Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 575, 2024 May 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702640

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is common in chronic medication users, which increases the risk of drug related problems. A suitable intervention is the clinical medication review (CMR) that was introduced in the Netherlands in 2012, but the effectiveness might be hindered by limited implementation in community pharmacies. Therefore our aim was to describe the current implementation of CMRs in Dutch community pharmacies and to identify barriers to the implementation. METHODS: An online questionnaire was developed based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and consisted of 58 questions with open ended, multiple choice or Likert-scale answering options. It was sent out to all Dutch community pharmacies (n = 1,953) in January 2021. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: A total of 289 (14.8%) community pharmacies filled out the questionnaire. Most of the pharmacists agreed that a CMR has a positive effect on the quality of pharmacotherapy (91.3%) and on medication adherence (64.3%). Pharmacists structured CMRs according to available selection criteria or guidelines (92%). Pharmacists (90%) believed that jointly conducting a CMR with a general practitioner (GP) improved their mutual relationship, whereas 21% believed it improved the relationship with a medical specialist. Lack of time was reported by 43% of pharmacists and 80% (fully) agreed conducting CMRs with a medical specialist was complicated. Most pharmacists indicated that pharmacy technicians can assist in performing CMRs, but they rarely do in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of time and suboptimal collaboration with medical specialists are the most important barriers to the implementation of CMRs.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia , Humanos , Países Baixos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/organização & administração , Polimedicação , Masculino , Feminino , Farmacêuticos , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/organização & administração , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/normas
2.
BMC Psychiatry ; 21(1): 402, 2021 08 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34389017

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) and/or coronary heart disease (CHD) are at high risk to develop major depression. Preventing incident major depression may be an important tool in reducing the personal and societal burden of depression. The aim of the current study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a stepped care program to prevent major depression (Step-Dep) in diabetes mellitus type 2 and/or coronary heart disease patients with subthreshold depression in comparison with usual care. METHODS: An economic evaluation with 12 months follow-up was conducted alongside a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial from a societal perspective. Participants received care as usual (n = 140) or Step-Dep (n = 96) which consisted of four sequential treatment steps: watchful waiting, guided self-help, problem solving treatment and referral to a general practitioner. Primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cumulative incidence of major depression. Costs were measured every 3 months. Missing data was imputed using multiple imputation. Uncertainty around cost-effectiveness outcomes was estimated using bootstrapping and presented in cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in QALYs or depression incidence between treatment groups. Secondary care costs (mean difference €1644, 95% CI €344; €3370) and informal care costs (mean difference €1930, 95% CI €528; €4089) were significantly higher in the Step-Dep group than in the usual care group. The difference in total societal costs (€1001, 95% CI €-3975; €6409) was not statistically significant. The probability of the Step-Dep intervention being cost-effective was low, with a maximum of 0.41 at a ceiling ratio of €30,000 per QALY gained and 0.32 at a ceiling ratio of €0 per prevented case of major depression. CONCLUSIONS: The Step-Dep intervention is not cost-effective compared to usual care in a population of patients with DM2/CHD and subthreshold depression. Therefore, widespread implementation cannot be recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register ( NTR3715 ).


Assuntos
Doença das Coronárias , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Doença das Coronárias/complicações , Doença das Coronárias/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
3.
Diabet Med ; 36(12): 1562-1572, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31215077

RESUMO

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies assessing the bi-directional association between depression and diabetes macrovascular and microvascular complications. Embase, Medline and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception through 27 November 2017. A total of 4592 abstracts were screened for eligibility. Meta-analyses used multilevel random/mixed-effects models. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Twenty-two studies were included in the systematic review. Sixteen studies examined the relationship between baseline depression and incident diabetes complications, of which nine studies involving over one million participants were suitable for meta-analysis. Depression was associated with an increased risk of incident macrovascular (HR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.30-1.47) and microvascular disease (HR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.25-1.41). Six studies examined the association between baseline diabetes complications and subsequent depression, of which two studies involving over 230 000 participants were suitable for meta-analysis. The results showed that diabetes complications increased the risk of incident depressive disorder (HR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.07-1.21). The quality analysis showed increased risk of bias notably in the representativeness of selected cohorts and ascertainment of exposure and outcome. Depression in people with diabetes is associated with an increased risk of incident macrovascular and microvascular complications. The relationship between depression and diabetes complications appears bi-directional. However, the risk of developing diabetes complications in depressed people is higher than the risk of developing depression in people with diabetes complications. The underlying mechanisms warrant further research.


