Predictive value of microvolt T-wave alternans in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the utility of microvolt T-wave alternans (TWA) in predicting arrhythmia-free survival and total mortality in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. BACKGROUND: Microvolt TWA has been proposed as a useful tool in identifying patients unlikely to benefit from prophylaxis with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) prophylaxis. METHODS: We evaluated 286 patients with an LV ejection fraction

Effect of bundle branch block on microvolt T-wave alternans and electrophysiologic testing in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: T-wave alternans (TWA) and electrophysiology study (EPS) are used for risk stratification for sudden death. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of bundle branch block or intraventricular conduction delay on TWA and EPS. METHODS: 386 patients with coronary artery disease, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40% underwent TWA and EPS, and were followed for 40 +/- 19 months. RESULTS: Patients with wide QRS were more likely than narrow QRS patients to have nonnegative TWA (77% vs 63%, P <.01) or positive EPS (60% vs 48%, P = .03). Nonnegative TWA predicted the combined endpoint of ventricular tachyarrhythmia or death in narrow QRS (HR = 1.64, P = .04) but not wide QRS patients (HR = 1.04, P = .91). Similarly, positive EPS predicted the combined endpoint in narrow QRS (HR = 2.28, P <.001) but not wide QRS patients (HR = 0.94, P = .84). In multivariate analysis, QRS width and TWA, as well as QRS width and EPS, were independent predictors of events. There was no TWA- or EPS-based difference in arrhythmia-free survival within any specific wide QRS morphology. CONCLUSION: TWA and EPS are more often abnormal in patients with a wide QRS than in those with a narrow QRS. In patients with narrow QRS, both TWA and EPS stratify patients according to their risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia or death. However, among patients with a wide QRS, regardless of specific QRS morphology, the risk is high and comparable regardless of TWA or EPS results. Therefore, the only truly low-risk group consists of those patients with negative test results and a narrow QRS.

Effect of oral beta-blocker therapy on microvolt T-wave alternans and electrophysiology testing in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Prior investigation has shown that intravenous beta-blockers decrease T-wave alternans (TWA) positivity in patients undergoing electrophysiology study (EPS). The present study examined whether oral beta-blocker use within 24 hours of TWA influences yield and predictive value of TWA and EPS. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 387 patients (312 [81%] men, mean age 67 +/- 11 years) with coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia who underwent EPS and were followed for a mean of 2.8 +/- 1.4 years. T-Wave alternans was performed using an atrial pacing protocol and interpreted using standard criteria. Beta-blocker status was determined based on oral beta-blocker use in the 24 hours preceding the test: beta-blocker (-) (n = 62), beta-blocker (+) (n = 325). Follow-up for ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and death was obtained from chart review, device interrogation, and the Social Security Death Index. Estimated sensitivity and specificity of TWA and EPS stratified by beta-blocker use were calculated based on event-free 2-year survival. RESULTS: There was no difference in EPS (31 [50%] inducible off beta-blockers vs 166 [51%] on beta-blockers [P = .89]) or TWA (26 [42%] positive, 17 [27%] indeterminate off beta-blockers vs 136 [42%] positive, 81 [25%] indeterminate on beta-blockers [P = .89]). Beta-blocker use within 24 hours of testing did not affect the predictive value of TWA or EPS for overall or 2-year event-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Oral beta-blocker therapy appears to have no effect on yield or predictive value of EPS or TWA in patients with coronary artery disease, diminished left ventricular function, and a history of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.