Blood pressure responses to handgrip exercise but not apnea or mental stress are enhanced in women with a recent history of preeclampsia.

Preeclampsia is a risk factor for future cardiovascular diseases. However, the mechanisms underlying this association remain unclear, limiting effective prevention strategies. Blood pressure responses to acute stimuli may reveal cardiovascular dysfunction not apparent at rest, identifying individuals at elevated cardiovascular risk. Therefore, we compared blood pressure responsiveness with acute stimuli between previously preeclamptic (PPE) women (34 ± 5 yr old, 13 ± 6 mo postpartum) and women following healthy pregnancies (Ctrl; 29 ± 3 yr old, 15 ± 4 mo postpartum). Blood pressure (finger photoplethysmography calibrated to manual sphygmomanometry-derived values; PPE: n = 12, Ctrl: n = 12) was assessed during end-expiratory apnea, mental stress, and isometric handgrip exercise protocols. Integrated muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was assessed in a subset of participants (peroneal nerve microneurography; PPE: n = 6, Ctrl: n = 8). Across all protocols, systolic blood pressure (SBP) was higher in PPE than Ctrl (main effects of group all P < 0.05). Peak changes in SBP were stressor specific: peak increases in SBP were not different between PPE and Ctrl during apnea (8 ± 6 vs. 6 ± 5 mmHg, P = 0.32) or mental stress (9 ± 5 vs. 4 ± 7 mmHg, P = 0.06). However, peak exercise-induced increases in SBP were greater in PPE than Ctrl (11 ± 5 vs. 7 ± 7 mmHg, P = 0.04). MSNA was higher in PPE than Ctrl across all protocols (main effects of group all P < 0.05), and increases in peak MSNA were greater in PPE than Ctrl during apnea (44 ± 6 vs. 27 ± 14 burst/100 hb, P = 0.04) and exercise (25 ± 8 vs. 13 ± 11 burst/100 hb, P = 0.01) but not different between groups during mental stress (2 ± 3 vs. 0 ± 5 burst/100 hb, P = 0.41). Exaggerated pressor and sympathetic responses to certain stimuli may contribute to the elevated long-term risk for cardiovascular disease in PPE.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Women with recent histories of preeclampsia demonstrated higher systolic blood pressures across sympathoexcitatory stressors relative to controls. Peak systolic blood pressure reactivity was exacerbated in previously preeclamptic women during small muscle-mass exercises, although not during apneic or mental stress stimuli. These findings underscore the importance of assessing blood pressure control during a variety of experimental conditions in previously preeclamptic women to elucidate mechanisms that may contribute to their elevated cardiovascular disease risk.

Effects of androgen excess and body mass index on endothelial function in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is associated with endothelial dysfunction; whether this is attributable to comorbid hyperandrogenism and/or obesity remains to be established. Therefore, we 1) compared endothelial function between lean and overweight/obese (OW/OB) women with and without androgen excess (AE)-PCOS and 2) examined androgens as potential modulators of endothelial function in these women. The flow-mediated dilation (FMD) test was applied in 14 women with AE-PCOS (lean: n = 7; OW/OB: n = 7) and 14 controls (CTRL; lean: n = 7, OW/OB: n = 7) at baseline (BSL) and following 7 days of ethinyl estradiol supplementation (EE; 30 µg/day) to assess the effect of a vasodilatory therapeutic on endothelial function; at each time point we assessed peak increases in diameter during reactive hyperemia (%FMD), shear rate, and low flow-mediated constriction (%LFMC). BSL %FMD was attenuated in lean AE-PCOS versus both lean CTRL (5.2 ± 1.5 vs. 10.3 ± 2.6%, P < 0.01) and OW/OB AE-PCOS (5.2 ± 1.5 vs. 6.6 ± 0.9%, P = 0.048). A negative correlation between BSL %FMD and free testosterone was observed in lean AE-PCOS only (R2 = 0.68, P = 0.02). EE increased %FMD in both OW/OB groups (CTRL: 7.6 ± 0.6 vs. 10.4 ± 2.5%, AE-PCOS: 6.6 ± 0.9 vs. 9.6 ± 1.7%, P < 0.01), had no impact on %FMD in lean AE-PCOS (5.17 ± 1.5 vs. 5.17 ± 1.1%, P = 0.99), and reduced %FMD in lean CTRL (10.3 ± 2.6 vs. 7.6 ± 1.2%, P = 0.03). Collectively, these data indicate that lean women with AE-PCOS exhibit more severe endothelial dysfunction than their OW/OB counterparts. Furthermore, endothelial dysfunction appears to be mediated by circulating androgens in lean but not in OW/OB AE-PCOS, suggesting a difference in the endothelial pathophysiology of AE-PCOS between these phenotypes.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We present evidence for marked endothelial dysfunction in lean women with androgen excess polycystic ovary syndrome (AE-PCOS) that is 1) associated with free testosterone levels, 2) impaired relative to overweight/obese women with AE-PCOS, and 3) unchanged following short-term ethinyl estradiol supplementation. These data indicate an important direct effect of androgens on the vascular system in women with AE-PCOS. Our data also suggest that the relationship between androgens and vascular health differs between phenotypes of AE-PCOS.

