Do Pediatrician Interpersonal and Personality Characteristics Affect Patient Experience?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have demonstrated associations between patient experience scores and physician's demographic characteristics such as gender and race. There is a paucity of data, however, on the effect of broader pediatrician characteristics on caregivers' experience of their children's care. This study assessed pediatric caregiver experience of care ratings within a children's hospital and examined the effects of pediatricians' interpersonal and personality traits on caregiver experience ratings. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included caregivers of children under 18 years old (n = 26,703) and physicians within children's hospital system (n = 65). Caregivers of children who received care from 2017 to 2019 provided their rating (0-10) of care experience via the standardized National Research Corporation Health Survey. Top box provider ratings were used for analyses. Physician's interpersonal and personality data were collected. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to examine the effects of physician interpersonal characteristics (empathy, compassion) and personality (perfectionism, Big Five personality traits [openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism]) on experience of care rating. RESULTS: The odds of caregivers of Spanish-speaking children to provide a high physician rating were 75% higher than the odds for non-Spanish-speaking patients. At the physician level, lower agreeableness (odds ratio [OR] = 0.63, P = .002), and lower narcissistic perfectionism (OR = 0.98, P = .016) were associated with an increased likelihood of a high care experience rating. The odds of nonemergency medicine pediatricians receiving high ratings were approximately 4.17 times higher than that of EM pediatricians. CONCLUSIONS: Current results may inform future interventions that address pediatrician personality characteristics associated with caregivers of children experience outcomes.

Perfectionism as a predictor of physician burnout.

BACKGROUND: Burnout is common among physicians and has detrimental effects on patient care and physician health. Recent editorials call attention to perfectionism in medicine; however, no studies to date have examined the effect of perfectionism on burnout in physicians practicing in the United States. This study examined associations among demographics, perfectionism and personality traits, and burnout among practicing physicians. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included general pediatric and pediatric sub-specialist physicians. Out of the 152 physicians contacted, 69 enrolled (Meanage = 44.16 ± 9.98; 61% female). Emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment burnout were assessed via the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Validated instruments were used to measure personality and perfectionism. Data were analyzed using linear regression models. RESULTS: Across physicians assessed, 42% reported either high emotional exhaustion burnout or depersonalization burnout. High self-critical perfectionism uniquely predicted both high emotional exhaustion burnout (B = 0.55, 95%CI 0.25-0.85) and depersonalization burnout (B = 0.18, 95%CI 0.05-0.31). Low conscientiousness (B = -6.12; 95%CI, -10.95- -1.28) predicted higher emotional exhaustion burnout and low agreeableness (B = -3.20, 95%CI -5.93- -0.46) predicted higher depersonalization burnout. CONCLUSIONS: Perfectionism is understudied among physicians and the current findings suggest that addressing system and individual-level factors that encourage perfectionism is warranted and may reduce risk for physician burnout.

Milestone Learning Trajectories of Residents at Five Anesthesiology Residency Programs.

Construct: Every six months, residency programs report their trainees' Milestones Level achievement to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Milestones should enable the learner and training program to know an individual's competency development trajectory. Background: Milestone Level ratings for residents grouped by specialty (e.g., Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine) show that, in aggregate, senior residents receive higher ratings than junior residents. Anesthesiology Milestones, as assessed by both residents and faculty, also have a positive linear relationship with postgraduate year. However, these studies have been cross-sectional rather than longitudinal cohort studies, and studies of how individual residents progress during the course of training are needed. Longitudinal data analysis of performance assessment trajectories addresses a relevant validity question for the Next Accreditation System. We explored the application of learning analytics to longitudinal Milestones data to: 1) measure the frequency of "straight-lining"; 2) assess the proportion of residents that reach "Level 4" (ready for unsupervised practice) by graduation for each subcompetency; 3) identify variability among programs and individual residents in their baseline Milestone Level and rates of improvement; and 4) determine how hypothetically constructed growth curve models fit to the Milestones data reported to ACGME. Approach: De-identified Milestone Level ratings in each of the 25 subcompetencies submitted semiannually to the ACGME from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2017 were retrospectively analyzed for graduating residents (n = 67) from a convenience sample of five anesthesia residency programs. The data reflected longitudinal resident Milestone progression from the beginning of the first year to the end of the third and final year of clinical anesthesiology training. The frequency of straight-lining, defined as the resident receiving the same exact Milestone Level rating for all 25 subcompetencies on a given 6-month report, was calculated for each program. Every resident was evaluated six times during training with the possibility of six straight-lined ratings. Findings: The number of residents in each program ranged from 5-21 (Median 13, range 16). Mean Milestone Level ratings for subcompetencies were significantly different at each six-month assessment (p < 0.001). Frequency of straight-lining varied significantly by program from 9% - 57% (Median 22%). Depending on the program, 53%-100% (median 86%) of residents reached the graduation target Level 4 or higher in all 25 anesthesiology subcompetencies. Nine to 18% of residents did not achieve a Level 4 rating for at least one subcompetency at any time during their residency. Across programs, significant variability was found in first-year clinical anesthesia training Milestone Levels, as well in the rate of improvement for five of the six core competencies. Conclusions: Anesthesia residents' Milestone Level growth trajectories as reported to the ACGME vary significantly across individual residents as well as by program. The present study offers a case example that raises concerns regarding the validity of the Next Accreditation System as it is currently used by some residency programs.

