Unmasking Ureteral Polyps: Insights From a Case Series.

Fibroepithelial polyps in the urinary tract are a rare cause of obstructive uropathy with fewer than 130 cases reported in the literature. In our series, we describe polyps that were missed on preoperative imaging and later found in the operating room during pyeloplasty. It is critical for urologists to be aware of polyps as a potential source of obstruction as they can increase the complexity of a reconstruction and, if missed, may result in a failed repair and persistent obstruction. We hypothesize that performing a retrograde pyelogram prior to ureteric reconstruction will facilitate diagnosis prior to surgical repair.

Deferring gonadectomy in patients with turner syndrome with a genetic Y component is not a safe practice.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with Turner syndrome who harbor Y chromosome material are known to be at increased risk of developing germ cell neoplasms. The optimal timing to perform gonadectomy to reduce the risk of cancer development in these patients is not well defined. We present outcomes of Turner with a Y component (TSY) patients who underwent gonadectomy at our institution. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that tumors could occur in a significant portion of TSY patients at any age and gonadectomy can be safely performed at diagnosis rather than deferred. STUDY DESIGN: We performed an IRB-approved retrospective single center study in which we queried our institutions electronic health record to identify all patients with TSY who underwent gonadectomy at our institution from 2012 to 2021. RESULTS: In our series of 18 consecutive TSY patients, a tumor was identified in 6 patients (33.3%): 4 (22.2%) with dysgerminoma (DG) [Fig. 1] and 2 (11.1%) with gonadoblastoma (GB). DISCUSSION: Our cohort of 18 consecutive TSY who underwent gonadectomy over a 9-year period is the largest published single site cohort to date. Additionally, our patient who was found to have GB at 40 days is to our knowledge the youngest TSY patient to be diagnosed with GB in the literature. This patient's remarkably early incidence of tumor occurrence illustrates the urgency of protective gonadectomy. Given the high incidence of tumor formation in this population and the minimal morbidity associated with gonadectomy, we do not recommend delaying gonadectomy in this population for any reason. Our study is vulnerable to selection bias and confounding innate to any retrospective study. There was variation with respect to the frequency and timing of pre-operative imaging as a strict preoperative imaging protocol with sequential studies was not in place at our institution. Additionally, we do not have a comparison cohort of patients who are being followed without operative intervention as all TSY patients at our institution have undergone gonadectomy. CONCLUSION: TSY patients cannot be safely observed for tumor formation based on clinical factors such as imaging or age. Gonadectomy is safe with a low complication rate and without tumor recurrence during three-year follow-up. We continue to recommend bilateral gonadectomy in this patient population at the time of diagnosis.

Trends in opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) usage in children undergoing common urinary tract reconstruction: A large, single-institutional analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Opioid stewardship is recognized as a critical clinical priority. We previously reported marked reductions in narcotic administration after implementation of an opioid reduction protocol for pediatric ambulatory urologic surgery. We hypothesize that a decrease in post-operative and discharge opioid administration will not increase short-term adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: All pediatric patients undergoing open or robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty or ureteral reimplantation between 2015 and 2019 were included. Patients' demographics, opioid and NSAID administration, urology or pain-related emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and reoperations within 30 days of surgery, were aggregated. RESULTS: 438 patients, with a median age of 3.5 years (IQR 1.5-8.3) at the time of surgery, met the inclusion criteria. Annual rates of inpatient opioid administration and prescriptions decreased significantly over the study period, while rates of intra-operative, inpatient, and prescribed NSAIDs significantly increased. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations within 30 days of surgery between patients who received an opioid prescription and those who did not. Multivariate regression showed that patients who did not receive an opioid prescription at discharge were found to be at a lower risk for unplanned encounters including ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations (OR:0.5, 95%CI: 0.2-0.9, p = 0.04). DISCUSSION: The present study shows the decreasing trend in inpatient opioid administration and opioid prescription after discharge, when accompanied by an increase NSAID administration, does not result in a significant change in rates of unplanned encounters and complications, similar to results from previous studies on non-urological and ambulatory urological surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: Non-opioid pain control after major pediatric urologic reconstruction is safe and effective. We found that a reduction in opioid administration can be associated with a reduced risk of unplanned ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations. Further investigations are required to corroborate this finding.

Incidence and resolution of de novo hydronephrosis after pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux.

