Testing liver allocation in São Paulo, Brazil: the relationship of model for end-stage liver disease implementation with a reduction in waiting-list mortality.

INTRODUCTION: In 2006, the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) was launched as a new liver allocation system in Sao Paulo, Brazil. We designed this study to assess the results of the new allocation policy on waiting list mortality. METHODS: We reviewed the state of Sao Paulo liver transplant database from July 2003 through July 2009. Patients were divided in those who were transplanted before (pre-MELD group) and those who were transplanted after (post-MELD group) the implementation of the MELD system. Included were adult liver transplant candidates. Waiting list mortality was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: The unadjusted death rate in patients on the waiting list decreased significantly after the implementation of the MELD system (from 91.2 to 33.5/1000 patients/year, P < .0001). Multivariate analysis has shown a significant drop of the risk of waiting list death for post-MELD patients (odds ration 0.34, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: There was a reduction in waiting time and list mortality after the implementation of the MELD system in Brazil. Patients listed in the post-MELD era had a significant reduction of death risk on the waiting list. Future studies should assess posttransplant outcomes.

Increasing the donor pool reduces the severity of liver disease: lessons learned from São Paulo, Brazil.

INTRODUCTION: A new liver allocation system driven by the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was implemented in Brazil in 2006. In association with the new allocation policy, there was a concomitant expansion of the number of donors. We designed this study to assess whether a potential expansion of the donor pool with these educational campaigns had reduced the severity of liver disease at transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the state of São Paulo liver transplant database from July 2003 through July 2009. Patients were divided into groups: those who were transplanted before (pre-MELD group) and those who were transplanted after (post-MELD group) the implementation of the MELD system. The number of transplantations and the severity of liver disease were the endpoints of the study. RESULTS: There has been a significant shift towards an older donor population, mainly those who are dying of cerebrovascular accidents. The average MELD score has changed over time. Approximately one quarter of the patients have been transplanted with a MELD score of more than 30 in the post-MELD era. However, this number has decreased over the past 3 years (P = .012). Currently, it has been possible to transplant patients with a MELD score from 25 to 30. The number of transplantations due to hepatocarcinoma (HCC) has increased 8-fold. CONCLUSION: An aggressive educational campaign has successfully expanded the donor pool with a concomitant yearly reduction of the average MELD score at the time of transplantation. Patients with HCC have been benefited tremendously with the new allocation system.

Clinical profile and liver explant findings in patients with and without pretransplant downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Since August 2010, The Brazilian National Transplantation System has allowed performance of liver transplantation (OLT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the Milan criteria (MC) who have been successfully treated with preoperative downstaging (DS). Herein we sought to compare the clinical profiles and liver explant findings among patients with versus without preoperative DS. METHODOLOGY: Prospective cohort of patients with HCC within and beyond the MC undergoing OLT. Patients were considered for DS if they were beyond the MC without evidence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic disease. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was used for DS, which was considered to be successful if the MC were achieved at any moment during the follow-up. RESULTS: Between May 2006 and May 2010, we performed 130 OLTs in HCC patients, among whom 10 received preoperative DS. Both groups were comparable for gender, age, viral etiology, serum levels of alpha fetoprotein, and Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (P > .05). The liver explants were within the MC in 80% of patients with preoperative DS and 90% of those without preoperative DS. They were comparable for the number of HCC nodules, total tumor size, histologic grade, and presence of microvascular invasion. Patients with pretransplant DS showed larger HCC nodules (33.3 ± 9.65 vs 26.3 ± 9.62 mm; P .029) and more frequent macrovascular invasion (1 vs 1 patient, P = .024). CONCLUSION: Preoperative DS for unresectable HCC may provide a curative treatment for patients who would otherwise be candidates for palliative therapy only. The baseline characteristics and liver explant findings were similar in both groups. We have yet to determine whether the differences observed regarding the size of the largest nodule and the higher frequency of macrovascular invasion have an impact on outcome.