Effects of Modification of Pain Protocol on Incidence of Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting.

BACKGROUND: A Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) care model applies a standardized multidisciplinary approach to patient care using evidence-based medicine to modify and improve protocols. Analysis of patient outcome measures, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), allows for refinement of existing protocols to improve patient care. We aim to compare the incidence of PONV in patients who underwent primary total joint arthroplasty before and after modification of our PSH pain protocol. METHODS: All total joint replacement PSH (TJR-PSH) patients who underwent primary THA (n=149) or TKA (n=212) in the study period were included. The modified protocol added a single dose of intravenous (IV) ketorolac given in the operating room and oxycodone immediate release orally instead of IV Hydromorphone in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). The outcomes were (1) incidence of PONV and (2) average pain score in the PACU. We also examined the effect of primary anesthetic (spinal vs. GA) on these outcomes. The groups were compared using chi-square tests of proportions. RESULTS: The incidence of post-operative nausea in the PACU decreased significantly with the modified protocol (27.4% vs. 38.1%, p=0.0442). There was no difference in PONV based on choice of anesthetic or procedure. Average PACU pain scores did not differ significantly between the two protocols. CONCLUSION: Simple modifications to TJR-PSH multimodal pain management protocol, with decrease in IV narcotic use, resulted in a lower incidence of postoperative nausea, without compromising average PACU pain scores. This report demonstrates the need for continuous monitoring of PSH pathways and implementation of revisions as needed.

A case management report: a collaborative perioperative surgical home paradigm and the reduction of total joint arthroplasty readmissions.

BACKGROUND: Efforts to mitigate costs while improving surgical care quality have received much scrutiny. This includes the challenging issue of readmission subsequent to hospital discharge. Initiatives attempting to preclude readmission after surgery require planned and unified efforts extending throughout the perioperative continuum. Patient optimization prior to discharge, enhanced disease monitoring, and seamless coordination of care between hospitals and community providers is integral to this process. The perioperative surgical home (PSH) has been proposed as a model to improve the delivery of perioperative healthcare via patient-centered risk stratification strategies that emphasize value and evidence-based processes. RESULTS: This case report seeks to specifically describe implementation of readmission reduction strategies via a PSH paradigm during total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures at the University of California Irvine (UCI) Health. An orthopedic surgeon open to collaborate within a PSH paradigm for TJA procedures was recruited to UCI Health in October of 2012. Institution specific data was then prospectively collected for 2 years post implementation of the novel program. A total of 328 unilateral, elective primary TJA (120 hip, 208 knee) procedures were collectively performed. Demographic analysis reveals the following: mean age of 64 ± 12; BMI of 28.5 ± 6.2; ASA Score distribution of 0.3 % class 1, 23 % class 2, 72 % class 3, and 4.3 % class 4; and 62.5 % female patients. In all, a 30-day unplanned readmission rate of 2.1 % (95 % CI 0.4-3.8) was observed during the study period. As a limitation of this case report, this reported rate does not reflect readmissions that may have occurred at facilities outside UCI Health. CONCLUSIONS: As healthcare evolves to emphasize value over volume, it is integral to invest efforts in longitudinal patient outcomes including patient disposition subsequent to hospital discharge. As outlined by this case management report, the PSH provides an institution-led means to implement a series of care initiatives that optimize the important metric of readmission following TJA, potentially adding further value to patients, surgical colleagues, and health systems.

