Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 18(9): 817-827, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31305174

RESUMO

Introduction: Preoperative systemic therapy (PST) including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) is used nowadays on a large scale especially in aggressive BC subtypes. The use of NAC in BC may be associated with some safety issues and hazards including possible increased rate of locoregional recurrence, inadequate staging with subsequent over or under-treatment, and surgical complications. Areas covered: This review article aims to discuss these concerns and to clarify the adequate steps and procedures needed to increase safety and alleviate the possible drawbacks of NAC. The author will discuss the adequate and meticulous technical procedures needed to stage and localize the breast tumor, detect any affected axillary lymph node, improve the accuracy and safety of doing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after NAC, estimate the tumor response to NAC to determine the extent of surgery, and enhance the precise documentation of pCR. Expert opinion: The use of breast MRI, image-detectable clips in the tumor bed, dual technique during SLNB, and target axillary dissection are among the required steps to maintain safety. In the future, ongoing prospective trials will allow us to select patients who can safely avoid breast and/or axillary surgery after systemic therapy.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Seleção de Pacientes , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos
2.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 17(11): 1061-1070, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28862039

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The approval of multiple biological therapies as a first line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the last decade have made the selection of the best treatment between these drugs, especially tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), a great challenge to oncologists and patients. The four TKIs recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines in this setting have a relatively similar mechanism of action and analogical adverse events. Areas covered: In this article, the two published American Society of Clinical Oncology frameworks are applied to calculate the net health benefits of the four TKIs used as the first line in mRCC and this was balanced against their monthly cost. The available clinical data that is present for each drug has been displayed and compared to the use of the ASCO frameworks. Expert commentary: There is an urgent need to develop a comprehensive model incorporating all relevant aspects of each drug together. Oncologists should consider all data available for the drugs in order to give the patients an informed opportunity to select the best drug fitting for them.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Metástase Neoplásica , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacologia , Proteínas Tirosina Quinases/antagonistas & inibidores , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...