorsiflexor coactivation. Following repeated exposure, the psychological and autonomic response to threat was substantially reduced, yet only high-frequency COP power and plantar/dorsiflexor coactivation habituated. Upon re-exposure after 2-4 weeks, there was partial recovery of the emotional response to threat and few standing balance adaptations were retained. This study suggests that some threat-induced standing behaviours are coupled with the psychological and autonomic state changes induced by threat, while others may reflect context-appropriate adaptations resistant to habituation.

The effects of perturbation type and direction on threat-related changes in anticipatory postural control.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the type and direction of postural perturbation threat differentially affect anticipatory postural control. Healthy young adults stood on a force plate fixed to a translating platform and completed a series of rise-to-toes movements without (No Threat) and with (Threat) the potential of receiving a postural perturbation to either their feet (15 participants) or torso (16 participants). Each type of perturbation threat was presented along the anteroposterior (A-P) or mediolateral (M-L) axis. For each condition, the A-P center of pressure (COP) signal and tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL) electromyographical (EMG) recordings were used to quantify the anticipatory postural adjustment (APA). Results indicated that across both threat types and directions, postural threat induced a 40.2% greater TA activation (p < 0.001), a 18.5% greater backward COP displacement (p < 0.001) and a 23.9% greater backward COP velocity (p < 0.001), leading to larger and faster APAs than the No Threat condition. Subsequently, a 7.7% larger forward COP displacement (p = 0.001), a 20.4% greater forward COP velocity (p < 0.001) and 43.2% greater SOL activation (p = 0.009) were observed during the execution phase of the rise-to-toes for the Threat compared to the No Threat condition. Despite these threat effects, there were no differences in the magnitude or velocity of APAs between the threat directsion conditions. Since the type and direction of perturbation-induced postural threat had minimal differential effects on anticipatory postural control, these factors are unlikely to explain the discrepancy of previous findings.

The effects of distraction on threat-related changes in standing balance control.

Research indicates that threat-induced changes in standing balance are associated with shifts in attention focus. This study investigated whether distracting attention modifies threat-induced changes in standing balance. Twenty-five healthy young adults stood without (No Threat) and with (Threat) the possibility of receiving a temporally unpredictable anteroposterior support surface translation. In both conditions, participants completed a distractor task that consisted of counting how often a pre-selected letter occurred in an auditory sequence, or no distractor task. Emotional responses to threat were quantified using electrodermal activity and self-report measures, while attention focus was quantified using self-report. Centre of pressure (COP) was measured to assess changes in standing balance. Results indicate that postural threat induced an emotional response, as well as broad shifts in attention focus and changes in standing balance. Distracting attention with a cognitive task mitigated threat-induced increases in medium-frequency COP displacements (0.5-1.8 Hz). These results provide support for a relationship between threat-related changes in balance control and attention focus.

Adaptation of emotional state and standing balance parameters following repeated exposure to height-induced postural threat.

Height-induced postural threat influences standing balance control. However, it is unknown if minimizing individuals' emotional response to threat moderates this relationship. This study repeatedly exposed individuals to height-induced postural threat to determine if reducing the emotional response to threat influences standing balance control. Sixty-eight young adults completed a series of standing trials at LOW (0.8 m above ground, away from edge) and HIGH (3.2 m above ground, at edge) postural threat conditions. Emotional state was assessed using self-report and electrodermal measures. Standing balance was assessed through analysis of centre of pressure (COP) movement and lower leg electromyographic activity. Individuals' emotional response to threat was attenuated following repeated threat exposure. However, threat-induced changes in standing balance were largely preserved. When initially threatened, individuals leaned backward and demonstrated smaller amplitude and higher frequency of COP adjustments; these balance outcomes did not change following repeated threat exposure. Only high frequency COP oscillations (>1.8 Hz) and ankle muscle co-contraction showed any adaptation; regression analyses showed that these behavioural adaptations were accounted for by a combination of emotional and cognitive state changes. This suggests that some threat-induced standing balance changes are more closely linked with the emotional response to threat than others, and are therefore amendable to intervention.

Examining changes in corticospinal excitability and balance performance in response to social-comparative feedback.