Early allograft dysfunction and liver transplant outcomes: a single center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) had been related to poor transplant outcomes during the early years of liver transplantation. We sought to determine the incidence of EAD at our unit and to evaluate its impact on posttransplant outcomes. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included primary deceased donor liver grafts transplanted under the model for end-stage liver disease system. EAD was defined as a peak values of aminotransferase >2000 IU/mL during the first week or an international normalized ratio of ≥1.6 and/or bilirubin ≥10 mg/dL at day 7. The main endpoints were patient and graft survivals. RESULTS: Patients with versus without EAD showed similar recipient characteristics. Donors who experienced EAD who comprises 56% of recipients were heavier with larger body mass indices. EAD was an independent risk factor for allograft loss. Most retransplants were performed early due to nonfunction. The primary nonfunction rate among subjects with versus without EAD were 7% and 12% respectively (P < .05). Patient survival among those with EAD was 87.4%, while without EAD it was 90% (P = NS) with graft survivals of 81.4% and 88.7% respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Patients with EAD show a significantly higher risk for allograft loss, but with a comparable survival after transplantation. Despite their worse outcomes, it seems that not all of these recipients behave equally.

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence among liver transplant recipients within the Milan criteria.

INTRODUCTION: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is an excellent option for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria. Recurrence of HCC has a severe impact on post-OLT survival. In this study, we performed an analysis of post-OLT recurrence pattern of HCC. METHODS: The prospective cohort of OLT patients included those with unresectable HCC within the Milan criteria, and those beyond the Milan criteria who were downstaged with transcatheter arterial embolization until they achieved the Milan criteria. RESULTS: Between May 2006 and May 2011, we performed 130 OLT for unresectable HCC within the Milan Criteria among whom 9 patients (6.9%) experienced tumor recurrence. Two (22.2%) had undergone preoperative downstaging. At the time of OLT, mean serum alpha-fetoprotein levels were 623.8 ± 682.9 ng/mL. The liver explants showed 7 (77.8%) subjects were within the Milan criteria, with an average 2.6 ± 2.2 tumors, most of which (89%) were moderately differentiated. Microvascular and macrovascular invasion were observed in 5 (55.6%) and 2 (22.2%) cases, respectively. Liver explants were beyond the Milan criteria in both patients who had undergone preoperative downstaging. Recurrence occurred 23.1 ± 14.3 months after OLT, having been detected in the liver (n = 3; 33.3%), lung (n = 3; 33.3%), brain, peritoneum, and adrenal gland (n = 1 each; 11.1% each). Mean survival after detection of recurrence was 137.4 ± 96.4 days. CONCLUSIONS: Despite strict candidate selection criteria, HCC recurrence may occur after OLT, bearing a significant impact on posttransplant outcomes to optimize results requires refinements in candidate selection, as well as well-defined cost-effective post-OLT surveillance protocols.

Obese and nonobese recipients had similar need for ventilatory support after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for patients undergoing major surgery. In liver transplantation, the morbidity and mortality in these patients may be higher owing to concomitant diseases that may prolong hospital stay. Moreover, the restrictive respiratory pattern in these patients, associated with pulmonary complications related to liver disease can impact the postoperative recovery. We sought to analyze the impact of high body mass index (BMI) on hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, necessity and length of use either invasive and noninvasive ventilatory support in the early postoperative period after liver transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and March 2009, we performed 85 liver transplantations in adult patients. BMI was calculated on the day of the transplantation. Data from 136 recipients undergoing OLT were reviewed by age, gender, etiology of liver disease, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, Child-Pugh class, cold and warm ischemic times, ICU stay, duration of invasive mechanical, and use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV). We divided the patients into 3 groups: Group 1, (normal weight BMI 18.5-24.99), versus group 2 overweight--BMI 25-29.99; versus group 3, obese--BMI ≥30. RESULTS: Groups 1, 2, and 3 had similar lengths of stay in the ICU, necessity of NIV as well as 6 month, 1- and 2-year survivals (P > .05). CONCLUSION: High BMI patients showed similar results to normal or overweight patients. Obesity should not be contraindication to liver transplantation.

