Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 118(2): 235-41, 2002 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12162684

RESUMO

We compared the accuracy and precision of the impedance platelet counts generated by the Beckman Coulter LH 750 and the Sysmex XE 2100 and the optical platelet counts produced by the Advia 120 and the Sysmex XE 2100 withflow cytometric reference platelet counts. Samples analyzed had platelet counts less than 150 x 10(3)/microL (150 x 10(9)/L) with a platelet flag or less than 75 x 10(3)/microL (75 x 10(9)/L) on the Sysmex SE 9500. The 105 samples were run sequentially through each analyzer. Anti-CD41 and anti-CD61 monoclonal antibodies were used for flow cytometric determination of the reference platelet count by the RBC/platelet ratio method. The Beckman Coulter and the Sysmex impedance platelet counts showed better correlation with the reference method than the optical platelet counts by the Advia and the Sysmex. At platelet transfusion thresholds of 10 and 20 x 10(3)/microL (10 and 20 x 10(9)/L), the precision of the impedance methods was somewhat better than that of the optical methods. Current methods of optical platelet counting may not be superior to impedance platelet counts for all patient populations.


Assuntos
Contagem de Plaquetas/instrumentação , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Antígenos CD/análise , Separação Celular , Contagem de Eritrócitos/normas , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Integrina beta3 , Contagem de Plaquetas/normas , Complexo Glicoproteico GPIIb-IIIa de Plaquetas/análise , Glicoproteínas da Membrana de Plaquetas/análise , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...