BACKGROUND: Social-comparative feedback informs an individual that their performance was better or worse than the group. Previous studies have found that compared to knowledge of results alone, social-comparative feedback produces a valence response that results in larger improvements in balance performance. However, the neural processes contributing to these motor improvements have not yet been examined. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does social-comparative feedback alter corticospinal excitability and consequently, balance performance? METHODS: Thirty-six healthy young adults stood and maintained their balance on a stabiliometer for eight trials. After three of the trials, the neutral (i.e., only knowledge of results) group received their performance feedback (i.e., time on balance) while the other two groups also received positive (i.e., performed better than the group) or negative (i.e., performed worse than the group) social-comparative feedback. To measure corticospinal excitability, soleus motor-evoked potentials were elicited using transcranial magnetic stimulation at the beginning of the experiment, after the presentation of feedback, and at the end of the experiment. Pre- and post- ratings of confidence, perceived skill, motivation, and anxiety were also collected. RESULTS: The negative feedback group reported decreases in perceived skill (43 ± 29%) and balance confidence (26 ± 28%), while the positive group reported a 13 ± 17% increase in perceived skill. Despite these group differences in feedback perception, all three groups improved their balance performance by ≈35% (p < 0.001) by the eighth trial. However, this improvement in balance performance was not matched by any changes in corticospinal excitability over time (19.2 ± 55.9% change; p = 0.340) or between groups (p = 0.734). SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that social-comparative feedback, as presented in this study, does not affect corticospinal excitability and balance performance differently than knowledge of results (neutral feedback) alone. More arousing and more frequent forms of social-comparative feedback may be necessary for observing larger changes in the functional or neural control of balance.

Repeated exposure to the threat of perturbation induces emotional, cognitive, and postural adaptations in young and older adults.

Threat-related changes in postural control and their associations with changes in emotional and cognitive states are influenced by postural threat experience, however, limited work has explored individuals' capacity to adapt threat-related responses over longer periods of threat exposure. This study examined the effects of initial and repeated postural threat exposure on emotional, cognitive, and postural responses. Twenty-seven young and twenty-seven older adults stood on a force plate fixed to a translating platform. Threat was manipulated through expectation of a temporally and directionally (left or right) unpredictable platform perturbation. Participants completed one 60s stance trial with no expectation of perturbation (No Threat) followed by 24 trials with threat of perturbation (Threat). The stance period before each perturbation varied (5-60s) except on an early Threat trial and the last Threat trial (60s), which were used for analysis. Postural threat elicited similar emotional, cognitive, and postural changes in young and older adults. With initial threat exposure, participants reported increases in self-reported anxiety and physiological arousal, as well as broad changes in attention focus. Participants also significantly increased centre of pressure (COP) amplitude and frequency, and COP power within medium and high frequencies. With repeated threat exposure, anxiety, arousal, and some threat-induced changes in attention focus significantly adapted. These changes were accompanied by significant reductions in COP frequency and COP power within medium frequencies. Some emotional and cognitive outcomes returned to no threat levels while postural outcomes did not. This study suggests that some threat-related changes in standing postural control may be closely linked with one's emotional response to threat, while others may be context-dependent.

Postural Threat Modulates Perceptions of Balance-Related Movement During Support Surface Rotations.

Postural threat decreases center of pressure displacements yet increases the magnitude of movement-related conscious sway perception during quiet standing. It is unknown how these changes influence perception of whole body movement during dynamic stance. The aim of this study was to examine how postural threat influences whole-body movements and conscious perception of these movements during continuous pseudo-random support surface perturbations to stance. Sixteen healthy young adults stood on a moveable platform with their eyes closed for 7 min in a low threat (1.1 m above ground, away from edge) then high threat (3.2 m above ground, near edge) condition. Continuous pseudorandom roll platform rotations (± 4.5°, < 0.5 Hz) evoked large amplitude sway in the medio-lateral (ML) direction. Participants were asked to remain upright and avoid a fall at all times while tracking their ML body movements using a hand-held rotary encoder. Kinematic data was recorded using three markers placed on the upper trunk. Questionnaires assessed anxiety, fear and confidence. Electrodermal activity (EDA) was recorded as an indicator of arousal. Height-induced threat increased fear, anxiety and EDA, and decreased confidence. Trunk sway amplitude remained constant, while tracked movement amplitude increased at height. The gain for perceived to trunk movement was significantly increased at height across frequencies. Threat-related increases in sensitivity of sensory systems related to postural control and changes in cognitive and attention processes may lead to misperceptions of actual movement amplitudes, which may be important when examining increased fall risk in those with a fear of falling.

Exploring the relationship between threat-related changes in anxiety, attention focus, and postural control.

Individuals report directing attention toward and away from multiple sources when standing under height-related postural threat, and these changes in attention focus are associated with postural control modifications. As it is unknown whether these changes generalize to other types of threat situations, this study aimed to quantify changes in attention focus and examine their relationship with postural control changes in response to a direct threat to stability. Eighty young adults stood on a force plate fixed to a translating platform. Three postural threat conditions were created by altering the expectation of, and prior experience with, a postural perturbation: no threat of perturbation, threat without perturbation experience, and threat with perturbation experience. When threatened, participants were more anxious and reported directing more attention to movement processes, threat-related stimuli, and self-regulatory strategies, and less to task-irrelevant information. Postural sway amplitude and frequency increased with threat, with greater increases in frequency and smaller increases in amplitude observed with experience. Without experience, threat-related changes in postural control were accounted for by changes in anxiety; larger changes in anxiety were related to larger changes in sway amplitude. With experience, threat-related postural control changes were accounted for by changes in attention focus; increases in attention to movement processes were related to greater forward leaning and increases in sway amplitude, while increases in attention to self-regulatory strategies were related to greater increases in sway frequency. Results suggest that relationships between threat-related changes in anxiety, attention focus, and postural control depend on the context associated with the threat.

