[Letter to the Editor]. / Carta al Editor.

No Abstract available.

[With a new presence]. / Con una nueva presencia.

No Abstract available.

[Total knee arthroplasty with ultracongruent tibial insert. Two-year follow-up]. / Artroplastía total de rodilla con inserto tibial ultracongruente. Seguimiento a dos años.

INTRODUCTION: There is no single criterion to select a posterior stabilization system for an arthroplasty; the ultracongruent system may avoid the complications observed with the drawer and the post. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and functional status of total knee arthroplasty with the ultracongruent system and compare the results with those published in the international literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out with a descriptive and comparative analysis of the total knee arthroplasties in which the Consensus system was used, to determine the operative time, the range of motion, pain, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Scale (WOMAC), and the level of satisfaction. RESULTS: Sixty-six arthroplasties were performed; mean age was 70.58 years; 45.5% were right and 54.5% left; the operative time was 76.84 minutes, the VAS pain score was 2.02, the WOMAC score was 17.11, and the range of motion was 96.5 +/- 14.04. Ninety-two percent of the patients are satisfied with the surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The prosthesis with the ultracongruent insert is an effective option to relieve pain in patients with knee pathology. The clinical and functional results were similar to those reported with other stabilization systems. The system is well accepted by the patients. It is recommended as an alternative to prevent the possible complications that occur with the drawer and post system.

[Joint position statement of the Mexican College of Orthopedics and Traumatology: prophylaxis for venous thromboembolic disease in high-risk orthopedic surgery]. / Declaración de posición conjunta del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología: profilaxis de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en cirugía ortopédica de alto riesgo.

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) is a public health problem worldwide. In the United States it causes 2 million annual cases. Its annual incidence is 1-2 cases per 1,000 individuals in the general population. It is a disease frequently associated with life threatening complications and its mortality rate is 1-5% of cases. Due to its high complication rate, its slow recovery, and the need for prolonged disability, it is considered as a high-cost disease. VTED may occur in both surgical and medical patients; the known associated risk factors include prolonged rest, active cancer, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke, among the major medical conditions. Orthopedic surgery represents the main surgical risk factor for VTED, including mainly hip and knee replacements, as well as polytraumatized patients with severe spinal lesions, and major fractures. VTED may be prevented with the appropriate use of antithrombotics. The participants in this consensus defined thromboprophylaxis as the strategy and actions undertaken to reduce the risk of VTED in patients undergoing high risk orthopedic surgery. The position of the Mexican College of Orthopedics and Traumatology regarding the prevention of VTED in orthopedic surgery is described herein.

Disability impact on quality of life in Mexican adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and juvenile ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the disability impact on quality of life (QOL) in Mexican adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis polyarticular course (JIAPA) and juvenile ankylosing spondylitis (JAS). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed on 32 adult patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Functional outcome was evaluated using Global Functional Status (GFS) according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and Spanish Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) arthritis-specific measurements for functional disability in patients with polyarticular course and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) for those who developed JAS. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using SF-36 and EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D). Descriptive statistics and associations among clinical, functional, and QOL measurements were examined using Spearman's correlation test. Multiple regression analysis was used to estimate predictor factors for impaired QOL. Differences between groups were evaluated by Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests, and p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: JIAPA and JAS had GFS III/IV in 65 and 50%, respectively. A HAQ-DI score of > 1.5 was found in 35% of JIAPA, and a BASFI score of > 5 in 92% of JAS. Patients with JIAPA and JAS reported lower scores for all physical domains and for mental domains (physical role, social functioning, and emotional role) compared with Mexican population scores (p < 0.005). Health status between both groups studied does not show significant differences (p > 0.05). EQ-5D showed impairment in all five dimensions for both groups studied. Multiple regression analysis showed that GFS was the only variable that affects QOL assessed by SF36. CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, JIAPA and JAS exhibited a great disability impact on QOL and poor functional outcome during the patients' adult life. GFS has a significant impact on quality of life.