BL-8040 CXCR4 antagonist is safe and demonstrates antileukemic activity in combination with cytarabine for the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myelogenous leukemia: An open-label safety and efficacy phase 2a study.

BACKGROUND: CXCR4 mediates the retention and survival of acute myelogenous leukemia blasts in bone marrow and contributes to their resistance to chemotherapy. The authors evaluated a combination of the high-affinity CXCR4 antagonist BL-8040 with high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) chemotherapy in a phase 2a study of patients with relapsed and refractory AML. METHODS: Forty-two patients received treatment with BL-8040 monotherapy for 2 days followed by a combination of BL-8040 with HiDAC for 5 days. Six escalating BL-8040 dose levels were investigated (0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, and 2.0 mg/kg), and 1.5 mg/kg was selected as the dose for the expansion phase (n = 23). RESULTS: BL-8040 in combination with HiDAC was safe and well tolerated at all dose levels. Clinical response was observed with BL-8040 doses ≥1.0 mg/kg. The composite response rate (complete remissions plus complete remissions with incomplete hematologic recovery of platelets or neutrophils) was 29% (12 of 42) in all patients and 39% (9 of 23) in the 1.5-mg/kg phase. The median overall survival was 8.4 months for all patients, 10.8 months in the 1.5-mg/kg phase, and 21.8 months for responding patients in the 1.5-mg/kg cohort. Two days of BL-8040 monotherapy triggered the mobilization of blasts into peripheral blood, with significantly higher mean fold-changes in responders versus nonresponders. This was accompanied by a decrease in bone marrow blasts. CONCLUSIONS: The current results demonstrate the efficacy of CXCR4 targeting with BL-8040 and support continued clinical development in acute myelogenous leukemia.

A blocking monoclonal antibody to CCL24 alleviates liver fibrosis and inflammation in experimental models of liver damage.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: C-C motif chemokine ligand 24 (CCL24) is a chemokine that regulates inflammatory and fibrotic activities through its receptor, C-C motif chemokine receptor (CCR3). The aim of the study was to evaluate the involvement of the CCL24-CCR3 axis in liver fibrosis and inflammation and to assess the potential of its blockade, by a monoclonal anti-CCL24 antibody, as a therapeutic strategy for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and liver fibrosis. METHODS: Expression of CCL24 and CCR3 was evaluated in liver biopsies and blood samples. CCL24 involvement in NAFLD/NASH pathogenesis was assessed in Ccl24 knockout mouse using the methionine-choline deficient (MCD) diet experimental model. Antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects of CM-101 were tested in the MCD and STAM mouse models and in the thioacetamide (TAA) model in rats. Liver enzymes, liver morphology, histology and collagen deposition, as well as fibrosis- and inflammation-related protein expression were assessed. Activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) was evaluated in the human LX2 cell line. RESULTS: Patients with NASH and advanced NAFLD exhibited significant expression of both CCL24 and CCR3 in liver and blood samples. In the experimental MCD-diet model, Ccl24 knockout mice showed an attenuated liver damage response compared to wild-type mice, exhibiting reduced histological NAFLD activity scores and fibrosis, as well as lower levels of liver enzymes. Blocking CCL24 using CM-101 robustly reduced liver damage in 3 experimental animal models (MCD, STAM and TAA), as demonstrated by attenuation of liver fibrosis and NAFLD activity score. Furthermore, blocking CCL24 by CM-101 significantly inhibited CCL24-induced HSC motility, α-SMA expression and pro-collagen I secretion. CONCLUSION: Our results reveal that blocking CCL24 significantly attenuates liver fibrosis and inflammation and may have a potential therapeutic effect in patients with NASH and/or liver fibrosis. LAY SUMMARY: CCL24 is a chemokine that regulates inflammation and fibrosis. It was found to be significantly expressed in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, in whom it regulates profibrotic processes in the liver. Herein, we show that blockade of CCL24 using a monoclonal antibody robustly attenuated liver fibrosis and inflammation in animal models, thus suggesting a potential therapeutic role for an anti-CCL24 agent.