Sex differences in sympathetic neurovascular and neurohemodynamic relationships during cold pressor test.

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) affects vascular resistance differently in women and men. However, whether this sex difference persists during pronounced increases in MSNA remains unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine sex differences in neurovascular transduction during cold pressor test (CPT)-mediated sympathoexcitation. Integrated peroneal MSNA (microneurography) was measured at rest and during a 3-min CPT in young healthy women (n = 11) and men (n = 10). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured beat-by-beat (Finometer), and superficial femoral artery blood flow was measured using duplex ultrasound. Femoral vascular resistance (FVR) was quantified as MAP/femoral blood flow (mmHg/mL/min). Baseline MSNA was similar between women and men (14 ± 9 vs. 15 ± 9 bursts/100 heartbeat, respectively; P = 0.83), whereas MAP was lower (86 ± 7 vs. 92 ± 4 mmHg; P = 0.047), and FVR was greater in women than men (0.54 ± 0.16 vs. 0.36 ± 0.15 mmHg/mL/min; P = 0.02). CPT-induced increases in MSNA were similar between the sexes (19 ± 11 vs. 26 ± 14 bursts/100 heartbeat; P = 0.26) whereas increases in MAP (7 ± 3 vs. 10 ± 3 mmHg; P = 0.03) and FVR (3.2 ± 18.6 vs. 26.8 ± 12.8%; P < 0.01) were smaller in women than in men. Within men, CPT- induced increases in MSNA predicted increases in MAP (R2 = 0.51, P = 0.02) and FVR (R2 = 0.49, P = 0.02). However, MSNA did not predict MAP (R2 = 0.11, P = 0.35) or FVR (R2 = 0.07, P = 0.46) in women. Our findings demonstrate that men experience robust CPT-induced MAP responses that are driven by both neurovascular (MSNA-FVR) and neurohemodynamic (MSNA-MAP) coupling. These relationships were not observed in women, indicating that even during pronounced increases in sympathetic outflow, MSNA is not predictive of vascular nor blood pressure outcomes in young healthy women.

Sex differences in dynamic blood pressure regulation: beat-by-beat responses to muscle sympathetic nerve activity.