Results of retransplantation for primary nonfunction in a single center.

INTRODUCTION: Early graft dysfunction has a negative impact on allograft and patient survivals, evolving to retransplantation or death in the majority of cases. The outcome of a second liver transplant is usually worse than the first procedure. Considering the increasing number of recipients on the waiting list, and the discrepancy between the number of accessible donors and recipients, we sought to analyze the results of retransplantation at our institution and at those within the State of Sao Paulo. METHODS: We reviewed the data of 419 deceased donor transplants on 367 patients from June 2005 to April 2010. Twenty-three patients underwent retransplantation due primary nonfunction (PNF) or early graft dysfunction. The following variables were studied: age, gender, disease that lead to the first transplant, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score on the day before the retransplantation, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and duration of orotracheal intubation (OTI). We compared our patient survival at 30 days and 1 year with that of other patients undergoing retransplantation due to PNF in the Sao Paulo State during the same period. RESULTS: The majority of patients were females (60.87%), with a mean age of 44.6 years. The etiology that led to our first transplantation was cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV; n = 6), followed by acute liver failure, (n = 5). The average of ICU stay was 15.08 days (range, 5-45). The mean MELD score was 34.43 (range, 19-50). The survival was 73.92% and 60.78% at 30 days and 1 year postretransplantation, respectively, whereas for São Paulo State, it was 63.04% and 51.63%, respectively.

Analysis of liver transplantation outcome in patients with MELD Score > or = 30.

Since July 2006, the liver graft allocation has been changed from the waiting time to the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD), prioritizing the sickest patients, who have a higher risk of dying on the waiting list, and sometimes in such poor clinical condition that it compromises transplantation outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of a MELD score > or = 30 on 30-day survival after liver transplantation (OLT). We prospectively collected the data on 178 liver transplants on 163 patients performed from March 2003 to August 2007. The subjects were divided in two groups according to their MELD scores: group 1, MELD > or = 30 (n = 15) and group 2, MELD < 30 (n = 96). The groups were compared with regard to hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, intraoperative blood products transfusion, early survival (30 days), and need for retransplantation. We excluded, patients with prioritization criteria, those receiving extra points for any special situation, and six other patients without significant data for MELD calculation (of whom only one has died after transplantation). Patients under a "special situation" were those with hepatocelular carcinoma, hepatopulmonary syndrome, and metabolic diseases, who initially received a MELD/PELD score 20, and 24, and 29. The mean MELD score at group I was 34 (range, 30 to 42), and for group II it was 16 (range, 6 to 29). Group I displayed a mean hospital length of stay of 24 days (4 to 155), with 12.60 days (ranges, 1 to 103) in the ICU versus 15.55 (range, 1 to 48) and 5.13 (range, 1 to 45) days, respectively, for group II. The need for blood component transfusions were greater in group I; 25.28% of patients in group II did not receive any transfusion during the entire inpatient period. There were nine retransplants in group II, and none in group I. The 30-day survivals were 93.3% for group I and 84.37% for group II. Besides the increased complexity of these sickest patients, there was no negative impact on early survival rates.

Impact of cumulative risk factors for expanded criteria donors on early survival after liver transplantation.

There are various options to help overcome the organ shortage, including performing transplants using grafts from marginal donors with characteristics previously described as unacceptable because of the high risk of graft failure. Nowadays, expanded criteria donors for liver transplantation (OLT) is a strategy used routinely by many teams. Some donor features have been suggested to jeopardize initial function or survival; when these features are aggregated, they may impact prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of donor risk factors on early patient survival and retransplantation. Donor risk factors were considered to be older than 60 years, body mass index > 30, serum sodium level > 155 mEq/L, cold ischemia time > 12 hours, and intensive care unit stay > 4 days. We prospectively recorded data from 139 patients who underwent 152 OLT from March 2003 to May 2007. Patients were classified into four groups: I, no risk factors; II, one risk factor; III, two risk factors; IV, three or more risk factors. Retransplantation or OLT due to acute liver failure was considered to be an exclusion criterion. Early overall survival rate was 83.76%; 12 retransplantations were required (10.25%). Comparing the four groups, patient survivals (P = .41) and retransplantation rates (P = .518) were similar. In conclusion, cumulative risk factors showed no impact on early (30-day) recipient survival and or on the necessity of retransplantation after OLT.