Real-world experience with the IUB Ballerine MIDI copper IUD: an observational, single-centre study in Israel.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the acceptability of the intrauterine ball IUB Ballerine MIDI copper intrauterine device (IUD), using real-world data collected from users and physicians in Israel.Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, conducted in a single clinic in Israel, healthy women (n = 175) who had had the device inserted ≥12 months prior to enrolment, and their physician, completed questionnaires relating to device insertion, user experience and performance.Results: The mean age at insertion was 32.8 ± 6.7 years; most women were married (80.6%) and multigravid (89.1%). At the time of the study, 131 (74.9%) women were still using the device; in 13 cases (7.4%), premature removal was due to desire to conceive. The 12 month continuation rate, excluding the women seeking to conceive, was 90.1%. The expulsion rate was 3.4% (n = 6) and the pregnancy rate was 0.57% (n = 1). Most of the women still using the device reported no to moderate pain or cramps (90.0%) and moderate to high (72.6%) satisfaction with the device; 76.3% said they would recommend it to friends and relatives. Most of the insertion procedures (86.9%) were uneventful and none required cervical dilation.Conclusion: The IUB Ballerine MIDI raised no major safety concerns and was both effective and highly accepted in a cohort of women, covering a broad age range, treated in a gynaecology clinic in Israel.

Real-world experience with the IUB Ballerine MIDI copper IUD: an observational study in the French-speaking region of Switzerland.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the acceptability of the intrauterine ball IUB Ballerine MIDI copper intrauterine device (IUD), using real-world data collected from users and physicians. Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, conducted in the French-speaking region of Switzerland, healthy women (n= 207) who had had an IUB Ballerine MIDI inserted ≥12 months before enrolment, and their physicians completed questionnaires relating to device insertion, user experience and outcome. Questions relating to current menstrual patterns, physical comfort and product satisfaction were only posed to women still using the device. Results: The mean age at insertion was 30.8 ± 7.2 years, with an average 14.2 ± 2.9 month lapse from time of insertion until study commencement. At the time of the study, 140 (67.6%) women were still using the device. The expulsion rate was 5.3% (n= 11) and the pregnancy rate was 1.4% (n= 3). Most of the women still using the device reported no to moderate pain or cramps (80.7%). The majority of women reported moderate to high (65.7%) satisfaction with the device, with 81.4% claiming they would recommend it to friends and relatives. Over 84.8% of physicians reported that the device was easy to insert, with no difficulties encountered during the procedure. Conclusions: The IUB Ballerine MIDI was demonstrated to be safe and acceptable in different clinical settings and risk groups among a socioeconomically and demographically diverse study population.

Single Dose of the CXCR4 Antagonist BL-8040 Induces Rapid Mobilization for the Collection of Human CD34+ Cells in Healthy Volunteers.

Purpose: The potential of the high-affinity CXCR4 antagonist BL-8040 as a monotherapy-mobilizing agent and its derived graft composition and quality were evaluated in a phase I clinical study in healthy volunteers (NCT02073019).Experimental Design: The first part of the study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose escalation phase. The second part of the study was an open-label phase, in which 8 subjects received a single injection of BL-8040 (1 mg/kg) and approximately 4 hours later underwent a standard leukapheresis procedure. The engraftment potential of the purified mobilized CD34+ cells was further evaluated by transplanting the cells into NSG immunodeficient mice.Results: BL-8040 was found safe and well tolerated at all doses tested (0.5-1 mg/kg). The main treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate. Transient injection site and systemic reactions were mitigated by methylprednisolone, paracetamol, and promethazine pretreatment. In the first part of the study, BL-8040 triggered rapid and substantial mobilization of WBCs and CD34+ cells in all tested doses. Four hours postdose, the count rose to a mean of 8, 37, 31, and 35 cells/µL (placebo, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 mg/kg, respectively). FACS analysis revealed substantial mobilization of immature dendritic, T, B, and NK cells. In the second part, the mean CD34+ cells/kg collected were 11.6 × 106 cells/kg. The graft composition was rich in immune cells.Conclusions: The current data demonstrate that BL-8040 is a safe and effective monotherapy strategy for the collection of large amounts of CD34+ cells and immune cells in a one-day procedure for allogeneic HSPC transplantation. Clin Cancer Res; 23(22); 6790-801. ©2017 AACR.

