Third-Line Overactive Bladder Therapies on TikTok: What Does the Public Learn?

IMPORTANCE: Millions of people rely on social media platforms, including TikTok, for health-related information. TikTok has not yet been evaluated as an information source for overactive bladder (OAB) third-line therapies. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to assess TikTok videos on third-line therapies for OAB for misinformation and quality. STUDY DESIGN: In this cross-sectional analysis, we abstracted the top 50 TikTok videos for keywords: "Axonics," "sacral neuromodulation," "Interstim," "PTNS," "posterior tibial nerve stimulation," and "bladder Botox." Videos were scored for quality by 3 independent reviewers using the Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool (MQ-VET). Two reviewers determined if videos contained misinformation. RESULTS: Of 300 videos screened, 119 videos were included. Twenty-four (21%) were created by medical professionals (MPs). Medical professional videos were more frequently shared (5 vs 1, P < 0.01) but had similar views, likes, comments, and length. Although MP videos had significantly higher MQ-VET scores (43 vs 27, P < 0.01), there was no difference in the rate of misinformation between MP and non-MP videos (21% vs 18%). Twenty-two videos (18.4%) contained misinformation, which were 3 times longer (50.5 vs 15 seconds, P < 0.01) and had higher MQ-VET scores (34.5 vs 27, P = 0.03) than those without misinformation. Common themes of misinformation pertained to therapy indication, mechanism of action, and patient limitations after undergoing therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Many TikTok videos on OAB third-line therapies contain misinformation. Most of these videos were not of high quality and created by the public. Medical professionals should be aware of misinformation permeating TikTok, given its large audience, and aim to promote or offer educational material of better accuracy and quality.

Preference Elicitation and Treatment Decision-Making Among Men Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial Results of Healium.

BACKGROUND: Elicitation of patients' preferences is an integral part of shared decision-making, the recommended approach for prostate cancer decision-making. Existing decision aids for this population often do not specifically focus on patients' preferences. Healium is a brief interactive web-based decision aid that aims to elicit patients' treatment preferences and is designed for a low health literate population. OBJECTIVE: This study used a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether Healium, designed to target preference elicitation, is as efficacious as Healing Choices, a comprehensive education and decision tool, in improving outcomes for decision-making and emotional quality of life. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer who had not yet made a treatment decision were randomly assigned to the brief Healium intervention or Healing Choices, a decision aid previously developed by our group that serves as a virtual information center on prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. Assessments were completed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months post baseline, and included decisional outcomes (decisional conflict, satisfaction with decision, and preparation for decision-making), and emotional quality of life (anxiety/tension and depression), along with demographics, comorbidities, and health literacy. RESULTS: A total of 327 individuals consented to participate in the study (171 were randomized to the Healium intervention arm and 156 were randomized to Healing Choices). The majority of the sample was non-Hispanic (272/282, 96%), White (239/314, 76%), married (251/320, 78.4%), and was on average 62.4 (SD 6.9) years old. Within both arms, there was a significant decrease in decisional conflict from baseline to 6 weeks postbaseline (Healium, P≤.001; Healing Choices, P≤.001), and a significant increase in satisfaction with one's decision from 6 weeks to 3 months (Healium, P=.04; Healing Choices, P=.01). Within both arms, anxiety/tension (Healium, P=.23; Healing Choices, P=.27) and depression (Healium, P=.001; Healing Choices, P≤.001) decreased from baseline to 6 weeks, but only in the case of depression was the decrease statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Healium, our brief decision aid focusing on treatment preference elicitation, is as successful in reducing decisional conflict as our previously tested comprehensive decision aid, Healing Choices, and has the added benefit of brevity, making it the ideal tool for integration into the physician consultation and electronic medical record. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05800483; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05800483.

Cancer Resource and Information Support (CRIS) for Bladder Cancer Survivors and Their Caregivers: Development and Usability Testing Study.

