An Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of a Comprehensive Aortic Service in a Tertiary Center over One Year.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is an established and attractive alternative to open surgical repair (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) due to its superior short-term safety profile. However, opinions are divided regarding its long-term cost-effectiveness. We compared the total yearly cost of running endovascular and OSR services in a single tertiary center to determine whether fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) represents a clinically efficacious, affordable treatment option. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed on 109 patients undergoing a procedure related to index or previous abdominal aortic repair, with 1 year follow-up. Data was collected from the National Vascular Registry and hospital records. The primary outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life year. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and morbidity, reintervention rates, length of hospital stay, aneurysm, and all-cause mortality at 1 year for elective index procedures. RESULTS: The average cost per patient of all FEVAR was £16,041.53 (±8,857.54), £13,893.51 (±£21,425.25) for standard EVAR, and £15,357.22 (±£15,904.49) for OSR (FEVAR versus EVAR P = 0.55, FEVAR versus OSR P = 0.83, OSR versus EVAR P = 0.76). Of the secondary outcomes, significant findings included increased length of stay and respiratory morbidity for patients undergoing open versus endovascular repair. There was no significant difference in 30-day or 1-year mortality between groups. CONCLUSIONS: FEVAR, EVAR, and OSR all represent cost-effective options for aortic repair with similar outcomes. Our data highlights the potential for FEVAR to present a viable alternative to open repair, particularly in higher-risk groups, when performed in specialist centers.

360-Degree Complex Primary Reconstruction Using Porous Tantalum Cages for Adult Degenerative Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To assess both implant performance and the amount of correction that can be achieved using multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study (n = 178) performed over a 4-year period. Surgical variables examined included blood loss, operative time, perioperative complications, and secondary/revision procedures. Follow-up radiographic assessment was performed to record implant-related problems. Radiographic parameters were examined pre- and postoperatively. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcome measures were collected preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Descriptive and comparative statistical analysis, using paired-sample t test and repeated-measures analysis of variance (rANOVA), was performed. RESULTS: Lumbar lordosis increased from 42° ± 17° preoperatively to 55° ± 11° postoperatively (P < .001). The visual analog scale back pain mean score improved from 8.3 ± 1.5 preoperatively to 2.6 ± 2.4 at 2 years (P < .001). The mean Oswestry Disability Index improved from 69.5 ± 21.5 preoperatively to 19.9 ± 15.2 at 2 years (P < .001). The EQ-5D mean score improved from 0.2 ± 0.2 preoperatively to 0.8 ± 0.1 at 2 years (P = .02). There were no neurological, vascular, or visceral approach-related injuries reported. No rod breakages and no symptomatic nonunions occurred. There was one revision procedure performed for fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The use of porous tantalum cages as part of a 360-degree fusion to treat adult degenerative spinal deformity has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective strategy, leading to good clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes in the short term.

Neurologic Injury in Complex Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Staged Multilevel Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MOLIF) Using Hyperlordotic Tantalum Cages and Posterior Fusion Versus Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy (PSO).

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the safety of MOLIF versus PSO. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Complex adult spinal deformity (CASD) represents a challenging cohort of patients. The Scoli-RISK-1 study has shown a 22.18% perioperative risk of neurological injury. Restoration of sagittal parameters is associated with good outcome in ASD. Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) is an important technique for sagittal balance in ASD but is associated with significant morbidity. The multilevel oblique lumbar interbody fusion (MOLIF) is an extensile approach from L1 to S1. METHODS: Single surgeon series from 2007 to 2015. Prospectively collected data. Scoli-RISK-1 criteria were refined to only include stiff or fused spines otherwise requiring a PSO. Roentograms were examined preoperatively and 2 year postoperatively. Primary outcome measure was the motor decline in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) at hospital discharge, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years. Demographics, blood loss, operative time, spinopelvic parameters, and spinal cord monitoring (SCM) events. RESULTS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients were included in this study, with 34 patients in each Group. Group 1 (MOLIF) had a mean age 62.9 (45-81) and Group 2 (PSO) had a mean age of 66.76 years (47-79); 64.7% female versus PSO 76.5%; Body Mass Index (BMI) Group 1 (MOLIF) 28.05 and Group 2 (PSO) 27.17. Group 1 (MOLIF) perioperative neurological injury was 2.94% at discharge but resolved by 6 weeks. Group 2 (PSO) had five neurological deficits (14.7%) with no recovery by 2 years. There were four SCM events (SCM). In Group 1 (MOLIF), there was one event (2.94%) versus three events (8.88%) in Group 2 (PSO). CONCLUSION: Staged MOLIF avoids passing neurological structures or retraction of psoas and lumbar plexus. It is safer than PSO in CASD with stiff or fused spines with a lower perioperative neurological injury profile. MOLIF have less SCM events, blood loss, and number of levels fused. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

A simplified method to account for wall motion in patient-specific blood flow simulations of aortic dissection: Comparison with fluid-structure interaction.