INTRODUCTION: With the advent of robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), understanding and minimizing its complications continues to be critical. Incidence of de novo hydronephrosis after RALUR could be indicative of an outcome that needs further study or could be a benign transient finding. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we hypothesized that the incidence of de novo hydronephrosis after RALUR is low and resolves spontaneously. METHODS: An IRB-approved prospective single-institutional registry was utilized to identify all patients undergoing RALUR via an extravesical approach from 2012 to 2020. Patients with primary VUR and minimal (Grade I SFU) or no hydronephrosis prior to surgery were included. Patients who had other associated pathology or underwent concomitant procedures were excluded. Preoperative characteristics including VUR and hydronephrosis grades as well as post-operative clinical details and hydronephrosis grades were aggregated and analyzed. RESULTS: 86/172 (50%) patients (133 ureters), with median reflux grade of 3 (IQR: G2, G3) met the inclusion criteria. Patients underwent RALUR at a median age of 5.7 years (IQR: 3.4, 8.7) with median 36.2 months (IQR: 19.6, 63.6) follow-up. Renal ultrasound at 4-6 weeks post-op showed de novo hydronephrosis in 18 (13.5%) ureters; the complete resolution was seen in 13 ureters (72%) at a median of 4.5 months from surgery. Among the 5 with non-resolved hydronephrosis (SFU G2:4, G3:1), 2 patients (3 ureters) underwent subsequent interventions. DISCUSSION: The present study evaluating the natural history of de novo hydronephrosis after RALUR-EV performed for primary VUR, is to our knowledge the largest cohort of patients undergoing RALUR that this has been studied in. In our cohort, the incidence of de novo hydronephrosis after RALUR was 13.5%, similar to rates reported in two OUR cohorts, and significantly lower than reported incidence rates of 22-26% in several OUR cohorts, and 30% in a RALUR cohort. In the present cohort, hydronephrosis resolved spontaneously in more than 72% of cases. The median time from surgery until resolution of hydronephrosis was 4.5 (1.6, 10.5) months, which is shorter in comparison to the average time to resolution of 7.6 months, reported by Kim et al. in an earlier study. CONCLUSIONS: De novo hydronephrosis after RALUR can be followed with serial renal ultrasounds. The majority of de novo hydronephrosis post-RALUR is transient and resolves spontaneously within a year of surgery with a very low re-intervention rate.

Office Based Pediatric Urologic Procedures: A Safe and Effective Alternative to Interventions Under Anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: To report on our experience performing office-based pediatric urologic procedures. We hypothesize that office-based interventions are safe and effective for children, avoiding unnecessary risk and cost associated with general anesthesia. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients undergoing office-based interventions from 2014 to 2019, including lysis of penile or labial adhesions, division of skin bridges, meatotomy and excision of benign lesion. Success was defined as a completed attempt in the office. Failure includes any unsuccessful office attempts. Complications include 30-day ED visits/readmissions and recurrent skin bridge post division of skin bridge. RESULTS: We identified 1326 interventions: 491 lyses of penile adhesions (37%), 320 division of skin bridges (24%), 128 lyses of labial adhesions (10%), 348 meatotomies (26%), and 39 excisions of benign lesions (3%) [Table 1]. There was a >95% success rate reported in every procedure with an overall complication rate of 0.6%. Excision of benign lesion had 100% success rate. ED visits within 30 days are rare (0.2%), and no patients required admission after their procedure [Table 2]. The rate of recurrence was highest following lysis of labial adhesions (13.3%). Of the 54 patients who underwent retreatment, very few required general anesthesia (n = 6). CONCLUSION: Office-based urologic interventions in children are well tolerated with excellent safety and efficacy. Complications and recurrence are universally low. Ultimately, 99.5% of this cohort was managed under local anesthetics, thereby avoiding the risks of anesthesia use in the pediatric population.

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterocalicostomy in the Setting of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Multi-Institutional Cohort.

PURPOSE: Recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) after failed pyeloplasty is a complex surgical dilemma. The robot-assisted laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy (RALUC) is a potential surgical approach, but widespread adoption is limited due to the perceived technical challenge of the procedure. We present a multi-institutional pediatric cohort undergoing RALUC for recurrent or complex UPJO, and hypothesize that the procedure is reproducible, safe and efficacious. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3-center multi-institutional collaboration was initiated and medical records of children undergoing RALUC between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The details on baseline demographics, perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were aggregated. RESULTS: During the study period 24 patients, 7 (29%) females and 17 (71%) males, were identified. Of the patients 21 (86%) had a history of previous pyeloplasty prior to RALUC, of whom 5 (24%) had 2 prior failed ipsilateral pyeloplasties. The reason for performing RALUC was short ureter in 3 (13%), intrarenal pelvis in 5 (21%) and extensive scarring at the ureteropelvic junction locus in 16 (67%) patients. The median age of patients at time of surgery was 5.1 years (IQR: 1.9, 14.7). Of the patients 9 (38%) had percutaneous nephrostomy prior to surgery; if percutaneous nephrostomy tubes were placed for relief of obstruction, an antegrade contrast study was done postoperatively to confirm resolution of obstruction. No 30-day Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V complications were noted. During the median followup of 16.1 months (IQR: 6, 47.5), 22 (92%) had improved symptoms and hydronephrosis with no further intervention; 2 (8%) patients underwent endoscopic interventions after RALUC and both ultimately underwent nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional cohort demonstrates that RALUC is a safe and efficacious salvage option for failed pyeloplasty or complex anatomy with an acceptable success profile, especially in cases of extensive scarring at the UPJO or an intrarenal pelvis.