New Insights on Emotional Contributions to Human Postural Control.

It has been just over 20 years since the effects of height-induced threat on human postural control were first investigated. Raising the height of the support surface on which individuals stood increased the perceived consequences of instability and generated postural control changes. Since this initial work, converging evidence has accumulated supporting the efficacy of using height-induced threat to study the effects of emotions on postural control and confirming a direct influence of threat-related changes in arousal, anxiety, and fear of falling on all aspects of postural control, including standing, anticipatory, and reactive balance. In general, threat-related postural changes promote a greater physical safety margin while maintaining upright stance. We use the static balance literature to critically examine the current state of knowledge regarding: (1) the extent to which threat-related changes in postural control are sensitive to threat-related changes in emotions; (2) the underlying neurophysiological and cognitive mechanisms that may contribute to explaining the relationship between emotions and postural control; and (3) the generalizability of threat-related changes across different populations and types of threat. These findings have important implications for understanding the neuromechanisms that control healthy balance, and highlight the need to recognize the potential contributions of psychological and physiological factors to balance deficits associated with age or pathology. We conclude with a discussion of the practical significance of this research, its impact on improving diagnosis and treatment of postural control deficits, and potential directions for future research.

Does spinal excitability scale to the difficulty of the dual-task?

PURPOSE: This study examined whether spinal excitability, as measured by the soleus Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex), is scaled to the difficulty level of the dual-task being performed. METHODS: Twenty-two participants completed a combination of three balance task and three secondary cognitive (visuo-motor) task difficulty levels for a total of nine dual-task conditions. An additional eight participants were tested while performing the same three balance task difficulty levels on its own (i.e., single-tasking). The balance task required participants to maintain their balance on a fixed or rotating stabilometer while the visuo-motor task required participants to respond to moving targets presented on a monitor. Throughout each single- and dual-task trial, H-reflexes were elicited from the soleus. RESULTS: Although dual-task performance, as quantified by visuo-motor task accuracy as well as the root mean square of the stabilometer position and velocity, decreased by 10-34% with increasing dual-task difficulty (p < 0.05), no changes in the soleus H-reflex amplitude were observed between dual-task conditions (p = 0.483-0.758). This contrasts to when participants performed the balance task as a single-task, where the H-reflex amplitude decreased by ~25% from the easy to the hard balance task difficulty level (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the commonly reported finding of a reduced soleus H-reflex amplitude when individuals perform a less posturally stable task by itself, the results indicate that spinal excitability is not modulated as a function of dual-task difficulty. It is possible that when an individual's attentional resource capacity is exceeded during dual-tasking, they become ineffective in regulating spinal excitability for balance control.

The threat of a support surface translation affects anticipatory postural control.

This study examined how postural threat in the form of a potential perturbation affects an individual's ability to perform a heel raise. Seventeen adults completed three conditions: i) low threat, where participants performed a heel raise in response to a "go" tone, ii) high threat, where participants either heard the same "go" tone, for which they performed a heel raise, or experienced a support surface translation in the medio-lateral direction that disturbed their balance, and iii) choice reaction time task, where participants either completed a heel raise in response to the same "go" tone or a toe raise in response to a lower pitched tone. For all heel raise trials, anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) were quantified from center of pressure (COP) recordings and electromyographic (EMG) activity from the tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL). Results indicated that participants exhibited larger APAs, as reflected by the greater backward COP displacement (p=0.038) and velocity (p=0.022) as well as a larger TA EMG amplitude (p=0.045), during the high threat condition. During the execution phase of the heel raise, an earlier (p=0.014) and larger (p=0.041) SOL EMG activation were observed during the high threat condition. These results contrast with previous findings of reduced APAs when the postural threat was evoked through changes in surface height. Therefore, the characteristics of the postural threat must be considered to isolate the effects of threat on anticipatory movement control.

Threat-induced changes in attention during tests of static and anticipatory postural control.

