Evaluating the impact of interprofessional training wards on patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes: a mixed-methods analysis.

Introduction: Interprofessional teamwork is pivotal in modern healthcare, prompting the establishment of interprofessional training wards since 1996. While these wards serve as hubs for optimizing healthcare professional collaboration and communication, research into patient outcomes remains notably sparse and geographically limited, predominantly examining patient satisfaction and sparingly exploring other metrics like mortality or self-discharge rates. This study seeks to bridge this gap, comparing patient outcomes in interprofessional training wards and conventional wards under the hypothesis that the former offers no disadvantage to patient outcomes. Materials and methods: We explored patient outcomes within an interprofessional student ward called A-STAR at a University Hospital from October 2019 to December 2022. Engaging with patients discharged between May 2021 and April 2022, we utilized digital and paper-based anonymous questionnaires, catering to patient preference, to gather pertinent data. Results: Analysis of outcomes for 1,482 A-STAR (interprofessional student ward) and 5,752 conventional ward patients revealed noteworthy findings. A-STAR patients tended to be younger (59 vs. 61 years, p < 0.01) and more frequently male (73.5% vs. 70.4%, p = 0.025). Vital clinical outcomes, such as discharges against medical advice, complication-driven readmissions, and ICU transfers, were statistically similar between groups, as were mortality rates (1.2% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.468). A-STAR demonstrated high patient satisfaction, underscored by positive reflections on team competence, ward atmosphere, and responsiveness to concerns, emphasizing the value placed on interprofessional collaboration. Patient narratives commended team kindness, lucid explanations, and proactive involvement. Discussion: This data collectively underscores the safety and reliability of patient care within training wards, affirming that patients can trust the care provided in these settings. Patients on the interprofessional ward demonstrated high satisfaction levels: 96.7% appreciated the atmosphere and conduct of ward rounds. In comparison, 98.3% were satisfied with the discussion and information about their treatment during their hospital stay.

Success Rate of Intra-articular Sacroiliac Joint Injection: Fluoroscopy vs Ultrasound Guidance-A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: Given the unacceptably high miss rates of non-image-guided injections into the sacroiliac joint, either fluoroscopy or ultrasound is recommended for guidance. The real success rate of both techniques was assessed by cadaver dissection. METHODS: Twenty bodies donated to science (40 joints: 15 female and 5 male) were investigated bilaterally. Fluoroscopy and a lower ultrasound-guided approach were performed in 10 bodies each. Conditions during puncture, the subjective feeling of the needle being intra-articular, and, for fluoroscopic guidance, the intra-articular spread of the contrast were assessed. First, 0.5 cc of Iopamidol was injected, followed by 2 mL of red-colored latex. The spread was investigated by dissection via anterior opening of the sacroiliac joint and the dorsal ligaments. RESULTS: Ultrasound guidance was used in 1/20 (5%, 95% CI = 0.9-23.6%) intra-articular injections. In 19/20 (95%, 95% CI = 0.9-23.6%) cases, latex spread in the interosseous sacroiliac ligament was used. Conditions of structural visibility were classified as good in 11/20 (55%, 95% CI = 34.2-74.2%) cases, puncture condition as good in 16/20 (80%, 95% CI = 58.4-91.9%) cases, and subjective feeling of the needle being intra-articular was present in 10/20 (50%, 95% CI = 34.2-74.2%) cases. Fluoroscopy showed an intra-articular injection in 10/20 (50%, 95% CI = 34.2-74.2%) cases. The structure visibility in fluoroscopy was good in 9/20 (45%, 95% CI = 25.8-65.8%), puncture conditions good in 8/20 (40%, 95% CI = 21.9-61.3%), intra-articular contrast spread visible in 10/20 (50%, 95% CI = 34.2-74.2%), and subjective feeling of being intra-articular was present in 17/20 (85%, 95% CI = 64.0-94.8%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy clearly showed a higher success rate of intra-articular sacroiliac joint injection.

Anterior subcutaneous internal fixation of the pelvis - what rod-to-bone distance is anatomically optimal?

INTRODUCTION: Anterior fixation of the pelvis using subcutaneous supra-acetabular pedicle screw internal fixation (INFIX) has proven to be a useful tool by avoiding the downsides of external fixation in patients where open fixation is not suited. The purpose of this study was to find a rod-to-bone distance for the INFIX that allows for minimal hazard to the inguinal neuro-vascular structures and, at the same time, as little as possible interference with the soft tissues of the proximal thigh when the patient is sitting. METHODS: An INFIX was applied to 10 soft-embalmed cadaver pelvises with three different rod-to-bone distances. With each configuration, the relations of the rod to the neuro-vascular and the muscular surroundings were measured in supine and sitting position. RESULTS: Except for the femoral artery, vein and nerve, all investigated anatomical structures of the groin were under compression with a rod-to-bone distance of 1cm. With a rod-to-bone distance of 2cm most of the anatomical structures were safe in supine position, although less than with 3cm. With hip flexion some structures got under compression, especially the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN, 80%) and the anterior cutaneous branches of the femoral nerve (ACBFN, 35%). With a rod-to-bone distance of 3cm almost all anatomical structures were safe in supine position, while with hip flexion most superficial structures of the proximal thigh got under compression, especially the LFCN (75%) and the ACBFN (60%). CONCLUSIONS: Aiming for a rod-to-bone distance of 2cm is the safest way with regard to compression of the femoral neuro-vascular bundle and at the same time leads to the least compression of more superficial structures like the LFCN, the ACBFN, or the sartorius and the rectus femoris muscles in sitting position.