Aortic dissection (AD) is a complex and highly patient-specific vascular condition difficult to treat. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can aid the medical management of this pathology, yet its modelling and simulation are challenging. One aspect usually disregarded when modelling AD is the motion of the vessel wall, which has been shown to significantly impact simulation results. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) methods are difficult to implement and are subject to assumptions regarding the mechanical properties of the vessel wall, which cannot be retrieved non-invasively. This paper presents a simplified 'moving-boundary method' (MBM) to account for the motion of the vessel wall in type-B AD CFD simulations, which can be tuned with non-invasive clinical images (e.g. 2D cine-MRI). The method is firstly validated against the 1D solution of flow through an elastic straight tube; it is then applied to a type-B AD case study and the results are compared to a state-of-the-art, full FSI simulation. Results show that the proposed method can capture the main effects due to the wall motion on the flow field: the average relative difference between flow and pressure waves obtained with the FSI and MBM simulations was less than 1.8% and 1.3%, respectively and the wall shear stress indices were found to have a similar distribution. Moreover, compared to FSI, MBM has the advantage to be less computationally expensive (requiring half of the time of an FSI simulation) and easier to implement, which are important requirements for clinical translation.

A multiscale modelling approach to understand atherosclerosis formation: A patient-specific case study in the aortic bifurcation.

Atherogenesis, the formation of plaques in the wall of blood vessels, starts as a result of lipid accumulation (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) in the vessel wall. Such accumulation is related to the site of endothelial mechanotransduction, the endothelial response to mechanical stimuli and haemodynamics, which determines biochemical processes regulating the vessel wall permeability. This interaction between biomechanical and biochemical phenomena is complex, spanning different biological scales and is patient-specific, requiring tools able to capture such mathematical and biological complexity in a unified framework. Mathematical models offer an elegant and efficient way of doing this, by taking into account multifactorial and multiscale processes and mechanisms, in order to capture the fundamentals of plaque formation in individual patients. In this study, a mathematical model to understand plaque and calcification locations is presented: this model provides a strong interpretability and physical meaning through a multiscale, complex index or metric (the penetration site of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, expressed as volumetric flux). Computed tomography scans of the aortic bifurcation and iliac arteries are analysed and compared with the results of the multifactorial model. The results indicate that the model shows potential to predict the majority of the plaque locations, also not predicting regions where plaques are absent. The promising results from this case study provide a proof of concept that can be applied to a larger patient population.

Development of a Patient-Specific Multi-Scale Model to Understand Atherosclerosis and Calcification Locations: Comparison with In vivo Data in an Aortic Dissection.

Vascular calcification results in stiffening of the aorta and is associated with hypertension and atherosclerosis. Atherogenesis is a complex, multifactorial, and systemic process; the result of a number of factors, each operating simultaneously at several spatial and temporal scales. The ability to predict sites of atherogenesis would be of great use to clinicians in order to improve diagnostic and treatment planning. In this paper, we present a mathematical model as a tool to understand why atherosclerotic plaque and calcifications occur in specific locations. This model is then used to analyze vascular calcification and atherosclerotic areas in an aortic dissection patient using a mechanistic, multi-scale modeling approach, coupling patient-specific, fluid-structure interaction simulations with a model of endothelial mechanotransduction. A number of hemodynamic factors based on state-of-the-art literature are used as inputs to the endothelial permeability model, in order to investigate plaque and calcification distributions, which are compared with clinical imaging data. A significantly improved correlation between elevated hydraulic conductivity or volume flux and the presence of calcification and plaques was achieved by using a shear index comprising both mean and oscillatory shear components (HOLMES) and a non-Newtonian viscosity model as inputs, as compared to widely used hemodynamic indicators. The proposed approach shows promise as a predictive tool. The improvements obtained using the combined biomechanical/biochemical modeling approach highlight the benefits of mechanistic modeling as a powerful tool to understand complex phenomena and provides insight into the relative importance of key hemodynamic parameters.