It has been suggested that sex differences in acute blood pressure fluctuations occur during the periods of time between bursts of muscle sympathetic nerve activity. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that men experience more dynamic changes in mean arterial pressure (Finometer MIDI) than women during acute sympathoinhibition (i.e., slow breathing) in which bursts of sympathetic activity occur more infrequently than at rest. We tested healthy women (n = 9) and men (n = 9) of similar age (22 ± 2 vs. 23 ± 3 yr, P = 0.6). Custom software was used to calculate beat-by-beat changes in blood pressure following sympathetic burst and nonburst sequences (recorded using microneurography) during 10 min of supine rest and a 15-min bout of slow breathing. During slow breathing following nonburst sequences, women demonstrated smaller overall reductions in mean arterial pressure compared with men over the subsequent 15 cardiac cycles (P < 0.01). In addition, following a burst of sympathetic activity, women experienced greater overall increases in mean arterial pressure compared with men over the following 15 cardiac cycles (P < 0.01). Despite these differences, the peak and nadir changes in arterial pressure following burst and nonburst sequences were not different between the sexes (P = 0.45 and P = 0.48, burst and nonburst sequences, respectively). As such, these data suggest that women respond to a burst of sympathetic activity with more sustained increases in blood pressure than men, coupled with improved maintenance of blood pressure during acute periods of sympathetic quiescence. In other words, these findings suggest that men rely more on frequent bursts of sympathetic activity to acutely regulate arterial pressure than women.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate that during acute sympathoinhibition, women demonstrate more sustained increases in blood pressure following sympathetic bursts of activity than men. Likewise, during prolonged sympathetic quiescence, blood pressure is less labile in women than men. This suggests that lower overall blood pressure in young women may not be mediated by smaller beat-by-beat changes in blood pressure in response to sympathetic outflow but may instead be mediated by a lower frequency of sympathetic bursts.

A recent history of preeclampsia is associated with elevated central pulse wave velocity and muscle sympathetic outflow.

Preeclampsia is associated with the development of cardiovascular diseases later in life. To investigate this phenomenon, we compared established markers of cardiovascular dysregulation between previously preeclamptic women (PPE; n = 12, 13 ± 6 mo postpartum, 34 ± 6 yr) and women who had previously had an uncomplicated pregnancy [control (CTRL); n = 12, 15 ± 4 mo postpartum; 29 ± 3 yr]. We hypothesized that PPE would present with elevated arterial stiffness (assessed as central and peripheral pulse wave velocity) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography) and blunted baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) relative to CTRL. Blood pressure (Finometer) was similar between PPE and CTRL (mean arterial pressure: 94 ± 11 vs. 89 ± 9, P = 0.16). Central (6.92 ± 0.21 vs. 6.24 ± 0.22 m/s, P = 0.04) but not peripheral arterial stiffness (7.52 ± 0.19 vs. 7.09 ± 0.19 m/s, P = 0.13) was elevated in PPE versus CTRL (values normalized to MAP). MSNA was also elevated in PPE versus CTRL (22 ± 7 vs. 13 ± 5 bursts/min, P = 0.01), although this was independent of arterial stiffness (central: r2 = 0.01, P = 0.74; peripheral: r2 = 0.01, P = 0.74). Cardiovagal BRS was blunted in PPE versus CTRL (15 ± 5 vs. 28 ± 1 ms/mmHg, P = 0.01), whereas sympathetic vascular BRS was similar (-3.2 ± 0.9 vs. -3.1 ± 1.4 bursts·100 hb-1·mmHg-1, P = 0.88). Cardiovagal and sympathetic BRS were inversely correlated in both CTRL (r2 = 0.43; P = 0.05) and PPE (r2 = 0.69; P = 0.04), supporting a compensatory mechanism resulting in normal blood pressures in both groups. Overall, these data indicate that PPE retain their ability to buffer elevated MSNA. We propose that the higher incidence of cardiovascular disease observed later in life in PPE results from this arterial stiffness, combined with the loss of protective vascular mechanisms and the "unmasking" of high MSNA.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate that resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity is elevated in women with a recent history of preeclampsia relative to women who have recently had uncomplicated pregnancies and without a history of preeclampsia. Structural changes in the central arteries are associated with arterial stiffness following preeclampsia, independent of changes in the sympathetic nervous system. The structural changes are observed in these relatively young previously preeclamptic women, indicating elevated cardiovascular risk. Our data suggest that with aging (and the gradual loss of vascular protection for women, as established by others), this risk will become exaggerated compared with women who have had normal pregnancies.

Device-guided slow breathing reduces blood pressure and sympathetic activity in young normotensive individuals of both sexes.

