Once- versus twice-daily amikacin regimen: efficacy and safety in systemic gram-negative infections. Scandinavian Amikacin Once Daily Study Group.

Three hundred and sixteen patients with serious infections verified or suspected to be of Gram-negative aetiology were treated in an open, randomized, comparative multicentre study with amikacin 15 mg/kg/day given either as a single dose or in two divided doses at 12 h intervals. Two hundred patients were evaluated for efficacy and all 316 for safety. The efficacy of both dosage regimens was very good with a satisfactory clinical response in 90% of the patients. There were no significant differences between the two regimens regarding efficacy and safety. This was also confirmed in an analysis according to the principle of 'intention-to-treat' including all randomized patients. In 218 patients additional therapy, most commonly with piperacillin or ampicillin, was considered necessary. The mean peak serum concentration of amikacin was 40.9 mg/L in the once-daily group, which is 10 x MIC for most Gram-negative bacteria, compared to 24.4 mg/L in the twice-daily group, which is 6 x MIC. Mean trough serum concentrations after 24 h were 1.8 mg/L in the once-daily group and 3.1 mg/L after 12 h in the twice-daily group. These serum concentrations were often close to or just below the MICs of the isolated pathogens. Drug related adverse reactions were seen in 40 (13%) of the patients. Among the adverse reactions with possible or probable relation to amikacin were 20 nephrotoxic events, nine in the once-daily group and 11 in the twice-daily group. A multivariate analysis of selective causative factors and nephrotoxic events gave a low correlation for once- vs twice-daily amikacin therapy. Five ototoxic events were observed, three in the once-daily group and two in the twice-daily group. One patient in the once-daily group experienced nausea in connection with amikacin infusions.

Serum levels of lymphokines and soluble cellular receptors in primary Epstein-Barr virus infection and in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.

The immunopathology in primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections and in chronic fatigue syndrome was studied by examining serum levels of interleukins (IL) and of soluble T cell receptors in serum samples. Serum samples were from patients during and 6 months after primary EBV-induced infectious mononucleosis and from patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and serologic evidence of EBV reactivation. Markers for T lymphocyte activation (soluble IL-2 and CD8) and for monocyte activation (neopterin) were significantly elevated during acute infectious mononucleosis but not in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Interferon-alpha, IL-1 beta, and IL-6 levels were not significantly increased in any patient group but inferferon-gamma levels were significantly increased during the acute phase of infectious mononucleosis. The levels of IL-1 alpha were significantly higher than in controls both in patients with infectious mononucleosis and in those with chronic fatigue syndrome. In the latter, the lack of most markers for lymphocyte activation found in patients with infectious mononucleosis makes it less likely that EBV reactivation causes symptoms.

Efficacy and safety of amikacin in systemic infections when given as a single daily dose or in two divided doses. Scandinavian Amikacin Once Daily Study Group.

Two hundred and twenty patients with serious infections verified or suspected to be of Gram-negative aetiology were treated in an open randomized comparative multicentre trial with amikacin 15 mg/kg/day given either as a single dose or in two divided doses at 12-h intervals. Amikacin was administered as a short-term iv infusion. When additional therapy was considered necessary piperacillin or ampicillin was recommended. The trial continues and an interim report on data from the 12 participating Scandinavian hospitals is presented. One hundred and forty-four patients have been evaluated for efficacy and 213 patients for safety. There were no significant differences between the two dosage regimens regarding efficacy and safety. A satisfactory clinical response was recorded in 129 (90%) of the evaluable patients. One serious adverse reaction was seen in a patient in the once-daily group. This was ototoxicity which was superimposed on a long standing hearing defect possibly caused by previous streptomycin therapy.