Assuntos
Depressão/epidemiologia , Complicações do Diabetes/psicologia , Depressão/complicações , Angiopatias Diabéticas/psicologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , MEDLINE , Microvasos , Fatores de Risco
4.
Diabet Med ; 31(6): 747-53, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24494697

RESUMO

AIMS: To study symptom burden among older people and its associations with change in glucose metabolism status over a 7-year period. METHODS: We conducted a prospective population-based cohort study among 397 older people. We used the revised Diabetes Symptom Checklist to assess symptom burden. Glucose metabolism status was determined using an oral glucose tolerance test. Analyses were adjusted for multiple confounders, including cardiovascular risk and risk of depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale score ≥ 16). RESULTS: Revised Diabetes Symptom Checklist total scores (range 0-100) increased slightly over time among people with normal glucose metabolism (mean difference ß1.04; P = 0.04) and those with impaired glucose metabolism (ß1.96; P = 0.01), but not among people with Type 2 diabetes (ß0.46; P = 0.55). These associations between symptom burden and glucose status were attenuated after full adjustment for multiple confounders and remained statistically significant for those with impaired glucose status. Linear mixed models showed significant mean differences in revised Diabetes Symptom Checklist total scores over time when comparing people with Type 2 diabetes with those with normal or impaired glucose metabolism, but not when comparing subjects with impaired vs normal glucose metabolism; these results did not alter after full adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom burden increased gradually over time in the people with impaired glucose metabolism and those with normal glucose metabolism, but not in patients with Type 2 diabetes over a 7-year follow-up period.


Assuntos
Glicemia/metabolismo , Complicações do Diabetes/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Idoso , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Psychol Med ; 44(7): 1403-16, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23942242

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction (ED), low-grade inflammation (LGI) and oxidative stress (OxS) may be involved in the pathobiology of depression. Previous studies on the association of these processes in depression have yielded contradictory results. We therefore investigated comprehensively, in a population-based cohort study, the association between ED, LGI and OxS on the one hand and depressive symptoms on the other. METHOD: We used data from the Hoorn Study and determined biomarkers of ED [flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), von Willebrand factor, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, soluble thrombomodulin and soluble endothelial selectin], LGI [C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin 6, interleukin 8, serum amyloid A, myeloperoxidase (MPO) and sICAM-1] and OxS (oxidized low density lipoprotein and MPO). Depressive symptoms were quantified by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) questionnaire (n = 493; age 68 years; 49.9% female). Regression analyses were performed with the use of biomarker Z scores. Adjustments were made for age, sex and glucose metabolism status (cohort stratification variables) and prior cardiovascular disease, hypertension, waist-to-hip ratio, cholesterol levels, education level, physical activity, dietary habits, and the use of antihypertensive and/or lipid-lowering medication and/or metformin (potential confounders). RESULTS: After adjustment for age, sex and glucose metabolism status, one standard deviation increase in the ED Z score was associated with a 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-3.1] higher CES-D score. Additional adjustments did not materially change this result. LGI and OxS were not associated with the CES-D score. CONCLUSIONS: ED, as quantified by an array of circulating biomarkers and FMD, was independently associated with depressive symptoms. This study supports the hypothesis that ED plays an important role in the pathobiology of depression.


