Evaluating Safety of Ring Versus Clamp Devices in Neonatal Circumcision: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: While device-based circumcision is considered non-inferior to traditional dissection, there is no consensus on the efficacy and safety of ring devices in comparison with clamp devices. We aimed to compare the safety outcomes of ring-based versus clamp-based circumcision techniques in neonates. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched following the Cochrane collaboration (PRISMA guidelines), without language restrictions, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. Adverse events, bleeding events, infection events, and procedure time were extracted and analyzed from the selected studies. RESULTS: From 1661 citations, seven trials were included, encompassing 3390 patients. These studies compared ring-based to clamp-based circumcision devices in neonates. No significant difference was found in overall adverse events between the two groups. However, ring devices showed significantly fewer bleeding events compared to clamp devices. Infection events and procedure time were similar for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both ring and clamp devices have similar safety profiles, with ring devices potentially offering a reduced risk of bleeding. A comprehensive understanding of ring-specific complications and cosmetic outcomes is necessary for a more complete evaluation of these circumcision techniques. Our analysis is limited from a lack of detailed examination of ring-specific complications and their impact on cosmetic results. The included studies varied in quality, and some exhibited a risk of bias. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Treatment Study.

Intradetrusor Versus Suburothelial Onabotulinum Toxin A in Adults with Neurogenic and Non-neurogenic Overactive Bladder Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of submucosal injection of onabotulinum toxin A (OnabotA) with intradetrusor injection for overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). METHODS: This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021237964). A licensed librarian surveyed Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to conduct a comprehensive search. Studies comparing suburothelial and intradetrusor techniques of OnabotA injection for OAB were included, along with clinical and urodynamic variables and complications. The studies were assessed for quality on the basis of Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and evaluated using statistical analysis via a random-effect model and I2 statistic. Data extraction and analysis were conducted using Covidence systematic review platform and Review Manager software. RESULTS: Six studies with 299 patients were included in the systematic review, with four reporting that suburothelial injection of OnabotA was as effective as intradetrusor injection and two reporting intradetrusor injection to be more effective. The meta-analysis found no significant difference between the suburothelial and intradetrusor groups for mean daily catheter or voiding frequency (mean difference: 2.12 [95% confidence interval (CI): -1.61, 5.84]) and the mean number of urgency/urge incontinence episodes (mean difference: 0.08 [95% CI: -1.42, 1.57]). However, a significant heterogeneity was found among the studies. Only the mean volume at first detrusor contraction showed a significant difference, being higher for suburothelial injection (mean difference: 33.39 [95% CI: 0.16, 66.63]). No significant difference was noted for mean compliance, mean bladder capacity, and mean maximum detrusor pressure. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) (p = 0.24) and acute urinary retention (p = 0.92) showed no significant difference between the two groups. The risk of bias varied among the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Suburothelial injection of OnabotA is as effective as intradetrusor injection in improving OAB symptoms, and it has similar complication rates. A higher mean volume of the first detrusor contraction was found in a urodynamic study with suburothelial injection.

The Role of Secondary Conservative Management Strategies in Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the effect of secondary management strategies in addition to urotherapy on bowel bladder dysfunction outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: The review protocol was prospectively registered (CRD42023422168). MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and Scopus (database initiation until June 2023) were searched. Comparative studies of secondary management strategies vs conventional urotherapy alone were included. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and reviewed full-text articles. Two authors extracted data related to study characteristics, methodology, subjects, and results. RESULTS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 studies and 1228 children, secondary management strategies (home-based education, biofeedback, and physical therapy) were associated with reduced symptom burden, fewer recurrent urinary tract infections, and improved uroflowmetry findings than children treated solely with urotherapy for conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is significant reporting heterogeneity, secondary conservative management strategies such as home education, biofeedback or cognitive behavioral therapy, and physiotherapy-based education are associated with less urinary incontinence, fewer infections, and fewer abnormal uroflowmetry findings.

Application of STREAM-URO and APPRAISE-AI reporting standards for artificial intelligence studies in pediatric urology: A case example with pediatric hydronephrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in pediatric urology is gaining increased popularity and credibility. However, the literature lacks standardization in reporting and there are areas for methodological improvement, which incurs difficulty in comparison between studies and may ultimately hurt clinical implementation of these models. The "STandardized REporting of Applications of Machine learning in UROlogy" (STREAM-URO) framework provides methodological instructions to improve transparent reporting in urology and APPRAISE-AI in a critical appraisal tool which provides quantitative measures for the quality of AI studies. The adoption of these will allow urologists and developers to ensure consistency in reporting, improve comparison, develop better models, and hopefully inspire clinical translation. METHODS: In this article, we have applied STREAM-URO framework and APPRAISE-AI tool to the pediatric hydronephrosis literature. By doing this, we aim to describe best practices on ML reporting in urology with STREAM-URO and provide readers with a critical appraisal tool for ML quality with APPRAISE-AI. By applying these to the pediatric hydronephrosis literature, we provide some tutorial for other readers to employ these in developing and appraising ML models. We also present itemized recommendations for adequate reporting, and critically appraise the quality of ML in pediatric hydronephrosis insofar. We provide examples of strong reporting and highlight areas for improvement. RESULTS: There were 8 ML models applied to pediatric hydronephrosis. The 26-item STREAM-URO framework is provided in Appendix A and 24-item APPRAISE-AI tool is provided in Appendix B. Across the 8 studies, the median compliance with STREAM-URO was 67 % and overall study quality was moderate. The highest scoring APPRAISE-AI domains in pediatric hydronephrosis were clinical relevance and reporting quality, while the worst were methodological conduct, robustness of results, and reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: If properly conducted and reported, ML has the potential to impact the care we provide to patients in pediatric urology. While AI is exciting, the paucity of strong evidence limits our ability to translate models to practice. The first step toward this goal is adequate reporting and ensuring high quality models, and STREAM-URO and APPRAISE-AI can facilitate better reporting and critical appraisal, respectively.