Slow breathing (SLOWB) is recommended for use as an adjuvant treatment for hypertension. However, the extent to which blood pressure (BP) responses to SLOWB differ between men and women are not well-established. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that an acute bout of SLOWB would induce larger decreases in BP in males than in females, given that males typically have higher resting BP. We also examined autonomic contributors to reduced BP during SLOWB; that is, muscle sympathetic nerve activity and spontaneous cardiovagal (sequence method) and vascular sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity. We tested normotensive females (n = 10, age: 22 ± 2 y, body mass index: 22 ± 2 kg/m2) and males (n = 12, age: 23 ± 3 y, body mass index: 26 ± 4 kg/m2). Subjects were tested at baseline and during the last 5 min of a 15-min RESPeRATE-guided SLOWB session. Overall, SLOWB reduced systolic BP by 3.2 ± 0.8 mmHg (main effect, P < 0.01). Females had lower systolic BP (main effect, P = 0.02); we observed no interaction between sex and SLOWB. SLOWB also reduced muscle sympathetic nerve activity burst incidence by -5.0 ± 1.4 bursts/100 heartbeats (main effect, P < 0.01). Although females tended to have lower burst incidence (main effect, P = 0.1), there was no interaction between sex and SLOWB. Cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity improved during SLOWB (21.0 vs. 36.0 ms/mmHg, P = 0.03) with no effect of sex. Despite lower overall BP in females, our data support a lack of basement effect on SLOWB-induced reductions in BP, as SLOWB was equally effective in reducing BP in males and females. Our findings support the efficacy of the RESPeRATE device for reducing BP in both sexes, even in young, normotensive individuals.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We provide support for the effectiveness of device-guided slow breathing for blood pressure reduction in young normotensive women and men. Despite having lower baseline blood pressure and sympathetic nerve activity, women experienced equivalent reductions in both measures in response to RESPeRATE-guided slow breathing as men. Thus, slow breathing appears to be effective in young healthy normotensive individuals of both sexes and may be an ideal preventative therapy against future hypertension.

Blood pressure predicts endothelial function and the effects of ethinyl estradiol exposure in young women.

Hypertension, obesity, and endothelial function predict cardiovascular disease in women, and these factors are interrelated. We hypothesized that hypertension and obesity are associated with endothelial dysfunction in young women and that short-term ethinyl estradiol exposure mitigates this dysfunction. We examined flow-mediated dilation (FMD) responses before and during 7 days of oral ethinyl estradiol (30 µg/day) in 19 women (25 ± 5, 18-35 yr). We divided our sample into two groups based on two criteria: blood pressure and obesity. Women were divided into normal blood pressure (NBP; mean arterial pressure range: 78-91 mmHg, n = 7) and high blood pressure (HBP; mean arterial pressure range: 95-113 mmHg, n = 9) groups. We also stratified our subjects by body composition (lean: 18-31%, n = 8; obese: 38-59%, n = 9). We evaluated brachial FMD after two distinct shear stress stimuli: occlusion alone and occlusion with ischemic handgrip exercise. Obesity was unrelated to both FMD responses. Before ethinyl estradiol administration, the HBP group had blunted ischemic exercise responses relative to the NBP group (8.0 ± 3.5 vs. 12.3 ± 3.2%, respectively, P = 0.05). However, during ethinyl estradiol administration, ischemic exercise responses increased in the HBP group (12.8 ± 6.1%, P = 0.04) but decreased in the NBP group (5.6 ± 2.4%, P = 0.01). Standard FMD did not reveal differences between groups. In summary, 1) moderate HBP predicted endothelial impairment, 2) ethinyl estradiol administration had divergent effects on FMD in women with NBP versus HBP, and 3) enhanced FMD (ischemic handgrip exercise) revealed differences in endothelial function, whereas standard FMD (occlusion alone) did not. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We are the first to show that mild hypertension is a stronger predictor of endothelial dysfunction than obesity in healthy women without overt cardiovascular dysfunction. Importantly, the standard 5-min flow-mediated vasodilation stimulus did not detect endothelial dysfunction in our healthy population; only an enhanced ischemic handgrip exercise shear stress stimulus detected endothelial impairment. Estradiol administration increased flow-mediated dilation in women with high blood pressure, so it may be a therapeutic intervention to improve endothelial function.