A new extensile anterolateral retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1: a prospective series with clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A variety of surgical approaches have been used for cage insertion in lumbar interbody fusion surgery. The direct anterior approach requires mobilization of the great vessels to access the intervertebral disc spaces cranial to L5/S1. With the lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach, it is difficult to access the L4/L5 intervertebral disc space due to the lumbar plexus and iliac crest, and L5/S1 is inaccessible. We describe a new anterolateral retroperitoneal approach, which is safe and reproducible to access the disc spaces from L1 to S1 inclusive, obviating the need for a separate direct anterior approach to access L5/S1. PURPOSE: This paper had the following objectives: first, to report a reproducible novel single-incision, muscle-splitting, anterolateral pre-psoas surgical approach to the lumbar spine from L1 to S1; second, to highlight the technical challenges of this approach and highlight approach-related complications; and third, to evaluate clinical outcomes using this surgical technique in a prospective series of L1 to S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs) performed as part of a 360-degree fusion for adult spinal deformity correction. STUDY DESIGN: This report used a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A prospective series of patients (n=64) having ALIF using porous tantalum cages as part of a two-stage complex spinal reconstruction from L1 to S1 were studied. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data collected included blood loss, operative time, incision size, technical challenges, perioperative complications, and secondary procedures. Clinical outcome measures used included visual analogue scale (VAS) Back Pain, VAS Leg Pain, EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), EQ-5D VAS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22). METHODS: Pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters and clinical outcome measures were assessed. Mean follow-up time was 1.8 years. RESULTS: Mean blood loss was 68±9.6 mL. The mean VAS Back Pain score improved from 7.5±1.25 preoperatively to 2.5±1.7 at 3 months (p=.02), 1.2±0.5 at 6 months (p=.01), and 1.4±0.6 at 1 year (p=.02). The mean ODI improved from 64.3±31.8 preoperatively to 16.6±14.7 at 3 months (p>.05), 10.7±6.0 at 6 months (p=.02), and 6.7±6.1 at 1 year (p=.01). There were no permanent neurologic, vascular, or visceral injuries. One revision anterior procedure was required on a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and advanced systemic disease that sustained a sacral fracture and required revision ALIF at L5/S1. CONCLUSIONS: The technique described is a safe, new, muscle-splitting, psoas-preserving, one-incision approach to provide access from L1 to S1 for multilevel anterior or oblique lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

Results of complex aortic stent grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms stratified according to the proximal landing zone using the Society for Vascular Surgery classification.

BACKGROUND: Advances in endovascular technology have led to the successful treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, there is currently no consensus on what constitutes a juxtarenal, pararenal, or suprarenal aneurysm. There is emerging evidence that the extent of the aneurysm repair is associated with outcome. We compare the outcomes of 150 consecutive patients treated with a fenestrated or branched stent graft and present the data stratified according to the Society for Vascular Surgery classification based on proximal anatomic landing zones. METHODS: A prospectively collected database of consecutive patients undergoing fenestrated or branched stent graft insertion in a tertiary center between 2008 and 2013 was retrospectively analyzed. Aneurysms were subdivided into zones according to where the area of proximal seal could be achieved in relation to the visceral arteries. Zone 8 covers the renal arteries, zone 7 covers the superior mesenteric artery, and zone 6 covers the celiac axis. Patient demographics, operative variables, mortality, and major morbidity were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis to assess for differences between zones. RESULTS: During the study period, 150 patients were treated. There were 49 in zone 8, 76 in zone 7, and 25 in zone 6. Prior aortic surgery had been performed in 19 patients, which included 11 patients with previous endovascular aneurysm repairs. There was significantly increased blood loss (P < .001), operative time (P < .0001), total hospital stay (P = .018), and intensive care unit stay (P < .0001) as the zones ascended the aorta. There were 14 inpatient deaths recorded across all zones with a 30-day mortality rate of 8%. Logistic regression analysis for 30 day mortality showed a significant increase as the zones ascended (P = .007). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 5-year survival significantly deteriorated as the zones ascended (P = .039), with no significant difference in the freedom from reintervention curves between zones (P = .37). CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that the extent of the aneurysm repair as determined by the proximal sealing zone is associated with outcome. Mortality, operative duration, blood loss, and hospital stay all significantly increased as the zones ascended. These data also validate the use of the proposed new classification based on aortic anatomy.

Aortic dissection simulation models for clinical support: fluid-structure interaction vs. rigid wall models.

