Incidence and characteristics of chronic postsurgical pain at 6 months after total mastectomy under pectoserratus and interpectoral plane block combined with general anesthesia: a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) occurs in 20%-30% of patients who undergo total mastectomy (TM) performed under general anesthesia alone and significantly affects the quality of life. Pectoserratus and interpectoral plane block have been reportedly combined with general anesthesia to control immediate postoperative pain after TM. Our prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the incidence of CPSP after TM when pectoserratus and interpectoral plane block were combined with general anesthesia. METHODS: We recruited adult women scheduled to undergo TM for breast cancer. Patients planned for TM with flap surgery, those who underwent breast surgery in the past 5 years, or those presenting with residual chronic pain after prior breast surgery were excluded. After general anesthesia induction, an anesthesiologist performed pectoserratus and interpectoral plane block with a ropivacaine (3.75 mg/mL) and clonidine (3.75 µg/mL) in 40 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of CPSP-defined as pain with a Numeric Rating Scale Score of ≥3, either at the breast surgical site and/or at axilla, without other identifiable causes-evaluated during a pain medicine consultation at 6 months post TM. RESULTS: Overall, 43/164 study participants had CPSP (26.2%; 95% CI: 19.7 to 33.6); of these, 23 had neuropathic type of pain (53.5%), 19 had nociceptive (44.2%), and 1 had mixed (2.3%) type of pain. CONCLUSION: Although postoperative analgesia has significantly improved in the last decade, there is still need for improvement to reduce CPSP after oncologic breast surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03023007.

Single-port or Classic Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy to Assess the Peritoneal Cancer Index in Primary Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

A thorough laparoscopic assessment of the abdominopelvic cavity is a crucial step in the workup of primary advanced epithelial ovarian cancer to decide whether up-front cytoreductive surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the best option for adequate management. The purpose of our study was to compare single-port laparoscopy (SPL), classic laparoscopy (CL), and laparotomy using the peritoneal cancer index (PCI). Patients treated for Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique stage 3 or 4 epithelial ovarian cancer were included in our study when they underwent a PCI evaluation by laparoscopy followed by laparotomy for cytoreduction. According to the technique used for the "noninvasive" procedure (SPL vs CL), 2 groups were compared retrospectively. The individual records of all patients were reviewed and analyzed. From 2011 to 2014, 21 patients were assessed for PCI by SPL plus laparotomy versus 21 by CL plus laparotomy. The clinicopathological features were similar in both groups (not significant [NS]), except for performance status >0, which was more frequent in the SPL group (39% vs 6%, p = .04). Quotation of PCI was possible for all patients. Nonbrowsing areas marked 3 procedures in the SPL group and 2 procedures in the CL group (NS). The mean PCI score and the score of each region assessed by SPL and CL were comparable with the evaluation by laparotomy (NS). Completeness of cytoreduction was achieved in 78% of cases in both groups (NS). SPL and widely mini-invasive procedures seem to be effective tools compared with laparotomy to adequately assess the resectability of a peritoneal carcinomatosis using the PCI.