Stress-driven emigration in complex field scenarios of habitat disturbance: The heterogeneous multi-habitat assay system (HeMHAS).

Lines of evidence used in ecological risk assessment (ERA) are essentially three: chemistry, biology and ecotoxicology. Until now, the fundamental assumption made when measuring ecological risks is that organisms are forcedly exposed to stressors. However, when organisms can avoid disturbed habitats by escaping to less stressful areas, the assumption that exposure is mandatory to pose risk may not match field disturbance scenarios. A non-forced exposure approach using a linear free-choice multi-compartmented system has been proposed previously as a complementary tool to assess the effects on organisms' spatial avoidance/preference responses. Yet, the linearity of the latter system limits avoidance measurements to one spatial dimension. A novel, heterogeneous multi-habitat assay system (HeMHAS) consisting of 18 connected circular compartments (3 compartments on a vertical axis in each one of 6 zones on a longitudinal axis; a 2D system) is put forward here to be used in heterogeneous-habitat selection studies, as it makes it possible to assess the ability of organisms to detect contamination and other stressors and select more favorable habitats. In the present study, the avoidance to copper by zebrafish (Danio rerio) was tested after exposing organisms to a copper gradient in the HeMHAS and compared with that in the linear system. Avoidance occurred for all copper concentrations: 43% in the lowest (21 µg·L-1) to 72% in the highest (221 µg·L-1). Results obtained within the HeMHAS (AC50: 60 µg·L-1) were statistically (p = 0.72) similar to avoidance of copper by D. rerio in the linear non-forced system (AC50: 89 µg·L-1). In summary, the simulation of a copper gradient in the HeMHAS (2D system) allowed to assess the potential repellency of copper to zebrafish and to corroborate the ability of organisms to detect and avoid potentially toxic concentrations.

Consumer beliefs regarding farmed versus wild fish.

Aquaculture is a food-producing activity, alternative to traditional extractive fishing, which still acts as a reference for most consumers. The main objective of the present paper was to study which consumer beliefs, regarding farmed versus wild fish, hinder the potential development of the aquaculture sector. To achieve this purpose the study was organized into two complementary steps: a qualitative approach (focus groups) aimed at assessing consumer perception about wild and farmed fish and to identify the salient beliefs that differentiate them; and a quantitative approach (survey by means of a questionnaire) to validate the results obtained in the focus group discussions over a representative sample of participants (n = 919). Results showed that participants perceive clear differences between farmed and wild fish. Although no significant differences between both kinds of fish were detected on safety, in general farmed fish was perceived to be less affected by marine pollution, heavy metals and parasites. In the contrary, wild fish was considered to have healthier feeding, to contain fewer antibiotics and to be fresher, healthier, less handled and more natural. Beliefs related to quality were in favour of wild fish, while those related to availability and price were in favour of farmed fish. Significant differences were observed in the perception of both kinds of fish depending on the consumers' objective knowledge about fish, on the level of education, age and gender and on the three segments of consumers identified: "Traditional/Conservative", "Connoisseur", "Open to aquaculture". The results provided could play an important role when planning and designing efficient marketing strategies for promoting farmed fish by adapting the information provided to the perception of each segment of consumers identified by the present study.