BACKGROUND: The management and prognosis of aortic dissection (AD) is often challenging and the use of personalised computational models is being explored as a tool to improve clinical outcome. Including vessel wall motion in such simulations can provide more realistic and potentially accurate results, but requires significant additional computational resources, as well as expertise. With clinical translation as the final aim, trade-offs between complexity, speed and accuracy are inevitable. The present study explores whether modelling wall motion is worth the additional expense in the case of AD, by carrying out fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations based on a sample patient case. METHODS: Patient-specific anatomical details were extracted from computed tomography images to provide the fluid domain, from which the vessel wall was extrapolated. Two-way fluid-structure interaction simulations were performed, with coupled Windkessel boundary conditions and hyperelastic wall properties. The blood was modelled using the Carreau-Yasuda viscosity model and turbulence was accounted for via a shear stress transport model. A simulation without wall motion (rigid wall) was carried out for comparison purposes. RESULTS: The displacement of the vessel wall was comparable to reports from imaging studies in terms of intimal flap motion and contraction of the true lumen. Analysis of the haemodynamics around the proximal and distal false lumen in the FSI model showed complex flow structures caused by the expansion and contraction of the vessel wall. These flow patterns led to significantly different predictions of wall shear stress, particularly its oscillatory component, which were not captured by the rigid wall model. CONCLUSIONS: Through comparison with imaging data, the results of the present study indicate that the fluid-structure interaction methodology employed herein is appropriate for simulations of aortic dissection. Regions of high wall shear stress were not significantly altered by the wall motion, however, certain collocated regions of low and oscillatory wall shear stress which may be critical for disease progression were only identified in the FSI simulation. We conclude that, if patient-tailored simulations of aortic dissection are to be used as an interventional planning tool, then the additional complexity, expertise and computational expense required to model wall motion is indeed justified.

Evaluation of the hemodynamic effectiveness of aortic dissection treatments via virtual stenting.

Aortic dissection treatment varies for each patient and stenting is one of a number of approaches that are utilized to Stabilize the condition. Information regarding the hemodynamic forces in the aorta in dissected and virtually stented cases could support clinicians in their choices of treatment prior to medical intervention. Computational fluid dynamics coupled with lumped parameter models have shown promise in providing detailed information that could be used in the clinic; for this, it is necessary to develop personalized workflows in order to produce patient-specific simulations. In the present study, a case of pre- and post-stenting (virtual stent-graft) of an aortic dissection is investigated with a particular focus on the role of personalized boundary conditions. For each virtual case, velocity, pressure, energy loss, and wall shear stress values are evaluated and compared. The simulated single stent-graft only marginally reduced the pulse pressure and systemic energy loss. The double stent-graft results showed a larger reduction in pulse pressure and a 40% reduction in energy loss as well as a more physiological wall shear stress distribution.Regions of potential risk were highlighted. The methodology applied in the present study revealed detailed information about two possible surgical outcome cases and shows promise as both a diagnostic and an interventional tool.

CT signal heterogeneity of abdominal aortic aneurysm as a possible predictive biomarker for expansion.

OBJECTIVE: There is a need for prognostic biomarkers for risk assessment of small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Since CT textural analysis of tissue is a recognized feature of adverse biology and patient outcome in other diseases, we investigated it as a possible biomarker in small AAA. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients (46-men, 4-woman, median-age 75 y, range 56-85) with small AAA (3-5.5 cm) under surveillance undergoing serial ultrasound were prospectively recruited and assessed at baseline with CT texture analysis (CTTA) and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET). We followed forty patients (36-men, 4-woman, median-age=74 y, range 60-85, participation rate=80% for 1 year. For each axial image, CTTA using the filtration-histogram technique was carried out using a software algorithm that selectively extracts texture features of different coarseness (fine, medium and coarse) and intensity variation. Standard-deviation (SD) and kurtosis (K) at each feature-scale were measured. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 18F-FDG in each axial image of the AAA was also measured with corrections for blood pool 18F-FDG activity to assess AAA metabolic activity. Specificity, sensitivity, and c-statistics were calculated with 95% confidence intervals for prediction of significant AAA expansion (≥2 mm) by CTTA measures before and after adjusting for clinical variables. RESULTS: The median aneurysm expansion at 12 months was 2.0 mm, (IQR 0.0-4.0). Coarse texture SD correlated inversely with AAA SUVmax (rs=-0.456, P=0.003). Medium coarse texture K correlated significantly with future AAA expansion adjusted for baseline size (rs=0.343, P=0.030). AAA SUVmax correlated inversely with AAA expansion corrected for baseline size (rs=-0.383, P=0.015). Medium texture K was a strong predictor of significant AAA expansion (area under the Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.813) after adjusting for clinical variables. CONCLUSION: We have shown evidence that CT signal heterogeneity measurements in small aortic aneurysm may be considered as a risk stratification tool in future prospective studies to identify aneurysms at risk of significant expansion. CT textural data appears to reflect AAA metabolism measured by PET.