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer survivors and their caregivers face profound practical (eg, use of stoma appliances and care for urinary diversion methods) and psychosocial (eg, depression and anxiety) challenges after surgical treatment with cystectomy. OBJECTIVE: To improve the health-related quality of life and postsurgical outcomes of both bladder cancer survivors and their caregivers, the team, in collaboration with Sourcetop, Inc (software design) and Dappersmith (graphic design), developed the Cancer Resource and Information Support (CRIS) software. The purpose of this manuscript is to report on the development and usability testing of the CRIS software. METHODS: The development of the CRIS software was guided by the Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials (ORBIT) model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases. The ORBIT model is unique in that it proposes a flexible and progressive process with prespecific clinically significant milestones for forward movement and returns to earlier stages for refinement, and it facilitates communication among diverse groups by using terminology from the drug development model. This paper focuses on 2 phases of the ORBIT model: phase IA: define and IB: refine. During phase IA, the study team developed solutions for the stated clinical problem-adjustment to life post cystectomy-by reviewing the literature and collecting feedback from clinicians, professional organizations, bladder cancer survivors, and their caregivers. During Phase IB, the study team focused on tailoring content in the CRIS software to the user as well as usability testing with 7 participants. RESULTS: The finished product is CRIS, a web-based software for survivors of bladder cancer and their caregivers to serve as a health management and lifestyle resource after surgery. Overarching themes from phase IA (participant feedback) included how to use new medical equipment, tips and tricks for easier living with new medical equipment, questions about health maintenance, and questions about lifestyle modifications. To accommodate our target population, we also incorporated recommendations from the Americans with Disabilities Act for website design, such as large text size, large paragraph spacing, highly contrasting text and background colors, use of headings and labels to describe the purpose of the content, portrait orientation without the need for horizontal scrolling, multiple ways to access a web page within a set of pages, ability to navigate web pages in sequential order, and in-text links that are descriptive. Usability participants evaluated CRIS very positively, indicating that it was easy to use, the functions were well-integrated, and if available, they would use CRIS frequently. CONCLUSIONS: CRIS, developed over the course of 18 months by integrating feedback from experts, literature reviews, and usability testing, is the first web-based software developed for bladder cancer survivors and their caregivers to help them adjust to life following cystectomy. The efficacy of CRIS in improving patients' and caregivers' quality of life is currently being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.

Validation of the 'Pelvic Pain Map': a new self-assessment tool for chronic pelvic pain localisation.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the Pelvic Pain Map to fill a gap in the need for a localised body map of the pelvic region. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Pelvic Pain Map incorporated input from 12 chronic pelvic pain experts across the United States, as well as patient feedback to assess face validity. Finalised diagrams are single, front-facing images of the male and female pelvis that incorporate both abdominal and perineal views. Assessment of test-retest reliability and construct (convergent and discriminant) validity was carried out on a retrospective cohort of patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) who completed the maps from January 2022 to May 2022. Other measures used in the validation process consisted of the male and female forms of the Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) and the short form (six item) of the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS-6). RESULTS: Test-retest for individual map zones demonstrated moderate to excellent reliability (Cohen's kappa coefficients ranging from 0.28 to 0.64) and for total map zones demonstrated excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.90). Convergent validity for individual map zones with location descriptors from the GUPI was strong (phi coefficients ranging from 0.26 to 0.79) and for total map zones was moderate (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.56). Discriminant validity for total map zones with separate, but related constructs from the GUPI and PCS-6 was weakly positive (Spearman's correlation coefficients ranging from 0.27 to 0.32). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the Pelvic Pain Map is a valid and reliable tool for assessing location of pain in patients with CPPS. Our findings highlight the potential utility of the Pelvic Pain Map in guiding treatment selection and monitoring therapeutic response in patients with chronic pelvic pain.

Pelvic mapping to explore patterns of chronic pelvic pain.

PURPOSE: Chronic pelvic pain syndromes (CPPS) are commonly encountered by urologists and urogynecologists and pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Body maps have been helpful adjuncts to verbal descriptions of pain and may serve a role in phenotyping what is known to be a heterogeneous patient population. The aim of this study was to assess whether patterns of pain as marked on a body map of the pelvis exist among common CPPS diagnoses. The secondary aim was to investigate the association between the total number of pain locations marked on the map and clinical indices in patients with 1 to 3 CPPS diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was collected on patients who visited the Northwell Health Pelvic Pain Treatment Center (PPTC) from January to May 2022 and were diagnosed with at least one of four major CPPS diagnoses: interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), pelvic floor myalgia (PFM), chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), and vulvodynia. Demographic data as well as survey data from pelvic pain maps, Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) forms, and the short form-6 of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-6) were recorded. Descriptive statistics among CPPS groups and Pearson correlations among the number of CPPS diagnoses were computed. RESULTS: One hundred seventy females and 125 males with CPPS were included in the study. Significant cross-over in mapping patterns was notable between IC/BPS and PFM groups, both most commonly marking "abdomen" and "genital" regions. The most distinct pattern of pain was seen in patients with CP/CPPS and in patients with vulvodynia. Among the total sample, as the mean number of pain locations marked within the pelvis increased, GUPI and PCS scores increased (p < 0.05). As the number of CPPS diagnoses increased, the strength of the relationship independently increased. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic body mapping demonstrated that different forms of CPPS displayed different distributions of pain, but mapping was not predictive of any diagnostic group. Nevertheless, the pelvic body map proved useful in identifying precise locations of pain and may help uncover regions of pain that cannot be easily communicated. The total number of pain sites marked appeared to correlate with worse clinical features.