A scoping review on chordee correction in boys with ventral congenital penile curvature and hypospadias.

Introduction: Congenital penile curvature (PC), often concomitant with hypospadias, poses challenges in urology. Surgical correction techniques, including plication and corporotomy, lack standardized guidelines. This study aims to address the paucity of high-level evidence by comprehensively reviewing the outcomes of PC correction procedures in patients with and without hypospadias. This will inform clinical decision-making and provide insights for future research and meta-analyses. Methods: We conducted this scoping review in accordance with the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. An extensive literature search was performed and comparative studies published in English up to June 2023 were included. The studies were divided into three categories: PC without hypospadias, PC with hypospadias, and studies comparing two or more materials for covering the ventral corporotomy. Data extraction comprised author details, patient characteristics, study design, interventions, outcomes, and complications. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Forty-two studies were included in the review, which collectively comprised 3180 patients. Thirteen comparative studies reported the outcomes of surgery for congenital PC without hypospadias, 22 studies compared different techniques of PC correction in patients with hypospadias and 7 studies compared the type of materials for coverage following ventral corporotomy. In cases of PC without hypospadias, the most commonly reported surgery was the Nesbit's plication. For PC with hypospadias correction, the results of ventral corporotomy were superior to that of dorsal plication in most of the studies. The two-stage repair had better results when compared to the one-stage repair for patients with perineo-scrotal hypospadias. In studies comparing materials for coverage of ventral corporotomy, the tunica vaginalis flap or graft was utilized most commonly. The majority of the studies reported a success rate ranging from 85% to 100%. The methodological quality was high in all but four studies. Conclusion: Plication procedures are generally preferred for PC without hypospadias, but they result in penile shortening. For those with hypospadias, corporotomy is associated with superior outcomes than plication, especially for those with severe curvature and redo procedures. For ventral corporotomy coverage, the tunica vaginalis flap or graft is the most commonly reported tissue in the literature.

Kidney function and transplants in prune belly syndrome: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Children with prune belly syndrome (PBS) are at higher risk of developing kidney dysfunction and requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT). While studies have described surgical and survival outcomes in these populations, there has yet to be a focused synthesis of evidence regarding kidney outcomes in this population. Here, the focus of this scoping review was to highlight knowledge gaps and report standards on kidney outcomes in PBS of all ages. METHODS: Following scoping review methodology, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed literature that describe kidney outcomes in PBS. All studies with a broad set of kidney outcomes (such as kidney function measures, chronic kidney disease (CKD), KRT and associated outcomes) were included. Findings were summarized and qualitatively synthesized. RESULTS: Of the 436 unique records identified, 25 were included for synthesis. A total of 17 studies (441 patients) reported on kidney insufficiency outcomes, with an estimated prevalence of CKD ranging from 8 to 66%. A total of 15 studies (314 patients) described KRT, primary kidney transplant, and outcomes. Of these, the age for KRT ranged from 4 to 21 years, and graft survival ranged from 22 to 87% by last follow-up (range 1.3-27 years). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variability in studies reporting kidney outcomes in PBS which limits meaningful synthesis. There is a need for future studies with comprehensive reporting of confounders and drivers for kidney insufficiency in PBS.

Thulium fibre laser vs holmium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis: meta-analysis of clinical studies.

OBJECTIVE: To compare and assess the clinical outcomes between thulium fibre laser (TFL) and holmium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser endoscopic lithotripsy of urolithiasis through a meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in May 2022, grey literature search in July 2022. Comparative clinical studies were evaluated according to Cochrane recommendations. Assessed outcomes include the stone-free rate (SFR), complication rate, operative time (OT), laser utilisation time (LUT), ablation rate (stone volume/laser time), ablation efficiency (energy use/stone volume), total energy usage, degree of retropulsion, and hospital stay. Risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) were extrapolated. Subgroup analyses, heterogeneity, publication bias, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment were performed. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration: CRD42022300788. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies with 1698 cases were included in this review. The outcome of SFR showed no significant between-group difference (RR 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.20). However, subgroup analysis of TFL vs Ho:YAG with no pulse modulation showed a SFR favouring TFL (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.23). The composite postoperative complication rate was comparable between the two intervention groups (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.66-1.43). OT, LUT and ablation rate were significantly better for TFL than Ho:YAG (SMD -1.19, 95% CI -1.85 to -0.52; SMD -1.67, 95% CI -2.62 to -0.72; SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.15-1.03; respectively). The degree of retropulsion was significantly lower for TFL than Ho:YAG without pulse modulation (SMD -1.23, 95% CI -1.74 to -0.71). Ablation efficiency, total energy usage, and hospital stay were all comparable. Based on GRADE criteria, the evidence certainty was determined to be very low. CONCLUSION: Overall, there was no between-group difference for the SFR. However, compared to Ho:YAG with no pulse modulation, TFL rendered a better SFR. Shorter OT and LUT, a lesser degree of retropulsion, and a better ablation rate were noted in favour of the TFL. There was no overall between-group difference for composite postoperative complication rate, ablation efficiency, total energy usage, and hospital stay. Currently, the available clinical evidence was assessed to be of very low certainty.