Assuntos
Depressão/etiologia , Endotélio Vascular/fisiopatologia , Inflamação/sangue , Estresse Oxidativo/fisiologia , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Depressão/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia
6.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci ; 20(4): 357-65, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22201213

RESUMO

AIMS: To determine the prevalence of psychosocial problems among Dutch children aged 8-12 years and studying its association with risk factors and quality of life. METHODS: This study was conducted within the framework of a community-based health study in the north-west region of the Netherlands. The cross-sectional study sample consisted of 2703 children (1392 boys and 1311 girls). Psychosocial problems and quality of life were measured with the extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and KIDSCREEN-10, respectively. Questionnaires and data about risk factors (parental education level, ethnicity, family structure, income, chronic diseases and life events) were completed by the parents or caregivers. RESULTS: The prevalence of psychosocial problems (SDQ score > or =14) in the total sample was 10.4%. The prevalence was higher in boys compared with girls (13.9% v. 6.6%, OR= 2.28; 95% CI = 1.75-2.97). Boys had significantly more hyperactivity/inattention, conduct, peer relationship and prosocial behaviour problems compared with girls. Risk factors associated with psychosocial problems were: one or more chronic disease(s), life event(s), a low parental educational level (for boys only) and an income under a modal level. Psychosocial problems were significantly inverse related with quality of life in the total sample (rho = -0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial problems are common in children, especially among boys, and are inversely related with children's quality of life. The identified risk factors in this study can be useful for developing targeted prevention strategies aimed at children at high risk for psychosocial problems.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Criança , Transtornos do Comportamento Infantil/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Comportamento Infantil/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
Diabet Med ; 27(6): 718-22, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20546295

RESUMO

AIMS: To assess the prevalence of diabetes in depressed patients compared with non-depressed matched controls and to compare diabetes regimen and co-morbidity in depressed patients with diabetes vs. non-depressed patients with diabetes in primary care in the Netherlands. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study over 3 years (2002-2004). Data for depressed patients (n = 7128) and non-depressed matched controls (n = 23,772) were available from an electronic medical record system of 20 general practices organized in one large primary care organization in the Netherlands. Matching was based on year and month of birth, sex and general practitioner. Diabetes, diabetes regimen (i.e. oral glucose medication, insulin or both) and co-morbidity were defined using Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification codes of delivered medication. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes was 5.5% (n = 393) among depressed patients, which was 2.6 times higher than in non-depressed matched controls where the figure was 2.1% (n = 494; P < 0.001). Diabetes regimen, i.e. the proportions of subjects on oral glucose medication, insulin or both did not differ among depressed patients with diabetes (51, 27 and 22%, respectively) compared with non-depressed patients with diabetes (51, 30, 19%; P = 0.53). Co-morbidity was significantly more prevalent among depressed patient with diabetes than in non-depressed patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with non-depressed matched controls, adults with treated depression have almost three times higher rates of diabetes. Depressed patients with diabetes had more co-morbidities compared with non-depressed patients with diabetes, whereas diabetes regimen did not differ.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Diabetes Mellitus/psicologia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comorbidade , Transtorno Depressivo/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Prevalência , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estatística como Assunto
8.
Diabet Med ; 25(7): 843-9, 2008 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18513303

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence and risk factors of depressive symptoms, comparing subjects with normal glucose metabolism (NGM), impaired glucose metabolism (IGM) or Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional data from a population-based cohort study conducted among 550 residents (276 men and 274 women) of the Hoorn region, the Netherlands. Levels of depressive symptoms were measured using the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D score > or = 16). Glucose metabolism status was determined by means of fasting and post-load glucose levels. RESULTS: The prevalence of depressive symptoms in men with NGM, IGM and DM2 was 7.7, 7.0 and 15.0% (P = 0.19) and for women 7.7, 23.1 and 19.7% (P < 0.01), respectively. Depression was significantly more common in women with IGM [odds ratio (OR) = 3.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.57 to 8.28] and women with DM2 (OR = 3.18, 95% CI = 1.31 to 7.74). In men, depression was not associated with IGM (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.32 to 2.57) and non-significantly more common in DM2 (OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 0.75 to 5.49). Adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular disease and diabetes symptoms reduced the strength of these associations. CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms are more common in women with IGM, but not men. Adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular disease and diabetes symptoms partially attenuated these associations, suggesting that these variables could be intermediate factors.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo/etiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Intolerância à Glucose/psicologia , Idoso , Glicemia/metabolismo , Estudos Transversais , Transtorno Depressivo/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Feminino , Intolerância à Glucose/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo
9.
Diabetologia ; 49(12): 2874-7, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17066302