Impact of renal failure on liver transplantation survival.

Renal failure after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a common complication (ranging from 12% to 70%) associated with worse outcomes, particularly when it requires renal replacement therapy (RRT). Renal dysfunction is a common scenario among waiting list patients. It can lead to a worse prognosis after OLT, due to an increased incidence of postoperative renal failure. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of renal failure after OLT, its relationship to pretransplant renal dysfunction, and its impact on outcomes. We analyzed data collected prospectively from 152 consecutive OLTs in 139 patients performed by the same team from March 2003 to November 2007. Exclusion criteria for 34 cases included transplantation due to acute liver failure, combined liver-kidney transplantation, retransplantation, and patients who died up to 2 days posttransplantation. Based on creatinine clearance (CCr) calculated at the time of OLT, the 118 patients were classified in two groups: group I, normal pre-OLT renal function (CCr > or = 70 mL/min) versus group II, pre-OLT renal failure (CCr < 70 mL/min). Each group was analyzed according to the development of post-OLT renal failure, being classified as subgroup A (normal renal function post-OLT), subgroup B (mild renal impairment post-OLT-serum creatinine level between 2.0 and 3.0 mg/dL or doubled basal value up to 3.0 mg/dL) versus subgroup C (severe renal impairment post-OLT-serum creatinine level > or = 3.0 mg/dL or utilization of RRT). The overall incidence of post-OLT renal impairment was 41.52% with RRT in 22 patients (18.64%). Group II patients showed a greater incidence of post-OLT renal failure when compared with other patients (P < .05), but without a statistical difference when compared according to RRT requirement. Comparison of average hospital stay was similar between groups I and II, and also among its subgroups (A, B, and C, respectively). There was no statistical difference in early (30-day) and 1-year survival rates between groups I and II. Comparing all subgroups for early and 1-year survival, we observed that patients who developed severe renal failure post-OLT (subgroups I-C and II-C) showed worse outcomes compared with other patients (subgroups I-A, I-B, II-A, and II-B), respectively 95.29% versus 69.69% and 86.95% versus 41.66% for early and 1-year survivals (P < .001). In conclusion, our findings suggested that patients who developed severe renal failure post-OLT, independent of pretransplant renal function, showed worse outcomes.

Total hepatectomy and liver transplantation as a two-stage procedure for toxic liver: case reports.

Total hepatectomy with temporary portocaval shunt was employed as a bridging procedure before liver transplantation, in the setting of fulminant hepatic failure with "toxic liver syndrome"; acute, severe, and extensive liver necrosis associated with cardiovascular shock and acute renal failure with or without respiratory failure. This procedure sought to improve metabolic acidosis and hemodynamic instability related to advanced liver necrosis. The aim of this study was to report our experience with three patients who underwent total hepatectomy and protocaval shunt, followed by liver transplantation (two-stage procedure).

Antibody-mediated rejection: hyperacute rejection reality in liver transplantation? A case report.

Hyperacute rejection is rare among ABO-compatible liver transplantations. The mechanism is donor preformed antibodies causing graft loss within a few days. Herein, we have described a case of an ABO-compatible liver transplantation that underwent hyperacute rejection, needing retransplantation for treatment. A 27-year-old man of blood group A positive who displayed fulminant hepatic failure due to hepatitis B (in agreement with the O'Grady criteria), received an ABO-compatible graft. He developed significant asthenia, fever, hypotension, oliguria, and coagulopathy. Ultrasonography revealed total thrombosis of the portal vein and absence of dilatation of bile ducts. The patient was priorized for retransplantation and underwent a good subsequent evolution. On anatomopathologic exam the explant revealed thrombosis of the intrahepatic branches of the portal vein with venous and ischemic infarcts compatible with a diagnosis of hyperacute rejection. The clinical findings of hyperacute rejection were characterized by progressive elevation of bilirubin and thrombocytopenia associated with signs of hepatic failure during the first days after transplantation. In this case, the histological exam was compatible with hyperacute rejection, excluding the diagnoses of hepatic artery thrombosis or biliary obstruction, despite the negative test for anti-HLA antibodies. The diagnosis of hyperacute rejection could be made associated with a short ischemic time and a good response after retransplantation.

