Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 60(3): 341-8, 2015 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25352591

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After a case of rabies, healthcare workers (HCWs) had fear of contagion from the infected patient. Although transmission of rabies to HCWs has never been documented, high-risk exposures theoretically include direct contact of broken skin and/or mucosa with saliva, tears, oropharyngeal secretions, cerebrospinal fluid, and neural tissue. Urine/kidney exposure posed a concern, as our patient's renal transplant was identified as the infection source. METHODS: Our risk assessment included (1) identification of exposed HCWs; (2) notification of HCWs; (3) risk assessment using a tool from the local health department; (4) supplemental screening for urine/kidney exposure; and (5) postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) when indicated. RESULTS: A total of 222 HCWs including diverse hospital staff and medical trainees from university affiliates were evaluated. Risk screening was initiated within 2 hours of rabies confirmation, and 95% of HCWs were assessed within the first 8 days. There were 8 high-risk exposures related to broken skin contact or mucosal splash with the patient's secretions, and 1 person without high-risk contact sought and received PEP outside our hospital. Nine HCWs (4%) received PEP with good tolerance. Due to fear of rabies transmission, additional HCWs without direct patient contact required counseling. There have been no secondary cases after our sentinel rabies patient. CONCLUSIONS: Rabies exposure represents a major concern for HCWs and requires rapid, comprehensive risk screening and counseling of staff and timely PEP. Given the lack of human-to-human rabies transmission from our own experience and the literature, a conservative approach seems appropriate for providing PEP to HCWs.


Assuntos
Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição , Raiva/transmissão , Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitais , Humanos , Transplante de Rim , Raiva/epidemiologia , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco , Saliva , Pele/lesões
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 31(8): 864-6, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20569114

RESUMO

We reviewed the medical records of all the patients who died in our hospital during the period from 2004 through 2008 to determine the contribution of healthcare-associated infections to mortality. Of the 179 unexpected in-hospital deaths during that period, 55 (31%) were related to 69 healthcare-associated infections. The most common healthcare-associated infection was central line-associated bloodstream infection, and the most common organisms identified were members of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Overall, 45% of bacterial isolates were multidrug resistant.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Infecção Hospitalar/fisiopatologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Idoso , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Feminino , Hospitais de Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...