RESUMO

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The association between depression and insulin resistance has been investigated in only a few studies, with contradictory results reported. The aim of this study was to determine whether the association between symptoms of depression and insulin resistance varies across glucose tolerance status and between men and women. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional data from a population-based cohort study in Hoorn, a medium-sized town in the Netherlands, were analysed. The study sample consisted of 541 men and women aged 55-75 years, of whom 260 had NGT, 164 had IGT and 117 had established type 2 diabetes mellitus. Main outcome measures were insulin resistance defined by the homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and symptoms of depression using the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). RESULTS: In the total sample, we found a weak positive correlation between the depressive symptoms CED-D scores and HOMA-IR scores (r (s) = 0.156, p < 0.001). Even weaker associations were found in subjects with NGT (r (s) = 0.041, p=0.509), in subjects with IGT (r (s) = 0.112, p = 0.160) and in subjects with type 2 diabetes (r (s) = 0.007, p = 0.942). The association between depressive symptoms and insulin resistance was similar for men and women. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: We found only weak associations between depressive symptoms and insulin resistance, which did not differ among different glucose metabolism subgroups or between men and women.


Assuntos
Depressão/epidemiologia , Resistência à Insulina/fisiologia , Idoso , Glicemia/metabolismo , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Teste de Tolerância a Glucose , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros
10.
Diabet Med ; 21(10): 1075-81, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15384953

RESUMO

AIMS: To determine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the first year following diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes among newly diagnosed patients in general practice compared with patients detected by targeted population screening. METHODS: The study population consisted of 49 newly diagnosed patients in general practice and 116 screening-detected patients. HRQoL was operationalized as symptom distress, perceived health status and emotional well-being, that were assessed prospectively approximately 2 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes, with the Type 2 Diabetes Symptom Checklist (DSC-type 2), the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Well-Being Questionnaire (W-BQ12), respectively. RESULTS: The DSC-type 2 total score (range 0-4) improved significantly within newly diagnosed patients in general practice (median at approximately 2 weeks, 6 months and 12 months; 0.56, 0.21, 0.26; P = 0.000) and not within screening-detected patients (0.24, 0.24, 0.29; P = 0.093). Descriptives showed that newly diagnosed patients in general practice compared with screening-detected patients had consistently worse mean scores on all SF-36 mental health subscales Social Functioning, Role Emotional, Mental Health, Vitality, and all W-BQ12 scales at each time point. The differences were statistically significant for Role Emotional, Mental Health, Vitality (SF-36), and General well-being (W-BQ12). The SF-36 General Health (F = 3.7, P = 0.028) and Vitality (F = 4.5, P = 0.012) scores of newly diagnosed patients in general practice improved significantly over time, compared with screening-detected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Newly diagnosed patients in general practice compared with screening-detected patients reported more diabetes-related symptom distress shortly after the diagnosis, and a consistently worse mental health status at each time point. Improved Vitality scores in newly diagnosed patients in general practice in the first year following diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes suggest a positive effect of diabetes treatment on HRQoL.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Emoções , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/psicologia , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Percepção , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo
11.
Diabet Med ; 21(9): 992-8, 2004 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15317604