Towards personalised management of atherosclerosis via computational models in vascular clinics: technology based on patient-specific simulation approach.

The development of a new technology based on patient-specific modelling for personalised healthcare in the case of atherosclerosis is presented. Atherosclerosis is the main cause of death in the world and it has become a burden on clinical services as it manifests itself in many diverse forms, such as coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease/stroke and peripheral arterial disease. It is also a multifactorial, chronic and systemic process that lasts for a lifetime, putting enormous financial and clinical pressure on national health systems. In this Letter, the postulate is that the development of new technologies for healthcare using computer simulations can, in the future, be developed as in-silico management and support systems. These new technologies will be based on predictive models (including the integration of observations, theories and predictions across a range of temporal and spatial scales, scientific disciplines, key risk factors and anatomical sub-systems) combined with digital patient data and visualisation tools. Although the problem is extremely complex, a simulation workflow and an exemplar application of this type of technology for clinical use is presented, which is currently being developed by a multidisciplinary team following the requirements and constraints of the Vascular Service Unit at the University College Hospital, London.

Development of a patient-specific simulation tool to analyse aortic dissections: assessment of mixed patient-specific flow and pressure boundary conditions.

Aortic dissection has high morbidity and mortality rates and guidelines regarding surgical intervention are not clearly defined. The treatment of aortic dissection varies with each patient and detailed knowledge of haemodynamic and mechanical forces would be advantageous in the process of choosing a course of treatment. In this study, a patient-specific dissected aorta geometry is constructed from computed tomography scans. Dynamic boundary conditions are implemented by coupling a three element Windkessel model to the 3D domain at each outlet, in order to capture the essential behaviour of the downstream vasculature. The Windkessel model parameters are defined based on clinical data. The predicted minimum and maximum pressures are close to those measured invasively. Malperfusion is indicated and complex flow patterns are observed. Pressure, flow and wall shear stress distributions are analysed. The methodology presented here provides insight into the haemodynamics in a patient-specific dissected aorta and represents a development towards the use of CFD simulations as a diagnostic tool for aortic dissection.

A new technique of branched stent graft treatment for ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) using a branched stent graft is a technically challenging procedure. A 64-year-old man with multiple medical problems, including severe renal impairment, is presented with a ruptured type IV TAAA. He underwent emergency repair using an off-the-shelf branched stent graft and carbon dioxide as the exclusive contrast agent.

Temporary axillobifemoral bypass during fenestrated aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (f-EVAR) of juxtarenal aneurysms requiring cannulation of the superior mesenteric artery and renal arteries is technically challenging, has a long operating time, and requires bilateral large-caliber sheath insertion into the femoral arteries. Consequently, the risk of lower limb ischemia and subsequent reperfusion injury is increased. We describe the use of an adjunct temporary axillobifemoral bypass graft (TABFBG) for f-EVAR and propose that it be used as a strategy to avoid ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients anticipated as being at increased risk. METHODS: Consecutive patients from a tertiary referral center undergoing f-EVAR, between October 2008 and August 2011, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with lower limb arterial occlusive disease and those with difficult anatomy had an adjunct TABFBG. RESULTS: All patients presenting with a juxtarenal aortic aneurysm were treated endovascularly, regardless of aneurysm anatomy and technical difficulties. There were 37 patients without TABFBG (group 1) and 27 with TABFBG (group 2). No patients required open conversion. Sex and age were not significantly different between the groups. The median ankle-brachial pressure index was significantly higher in group 1 (P=.0001). The groups had similar median blood loss, percentage of target vessel cannulation, and median stay in the intensive therapy unit. Morbidities were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in cardiac, renal, or respiratory complications between the groups. The 30-day mortality was 10.8% (n=4) in group 1 and 0% in group 2 (P=.046). CONCLUSIONS: Our series has demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality (10.8% absolute risk reduction) and no increase in morbidity with the use of a TABFBG for fenestrated grafts. This is likely a result of the reduction in ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion injury in these patients. We therefore recommend the use of TABFBG in patients with proximal severe stenotic or occlusive disease and those in whom an operative time of >4 hours is predicted (typically those for whom three or more target fenestrations is planned).

