COMPLEX-VALUED TIME SERIES MODELING FOR IMPROVED ACTIVATION DETECTION IN FMRI STUDIES.

A complex-valued data-based model with pth order autoregressive errors and general real/imaginary error covariance structure is proposed as an alternative to the commonly-used magnitude-only data-based autoregressive model for fMRI time series. Likelihood-ratio-test-based activation statistics are derived for both models and compared for experimental and simulated data. For a dataset from a right-hand finger-tapping experiment, the activation map obtained using complex-valued modeling more clearly identifies the primary activation region (left functional central sulcus) than the magnitude-only model. Such improved accuracy in mapping the left functional central sulcus has important implications in neurosurgical planning for tumor and epilepsy patients. Additionally, we develop magnitude and phase detrending procedures for complex-valued time series and examine the effect of spatial smoothing. These methods improve the power of complex-valued data-based activation statistics. Our results advocate for the use of the complex-valued data and the modeling of its dependence structures as a more efficient and reliable tool in fMRI experiments over the current practice of using only magnitude-valued datasets.

Ricean over Gaussian modelling in magnitude fMRI Analysis-Added Complexity with Negligible Practical Benefits.

It is well-known that Gaussian modeling of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) magnitude time-course data, which are truly Rice-distributed, constitutes an approximation, especially at low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Based on this fact, previous work has argued that Rice-based activation tests show superior performance over their Gaussian-based counterparts at low SNRs and should be preferred in spite of the attendant additional computational and estimation burden. Here, we revisit these past studies and after identifying and removing their underlying limiting assumptions and approximations, provide a more comprehensive comparison. Our experimental evaluations using ROC curve methodology show that tests derived using Ricean modeling are substantially superior over the Gaussian-based activation tests only for SNRs below 0.6, i.e SNR values far lower than those encountered in fMRI as currently practiced.