RESUMO

AIMS: To examine the impact of the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes on psychological well-being and perceived health status in subjects who participated in a targeted population-screening programme. METHODS: This study was conducted within the framework of a screening project in the general (aged 50-75 years) Dutch population. The final study population consisted of 259 subjects with a high-risk score on the Symptom Risk Questionnaire; 116 of whom were subsequently detected with Type 2 diabetes and 143 who were non-diabetic. The impact was assessed approximately 2 weeks (shortly) and 6 and 12 months after the diagnosis, using the 12-item Well-Being Questionnaire (W-BQ12) and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), respectively. Analyses of co-variance (ancova) were used. RESULTS: Approximately 2 weeks after the diagnosis, no significant mean differences were found on either the W-BQ12 or the SF-36, between the screening-detected Type 2 diabetes subjects and the non-diabetic subjects. Six months after the diagnosis, we found lower scores in the screening-detected Type 2 diabetes subjects compared with the non-diabetic subjects on the SF-36 dimensions Role Physical (mean difference (95% CI); -8.2 (-16.2; -0.1); P = 0.046) and Role Emotional (mean difference (95% CI); -7.9 (-15.3; -0.5); P = 0.038). One year after the test results, no significant mean differences were found between both groups on either instrument (W-BQ12; SF-36). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes has no substantial adverse or positive effect on psychological well-being and perceived health status, shortly, and 6 and 12 months after the diagnosis.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Idoso , Glicemia/análise , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Autoimagem , Inquéritos e Questionários
12.
Diabet Med ; 20(3): 210-5, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12675665

RESUMO

AIMS: To determine the risk perception of Type 2 diabetes in participants in a stepwise population-screening programme. METHODS: This study was carried out within the framework of a stepwise Type 2 diabetes population screening in the general (age 50-75 years) Dutch population. Main outcome measures were perceived risk of having diabetes and perceived seriousness of diabetes, based on a self-report questionnaire, completed before being informed about the diagnosis (Type 2 diabetes yes/no) of the screening procedure. Among 7736 participants, the risk perception of 217 screening-detected participants was compared with 4435 with a low-risk profile for undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Of 7736 participants, 43.5% could not give an estimate of their risk of having diabetes, 31.2% estimated their risk to be 0% and 25.3% estimated their risk to be 10% or higher. Compared with 4435 participants with an objectively low risk profile, 217 screening-detected participants were more likely to answer 'I do not know' (52.4% vs. 40.1%, P < 0.001), perceived their risk less often to be 0% (19.3% vs. 34.7%, P < 0.001), and slightly more often perceived their risk to be 10% or higher (28.3% vs. 25.2%, P < 0.001). Overall, more than half of the total population, including both participants with a low risk profile and the screening-detected participants, perceived diabetes as a (very) serious disease. Higher age, obesity and taking anti-hypertensive drugs did not translate into a higher perceived risk. CONCLUSIONS: Among screening-detected participants the seriousness of Type 2 diabetes was generally acknowledged, whilst the perceived risk of having Type 2 diabetes was low, despite the presence of risk factors.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Participação do Paciente , Percepção , Vigilância da População , Fatores de Risco
14.
Diabet Med ; 19(5): 406-11, 2002 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12027929

RESUMO

AIM: To explore the psychological impact of a stepwise population-screening project for Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: As part of a stepwise population screening project for Type 2 diabetes in the Hoorn region, The Netherlands, an explorative interview study was conducted. The psychological impact of screening was studied using semistructured interviews in 40 subjects: 20 who were diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes, and 20 subjects who were at increased risk of having diabetes but who did not meet criteria for diabetes. Transcripts were analysed using techniques of content analysis. RESULTS: Newly diagnosed subjects reported limited understanding of their elevated blood glucose levels. None, with the exception of one, was alarmed by the diagnosis. Having Type 2 diabetes was not experienced as severe and no concerns were expressed. Adjusting diet was perceived as a major change by some. All newly diagnosed subjects had informed close relatives and friends of the diabetes, who were in general not alarmed by the news. Both groups positively judged the screening procedure. In general the screening procedure was considered as useful and not experienced as burdensome. CONCLUSIONS: This explorative study suggests that the psychological impact of screening in newly diagnosed subjects is limited. Both those who were and those who were not diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes judged the screening procedure positively.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Seleção de Pacientes , Percepção , Projetos Piloto , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...