Authorship in Urology: A Gender Reveal.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate female author representation in urologic literature as compared to the proportion of female practicing urologists. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed to analyze trends in women authorship of urology publications in 2019 as compared to AUA 2019 census data. The 5 highest impact urologic journals in 2019 were identified using the publicly available SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indices. Author genders and study categorization were independently determined by 2 authors. Chi-squared test was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The 5 highest impact urologic journals in 2019 as per SJR were European Urology, Journal of Urology, British Journal of Urology International, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, and Nature Reviews Urology. A total of 501 publications were included for analysis. Women comprised 22.1% of first authors and 14.6% of senior authors. The proportion of publications authored by women was significantly higher than would be expected based on population proportions from the AUA 2019 census data for women as both first (P < .0001) and senior author (P =.0005). Similarly, women authorship was significantly higher than expected for basic science (P < .0001), clinical medicine (P <.0001), economics/practice management (P =.0002), editorial (P =.0027), and review/meta-analysis (P <.0001) publications. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that women contribute to the urologic literature significantly more than would be expected based on the proportion of practicing female urologists. However, with the persistence of gender gap in academic medicine promotions, further research into contributing factors and strategies for improvement are needed to promote greater women representation in academia.

Actigraphy assessment of sleep quality among patients with acute myeloid leukaemia during induction chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Patients receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) anecdotally describe poor sleep, but sleep disturbances have not been well-characterised in this population. We aimed to test the feasibility of measuring sleep quality in AML inpatients using a wearable actigraphy device. METHODS: Using the Actigraph GT3X 'watch', we assessed the total sleep time, sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, number of awakenings after sleep onset and sleep efficiency for inpatients with AML receiving induction chemotherapy. We assessed patient self-reported sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). RESULTS: Of the 12 patients enrolled, 11 completed all actigraphy and PSQI assessments, demonstrating feasibility. Patients wore the Actigraph device for a mean (SD) of 15.92 (8.3) days, and actigraphy measures suggested poor sleep. Patients had a median average awakening length of 6.92 min, a median number of awakenings after sleep onset of 4 and a median sleep onset latency of 10.8 min. Actual median sleep efficiency (0.91) was high, suggesting that patients' poor sleep was not due to insomnia but perhaps due to interruptions, such as administration of medications, lab draws and vital sign measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Collection of sleep quality data among inpatients with AML via a wearable actigraphy device is feasible. AML inpatients appear to have poor sleep quality and quantity, suggesting that sleep issues represent an area of unmet supportive care needs in AML. Further research in this areas is needed to inform the development of interventions to improve sleep duration and quality in hospitalised patients with AML.

Assessing the effort associated with teaching residents.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative resident education is an integral mission of academic medical centers and serves as the basis for training the next generation of surgeons. The actual effort associated with teaching residents is unknown as it pertains to additional operative time. Using a large validated multi-institutional dataset, this study aims to quantify the effect of having a resident present in common plastic surgery procedures on operative time. Future directions for developing standardized methods to record and report teaching time are proposed, which can help inform prospective studies. STUDY DESIGN: The 2006-2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried to identify seven isolated plastic surgical procedures that were categorized based on resident involvement and supervision. Linear regression models were used to calculate the difference in operative time with respect to resident participation while controlling for patient and operative factors. RESULTS: Resident involvement was associated with longer operative times for muscle flap trunk procedures (53 min, 95% CI = [25, 80], p-value = 0.0002) and breast reconstruction procedures with a latissimus dorsi flap (55 min, 95% CI = [22, 88], p-value = 0.001). For six of the seven surgeries evaluated, resident involvement was associated with longer operative times, as compared to no resident involvement. CONCLUSION: Resident involvement is associated with an increase in operative time for certain plastic surgery procedures. This finding underscores the need for a mechanism to quantify the time and effort that the attending surgeons allocate toward intraoperative resident education. Further study is also necessary to determine the causal impact on patient care.