Joint arthroplasty Perioperative Surgical Home: Impact of patient characteristics on postoperative outcomes.

AIM: To determine the impact of different characteristics on postoperative outcomes for patients in a joint arthroplasty Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) program. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for patients enrolled in a joint arthroplasty PSH program who had undergone primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients were preoperatively stratified based on specific procedure performed, age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Classification System (ASA) score, and Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI) score. The primary outcome criterion was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary criteria including operative room (OR) duration, transfusion rate, Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) stay, readmission rate, post-operative complications, and discharge disposition. For each outcome, the predictor variables were entered into a generalized linear model with appropriate response and assessed for predictive relationship to the dependent variable. Significance level was set to 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 337 patients, 200 in the TKA cohort and 137 in the THA cohort, were eligible for the study. Nearly two-third of patients were female. Patient age averaged 64 years and preoperative BMI averaged 29 kg/m(2). The majority of patients were ASA score III and CCI score 0. After analysis, ASA score was the only variable predictive for LOS (P = 0.0011) and each increase in ASA score above 2 increased LOS by approximately 0.5 d. ASA score was also the only variable predictive for readmission rate (P = 0.0332). BMI was the only variable predictive for PACU duration (P = 0.0136). Specific procedure performed, age, gender, and CCI score were not predictive for any of the outcome criteria. OR duration, transfusion rate, post-operative complications or discharge disposition were not significantly associated with any of the predictor variables. CONCLUSION: The joint arthroplasty PSH model reduces postoperative outcome variability for patients with different preoperative characteristics and medical comorbidities.

Total Joint Replacement Perioperative Surgical Home Program: 2-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Previously, our group successfully established one of the nation's first Perioperative Surgical Homes (PSHs) aimed at coordinating services to patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As we now focus on extending the PSH to other service lines within the hospital, the long-term sustainability of this practice model is an important factor to consider moving forward. METHODS: We prospectively collected data from all patients who underwent elective primary TKA and THA at our institution between October 1, 2012, and September 30, 2014. Prospectively collected data included length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rate, postoperative pain scores, and complications. RESULTS: During the 2-year period, there were 328 primary joint arthroplasty patients. Overall, the median LOS was significantly shorter in the second year of the PSH initiative (P = 0.03). Stratified by procedure, the median LOS for patients undergoing THA was significantly shorter in the second year (P = 0.02), whereas the median LOS for patients undergoing TKA did not differ between the 2 time periods. In the second year of the PSH initiative, significantly more patients were discharged home than to a skilled nursing facility compared with year 1 of the PSH initiative (P = 0.02). Readmission rates within 30 days after surgery to our institution were 0.9% (0.0-4.4) in the first year of the PSH initiative and 3.3% (confidence interval, 1.3%-7.2%) in the second year of the PSH initiative (P = not significant). Pain scores did not change significantly from year 1 to year 2 (P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Data for the second year of implementation demonstrate similarly positive results in LOS, pain control, discharge destination, readmission, transfusion rates, and complications.

Fall-prevention strategies and patient characteristics that impact fall rates after total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Fall prevention has emerged as a national quality metric, a focus for The Joint Commission, because falls after orthopedic surgery can result in serious injury. In this study, we examined patient characteristics and effects of fall-prevention strategies on the incidence of postoperative falls in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We reviewed electronic records of all patients who fell after total knee arthroplasty between 2003 and 2012 (10 years). Patient demographics, including age, sex, and body mass index, were analyzed. The impact of various fall-prevention efforts, including provider and patient education, Hendrich II Fall Risk Model, fall-alert signs, and the use of patient lifts on the incidence of falls, also was studied. RESULTS: Between January 2, 2003, and December 31, 2012 (10 years), 15,189 total knee arthroplasties were performed at Methodist Hospital, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN. The overall fall rate was 15.3 per 1000 patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.4-17.4). The rate varied significantly (P < 0.001) during the 10-year period with an initial increase followed by a gradual decrease after the initiation of the fall-prevention strategies. From multivariable analysis adjusting for the temporal trends over time, the odds of falling were found to increase with older age (odds ratio = 1.7 and 2.0 for those 70-79 and ≥80 compared with those 60-69 years of age; P < 0.001) and were lower for patients undergoing revision compared with primary total knee arthroplasties (odds ratio = 0.6, P = 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in fall rates by sex or body mass index. Most patient falls (72%; 95% CI: 66%-78%) occurred within their own rooms. Elimination-related falls (those that occurred while in the bathroom, while going to and from the bathroom, or while using a bedside commode) comprised a majority (59%; 95% CI: 53%-65%) of the falls. Most patients who fell were not considered high risk according to the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model. Twenty-three percent of falls were associated with morbidity, including 7 return visits to the operating room and 2 new fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate a reduction in fall incidence coinciding with the implementation of a multi-intervention fall-prevention strategy. Despite prevention efforts, patients of advanced age, elimination-related activities, and patients in the intermediate phase (late postoperative day 1 through day 3) of recovery continue to have a high risk for falling. Therefore, fall-prevention strategies should continue to provide education to all patients (especially elderly patients) and reinforce practices that will monitor patients within their hospital rooms.