Primary vs redo robotic pyeloplasty: A comparison of outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) is a safe and efficacious option for repair of UPJO. We hypothesize that redo-RALP is technically more difficult but has comparable outcomes to primary RALP. METHODS: An IRB-approved single institutional registry was utilized to identify all patients undergoing primary or redo RALP from 2012 to 2019. Redo RALP consisted of pyeloplasty and ureterocalicostomy (RALUC). Peri-operative and post-operative details and outcomes were aggregated. Successful reconstruction was defined as resolution of symptoms, improved hydronephrosis and no need for additional procedures. RESULTS: From 399 patients who underwent UPJO repair at our center, a total of 306 with a median age of 4.9 years at surgery and a median follow-up of 18.5 months were included: 276 primary and 30 redo (21 RALP and 9 RALUC). Redo group had significantly longer procedure time and length of stay compared to the primary group. However, no significant difference was noted in the post-operative complications, need for additional endoscopic procedures or redo reconstruction, and success between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that when controlled for age, gender, 30-days post-operative complication and anatomy of obstruction, redo as compared to primary reconstruction did not have a significant effect on success. DISCUSSION: This study is the largest controlled cohort in the pediatric population comparing redo RALP with an established control group -primary RALP. This retrospective chart review possesses the biases innate to any retrospective study. The low number of re-operative cases as well as low rate of failure in redo RALP further complicates identification of statistically significant predictors of outcomes following redo RALP. CONCLUSION: Redo RALP is an efficient and safe approach for reconstruction of recurrent UPJO, with low complication rate and high success rate, comparable to primary RALP.

Pyeloplasty is a safe and effective surgical approach for low functioning kidneys with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Indications for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) include symptomatic obstruction, urinary tract infections, presence of an obstructive pattern on functional renal scan and/or worsening differential renal function (DRF). This paper aims to determine the relationship between preoperative DRF and surgical outcomes after pyeloplasty. We hypothesized that low preoperative DRF is not an independent predictor of pyeloplasty failure. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients undergoing pyeloplasty for UPJO between 2008 and 2019. Patients were included only if they had at least one preoperative functional scan and a minimum of one renal ultrasound post-operatively. Patients were divided into three groups based on DRF for analysis: Group 1- 0-10%, Group 2 - >10-≤20%, Group 3 - >20%. Baseline, intraoperative and postoperative characteristics, including success and complications were compared. Additional sensitivity analyses were performed comparing patients with ≤20%, and >20% function, ≤30%, and >30% function as well as an analysis of patients undergoing only minimally invasive reconstruction. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-four patients met inclusion criteria. We identified 8 patients in Group 1, 24 patients in Group 2 and 332 patients in Group 3. Mean procedure time was longest for the ≤10% function group (237.9 vs 206.4 vs 189.1; p = 0.01). We found no difference in 30-day post-operative complications, overall success rate or the need for additional procedures among the three groups. For patients in Group 1, we noted variation in the post-procedure DRF with a range of -2.8 to +47% change. In this group, none of patients with low DRF underwent nephrectomy. Multivariate logistic regression did not identify renal function as a predictor of operative success OR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97-1.03) (p-value: 0.88). DISCUSSION: The results of the present study suggest that low DRF alone is not associated with worse outcomes and shows no difference in the failure rate. The incidence and type of complications were not increased for the lower functioning groups. The main limitation of this study would be its retrospective nature and single-institution experience. Furthermore, post-operative functional studies were not available for all patients, limiting the ability to draw conclusions on the change in DRF after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort, preoperative DRF was not predictive of pyeloplasty success rate. DRF ≤10% was not associated with higher incidence of complications or failure rate. The DRF alone should not dictate the management options available for patients with UPJO.