A Novel Proliposomal Ropivacaine Oil: Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Studies After Subcutaneous Administration in Pigs.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal local anesthetics are limited by a short liposomal shelf-life, even when under refrigeration. We describe a novel proliposomal ropivacaine that produces liposomes in situ, only after exposure to aqueous media. METHODS: In vitro: Nanoparticles were assessed (particle size distribution analyzer, cryo-transmission electron microscopy) at baseline and after exposure to saline/plasma. TOXICITY: In porcine wound healing study (n = 12), healing was assessed by photography, clinical assessment, and histology. Pharmacodynamics: Seventeen young piglets were randomly assigned to plain 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 5), proliposomal 4% ropivacaine (n = 6), or sham (n = 6). Tactile threshold was assessed using von Frey filaments applied to the surgical wound; the nonoperated skin was used as a control. Tactile threshold over time was determined using area under the curve (AUC) and assessed by 1-way analysis of variance. PHARMACOKINETICS: 8 young piglets were randomly assigned to plain 0.5% (25 mg, n = 4) or proliposomal 4% (200 mg, n = 4) ropivacaine. Plasma ropivacaine was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography at baseline and at intervals over 36 hours. Paired ropivacaine concentration (from wound exudate and plasma) was obtained at 96 hours. Data were analyzed using noncompartmental and compartmental models. RESULTS: In vitro: On exposure to saline and plasma, the study drug was transformed from a homogenous oil to an emulsion containing liposomes of approximately 1.4-µm diameter; this effect was dilution dependent and stable over time. TOXICITY: All wounds healed well; no effect of drug group was observed. Pharmacodynamics: Plain and proliposomal ropivacaine provided sensory anesthesia for approximately 6 and 30 hours, respectively. There was an approximately 7-fold increase in the AUC of anesthesia for proliposomal ropivacaine compared with plain ropivacaine (mean difference, 1010; 95% confidence interval [CI], 625-1396 g·h/mm; P < 0.0001). PHARMACOKINETICS: There was no difference in Cmax (2.31 ± 0.74 vs 2.32 ± 0.46 mg/L), despite an approximately 8-fold difference in dose. However, proliposomal ropivacaine was associated with a marked prolongation of Tmax (6.50 ± 6.35 vs 0.5 ± 0.0 hours), terminal half-life (16.07 ± 5.38 vs 3.46 ± 0.88 hours; P = 0.0036), and ropivacaine-time AUC (47.72 ± 7.16 vs 6.36 ± 2.07 h·mg/L; P < 0.0001), when compared with plain ropivacaine. The proliposomal formulation provided an approximately 250-fold higher ropivacaine concentration in the surgical wound (mean difference, 3783 ng/mL; 95% CI, 1708-5858; P = 0.001) and an approximately 25-fold higher wound:plasma ropivacaine concentration ratio (mean difference, 126; 95% CI 38-213; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Proliposomal ropivacaine exerted prolonged anesthesia with delayed elimination, typical for liposomal drugs. The advantage of this novel proliposomal ropivacaine is its ease of preparation and its extended shelf-stability (>2 years) at room temperature.