Needle echogenicity in sonographically guided regional anesthesia: blinded comparison of 4 enhanced needles and validation of visual criteria for evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: Needle visualization is important for sonographically guided regional anesthesia procedures. Needle characteristics that improve needle visualization are therefore important to anesthesiologists. This study compared several echogenic needle designs by defining characteristics of needle echogenicity and assessing regional anesthesiologist preferences for these characteristics across various needle angles. METHODS: Twelve blinded regional anesthesiologists graded 5 randomized block needles (1 nonechogenic control and 4 echogenic) on 4 predefined characteristics (overall brightness of the needle, overall clarity of the needle, brightness of the needle tip, and clarity of the needle tip). In-plane needle images in a gel phantom were obtained at 4 needle angles (15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°). Participants rated specific needle characteristics for each needle at each angle and then ranked their overall needle preferences. RESULTS: Significant differences in all 4 needle characteristics were found across needle types (P< .01). Clarity of the needle tip was significantly associated with overall needle rank (P = .009). Other needle visualization characteristics were not significantly correlated with needle rank. The SonoPlex Stim needle (Pajunk Medical Systems, Tucker, GA) was rated highest in all 4 predefined needle characteristics as well as overall needle rank. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that anesthesiologists prefer certain visual characteristics of needles used in sonographically guided regional anesthesia procedures. Specifically, needle tip clarity most closely predicted clinician needle preferences. These results support the idea that all echogenic needle designs do not uniformly enhance needle visualization. Further studies are needed to determine whether needles with superior tip clarity predict not only clinician preferences but also improved sonographically guided regional anesthetic outcomes.

Postsurgical inflammatory neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative nerve injuries are devastating complications that are commonly attributed to a variety of patient, surgical, or anesthetic factors. Well-documented causes of postsurgical neuropathy include nerve compression, stretch, contusion, or transection, which can occur following surgical trauma or patient positioning. Potential anesthetic causes of perioperative nerve injury include mechanical trauma, local anesthetic toxicity, and ischemic injury. We present a case of a diffuse, bilateral neurologic deficit of unclear etiology in a patient who underwent a combined neuraxial-general anesthetic for bilateral total hip arthroplasty. CASE REPORT: A 17-year old boy with end-stage Legg-Perthes disease presented with severe lower-extremity neuropathy of both legs following bilateral total hip arthroplasty under combined epidural-general anesthesia. A thorough workup excluded potentially devastating and treatable causes, including epidural hematoma or abscess and surgical bleeding or trauma. A neurology consultation and further testing (electromyography, nerve biopsy) resulted in a diagnosis of postsurgical inflammatory neuropathy. Treatment with prolonged, high-dose corticosteroids was undertaken, and although the patient's symptoms improved, he continues to have significant neurologic deficits 8 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative nerve deficits not readily explained by direct surgical or anesthesia-related causes should prompt early neurologic consultation to seek alternative etiologies such as postsurgical inflammatory neuropathy. Although this condition is poorly understood, it is believed to be an idiopathic immune-mediated response to a physiologic stress (eg, surgery, regional block) and is treated with prolonged, high-dose corticosteroids. Because suppression of the immune system with high-dose steroids may result in improved neurologic outcome, it is essential that surgeons and anesthesiologists are aware of this condition so that treatment is not delayed.