Early outcome following endovascular repair of pararenal aortic aneurysms: triple- versus double- or single-fenestrated stent-grafts.

PURPOSE: To review the early outcome following endovascular repair of pararenal aortic aneurysm using fenestrated stent-grafts and to determine if the number of fenestrations required is predicative of outcome. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 20 consecutive patients (18 men; mean age of 75 ± 7 years) treated with stent-grafts containing either ≤ 2 fenestrations (n = 10, group 1) or 3 fenestrations (n = 10, group 2). Target vessels also included those accommodated by a scallop (renal artery or superior mesenteric artery in group 1 and the celiac artery in group 2). RESULTS: Comorbidities were similar in both groups. Aneurysm size [median 6.9 (IQR 6.7-8.3) versus 6.0 cm (IQR 5.8-6.6), p = 0.03], procedure time (mean 6.6 ± 2.1 versus 4.6 ± 1.7 hours, p = 0.04), and intensive care stay [median 4.5 (IQR 2-14) versus 2 (IQR 1-3) days, p = 0.07] were greater in group 2. There were 2 postoperative deaths, both in group 2. Morbidity was significant and similar in both groups (4 patients in group 1 and 3 patients in group 2), including 1 patient requiring long-term hemodialysis. Target vessel preservation was similar in both groups (96% overall). There were 2 type II endoleaks (one in each group) and no type I or III endoleak. CONCLUSION: Triple-fenestrated stent-grafts allow patients with extensive pararenal aneurysms and significant comorbidity to be treated by endovascular means. Although the number of patients treated was small, which limited the validity of the comparison, longer procedures and greater early morbidity and mortality were seen in the triple-fenestrated group. At present, the procedures are technically more demanding and associated with increased risk compared with double or single fenestrations, but the technology continues to evolve.

Temporary axillobifemoral bypass as an adjunct to endovascular aneurysm repair using fenestrated stent grafts.

Prolonged endovascular procedures requiring a large diameter sheath in each groin can be associated with significant intraoperative lower limb ischemia, particularly in those with pre-existing peripheral vascular disease. We report the case of a patient who suffered severe ischemia-reperfusion injury following endovascular repair of a pararenal aortic aneurysm using a fenestrated stent graft and describe the use of temporary axillobifemoral bypass in a patient with similar comorbidities undergoing the same procedure. We propose this adjunctive technique as a means of maintaining antegrade limb perfusion and avoiding the peripheral and central metabolic consequences of ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Twelve-year outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair using earliest available endograft components from a single center.

OBJECTIVES: Comprehensive long-term outcome data after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are scarce, although anecdotes of endograft failure in the early 1990s abound. The objective of this report is to provide comprehensive outcomes after EVAR performed with the earliest available endograft components. These were a home-made endograft (pre-expanded polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE] fixed with giant Palmaz stents) and first-generation Talent endografts (World Medical, Sunrise, Fla). METHODS: A prospectively recorded database of all cases undertaken at a tertiary referral center was retrospectively interrogated. Sex, age, types of endograft used, and fate of patient and endografts implanted between 10 and 15 years previously were studied. A literature search was undertaken to obtain data for long-term survival after EVAR and open surgery (OR). RESULTS: There were 50 patients in total operated on between 1994 and 1998 of whom 43 were male. The median age was 73 years (54-93) at time of EVAR and 85 years (67-100) in the survivors at a median of 12 years later. There were 26 home-made (PTFE fixed with Palmaz stents) and 24 Talent endografts (World Medical). Thirty-day mortality was 4%, one death in a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Twenty-one (42%) survived for 12 years to the time of reporting. Of these, 6 have functioning home-made endografts, 8 have Talent endografts, and 8 (5 home-made and 3 Talent) survive after conversion to OR. Secondary interventions took place in 9 further patients. Of 27 late deaths, 1 suffered endograft sepsis, 20 died of cardio-respiratory causes and 6 died of cancer. The only report of more than a 10-year survival after OR was found in an e-publication from Sweden. The projected survival after 10 years was 40% for unruptured aneurysms. However, survival in the general population was higher at 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Ten-year survival after EVAR parallels that of elective OR but is less than the general population. Although the rate of eventual conversion to open repair was high using this earliest available endograft technology, the aneurysm-related mortality was low, and both endografts remain functional for more than 10 years after placement.