Analysis of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in a liver transplantation waiting list.

BACKGROUND: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) was introduced in 1999 to quantify the 3-month prognosis of cirrhotic patients after a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Because of the imbalance between organ donors and patients on the waiting list, the MELD was adopted by the United States in 2002 to allocate liver grafts for transplantation. Preliminary results have indicated a reduction in waiting list deaths and an increase in transplantation rates for candidates. Seeking to find a new model to predict death on the waiting list and after liver transplantation, retrospective studies have examined MELD scores in waiting list patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the MELD scores of patients on the liver waiting list for comparisons between transplanted patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed analyzing 131 registrations of 127 orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) patients (4 underwent retransplantation) grafted between November 2000 and January 2006, excluding 24 patients: 2 had urgent retransplantations due to hepatic artery thrombosis and 22 had incomplete data. These patients were divided into 3 groups: group I (transplanted patients)-53 patients underwent 55 OLT; group II-29 patients who died on the waiting list; group III-patients on the waiting list including 23 patients still waiting as of the date of the study. RESULTS: The main indication for OLT was hepatitis C virus cirrhosis (50.50%), followed by alcoholic liver cirrhosis (23.30%), cryptogenic cirrhosis (12.60%), autoimmune hepatitis (5.80%), hepatitis B virus cirrhosis (4.85%), and primary biliary cirrhosis (2.91%). Group I: MELD score 15.62 (range, 6-39) on admission to the list, and 18.87 (range, 7-39) at transplantation. The mean waiting time for OLT was 478.39 days (range, 2-1270 days). The 38 patients who survived underwent 39 OLT (1 retransplantation). The MELD score at entrance to the list was 14.62 (range, 7-30) and at transplantation, 17.70 (range, 7-39). The mean time between admission to the list and transplantation was 505.37 days (range, 6-1270 days). The 15 patients who died had received 16 OLT (1 retransplantation). Their MELD scores were 17.80 (range, 6-39) and 21.81 (range, 9-39) at admission to the list and at transplantation, respectively, with a mean time on the waiting list of 417.93 days (range, 2-872 days). Group II: 29 patients died before OLT, at a mean age of 52.60 years (range, 22-67 years). Their MELD score was 19.24 (range, 7-45), and the interval between admission to the waiting list and death was 249.55 days (range, 3-1247 days). Group III: 23 patients still active on the OLT waiting list at the time of study displayed a mean MELD score of 13.65 (range, 6-28) and 354.30 days (range, 2-905 days) waiting until the moment. In conclusion, MELD score at the time of admission to the waiting list was higher among those patients who died either awaiting a liver graft (19.24) or after OLT (17.80) compared with those who survived after OLT (14.60) or are still awaiting OLT (13.65).

Correlation between graft arterial anatomy and biliary complications after liver transplantation.

Knowledge of the arterial vascular anatomy of the liver is important for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) because the lack of an adequate arterial blood supply results in biliary and parenchymal complications or graft loss. A number of reports have shown a relationship between aberrations of graft arteries and an increased incidence of early or late complications. Recent studies suggest no differences unless multiple anastomoses are required. The aim of this study was to report the incidence of aberrant hepatic arterial anatomy and its impact on vascular and biliary complications. We retrospectively reviewed data of 90 OLT performed on 82 patients, including 4 who underwent retransplantation from March 2003 to March 2006. The means recipient age was 52.47 years and 49 were men. The main caval vein reconstruction technique was piggyback (n = 55; 61.2%). The biliary reconstruction was performed by an end-to-end choledocho-choledocho anastomosis in 83 cases (92.3%) with choledocho-jejunal anastomosis (Roux-in-Y) in 7 cases (7.7%). Aberrant arterial anatomy was noted in 20 liver grafts (22.2%), namely, accessory right hepatic artery (n = 6; 6.6%), accessory left (n = 10; 11%), both accessory right and left (n = 3; 3.3%), and hepatic common artery from mesenteric artery (n = 1; 1.1%). Among the transplantations of grafts with aberrant arterial anatomy, 2 cases (10%) developed hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and 4 (20%) biliary complications. The rate of HAT and biliary complications among grafts with normal arterial anatomy was 3 and 8 cases (4.2% and 11.42%), respectively. Despite a greater number of complications among OLT with aberrant arterial anatomy, the Fisher test showed no significant relationship between HAT or biliary complications and aberrant arterial anatomy.