Postural threat, manipulated through changes in surface height, influences postural control. Evidence suggests changes in attention may contribute to this relationship. However, limited research has explored where and how attention is reallocated when threatened. The primary aim of this study was to describe changes in attention when presented with a postural threat, while a secondary aim was to explore associations between changes in attention and postural control. Eighty-two healthy young adults completed tests of static (quiet standing) and anticipatory (rise to toes) postural control under threatening and non-threatening conditions. Participants completed an open-ended questionnaire after each postural task which asked them to list what they thought about or directed their attention toward. Each item listed was assigned a percentage value reflecting how much attention it occupied. Exit interviews were completed to help confirm where attention was directed. Five attention categories were identified: movement processes, threat-relevant stimuli, self-regulatory strategies, task objectives, and task-irrelevant information. For both postural tasks, the percentage values and number of items listed for movement processes, threat-relevant stimuli, and self-regulatory strategies increased under threatening compared to non-threatening conditions, while the percentage values and number of items listed for task objectives and task-irrelevant information decreased. Changes in attention related to movement processes and self-regulatory strategies were associated with changes in static postural control, while changes in attention related to threat-relevant stimuli were associated with changes in anticipatory postural control. These results suggest that threat-induced changes in attention are multidimensional and contribute to changes in postural control.

Reliability of the Achilles tendon tap reflex evoked during stance using a pendulum hammer.

The tendon tap reflex (T-reflex) is often evoked in relaxed muscles to assess spinal reflex circuitry. Factors contributing to reflex excitability are modulated to accommodate specific postural demands. Thus, there is a need to be able to assess this reflex in a state where spinal reflex circuitry is engaged in maintaining posture. The aim of this study was to determine whether a pendulum hammer could provide controlled stimuli to the Achilles tendon and evoke reliable muscle responses during normal stance. A second aim was to establish appropriate stimulus parameters for experimental use. Fifteen healthy young adults stood on a forceplate while taps were applied to the Achilles tendon under conditions in which postural sway was constrained (by providing centre of pressure feedback) or unconstrained (no feedback) from an invariant release angle (50°). Twelve participants repeated this testing approximately six months later. Within one experimental session, tap force and T-reflex amplitude were found to be reliable regardless of whether postural sway was constrained (tap force ICC=0.982; T-reflex ICC=0.979) or unconstrained (tap force ICC=0.968; T-reflex ICC=0.964). T-reflex amplitude was also reliable between experimental sessions (constrained ICC=0.894; unconstrained ICC=0.890). When a T-reflex recruitment curve was constructed, optimal mid-range responses were observed using a 50° release angle. These results demonstrate that reliable Achilles T-reflexes can be evoked in standing participants without the need to constrain posture. The pendulum hammer provides a simple method to allow researchers and clinicians to gather information about reflex circuitry in a state where it is involved in postural control.

Personality traits and individual differences predict threat-induced changes in postural control.

This study explored whether specific personality traits and individual differences could predict changes in postural control when presented with a height-induced postural threat. Eighty-two healthy young adults completed questionnaires to assess trait anxiety, trait movement reinvestment (conscious motor processing, movement self-consciousness), physical risk-taking, and previous experience with height-related activities. Tests of static (quiet standing) and anticipatory (rise to toes) postural control were completed under low and high postural threat conditions. Personality traits and individual differences significantly predicted height-induced changes in static, but not anticipatory postural control. Individuals less prone to taking physical risks were more likely to lean further away from the platform edge and sway at higher frequencies and smaller amplitudes. Individuals more prone to conscious motor processing were more likely to lean further away from the platform edge and sway at larger amplitudes. Individuals more self-conscious about their movement appearance were more likely to sway at smaller amplitudes. Evidence is also provided that relationships between physical risk-taking and changes in static postural control are mediated through changes in fear of falling and physiological arousal. Results from this study may have indirect implications for balance assessment and treatment; however, further work exploring these factors in patient populations is necessary.

The influence of instruction on arm reactions in individuals with Parkinson's disease.

The purpose of this study was to examine whether explicit instruction would facilitate arm reactions in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). Individuals with (n = 10) and without (n = 15) PD responded to unexpected support-surface translations. To recover their balance, participants were required to either respond naturally (react natural) or to reach toward a nearby handrail (explicit instruction). Arm reactions were quantified from electromyographic (EMG) and arm kinematic recordings. Results showed that while explicit instruction led to earlier and larger arm reactions, the benefits were not different between individuals with and without PD. Specifically, when explicitly instructed to reach toward a handrail, shoulder EMG responses were 4% earlier (p = .005) and 32% larger (p < .001) compared to when instructed to react naturally. A 44% greater peak wrist medio-lateral velocity (p < .001) and a 29% greater peak shoulder abduction angular velocity (p < .001) were also observed when participants were instructed to direct their arms toward a handrail after an unexpected support-surface translation. Explicit instruction also led to a higher frequency of handrail contact and a 49 ms earlier time to handrail contact compared to the react natural condition (p = .015). These results suggest that providing instruction to promote arm movement may help reduce falls in older adults with and without PD.