Digital versus speculum insertion of Foley catheter for labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To compare Foley catheter insertion by digital blind method to its placement with a sterile speculum in women with unripe cervix for induction of labor. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from inception to July 2023. Included studies compared digital to speculum placement of the Foley catheter for labor induction. Data from the included studies were extracted and pooled using RevMan software for meta-analysis. The primary outcome was pain score during the procedure measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included Foley catheter insertion duration, cesarean delivery rate, induction to delivery interval, Bishop score, need for other cervical ripening methods, maternal satisfaction, and maternal fever. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving a total of 600 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pain during the procedure and Foley catheter insertion duration were significantly reduced in the digital insertion group compared to the speculum-guided group (p < 0.05). The Bishop score showed a significant improvement in the digital Foley catheter placement group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the cesarean delivery rate or the requirement for additional cervical ripening methods between the two groups. Maternal satisfaction with the delivery process was significantly improved in the digital insertion group (p < 0.001). Induction to delivery interval and maternal fever were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Digital placement of Foley catheter can be considered as an alternative to the sterile speculum method for pre-induction cervical ripening. More trials are required to confirm our findings.

Conservative management of a viable cervical ectopic pregnancy with systemic and multiple local methotrexate injections. A case report.

PURPOSE: Cervical ectopic pregnancy is rare and has serious haemodynamic implications, usually requiring a hysterectomy. However, the patient's haemodynamic profile and reproductive history may warrant medical management with methotrexate. We present a case report of a 33-year-old primigravida managed conservatively (patient insisted) for cervical ectopic pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 10-weeks pregnant lady suffered from cervical pregnancy as confirmed by ultrasonography with initial ß-HCG titre = 65,928 mIU/mL. She received a methotrexate IM-injection followed by multiple transabdominal-ultrasound-guided local doses. Serial sonography to monitor gestational sac size and ß-HCG levels were done weekly. RESULTS: ß-HCG levels declined satisfactorily over 4 weeks: 19,166 mIU/mL, 6900 mIU/mL and 1104 mIU/mL on days 14, 21 and 28, respectively. She remained haemodynamically stable throughout admission. On day-35, ß-hCG titre reached 400 mIU/mL, and products of conception seen on ultrasound (20 × 25 mm), that were later complicated by secondary infection, necessitated evacuation curettage. ß-HCG titre was 2 mIU/mL by 48th day. CONCLUSIONS: Live cervical ectopic pregnancy with high ß-hCG titres can be conservatively managed with multidose methotrexate injection administered systemically and locally. However, the efficacy of the applied dose of 25 mg or using higher doses should be evaluated to avoid occurrence of residual lesion.