Donor liver dysfunction: application of a new scoring system to identify the marginal donor.

Livers from marginal donors are increasingly used for transplantation due to the shortage of donor organs. The definition of a marginal donor remains unclear; prediction of organ function is a challenge. In the literature the use of steatotic livers has been associated with poor liver function or even primary dysfunction of the allograft. Tekin et al created a scoring system that classifies a donor as marginal or nonmarginal, using a mathematical model based on donor age and steatosis degree. The aims of this study were to apply the Tekin method to identify marginal and nonmarginal donors and evaluate the influence of the cold ischemia time (CIT) on allograft evolution. We retrospectively reviewed deceased donor liver transplantations performed from October 1995 to March 2006, namely, 177 adult liver transplantations in 163 patients. Fifty-five were excluded due to retransplantation (14) or insufficient data (41). Donor age and macrovesicular steatosis were evaluated according to the mathematical formula proposed by Tekin et al, classifying the donors as marginal versus nonmarginal. The authors also analyzed the CIT, 3-month mortality, and development of primary nonfunction or primary dysfunction. The median donor age was 38.9 years (range, 6-71). The postreperfusion biopsy specimen showed moderate to intense steatosis (>30%) in 14.75% of specimens, with no steatosis or mild steatosis in 85.25%. Sixty-one grafts (50%) developed primary graft dysfunction (PGD): 10 grafts, with primary nonfunction (PNF); and 51 with initial poor function (IPF). Using the criteria provided by Tekin et al, we obtained 41 marginal and 81 nonmarginal allografts. The marginal group showed 61.9% PGD, compared with 59.2% of PGD by the nonmarginal group. The CIT was greater than 12 hours in 5 marginal group transplants and 4 PGD cases (80%). Of the nonmarginal allografts, the CIT was greater than 12 hours in 29.6%, with 75% PGD. The 3-month graft survival rate was 80% in the marginal group with ischemia time more than 12 hours: 86.1% of the same group when CIT was less than 12 hours, and 82.7% in the nonmarginal group. In contrast, when we analyzed the occurrence of allograft dysfunction, the 3-month mortality rate was 34% among, grafts with dysfunction, whereas, in those without initial dysfunction, it was 4.1%. In conclusion, the score suggested by Tekin et al that classifies the donors as ideal (nonmarginal) or marginal was not able to predict initial primary dysfunction.

Results of urgent liver retransplantation in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.

The treatment of end-stage liver disease includes transplantation as a life-saving procedure although it has serious complications of hepatic artery thrombosis, liver dysfunction, or primary nonfunction, which frequently lead to the need for retransplantation. According to various reports, the incidence of retransplantation is around 10%. Given the critical organ shortage, the chance for a second transplant remains a controversial discussion in medical, ethical, and economic grounds because patient and graft survival rates after retransplantation are lower than those for primary transplantations. We retrospectively reviewed all of the urgent liver retransplants from October 2001 to February 2005 (52 months) by analyzing the number of retransplants, blood group, time between first and second liver transplantation, age, sex, and mortality. Data were obtained from the Transplantation System, State of Sao Paulo Health Secretariat. Among 1252 liver transplants performed during this period, 98 (7.82%) were urgent retransplantations. The primary procedure employed 955 (76.28%) deceased donors and 297 (23.72%) living donors. All 98 retransplants were performed using an organ from the pool of deceased donors. The retransplant rate was acceptable according to the literature, although we observed high rates of early mortality (<60 days), leading to a discussion of which patients had a better chance of survival and the best time to perform the second transplantation to use this scarce and precious resource in the best possible way.