Proliposomal Ropivacaine Oil: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data After Subcutaneous Administration in Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Slow-release liposomal formulations of local anesthetics prolong plasma redistribution and reduce peak plasma drug concentration, allowing safer administration of larger doses and further prolonging sensory effects. However, their clinical applicability is limited by expensive manufacture and liposomal leakage. Previously, we described the simple preparation of a novel proliposomal ropivacaine oil that produces multilamellar liposomal vesicles on exposure to aqueous media and that has a shelf-life of >2 years at room temperature. In this study, we present both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data in healthy volunteers after subcutaneous injection of this novel proliposomal preparation of ropivacaine. METHODS: In the pharmacodynamic phase of this study, 15 volunteers received 3 separate subcutaneous injections of 2.5 mL containing 1 of the following drugs: proliposomal 4% ropivacaine, plain 0.5% ropivacaine, and the ropivacaine-free proliposomal vehicle. Drugs were administered into the lower back, and their location was randomized and blinded; a separate area was used as an uninjected, open control. Experimental sensory assessment was made at repeated intervals over 72 hours using both pinprick sensation and experimental heat pain tolerance (assessed using quantitative sensory testing). In a separate pharmacokinetic phase of this study, 9 volunteers received subcutaneous injections of 2.5 mL of either proliposomal 4% ropivacaine (n = 6) or plain 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 3); these participants had plasma ropivacaine concentrations assessed at repeated intervals over 72 hours. RESULTS: The mean ± SE duration of pinprick anesthesia after proliposomal and plain ropivacaine administration lasted 28.8 ± 6.0 and 15.9 ± 3.5 hours, respectively (mean difference, 16.8 hours; 95% confidence interval, 10.0-23.7; P = 0.001). For experimental heat pain, the anesthesia duration was approximately 36 and 12 hours, respectively, with mean ± SE area under the curve of the normalized heat pain tolerance over time 55.0 ± 28.8 Δ°C·min for proliposomal ropivacaine and 9.6 ± 26.0 Δ°C·min for plain ropivacaine (mean difference, 64.6 Δ°C·min; 95% confidence interval, 10.2-119.0; P = 0.036). In the pharmacokinetic study, there was no significant difference in peak plasma concentration in the proliposomal ropivacaine group (164 ± 43 ng/mL compared with 100 ± 41 ng/mL in the plain ropivacaine group; P = 0.07) despite an 8-fold increase in ropivacaine dose in the proliposomal group. The 99% upper prediction limit for peak plasma concentrations (351 ng/mL proliposomal; 279 ng/mL plain) was well below the putative toxic plasma concentration for both groups. The mean ± SE terminal half-life and area under the curve for proliposomal ropivacaine versus plain ropivacaine were 13.8 ± 3.6 hours vs 5.9 ± 2.3 hours (P = 0.011) and 5090 ± 1476 h·ng/mL vs 593 ± 168 h·ng/mL (P = 0.0014), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prolonged pharmacodynamic effect of proliposomal ropivacaine, together with its delayed elimination and prolonged redistribution to plasma, is compatible to depot-related slow-release and similar to the performance of other liposomal local anesthetics. The advantage of the proliposomal oil is its ease of preparation and its extended shelf-stability at room temperature.

Prolonged Analgesic Effect of PRF-108 and PRF-110 on Post-operative Pain in Pigs.

INTRODUCTION: Local anesthetic infusion techniques have been reported to reduce opiate requirements and pain scores following different kinds of surgery, including orthopedic surgery, inguinal hernia, and Cesarean surgery in women. METHODS: PRF-108 and PRF-110 formulations were applied to the wound space in an incisional model in pigs to test the hypothesis that these formulations have better and longer analgesic effects than the commercially available ropivacaine solution (Naropin(®), AstraZeneca). RESULTS: The data show significantly better analgesic activity with PRF-108 and PRF-110 compared to ropivacaine. The duration of the analgesic efficacy of PRF-108 and PRF-110 was at least five times longer than that was measured following treatment with ropivacaine. The data further suggest that active clearance from the injection site (the wound) is much slower for PRF-108 and PRF-110 than for the commercial ropivacaine solution. CONCLUSION: Assessing the local concentration of PRF compounds and commercially available ropivacaine solution suggests that active clearance from the injection site (the wound) is much slower for PRF-108 and PRF-110 than for ropivacaine. FUNDING: PainReform.