Comparing the safety and effectiveness of various umbilical cord milking techniques and delayed cord clamping in full-term and preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

We compare the hematocrit, hemoglobin, need for transfusion, recurrent phototherapy, serum bilirubin level, and serum ferritin at different time frames for the umbilical cord milking (UCM) and delayed cord clamping (DCC) in both full-term and preterm infants. A comprehensive search through various databases aimed to compare UCM and DCC studies until May 2nd, 2023. Cochrane and NIH tools assessed RCTs and cohorts, respectively. Meta-analysis employed Review Manager 5.4 software, calculating MD and RR with 95% CIs for continuous and dichotomous data. We included 20 studies with a total of 5189 infants. Regarding preterm infants, hematocrit level showed no significant difference between intact Umbilical Cord Milking (iUCM) compared to DCC (MD = -0.24, 95% CI [-1.11, 0.64]). Moreover, Neonatal death incidence was significantly higher with the UCM technique in comparison to DCC (RR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.01 to 1.62]). Regarding term and late preterm infants, Hematocrit level showed no significant difference between the iUCM or cUCM techniques compared to DCC (MD = 0.21, 95% CI [-1.28 to 1.69]), (MD = 0.96, 95% CI [-1.02 to 2.95]), respectively. UCM led to a higher risk of neonatal death in preterm infants compared to DCC. However, the incidence of polycythemia was lower in the UCM group. Additionally, UCM was associated with higher rates of severe IVH events. Based on these findings, DCC may be preferred due to its lower incidence of severe IVH and neonatal death.

Nous comparons l'hématocrite, l'hémoglobine, le besoin de transfusion, la photothérapie récurrente, le taux de bilirubine sérique et la ferritine sérique à différentes périodes pour la traite du cordon ombilical (UCM) et le clampage retardé du cordon (DCC) chez les nourrissons nés à terme et prématurés. Une recherche complète dans diverses bases de données visait à comparer les études UCM et DCC jusqu'au 2 mai 2023. Les outils Cochrane et NIH ont évalué les ECR et les cohortes, respectivement. La méta-analyse a utilisé le logiciel Review Manager 5.4, calculant le MD et le RR avec des IC à 95 % pour les données continues et dichotomiques. Nous avons inclus 20 études portant sur un total de 5 189 nourrissons. Concernant les nourrissons prématurés, le niveau d'hématocrite n'a montré aucune différence significative entre la traite du cordon ombilical intact (iUCM) et la DCC (DM = -0,24, IC à 95 % [-1,11, 0,64]). De plus, l'incidence des décès néonatals était significativement plus élevée avec la technique UCM qu'avec la technique DCC (RR = 1,28, IC à 95 % [1,01 à 1,62]). Concernant les nourrissons à terme et peu prématurés, le niveau = 0,21, IC à 95 % [-1,28 à 1,69]), (DM = 0,96, IC à 95 % [-1,02 à 2,95]), respectivement. L'UCM a entraîné un risque plus élevé de décès néonatal chez les nourrissons prématurés par rapport au DCC. Cependant, l'incidence de la polyglobulie était plus faible dans le groupe UCM. De plus, l'UCM était associée à des taux plus élevés d'événements IVH graves. Sur la base de ces résultats, le DCC peut être préféré en raison de sa plus faible incidence d'IVH grave et de décès néonatals. d'hématocrite n'a montré aucune différence significative entre les techniques iUCM ou cUCM par rapport à la technique DCC (DM.

Efficacy of warm compresses in preserving perineal integrity and decreasing pain during normal labor: A systematic review and meta-Analysis.

The objective of the study was to assess the effect of warm compresses in preserving perineal integrity in women who delivered a single baby vaginally with cephalic presentation. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and the ISI Web of Science databases. Two researchers worked independently and conducted the study's search, selection, and extraction. We calculated the pooled risk ratio (R.R.)- for our categorical outcomes- and mean difference (M.D.)-for our continuous outcomes- using random or fixed-effect meta-analysis according to heterogenicity status. I2 test was used to detect heterogenicity. Studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Our study analyzed 13 controlled trials (n= 3947) to compare warm compresses versus not using it during vaginal delivery. The analysis revealed that warm compresses group had better outcomes regarding episiotomy, degree of perineal trauma (third and fourth degree), perineal trauma requiring suturing, and also in behavioral pain scales (severe muscle tense, being very restless, and constant grimacing) with the following R.R. and confidence intervals: (R.R.= 0.56, 95% C.I.[0.23, 1.37]), (R.R.= 0.69, 95% C.I.[0.54, 0.89], p= 0.004),( (R.R.= 0.37, 95% C.I.[0.18, 0.77], p= 0.004), and ( (R.R.= 0.42, 95% C.I.[0.23, 0.78], p= 0.006) respectively. We conclude that among primiparous women, warm compresses group showed better outcome in improving perineal comfort than a the good of women who did not receive warm compresses after delivery.