Future doctors and brain death: what is the prognosis?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the knowledge and the opinion of medical students at the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo related to the general aspects of donation, organ and tissue procurement, and basic concepts of brain death (BD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires of 24 items were distributed among all students related to the concept and diagnosis of BD, personal aspects of tissue and organ donation, and general question concerning organ donation. The answers classified students as good versus bad experts of the concept and the diagnosis of BD. RESULTS: Of a total of 580 students, 361 (62.24%) answered the questionnaire. Although the concept of BD was known to 70%, only 35% had a good knowledge of the diagnosis. One percent of the students were opposed to the organ donation and 76% of them were donors. Approximately 90% would authorize organ retrieval from their family members but 27% had never discussed organ donation with their families. Most students were interested in the general aspects of donation and organ procurement (88.36%). CONCLUSION: The majority of the students know the concept of BD. General aspects regarding tissue and organ donation and diagnosis of BD might be improved with the continued education on the subject.

Impact of steatotic grafts on initial function and prognosis after liver transplantation.

Steatotic grafts are considered a risk factor for dysfunction or even primary nonfunction of liver transplants; grafts with more than 50% fatty infiltration are routinely discarded. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of macrovesicular and microvesicular steatosis on postoperative initial liver function and prognosis by comparing outcomes to nonsteatotic grafts in 48 liver transplantation patients. Fifteen grafts had macrovesicular steatosis, 13 (27.09%) up to 50% fatty infiltration (MG2), and 2 (4.16%) more than 50% (MG3). Thirty-three (69.75%) grafts had no macrovesicular steatosis (MG1). Initial liver function was adequate in 26 (78.78%), 10 (76.93), and 2 (100%) patients, respectively, in subgroups MG1, MG2, and MG3 (P =.892). Thirty-day survival rates were 90.90%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, in subgroups MG1, MG2, and MG3 (P =.606). Twenty-six grafts showed microvesicular steatosis: 18 (37.50%) showed less than 50% fatty infiltration (mG2), and 8 (16.67%) more than 50% (mG3). Twenty-two (45.83%) grafts had no microvesicular steatosis (mG1). Initial liver function was adequate in 16 (72.72%), 16 (88.88%), and 6 (75%) patients, respectively, in subgroups mG1, mG2, and mG3 (P =.547). Thirty-day survival rates were 90.90%, 100%, and 87.5% respectively, in subgroups mG1, mG2, and mG3 (P =.380). In conclusion, macrovesicular and microvesicular steatotic liver grafts displayed adequate initial function, did not compromise survival, and thus should not be routinely discarded.

Portal vein aneurysm as late complication of liver transplantation: a case report.

OBJECTIVE: A case of intrahepatic portal vein aneurysm in the late postoperative period after liver transplantation, as well its complications, is reported. CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old man underwent orthotopic liver transplantation in 1996 for treatment of hepatitis C virus cirrhosis. The patient received a graft from a 10-year-old child. During the follow-up from 1996 to 1998, the patient did not show any alterations. In 1999, during an annual routine exam, a portal vein aneurysm was identified; however, it had no impact on graft function. In November 2002, the patient developed jaundice and serious graft dysfunction requiring hospital admission. Helicoidal CT scan showed an intrahepatic image compatible with a portal vein aneurysm without biliary tract dilatation. During the same hospitalization, he developed upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to variceal rupture as well as kidney and liver failure, and expired on December 31, 2002. The necropsy demonstrated an intrahepatic portal vein aneurysm with portal vein thrombosis and chronic liver disease. The evolution in this case suggests that if there is an intrahepatic portal vein aneurysm after liver transplantation, the patient is likely to experience an eventual recurrence of portal hypertension; retransplant may be an alternative.