Analysis of intrafractional organ motion for patients with prostate cancer using soft tissue matching image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy by helical tomotherapy.

AIM: To analyze an intrafractional organ motion for patients with prostate cancer using soft tissue matching by megavolt computed tomography (MVCT) images during the course of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IGRT-IMRT) using helical tomotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from a total of 10 patients with prostate cancer who received IGRT-IMRT were analyzed, and MVCT images were acquired before and after radiation therapy. Intra-fractional movement and PTV margins for soft tissue matching were calculated by comparing treatment planning images with 740 MVCT images for right-left (RL), superior-inferior (SI), and anteroposterior (AP) dimensions. A total of 74 Gy/37 fractions were administered. A margin to compensate for these variations was calculated using the van Herk's equation. RESULTS: The intrafractional motion was 0.03 (-1.3 to 1.4) ±0.39 mm in the RL dimension, 0.08 (-1.8 to 0.28) ±0.73 mm in the SI dimension, and 0.52 (-1.8 to 1.8) ±0.63 mm in the AP dimension. The required PTV margin was 0.60 mm, 1.10 mm, and 0.78 mm in the RL, SI, and AP dimensions, respectively. Only one patient exhibited a deviation greater than 5 mm only once in 37 fractions (1/370=0.2%) caused by anal contraction. CONCLUSION: The PTV margin in soft tissue matching IGRT-IMRT by helical tomotherapy for a patient with prostate cancer was 3 mm or less, and our tentative PTV margin of 3-5 mm is sufficient for most patients, if adequate instruction for avoiding anal contraction is given.

Assessment of planning target volume margin for a small number of vertebral metastatic lesions using image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy by helical tomotherapy.

AIM: To evaluate an appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margin in for one to three vertebral metastases using megavolt computed tomography (MVCT) images during the course of image-guided and stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IGRT-IMRT) by use of helical tomotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 25 lesions in 24 patients with vertebral metastases who received IGRT-IMRT were analyzed. MVCT images were acquired before and after radiation therapy. Intra-fractional movement and PTV margin were calculated by comparing treatment planning images and these 310 MVCT images for right-left (RL), superior-inferior (SI), and anteroposterior (AP) dimensions. Five patients were treated by 35 Gy/5 fractions, 17 by 30 Gy/5 fractions, one by 25 Gy/5 fractions, and one by 60 Gy/30 fractions. A margin to compensate for these variations was calculated with the formula of vanHerk's equation. RESULTS: The intra-fractional motion was 0.02 (-1.3 to 1.4) ± 0.34 mm in the RL direction, -0.09 (-1.8 to 0.28) ± 0.44 mm in the SI direction, and 0.20 (-1.8 to 1.8) ± 0.36 mm in the AP direction. The required PTV margin was 0.98 mm in the RL direction, 0.69 mm in the SI direction, and 1.26 mm in the AP direction. No patient showed a deviation greater than 2 mm. CONCLUSION: The PTV margin in hypofractionated IGRT-IMRT, using helical tomotherapy for a few vertebral metastases, was 2 mm or less and our tentative PTV margin of 5 mm was sufficient and reducible.